:SUBJECT

MAINTENANCE EVALUATION

:Made By
Mohamed Nabil Mohamed 20122132

:INSTRUCTOR
Dr. Abuelela Mohamed Abuelela
Abuelnaga
DATE: Spring 2017

1
 Abstract
(1.0)

This report is a research about

maintenance evaluation.
It's Definition , Importance , Goals and
Different Types.

2
 Contents
Abstract(1.0).....................................02
Introduction(2.0)...............................05
Defenition(2.1)....................................................................04
Importance(2.2)...04
Goals(2.3)............................................................................05
Types(3.0)..............................06
Evaluation through reports(3.1)..........................................06
Work Auditing(3.2)......................................................06
Objective Evaluation (3.3)..07
Subjective Evaluation (3.4),,,,,..08
Conclusion(4.0)..................................09
Refrences(5.0)....................................10

3
 Introduction
(2.0)

Defenition:(2.1)
It is an assessment of current maintenance
arrangements in an organization and subsequently
describes what is required to make improvements
towards a Maintenance Best Practice situation.
It is a mixture of interviews, observations,
information assessment and expert opinion.

Importance:(2.2)
It reveal the true performance of your current
maintenance organization and systems.
It show the strengths and weaknesses of the
maintenance organization and systems.
It compare your present situation with known best
practice in other maintenance organizations.
It provide a clear and cost effective road map for
Continuous Maintenance Improvement.

4
Goals:(2.3)

1. Setting up the standards for

different type of jobs.
2. Avoidance of overstaffing and
understaffing.
3. Evaluation of maintenance
functions through indices.

5
 Types (4.0)

Evaluation through reports(3.1):

The evaluation is done on the basis of reports
which are prepared at fixed time intervals
(monthly or yearly) giving details of the
equipment serviced/maintained during period.
The real evaluation of the process depends
upon the accuracy of the reports.
The reports should give the complete picture
of the maintenance function so that the
corrective measures can be taken.

Work Auditing(3.2)
In this method total time for which the
equipment is not available for production work
and total time taken by maintenance staff to
attend the fault is analyzed .
The step by step progress of randomly selected
job is recorded to highlight the delays caused.
The delay may be because of poor planning of
repair work or non availability of spare parts .
It enable the maintenance foreman to
understand the weak points . The areas where

6
 improvements are possible can be identified
and corrective actions initiated accordingly.

Objective Evaluation (3.3)

A number of indices are frequently used for
objective evaluation. These include:

The ratios given above helps helpful in assessing the

maintenance costs.
The ratios defined above can be computed on
monthly or yearly basis.

7
 These ratios are indicative of the performance of
maintenance personnel.

Subjective Evaluation (3.4):

It is a qualitative type of evaluation.
Evaluation is not expressed in numerical values but
expressed in qualitative estimates like good , fair ,
adequate etc.
Evaluation will depend upon the available expertise
on the subject, qualifications of the working people
and their training.

8
 Conclusion: (7.0)
There are many approaches for maintenance evaluation
even more then the types presented in this report.
While the optimum way to evaluate a maintenance
organization depends upon:

Costs.
Availability of Spare Parts and Tools.

Unproductive Time.

Staff Members(Number and Expertise).

Production Lifetime.

Overall Organization Efficiency.

9
 Refreneces
(9.0)
MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT .
By R. C. MISHRA, K. PATHAK

10
11