Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Reservoir PDF

Analysisanddesignofreinforcedconcretereservoir
foracapacityof115m3
Translated and Presented By: Civilax.com
Analysis and design of reinforced concrete reservoir

for a capacity of 115 m3
DESIGNOFASUPPORTEDFORRESERVOIRCAPACITY115m3
1. General
Information.
1.1. Geometry.
Type: a reservoir for storing water for human consumption shall be deemed,
under section 2.1.1 ACI 350.3-01 circular tank
is classified as reinforced concrete slab with
free wall-no-Flexible 2.2 (1).
Volume : Storage equal to 115 cubic meters.
Radio : Interior (D) of 7.00 m.
Alturas : Effective water storage height (Hl) equal to

3.00 m.
Depth buried (He) equal to 1.00
meters.
Height Total of wall (HW) equal to 4.00

m.
Arrow design for the dome (Fc) equal to
Light over 10 thus 7.00 / 10 =
0.70 meters.
Thickness of walls : tw = 0.20 meters.
Thickness of the Dome : Ce = 0.10 meters with a widening 0.15
meters at 1 meter from the dome-wall junction.

Thickness of Foundation: Hz = 0.25 meters.
Flown Foundation : v = 0.50 meters.

1.2. Materials.
Strength of Concrete : f'c = 210 Kg / cm2at 28 days.
It's Concrete : According to ACI 350M-01 section 8.5.1 =
15100 f ' c= 218819.79 Kg / cm2.

steel fy : 4200 Kg / cm2.
1.3. Used regulations.
Code Requirements for Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures (ACI

350M-01) And Commentary (ACI 350RM-01), ACI Committee 350 Reported By.
Seismic Design of Liquid-Containing Concrete Structures (ACI 350.3-01)
and Commentary (350.3R-01), Reported by ACI Committee 350.
Design Considerations for Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures
(ACI 350.4R-04), Reported by ACI Committee 350.
Concrete Structures for Containment of Hazardous Materials (ACI 350.2R-
04), Reported by ACI Committee 350.
Tightness Testing of Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures (ACI
350.1-01) and Commentary (350.1R-01), Reported by ACI Committee 350.
Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures (ACI 350.R-89), Reported
by ACI Committee 350.
Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318M-08) and
Commentary, ACI Committee 318 Reported by.
Technical Standard for Buildings "Earthquake-resistant Design" E-030.
2. Analysis (according Methodology Appendix A of ACI 350.3-01).
2.1. Static Seismic Analysis.
The results presented were evaluated in Excel spreadsheets and Sap2000

program.
Calculation of Effective Mass, according to ACI 350.3-01 Section 9.5.2:
Muroweight(Ww)+Domeweight(Wr) 5466.34kg
Muroweight(Ww) 4330.55kg
Domeweight(Wr) 1135.79kg
Interiordiameter(D) 7.00m
EffectiveLiquidheight(Hl) 3.00m
EffectiveloopcoefficientM()(forDeadWeight) 0.66
EffectiveloopM(We)(byDeadWeight) 3985.34kg
Calculation of Effective Mass of the stored liquid, impulsive component

(Wi) and convective component (Wc) as ACI 350.3-01 Section 9.3.1:
MTotalLiquidhandleacenadoAlm(Wl) 115000.00kg
D/Hl 2.33
Wi/Wl 0.48
Wc/Wl 0.49
EquivalentWeightrapporteurComImpulsivaWi 54946.11kg
EquivalentWeightrapporteurComConvectiveWc 56665.44kg
Calculating the combined natural vibration frequency (wi) of the structure

and the liquid stored impulsive component as ACI 350.3-01 section 9.3.4
Hl/D 0.43
Coef.Fordet.FrequencyFund.Tankliquid(Cw) 0.156
Murothickness(tw) 0.20m
Innerrimradius R 3.50m
Coef.Fordet.FrequencyFund.Tankliquid(Cl) 0.373
ResistancetopressureComConcrete(f'c) 210.00kg/cm
Moduleofelasticityofconcrete(Ec) 21458.90MPa
Concretedensity(c) 2.40kN.S2/m
Freq.Circ.Themodevibrationcompulsiveim(wi) 371.92rad/
Fundperiod.RockingTank+Comp.Imcompulsive(Ti) 0.0169s
Calculate the frequency of vibration of the convective component (wc) as

ACI 350.3-01 Section 9.3.4:

Accelerationduetogravity(g) 9.81m/s2
10,426
Freq.circularvibrationprimermconvectiveperiod(wc) 3.94rad/s
Naturalperiodofprimermconvectiveperiod(Tc) 1.59s
Parameters for Calculating Seismic Force as ACI 350.3-01 NTE section 4.2
and E-030:
The area factor corresponding to the Seismic Zone ACI 350.3 is similar to
the values specified in the NTE E-030 Section 2.1. Being in the high hazard
area shall be taken as Zone 3 with an acceleration of 0.30 g (NTE as E-
030), which is equivalent to Zone 4 ACI 350.3-01.
As for the parameter value of the soil, according to NTE 030 E-Type S3
corresponds to a value of 1.4, this time also the value is very similar to
that proposed by ACI 350.3-01.
The NTE E-030, ranks as reservoirs Essential Building (A) that corresponds
to the factor 1.5. NTE is seen that the E-030 does not have categories for
major reservoirs such as ACI 350.3-01, which categorizaramos this model in
the second type corresponding to reservoirs intended to remain in use for
emergency purposes in seismic events. For this model we use the highest
value of 1.5.
The Sharpe ratio Response Modification or seismic force reduction if we

used the NTE E-030 would have a value of 6, as in the previous parameter,
we see that the ACI 350.3-01 delivery values for different types of
reservoirs, and more NTE restrictive than the E-030. AL factors needed for
impulsive and convective components will use the values Rwi Rwc = 2.75 and
= 1.00 (type b).
Calculating spectral amplification factors Ci and Cc, as ACI 350.3-01

section 4.2:
Coefficientrepresentingthecharacteristicsofthesoil(S) 1.40
SpectralamplificationfactorAmformov.HorizontalCi 1.96
SpectralamplificationfactorAmformov.HorizontalCc 1.37
Calculation of the maximum displacement of the liquid contents (dmax) as

ACI 350.3-01 Section 7.1:

Factorzone(Z) 0.40
Imimportancefactor(I) 1.50
MarginShiftMaximumentVerticalliquidcontent(dmax) 4.04m
Calculate the height of the center of gravity location of impulsive and

convective components as ACI 350.3-01 Section 9.3.2:
hi/Hl 0.375
HeightatcenterofGravedadofComp.Impulsiva(hi) 1.13m
hc/Hl 0.58
HeightatcenterofGravedadofComp.Convective(hc) 1.75m
Calculation of dynamic lateral forces, according to ACI 350.3-01 Section

4.1.1:
Factorzone(Z) 0.40
Coef.FromMENDMENTImpulsivasResponseForces(Rwi) 2.75
Coef.FromMENDMENTConvectiveResponseForces(Rwc) 1.00
EffectiveWeightTankMuro(.Ww) 2849.55kg
DomeTankweight(Wr) 1135.79kg
EquivalentWeightrapporteurComImpulsivaWi 54946.11kg
EquivalentWeightrapporteurComConvectiveWc 56665.44kg
InertialForceLateralAccelerationofMuro(Pw) 1709.73
LateralAccelerationInertialForceDome(Pr) 681.47
LateralForcepulsivaIm(Pi) 32967.67kg
ConvectiveLateralForce(Pc) 65390.96kg
2.2. Horizontal Dynamic Spectral Analysis.
Initial Parameters and Formulation of Inelastic Spectra:
The following values specified in the static analysis will be taken:
Factorzone(Z) 0.40
Coef.FromMENDMENTImpulsivasResponseForces(Rwi) 2.75
Coef.FromMENDMENTConvectiveResponseForces(Rwc) 1.00
The Design Spectrum for assessing inertial forces produced by the wall +
dome + impulsive component, will be as follows.
ANLISISYDISEODEUNRESERVORIOAPOYADAOFCONCRETOARMADO
PARAUNACAPACIDADDE115m3
The Spectrum Design for Convective Component shall:
For both parameters records were taken Static Analysis.

Modeling the Impulsive and convective mass:
Criteria developed by Housner, GW which can be found in "Dynamic Pressure

on Fluid Containers", Technical Information (TID) Document 7024, Chapter 6,
and Appendix F, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1963. This model gives good
approximation take compared to more sophisticated models such as that
presented Graham and Rodriguez (1952).
A three dimensional model is built and a hub are assigned to map the
impulsive component weight (W = 54.95 Tn) to a hi (1.13 m) tall. Knots hi
level were modeled to have the same displacement and Wi simulate the mass
moving with the tank walls. The first mode of vibration obtained was
0.1955s, 0.0169s compared to that obtained in the calculation of Ti.
The convective component was modeled with Wc = 56.67 tons weight, a
height hc (1.75 m). This weight will be attached to the walls of tank
24 springs, which have a stiffness of 11.35 t / m; This causes the weight

to interact with the walls of the tank. The first vibration mode which is
obtained without considering the contribution of the tank walls, was 1.29s
1.59s compared to that obtained in the Tc calculation.
2.3. Push Soil Dynamics.
The soil mass involved in an earthquake is calculated by the method of

Pseudo force. The weight for the calculation of the mass of soil is
considered acting for a length equal to the diameter divided by the
reservoir area of each tributary of the wall section. Will be modeled to a
height of 0.3 H of the base of the wall.
According Monobe-Okabe:
DensityofSoil() 1100.00kg/m
Depthofthereservoirisburied(hz) 1.00m
Muroinclination() 0.00
SoilFrictionAngle() 17.00
FrictionanglebetweenMuroandSoil() 12.75
InclineSoilSlope() 0.00
tomax 0.20g
11.31
Kae 0.73
Weightpermhandlesoil 2804.49kg
WeightinteractingZISCi/Rwi(Pb) 1682.69kg
2.4. Uploads Dead Weight, Live Loads, Pressure Water and Soil Active Push.
The loads by weight own be the that provide the walls the
reservoir and the roof.
As overhead design for minimum of 50 kg/m2 on the dome of the reservoir
will be assigned.
Water pressure is modeled using all the contour of the walls of the
reservoir as the thrust forces from
active soil. Ture in both until they are, 3.00 m for water and 1.00 m to
the ground.
2.5. Summary of Structural Analysis
Calculation of Total Shear and Moment in the Base, as ACI 350.3-01 Section
4.1.2 and 4.1.3:
The base shear is equal to the sum of the inertial forces of the reservoir,
plus the forces promoting convective impulsive components, plus the force
produced by the mass of soil; the combination of these forces will be in
the discretion of the square root of the sum of squares.
AL IS AN IS AT E S T ICO
Totalinbaseshear(V) 75153.54kg
HeighttocenterofMuroravedadG(hw) 2.00m
HeighttocenteroftheDomeravedadG(hr) 4.31m
HeightatcenterofGravedadofComp.Impulsiva(hi) 1.13m
HeightatcenterofGravedadofComp.Convective(hc) 1.75m
Heightatthelocationofthethrustforceemsoil(hz/3) 0.33m
MomentbyMuroacceleration(Pw) 3419.46kgm
MomentbyacceleratingtheDome(Pr) 2933.81kgm
MomentbyLateralForcepulsivaIm(Pi) 37088.63kgm
MomentbyLateralForceConvective(Pc) 114377.44kgm
MomentbyLateralForceGroundloopM(Pb) 560.90kgm
TotalMomentatthebase(Mb) 122549.76kgm
AL IS IS AN DIN M ICO
Totalshearatthebaseto80%ofStaticAnalysis 60122.83kg
TotalshearatthebasetoDynamicAnalysisico(V) 77938.30kg
Factortoscalethedesignspectrum 9.81
De sp z to m e n t M a x im or
Rightshifttowardentanalysis 0.0083cm
Heightatwhichthepointislocated 4.00m
Drift 0.0000571
Driftmaximum 0.007
3. Design Parties Reservoir.
3.1. Majorization Load Factors and Strength Reduction. According to ACI 350M-01
and ACI 318M-08.
In both codes are working with the recently published ACI 318M-
. 08 The following load combinations are indicated by the load factors

majorization:
U = 1.4 (D + F)
U = 1.2 (D + F) + 1.6 (L + H) + Lr 0.5 U

= 1.2 D + 1.6 L + Lr
U = 1.2 D + E + L
U = 0.9 D + E
D = Dead Weight uploads, Dead Loads. L =
Loads Vivas.
Lr = Roof Loads.
H = Soil Pressure Loads.
F = Fluid Pressure Loads.
The reduction factors of resistance to:

Controlled Voltage = 0.9
Controlled compression spiral wire members = 0.75 Compression

Controlled, other types of reinforcement = 0.65
Shear and Torsion = 0.75
Seismic shear zones = 0.60
Boards and diagonal reinforcement beams = 0.85

3.2. Design Dome Reservoir.
Shells and Folded Plates ACI 318M-08: the considerations listed in Chapter
19 shall take.
According to section 9.2.11, the design strength will be equal to 0.40 f'c.
The minimum amount to be provided pursuant to Section 7.12, equal to

0.0018. The reinforcement is provided to resist tensile stresses. Design
efforts for the action associated with membrane (normal and shear forces)
and the effort associated with the flexural (bending moments, torsion and
shear) should be verified.
The reinforcement is provided in two directions and in a single
layer. They first analyze the section of the dome of 0.10 m.
The initial data are shown in the table below:
C design the pu's ode, e sp e so r = 1 0 cm

Yieldingsteel(fy) 4200.00kg/cm2
ResistancetopressureComConcrete(f'c) 210.00kg/cm2
Moduleofelasticityofconcrete(Ec) 218819.79kg/cm2
ThicknessoftheDome 0.10m
ThicknesspromedioDome,entareaensancham 0.125m
ComResistanceDesignofConcretepressure(f'dc)(19.2.11) 84.00kg/cm2
Minimumamountto(7.12) 0.0018
DriveReductionFactor() 0.90
In both directions (radial and tangential) are worked with minimum amounts.
Review before the moments and shear effects was performed.
Radialreinforcement(MembraneActions)
EffortRadialDriveS11 5.85t/m2
Elementlengthtoassess 0.50m
RadialForceDriveNDES1 165.00Kg
Steelarearequired 0.044cm2
Areaofsteelrequiredtominimum 0.900cm2
Steelusedarea 0.900cm2
Diameterbar 3/8
Bararea 0.710cm2
BarNumber 1.27
Numberofbarstouse 2.00
Separation 0.250m
Separationmaximum 0.450m
Usingseparation 0.250m
Rodsareplaced3/8@0.25m
IsioREVAMONMENTOYOUANDCOrtan
MomentM11(Radial) 10.00kgm
CantEfectico 0.065m
amountnecessary 0.00013
Areaofsteelrequired 0.0000041cm2
ShearV13(Radial) 0.79Kg
Shearresistingtheproposedsection 1184.02Kg
Noneedforshearreinforcement
TangentialReinforcement(MembraneActions)
TangentialEffortDriveS22 1.21t/m2
TangentialForceDriveNDES2 0.59Kg
Diameterbar 3/8
Bararea 0.710cm2
BarNumber 1.01
Separation 0.400m
MomentM22(Tangential) 8.48kgm
CantEfectico 0.065m
ShearV23(Tangential) 15.47Kg
The next step will be to design the widening area of the dome section shall
be calculated to an average thickness of 12.5 cm.
C design the pu's ode, e sp e so r = 1 5cm

ThicknesspromedioDome,entareaensancham 0.125m
ComResistanceDesignofConcretepressure(f'dc)(19.2.11) 84.00kg/cm2
Minimumamountto(7.12) 0.0018
Radialreinforcement(MembraneActions)
EffortRadialDriveS11 42.29tons/
RadialForceDriveNdes1 1479.56Kg
Diameterbar 3/8
Bararea 0.710cm2
BarNumber 1.58
Separation 0.250m
CantEfectico 0.065m
TangentialReinforcement(MembraneActions)
TangentialEffortDriveS22 44.82tons/
Areaofsteelrequiredtominimum 2,025cm2
Steelusedarea 2,025cm2
Diameterbar 3/8
Bararea 0.710cm2
BarNumber 2.85
Separation 0.300m
CantEfectico 0.065m
3.3. Reservoir Design Wall (Walls).
Earthquake Resistant Structures Forces ACI 318M-08: the considerations

listed in Chapter 21 shall be taken.
According to Table 1613.5.2 of the Standard IBC 2006, we classify the site
in category "D", and according to Table R21.1.1 of ACI 318 Chapter 21-M-08,
must comply with section 21.9.
The wall of a reservoir works to resist efforts membrane in the radial

direction, in the tangential direction is more important to the effects
produced by the moments and shear. The design is given for both the outside
and inside.
Design u ro M odel E x te rio r e sp e so r = 2 0 cm

ThicknessoftheMiddlepromuro 0.200m
Minimumamountto(21.9.2.1) 0.0025
Radialreinforcement(horizontal)intheExterior(EquityMembrane)
Diameterbar 3/8
Bararea 0.710cm2
BarNumber 3.52
Separation 0.167m
CantEfectico 0.065m
Tangentialreinforcement(vertical)intheExterior(MembraneActions)
Steelarearequired 1,477cm2
Diameterbar 3/8
Bararea 0.710cm2
BarNumber 6.34
Separation 0.129m
CantEfectico 0.065m
Rodsareplaced3/8@0.125 m
Radialreinforcement(horizontal)intheInnerFace(MembraneActions)
Diameterbar 3/8
Bararea 0.710cm2
BarNumber 3.52
Separation 0.125m
CantEfectico 0.065m
Tangentialreinforcement(vertical)intheInnerFace(MembraneActions)
Steelarearequired 1,464cm2
Diameterbar 3/8
Bararea 0.710cm2
BarNumber 6.34
Separation 0.129m
CantEfectico 0.065m
Sap2000 Comments to use:

It will work with the impulsive spectrum, for the weight of the convective component
will have to scale the values as this weight needs another spectrum and would be
evaluated in a separate model (separate the impulsive component and the inertial
forces of the reservoir), but to work it in the same model we will: Rwc / Rwc = 1.65
/ 0.6 = 2.75, so the weight will be 55,678 x Wc
2.75 = 155.83 corresponding to a value for the springs of 51.78 t / m.
Spectra values vary for impulsive and convective components, but working with the
peak values.

Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Reservoir PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Reservoir PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Reservoir PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analysisanddesignofreinforcedconcretereservoir

Translated and Presented By: Civilax.com

Analysis and design of reinforced concrete reservoir

Radio : Interior (D) of 7.00 m.

Alturas : Effective water storage height (Hl) equal to

Height Total of wall (HW) equal to 4.00

Light over 10 thus 7.00 / 10 =

Thickness of the Dome : Ce = 0.10 meters with a widening 0.15

meters at 1 meter from the dome-wall junction.

Flown Foundation : v = 0.50 meters.

Analysis and design of reinforced concrete reservoir

It's Concrete : According to ACI 350M-01 section 8.5.1 =

15100 f ' c= 218819.79 Kg / cm2.

1.3. Used regulations.

Code Requirements for Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures (ACI

2. Analysis (according Methodology Appendix A of ACI 350.3-01).

2.1. Static Seismic Analysis.

The results presented were evaluated in Excel spreadsheets and Sap2000

Calculation of Effective Mass, according to ACI 350.3-01 Section 9.5.2:

Calculation of Effective Mass of the stored liquid, impulsive component

Calculating the combined natural vibration frequency (wi) of the structure

Calculate the frequency of vibration of the convective component (wc) as

Analysis and design of reinforced concrete reservoir

The Sharpe ratio Response Modification or seismic force reduction if we

Calculating spectral amplification factors Ci and Cc, as ACI 350.3-01

Calculation of the maximum displacement of the liquid contents (dmax) as

Analysis and design of reinforced concrete reservoir

Calculate the height of the center of gravity location of impulsive and

Calculation of dynamic lateral forces, according to ACI 350.3-01 Section

2.2. Horizontal Dynamic Spectral Analysis.

Initial Parameters and Formulation of Inelastic Spectra:

The following values specified in the static analysis will be taken:

The Spectrum Design for Convective Component shall:

For both parameters records were taken Static Analysis.

Modeling the Impulsive and convective mass:

Criteria developed by Housner, GW which can be found in "Dynamic Pressure

24 springs, which have a stiffness of 11.35 t / m; This causes the weight

2.3. Push Soil Dynamics.

The soil mass involved in an earthquake is calculated by the method of

2.5. Summary of Structural Analysis

3. Design Parties Reservoir.

. 08 The following load combinations are indicated by the load factors

U = 1.2 (D + F) + 1.6 (L + H) + Lr 0.5 U

H = Soil Pressure Loads.

F = Fluid Pressure Loads.

The reduction factors of resistance to:

Controlled compression spiral wire members = 0.75 Compression

Seismic shear zones = 0.60

Boards and diagonal reinforcement beams = 0.85

3.2. Design Dome Reservoir.

The minimum amount to be provided pursuant to Section 7.12, equal to

The initial data are shown in the table below:

C design the pu's ode, e sp e so r = 1 0 cm

C design the pu's ode, e sp e so r = 1 5cm

3.3. Reservoir Design Wall (Walls).

Earthquake Resistant Structures Forces ACI 318M-08: the considerations

The wall of a reservoir works to resist efforts membrane in the radial

Design u ro M odel E x te rio r e sp e so r = 2 0 cm