Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Red Scxare or Free College 1 1 1
Red Scxare or Free College 1 1 1
Logan Caruso
Mrs. Cramer
Comp Pd. 6A
24 March 2017
We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a
bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle-Winston Churchill. With the political rise of
Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein, the United States has seen a growing popularity in the idea of free
college. However, nothing in life is free. If colleges had free tuition, rates for students, the
American people will have to pay for it out of their own paychecks and one the most hated things
in the United States is increased taxes. While some say this would allow more students to access
higher education, not all students should go on to higher education. Supporters of free college
also make the argument that free tuition would allow students to pursue their passions. However,
this could lead to problems down the road, because not all degrees lead to successful job
opportunities, which might lead to wasted tax dollars. Another issue that could arise from
increased amounts of college graduates is low quality workers flooding job markets leading to
decreased wages. Free college would cause economic problems like increased burden on
There are only to things garneted in life death and taxes. For free college to come into
reality the federal and state governments would need to find a way to fund the intuitions. They
most likely would impose some sort of income tax that would be withheld from every paycheck.
Many Americans are against any new taxes that either the Federal or the State governments try to
Caruso 2
impose. Americans want to see their tax dollars at work weather it is the roads they drive on, the
police patrolling the streets, or the military that keeps them safe. But it would be a tough pill for
a majority of Americans to swallow, if they had to pay another tax for something they couldnt
see. Which is why the creation of a tax to pay for higher education would be very unpopular.
Harder-pressed taxpayers are unfairly forced to fill the void, even if they dont go to college or
have kids who do. (How) This quote refers to the disposition that German taxpayers are put in
by taxes that support free college. Which raises a serious question for many Americans why pay
for something that they might not directly benefit from. Especially when under plans from Sen.
Bernie Sanders the revenue from capital gains from the stock market would be taxed
American incomes and living standards have been growing more slowly. These low
growth rates can be partly attributed to counterproductive tax policies that undermine
long-term growth by discouraging saving and investment. Although broad tax reform is
needed to address the deficiencies in the tax code, many economists believe that reducing
the capital gains tax rate is an important step in the right direction. A capital gains tax
reduction would enhance incentives to save and invest by increasing the after-tax return
from investment. The effects of a capital gains tax reduction should not be overstated;
nonetheless, its beneficial effects on the economy would make a significant contribution
If Bernie Sanders plan were to be passed it may have negative impacts on the economy slowing
investment and discouraging Americans to save. And with a bad economy it would be very
Students are always told to follow their passions not matter what anyone says. Supporters
of free college bring up the point that with free college, students would be able to purse their
Caruso 3
passions. When people follow their passion, they miss out on all kinds of opportunities they
didnt even know existed,- Mike Rowe. Not all passions led to success in life. So why then
should taxpayers provide the capital for a student to get their degree in something they might not
be able to get a job, which would lead to a waste of money. So what does society do in this
situation? It can pay for all students to go to college which could led to students getting
educations that might not have a positive impact on society and led to major tax dollars going to
waste. Or we could do nothing and allow students to take risks like many Americans. Students in
this situation may not follow their passion but find even better opportunities that could end up
bettering their life. For example, you find a lot of starving actors, but you dont find a lot of
starving accountants.
Many consider education as a gateway out of poverty and a stepping stone to success. So
naturally if education was more available to students especially those below or near the poverty
line more would attend. However, many government programs and even the colleges themselves
will provide finical aid especially groups like: single mothers, minorities, any disabled persons,
and any members of households near or below the poverty line. So when then should we make
college free when the tuition cost is almost if not free for those who need help the most. When
fire fighters put out a fire on a building they dont keep dumping water on buildings that arent
on fire. Why then should college be made free when it is already free for the needy. And college
is not necessarily for everyone, some people just arent smart enough or are willing to work hard
enough to make it to graduation day. And if public colleges were free resources would be spread
very thinly which may cause colleges to turn out students who might be under skilled when
In microeconomics when studying why certain jobs make more or less money, economist
look at how much demand there is for that job and then how much labor is being supplied and
then where the two lines meet is the wage. However, if more students flood the job market
weather they have a good or bad education many occupations will witness a decrease in wages.
And with wages already decreasing for both college and high school graduates this could hurt
millions of Americans. Wages of young college and high school graduates are performing
poorly-and are sustainably lower today than in 2000. The real wages of young high school
graduates are 5.5 percent lower today than in 2000, and the wages of young college graduates are
2.5 percent lower (Davis 3). Students should not be discouraged from going to college but we
have to make sure that public university that would be free are turning out students with
knowledge that will help them be successfulbut we cant. However, just like businesses
colleges compete against each other to attracts students to their school by offering a quality
education at competitive prices, and if you take out the price incentive away from colleges the
level of education will likely decrease. Which is why the idea of education is bad for wages and
bad for the taxpayer, this is why we cannot allow free college to come into reality.
Free college would work in a perfect world. Sadly, we do not live in a perfect world. Free
college would cost taxpayers millions of dollars every year and a majority of taxpayers would
not see those tax dollars benefit them in the slightest. Moreover, just because free education may
allow students to follow their passion that may not help student it could have quite the opposite
effect and set students farther back in life. Supporters of free college try and say that free tuition
would open higher education to those who cannot afford it, when if they are willing to work hard
they can receive money both from the private intuition and from the federal government. With
increased amounts of students, graduating from subpar schools the job market will be flooded
Caruso 5
with inferior workers driving down wages for Americans already working lowering their yearly
salary. After looking at all the costs to society, it is hard to say free college would really be so
free.
Caruso 6
Works Citied
Davis, Alyssa, Will Kimball, and Elise Gould. "The Class of 2015: Despite an Improving
"How Free College Tuition in One Country Exposes Unexpected Pros and Cons." The Hechinger