Professional Documents
Culture Documents
aspartame
By Chris Wheeler
The main reason that aspartame is approved in Australia is because aspartame is approved in
the United States. Aspartame is a heavily politicised issue because it is a major American
corporate profit base worth billions of dollars and, as every Australian adult should know by
now, we usually bend over backwards to please Uncle Sam. Its good politics. Monsanto and
the corporate chemical industry have helped put every American president in power since the
2nd World War and good relations with the USA means keeping American corporates happy
and ensuring their products pass through the Australian regulatory process virtually
Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ), our regulators deny this, of course, but then
they also deny that aspartame carries any health risks. Arguing the issue with them is a bit like
trying to promote the Earth as a sphere to the Flat Earth Society. You have to visit the
scandalous history of how aspartame was approved to understand exactly why FSANZ and our
Its no coincidence that the current US Secretary of Defence, Donald Rumsfeld, is a central
player in the aspartame approval drama and the full story of what happened is like an episode
Its January 21, 1981, the day after Ronald Reagan, a former B-grade Hollywood actor takes
office as U.S. President. Hes sailed into the White House on a huge raft of election funding
from corporate America and G.D. Searle in particular and the word is out that he will not
forget his friends. Donald Rumsfeld, former Ford White House Chief of Staff, is G.D. Searles
president and a firm Reagan favourite. Rumsfeld has been telling the Searle sales force he
would call in all his markers and that no matter what, he would see to it that aspartame would
That same day, G.D. Searle reapplies to the FDA for the approval of aspartame despite the fact
that to date this approval has been denied on grounds of aspartames proven toxicity. No
problem. Reagan and Rumsfeld already have a staunch Republican hack ready for the job as
new FDA Commissioner Arthur Hayes, who in short order overrules the FDAs own board of
inquiry that has refused to approve aspartame and gives the product the FDAs stamp of
approval.
Its well known in Washington circles, however, that aspartame is not just any old political FDA
approval, but is, in fact, a general signal to corporate America that Reagan means business
and Big Business at that. The signal, in particular, tells Big Business that from now on all the
brakes are off, tricky regulations about silly things like public health and safety are gone for
Arthur Hayes is quickly bored by his job at the FDA, at any rate, and before too long goes off
to work for notorious PR flack firm Burson-Marsteller, who just coincidentally, you
understand, happen to be retained by G.D. Searle! At about the same time, Federal attorney
Sam Skinner, whos been assigned to prosecute Searle for fraudulent tests in their original
aspartame application, gets an offer he cant refuse from - Guess who! - Searles lawyers! -
and goes off to work for them for a reputed $US1,000 per day, effectively sabotaging the
whole Federal case and, of course, effectively ending any litigation threat against Searle for its
authorities - and the FDA in particular - that they have a revolving door relationship with
G.D. Searle, Monsanto and the chemical industry in general. And, of course, as far as FSANZ is
concerned this whole shoddy exercise just never happened. But it did, and its recorded in US
Thats the thing about aspartame: its a bit like the key to Pandoras Box of stored evils - once
Recently, good old FSANZ has finalised approval of several knock-offs from aspartame,
phenylketonurics. Actually this is PR drivel. Dr Roberts and others in the long list of medical
critics say the clinical effects from neotame will be the same as aspartame, and the only
rights have run out, and the neotame formulation gives them patent control again and thus
In my own regular dealings with the food regulators it always seems were singing from
different hymn books when it comes down to the actual science indicating hazard or safety for
aspartame. However, when you can get to check what the regulators are actually reading, you
invariably discover they are sticking to the data produced by the aspartame industry or its
Substantive evidence of this trend was produced by Professor Ralph Walton of Northeastern
Ohio Universitys College of Medicine, who pointed out on the popular US TV programme 60
Minutes (Dec 29, l996) that he had done peer reviewed research showing that, of 90
INDEPENDENT studies on aspartame, 83, or 92%, identified a problem. Of the seven non-
industry studies attesting to aspartames safety, six were studies from the FDA and one was
from a literature review almost exclusively dealing with industry-sponsored research. Dr.
Walton noted at the time that As the role of the FDA, in the question of aspartame safety, has
been controversial and allegations were made of a conflict of interest on the part of the FDA
Commissioner at the time of aspartames approval, one could argue that the FDA studies
should not be considered truly independent. If these studies are excluded, along with the
literature review focusing only on NutraSweet industry funded research, then 100% of the truly
(aspartame). (4)
His warning words on the aspartame disaster, now well into its third decade on our food
chain, are echoed by a long list of eminent scientists whose peer-reviewed papers and
interviews on the subject of aspartame toxicity are listed in detail on the www.dorway.com
website.
FSANZ naturally places its confidence in aspartame safety on pro- industry research and the
shonky reports from the EU and UN Codex coming from committees loaded with food industry
representatives. When it is challenged on its aspartame safety data it always quotes the
on the Safety of Aspartame / E951 (SCF 2002) (7), which reads like something out of the
notoriously shonky Blair brief on the Iraq weapons of mass destruction scam - another piece
The EU Opinion naturally reported that aspartame was safe because two-thirds of the science
committees members earn a significant part of their living as scientific consultants to the
aspartame-using food industry. The United Nations body concerned with international food
industry groups, politicians and national regulators. In these circumstances genuine scientific
and consumer concerns get short shrift and aspartame carries on its path of destruction.
What we all need to keep focused on, of course, is that our bureaucrats and politicians have a
long, long history of support for blue asbestos, DDT, lead, and Agent Orange poisoning, as
the historic record demonstrates. It took Australian governments and their regulatory officials
and experts decades to accept that these toxins actually damaged human health. Little
wonder, then, at their staunch defence of aspartame and a long list of other harmful synthetic
Why all this carefully organised concern aimed at keeping a dangerous nerve poison part of
the world food chain? Are the people we trust - politicians, food regulators, even the
Establishment medical profession - suffering from a collective blind spot, or, perhaps,
temporary insanity over aspartame? Is it a plot from the New World Order or even Osama Bin
Laden?
Well, actually, nothing like that. Its really just a familiar case of the old Washington/White
House/Canberra run-around described earlier. They are all just protecting their jobs and their
backs. For a start, the potential litigation over aspartame - already in train - is billed to be
among the biggest class actions ever to hit the planet, far out-ranking tobacco, blue asbestos,
Agent Orange and lead, and they just hope the brown stuff doesnt hit the fan until they have
Aspartame litigation could destroy the credibility of whole governments and the very
international processes we rely on to regulate food safety. FSANZ will, before too long, be
dancing before investigating political committees in Canberra and Wellington answering the
important question, Why did you ignore all the warning data about aspartame for over 20
years!?
But dont expect logic. Everyone in authority is ducking for cover at the moment hoping that
aspartame will simply go away. This story will be ignored or denied following the usual
pattern. But unfortunately for all concerned, including the untold millions of aspartame
consumers out there, it will not be going away this time. Things have already gone too far.
Martini, that New Yorks leading class action attorney, Keith Silverstein, is collecting evidence
for a major class action case against all the key players in the aspartame industry. Silverstein
aspartame-containing products, but is limiting the medical field to brain tumours, seizures
and blindness or other eye deterioration. All medical records and updates can be sent direct to
the law firms email but check first with Betty Martini (Email: ) to make sure Australians can be
joined to the legal action. Silverstein and partners are also taking on Vioxx and Celebrex
cases, two recent drug medication disasters that also involve Australians.
Compensation paid out by the aspartame industry including major corporations such as Coca
Cola and Pepsi is expected to surpass the payouts in the case of blue asbestos and tobacco,
the current record holders in class action litigation, by billions of dollars. Wall Street, London
City and insurers from Zurich to Tokyo are beginning to tremble and look for avenues of
escape and you can bet FSANZ and state health regulators throughout Australia will be
checking their insurance policies and calling in their lawyers for some serious back-room
chats.
Be sure to send copies of this issue of Living Now to any friends or relatives who may be
suffering from aspartame poisoning. Remember, all diet preparations are suspect, many
sweetened medications and confectionery and many fitness and health drinks. Watch this
space for news of litigation in this part of the world, but in the meantime scan everything you
buy for Additive 951, the term contains artificial sweeteners and the phenylketonurics
warning.
If you believe that youve been poisoned by aspartame, the first thing to do is STOP USING THE
STUFF! If youve been a daily user it could take at least three months for the headaches,
muscle pains, migraines, etc, etc, to fade away, but immediate relief can be noticed by most
aspartame addicts within 24 hours of stopping. Australian doctor Sandra Cabots Liver Diet
books give a good programme of detoxification from aspartame addiction. Advice on de-tox
case histories from people who used the stuff, were made sick by it, and recovered. Reading
You should also keep a regular watch on the public notices sections of the major city
newspapers if you have been poisoned by aspartame products. Class actions against the major
players in the Australian food industry using aspartame will undoubtedly be a feature of
Australian law courts over the next decade. You could get your money back for all those diet
And while youre at it, why not raise the topic of aspartame regulation with our politicians?
References:
1. Dr. Woodrow C. Monte, Aspartame: Methanol and the Public Health, Journal of Applied
2. Russell L. Blaylock, M.D., Excitotoxins; The Taste That Kills, Health Press, Santa Fe, N.M.
3. FSANZ was formerly known under the rubric of ANZFA (Australia New Zealand Food
Authority).
programme 60 Minutes (Dec 29, l996) and provided to Ed Metcalfe for the purposes of his
story Sweet Talking, published in The Ecologist, Vol 30, No 4 June 2000.
5. British medical journal, the Lancet, July 29, 1999, see website ).
6. Gordon, Gregory, 1987. NutraSweet: Questions Swirl, UPI Investigative Report, 10/12/87.
8. See Bill Stathams Australian guide to food additives, The Chemical Maze, listing nearly
1,000 potentially harmful chemicals in our food chain. Available from Possibility.Com, P O Box
Poisoned World, available from Email: click here Tel (USA) - 520 - 624 -9710. Also the
medical text on aspartame: Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, available online from
www.sunsentpress.com or Tel (USA) 1 800 827 7991 H. J. Roberts, M.D. (along with other
books and tapes). Dr Roberts book contains a chapter on trial lawyers and drug interactions
since aspartame is a severely neurotoxic drug. See also books on aspartame by neurosurgeon
Russell Blaylock, MD, Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, and Health & Nutrition Secrets To
Save Your Life. See websites above for details. The latter book tells aspartame victims what
they have to avoid and why, and explains how a victim can re-build their immune system. Dr.
Blaylock also has a book on Cancer Strategies. With aspartame having caused so many
The BBC News of July 14 alerted the world to the latest research linking aspartame/additive
E951 to increased cancer risk. Reporting to the European Journal of Oncology (Vol 10, No.2,
2005), an Italian team of researchers led by Morando Soffritti of the Ramazzini Foundation of
Oncology and Environmental Sciences, Bologna, drew attention to the results of a very detailed
humans in common diet products. Rats fed aspartame also developed brain tumours, one of
the specific factors warned against in Professor J.W. Olneys 1996 report in the Journal of
Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (Vol. 55, No. 11, 1996) where he pointed to an
since 1981.
If it quacks!
This is not a battle we can afford to lose, stresses Dr Clark (26.6.05) in an aspartame
www.dorway.com. The damage aspartame does to our glaucoma and diabetic patients alone
is just staggering based on the info I have been seeing. When I first went into practice 28
years ago, I might have seen one glaucoma patient every 2 or 3 weeks. Now I find myself
surprised when I get through a single day and have not caught at least one glaucoma case
it is my hunch that the combination of aspartame, which is being consumed by young people
like crazy now to supposedly keep their weight down, and the partially hydrogenated oils that
do not break down well in our bodies for elimination, is causing a lot of this increase in
diabetes, glaucoma and macular degeneration. I may be wrong, but if it quacks like a duck
and walks like a duck, well, I have to think it is a duck until something else convinces me it is
not a duck.
Chris Wheeler is former president of the Soil & Health Association, Australasias oldest organic
report-on-aspartame-additive-951/
Part two: http://www.livingnow.com.au/2005/05/we-are-the-laboratory-rats-part-two-a-
special-report-on-aspartame-additive-951/