Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparison of Methods of Enantiomeric Methods
Comparison of Methods of Enantiomeric Methods
Alan Lai
The chiral resolution involved forming diastereomeric salts that had different
solubilities in order to separate the two enantiomers of mandelic acid. Its advantages include
the ability to separate a mixture of enantiomers, so that we can obtain one specific
enantiomer. Additionally, it yields a high purity, especially for that of the solid if the two
in that the enantiomer in solution has a lower purity, and that if only one enantiomer is
desired, then large quantities (half, corresponding to the other enantiomer) is wasted.
benzoylformate to methyl mandelate. It has multiple advantages - the yeast and sucrose
needed to support the reaction is very inexpensive, and little attention is needed to keep the
98%. Furthermore, an enzymes reusability allows it to react with more reactants than
synthetic reactions. Its mediated reactivity and substrate selectivity also prevents unwanted
reactions from occurring, such as creation of hydrogen gas, and is very safe to operate.
However, a few disadvantages include a lower yield, and the time needed for the reaction to
run sufficiently. Additionally, further purification techniques are needed, which contributes to
the lower yield, and there are no visible signs of the reaction occurring.
reduction of methyl benzoylformate using NaBH4. Advantages include its relatively fast
reaction time, and its simplicity in implementation. However, it is disadvantaged by the fact
that a racemic mixture is produced. This means if one enantiomer is preferred over the
other, we will not be able to make a specific enantiomer. Additionally, the reactivity of sodium
borohydride is also a liability. Its high reactivity makes it shock sensitive and explosive in
water, so extra precautionary measures are needed to make sure that no accidents occur.
Additionally, the hydrogen gas produced by the reaction by the hydride with the solvent is
highly flammable.
Enantioselective reduction was very similar to the racemic reduction in that it involved
sodium borohydride as the reducing agent. However, the reaction was mediated by
(L)-tartaric acid in order to produce one specific enantiomer. This is advantageous over the
racemic reduction in that a specific enantiomer is produced over the other, providing greater
yield of the desired enantiomer. It also incorporates the advantages of the racemic reduction
reaction, including its relatively quick reaction time, compared to enzymatic reduction.
However, it requires the use of another enantiomeric compound to obtain mediate this
reaction, which could be hard or expensive to come by. Additionally, the chiral auxiliary will
be needed to be removed, and the reaction requires more steps and more specific