Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Acl Final
Acl Final
Jenny Giampalmo
Independent Research
25 May 2017
Advisor: Nick Campanaro
Instructor: E. Leila Chawkat
Abstract
This research focused on the issue of ACL tears in female athletes. This
injury is very common and there is not much consensus about the best injury
the knee and ACL injuries a review of literature was conducted that focused on
injury risk factors associated with different demographics and current injury
assessment methods. Then, meta analysis was used to analyze several aspects of
injury prevention programs including fatigue, time and frequency of the program,
and the effects of specific exercises. It was found that the most effective exercises,
which should make up a majority of the program are the ones that cause co-
at least very limited. Overall, a trained professional to give the participants real-
Introduction
Every year in the United States there are 150,000 Anterior Cruciate
Ligament (ACL) tears in the United States every year. Over eighty percent of
movements (Dharamsi et. all, 2013). For those who do tear their ACLs,
is required to regain knee function (Mayo Clinic Staff, 2017b). The short term,
immediate consequences of this injury are loss of knee stabilization and decreased
knee function. The long term consequences that exist even after ACL
reconstructive surgery include limited return to athletics and early onset
osteoarthritis (Dharamsi et. all, 2013). This problem of common ACL tears with
lifelong effects and severe limitation in future sports participation (Mayo Clinic,
2017a) lead to the research question, How might the most effective
female athletes? Currently there are several prevention methods and protocols.
Despite this there is no conclusive decision about what the best method of ACL
injury prevention is for high school aged female athletes. Through background
research and meta analysis the following thesis was developed. If female lacrosse
quadricep and hamstring muscles then they will decrease their risk of ACL injury.
Review of Literature
In order to understand the function of the ACL and what causes injury to
this ligament, one must know the general anatomy of the knee. Four major bones
join at the knee: the femur, commonly known as the thigh bone, the tibia, the
collateral shin bone, the fibula, the shin bone on the lateral side, and the patella
which is the kneecap. The patella rests in the intercondylar groove, which is
located at the base of the femur. This groove is also an important part of ACL
injury because the ACL runs through this groove. Another key part of knee
function are the four ligaments used for stabilization: the Medial Collateral, the
Lateral Collateral, The Posterior Cruciate and the Anterior Cruciate. The Medial
Collateral ligament runs on the inside of the knee and the Lateral Collateral
Ligament runs on the outside of the knee. Both are used for stabilization in
sideways motions. The Posterior Cruciate Ligament runs from the posterior of the
tibia to the anterior of the femur. This ligament prevents dislocation of the femur.
The final ligament in the knee is the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. This ligament
runs from the anterior side of the tibia to the posterior side of the femur and is
primarily responsible for stabilizing the shin and preventing it from moving
forward (AAOS 2014). For more details about the anatomy of the knee view the
diagram below. The overall structure of the knee as well as the functions of the
individual components of the knee is essential to the study of ACL injury.
The next important research area related to ACL tears is the risk factors
that make this injury more likely to occur. Over eighty percent of ACL tears occur
in non-contact situations and are heavily influenced by several factors. The first
and then had their LESS scores recorded again. The LESS score is an indicator of
scores were significantly higher than pre exercise scores (mean difference = 1.3,
95% CI = 0.8, 1.8). The increase in LESS scores indicates that as athletes
become fatigued they commit more errors in their landing and jumping
movements; this can contribute to ACL injury (Wesley et. all, 2014). Another risk
factor is footstrike. Forefoot contact is better than rearfoot contact because it gives
a more even distribution of force. Rear-foot contact causes a large spike in force
on the knee. The graphs below show the difference in force distribution in a
rearfoot strike versus a forefoot strike and indicates that a rearfoot strike is much
of direction movements. Often the reason that these movements are risky is
because they are usually accompanied by valgus knee movement (inward twist of
the knee) and low knee flexion. One study found that, jumping to the left had the
smallest maximum flexion angle and was significantly less than jumping
vertically (P= .003) or to the right (P < .001). The maximum knee flexion angle at
PPGRF was also significantly less when jumping to the left compared with
vertical jumps (P = .008) (Timothy et. all). The decreased knee flexion in change
of direction movements was prevalent in both right and left cuts; however this
study found left movements to be the most dangerous (Sell et. all 2006). Having a
injury.
In addition to these risk factors females are also at risk of ACL injury for
even more reasons. Why females are different than males at movements (Yu et.
all, 2014) The first is joint laxity. Females joints are more flexible and looser
overall. This can increase the likelihood of hyperextension and causes general
joint weakness. Other neuromuscular factors also affect females. For one they
hamstring muscles. In addition females frequently have one leg that is stronger
than the other. A very dangerous risk that females face is that most rely on their
bones and ligaments to bring their body to a halt. This puts extreme stress on
ligaments instead of putting the force more safely on the quadricep, hamstring,
and gluteal muscles (Smith, 2012). Females also have physical factors that
increase their chances of ACL injury. This is because they tend to have a smaller
intercondylar groove. The ACL runs through the intercondylar groove, so the
smaller this groove is the smaller and weaker ACL. Overall there are many risk
factors for all people that make them likely to injure their ACLs; in addition, there
are also many more factors that pertain specifically to women and cause them to
assessment methods that are meant to determine a persons risk of ACL tear. One
method that is used to determine the movement of the tibia bone is the Navicular
Drop Test. The movement of the tibia directly translate to the risk of ACL injury
because the tibia is on stabilized by the ACL. For this test the distance between
the subtalar bone and the ground is measured. Then the test subject rocks side to
side while keeping their feet planted. During this rocking the maximum distance
between the subtalar bone from the ground is recorded. The difference between
these two scores is recorded as the navicular drop score and the higher the score
the more the tibia has shifted. High scores indicates a weak ACL.
Another test is the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) score. In this
predictor test the test subject performs a depth jump from half of their height and
reviewer has a checklist and if something is done incorrectly the test subject gets a
point. A higher score is bad and indicates that more errors were committed during
the test. These errors such as low knee flexion and lack of hip flexion put
increased stress on the knee and specifically on the ACL which can cause injury.
A final test used to determine risk of ACL injury is the single leg squat.
The single leg squat is used to evaluate knee and hip flexion during movement. In
a clinical study done by (Weeks et. all, 2012) a sample of twenty two participants
performed single leg squats and were evaluated for hip flexion, hip adduction and
abduction, and the degree of knee flexion and rotation. Internal and external
rotation of the knee and the hip is best as a minimum. This test worked best for
evaluating peak knee flexion, the degree to which the knee bends. This test only
somewhat reliable for the other test areas, but overall it can be used to evaluate
the general movement patterns and errors committed. It is not the most useful
assessment method.
A final part of the background research was to analyze a few current
regain knee strength. Many sources mentioned this type of training as essential to
contraction that in turn leads to a boost in muscle development and strength of the
eccentric strength is basically just your ability to resist weight and control it...
from the ACL (2017). This statement was supported with data from a clinical
trial that analyzed the effects of eccentric exercises after two to three weeks. The
eccentric exercise group and 13.4% (SD= 10.3%) and 11.6% (SD=10.4%),
respectively (Herman 2009) indicated that the usage of eccentric training was
the participants who had used eccentric training were always more than one
(ACSM, 2013). This is a strong indicator that eccentric training can be used as an
Neuromuscular training to target This source was used the least. It examined risk factors for
deficits associated with second ACL injury and examined how effective different methods
anterior cruciate ligament injury were to lessen these factors. The group that this study
mainly focused on was young, active females and so it
may not be very applicable to other demographics.
Overall it was found that the prevention programs were
useful in almost all areas of controllable risks, just to
varying degrees.
Preventive neuromuscular training This source found that the compliance rate of athletes
for young female athletes: participating in exercise programs was not affected by the
Comparison of coach and athlete time and frequency of the program. Athletes consistently
compliance rates had a very high rate of completion. Also, the in season
attendance rates were higher; however, the number of
sessions was limited with conflicts.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of This systematic review of current ACL injury prevention
anterior cruciate ligament injury programs analyzed different components of the programs
prevention programme training including balance, dynamic/static stretching, and
components: A systematic review feedback. It was found that static stretching done was
and meta-analysis. harmful and increased injury risk. The three areas that
made up a majority of the successful programs were
strengthening, explosiveness, and agility
This research utilized meta analysis to gather data for developing the most
effective anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) prevention program for female lacrosse
parts of current ACL prevention programs and other studies related to ACL
prevention protocols. This method of data collection was used because this topic
is an area of science research that relies on raw data but the researcher does not
have the access resources for conducting a firsthand experiment. By using meta
reviews about areas of ACL prevention programs including balancing the length
exercises used.
The time length and frequency of training programs was shown to have
rates of participants. A wide range of single session duration and overall duration
rate of ACL injury during or after participation in the program (Taylor et. All,
2013). Overall it was determined that the compliance of athletes and coaches
had lower compliance to follow through with instructing and overseeing the
decreased due to a lack of time and game of meet conflicts. This indicates that for
training prevention program is the level of feedback. There are multiple ways to
give feedback. The first is dyad training. In dyad training the athlete is given a
Another type of feedback given is visual stimulation video overlay. In this the
how similar the movement was in each. The goal of this is to reach one hundred
percent of the same movement. A final type of feedback that is reviewed is real-
time visual feedback. In this there is a qualified trainer to oversee the movement
and make on the spot adjustments to form. The dyad training and the real-time
feedback are the most feasible of the feedback options. They do require an expert
with enough training to allow them to identify and correct mistakes in form. Both
of those two feedback mechanisms are less precise than the visual overlay
because they are done without the assistance of a computer and rely solely on the
the tibia as well as a lack of stability in the overall knee region. Exercises that
target the quadriceps and the hamstrings as they work together are found to be the
most effective for developing strength and stability. Particular exercises that target
the co-activation of the hamstring and the quadriceps include lunging, single leg
squat, depth jumps and tuck jumps. The co-activation of muscle has been found to
be the most effective due to the more even and gradual distribution of force (Stasi
et. All, 2015) (Dedinsky et. all, 2013). A large percent of the exercises in current
explosiveness, and agility; these three areas of exercises should be the main focus
in ACL injury prevention protocols. One surprising thing was that static stretching
was associated with an increased risk of ACL tear (Sugimoto et. All, 2013). The
reasoning for this was not very clear and should be researched further. However,
until more conclusive data is published with the true effectiveness of static
program.
depending on a few factors. When all the strengths and weaknesses of the
systematic reviews are compared it is found that the time of the protocol is not
season compliance rate training programs need to have a time limit. Also, it is
errors in movement can be corrected early on. The most effective exercises that
should make up a majority of the program should strengthen the quadriceps and
very limited. Overall a main weakness in the data that should be researched
Throughout this research several conclusions about what makes an ACL exercise
protocol aimed at preventing injury have been reached. The first is that the duration and
frequency this product does not affect the effectiveness of the program. This does not
affect the compliancy of the participants. However, it is still important to consider that as
participants become fatigued they commit more errors in movements that increase their
risk of injury. In game situations a majority of the ACL injuries occurred in the final
feasible is to have real time feedback from a professional. This ensures that athletes can
immediately be alerted to the mistakes that they are making and have the opportunity to
correct them.
The product of this research is a sample exercise program with the focus of
decreasing ACL tear risks in female athletes. The program will consist of a short list of
exercises with specific instruction about duration and technique. Exercises that target the
quadriceps and the hamstrings as they work together are found to be the most effective
for developing strength and stability. These exercises include lunges, single leg squat,
depth jumps and tuck jumps. The co-activation of the hamstrings, glutes, and quadriceps
muscle have been found to be the most effective due to the more even and gradual
exercises, as they have been found to be an effective part of leg muscle development in
ACL injury prevention and ACLr recovery programs. The main group that will be
targeting by the product is players and coaches.The goal is for the coaches to add the
small workout program created to their practices as a way to help strengthen their players
AAOS. (2014, March). Common knee injuries. Retrieved from American Academy of
Orthopaedic Surgeons website: http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=a00325
ACSM. (2013). Eccentric resistance exercise for health and fitness. Retrieved
from American College of Sports Medicine website: https://www.acsm.org/docs/
brochures/eccentric-resistance-exercise.pdf
Benjaminse, A., Gokeler, A., Dowling, A., Faigenbaum, A., Ford, K., Hewett, T., . . .
Myer, G.
(2015). Optimization of the anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention paradigm:
Novel feedback techniques to enhance motor learning and reduce injury risk.
Journal of Orthopaedic &Sports Physical Therapy, 45(3), 170-182. Retrieved
from http://www.jospt.org/doi/full/10.2519/jospt.2015.4986?
mobileUi=0&code=jospt-site
Dedinsky, R., Baker, L., Imbus, S., Bowman, M., & Murray, L. (2013). Exercises that
facilitate
optimal hamstring and quadriceps co-activation to help decrease ACL injury risk
in healthy females: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Sports
Physical Therapy. Retrieved from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294945/
Dharamsi, A., & LaBella, C. (2013). Prevention of ACL injuries in adolescent female
athletes.
Contemporary Pediatrics, 12. Retrieved from
http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?
tabID=T002&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&se
archType=AdvancedSearchForm¤tPosition=6&docId=GALE
%7CA456573914&docType=Article&sort=RELEVANCE&contentSegment=&pr
odId=GPS&contentSet=GALE
%7CA456573914&searchId=R15&userGroupName=glen20233&inPS=true
Mayo Clinic Staff. (2017, January). ACL reconstruction. Retrieved from Mayo Clinic
website: http://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/acl-
reconstruction/home/ovc-20166733
Reid, A., Birmingham, T. B., Stratford, P. W., Alcock, G. K., & Giffin, J. R. (2007,
March). Hop
testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Physical Therapy, 87(3), 337+.
Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?
p=GPS&sw=w&u=glen20233&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE
%7CA160872852&asid=83c369f4c5bcac59699d104288f84d86
Sell, T. C., Ferris, C. M., Abt, J. P., Tsai, Y.-S., Myers, J. B., Fu, F. H., & Lephart, S. M.
(2006,
January). The effect of direction and reaction on the neuromuscular and
biomechanical characteristics of the knee during tasks that simulate the
noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury mechanism. The American Journal of
Sports Medicine, 34(1), 43+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?
p=GPS&sw=w&u=glen20233&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE
%7CA140560564&asid=dcb480c1c8893993ee649f5b3f4c9f5d
Smith, H., Vacek, P., Johnson, R., Slauterbeck, J., Hashemi, J., Shultz, S., & Beynnon, B.
(2012, January). Risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Retrieved from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3435896/
Stasi, S., Myer, G., & Hewett, T. (2013). Neuromuscular training to target deficits
associated
with second anterior cruciate ligament injury. Journal Orthopedic Sports Physical
Therapy. Retrieved from http://Preventive Neuromuscular Training for Young
Female Athletes: Comparison of Coach and Athlete Compliance Rates
Sugimoto, D., Mattacola, C., Bush, H., Thomas, S., Foss, K., Myer, G., & Hewett, T.
(n.d.).
Preventive neuromuscular training for young female athletes: Comparison of
coach and athlete compliance rates. Journal of Athletic Training. Retrieved from
http://www.natajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.20?code=nata-site
Taylor, J., Waxman, J., Richter, S., & Shultz, S. (2013). Evaluation of the effectiveness of
anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention programme training components: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine.
Retrieved from
http://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/44997711/Evaluation_of_the_
effectiveness_of_anter20160422-17426-xq6na1.pdf?
AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1489976938&Sig
nature=bcHrbtfrSLep2O4PeAgzoEAfgqc%3D&response-content-
disposition=inline%3B%20filename
%3DEvaluation_of_the_effectiveness_of_anter.pdf
Weeks, B., Carty, C., & Horan, S. (2012). Kinematic predictors of single-leg squat
performance:
A comparison of experienced physiotherapists and student physiotherapists.
Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517427/
Wesley, C. A., Aronson, P. A., & Docherty, C. L. (2015). Lower extremity landing
biomechanics in both sexes after a functional exercise protocol. Journal of
Athletic Training, 50(9). Retrieved from http://natajournals.org/doi/10.4085/1062-
6050-50.8.03?code=nata-site
Yu, B., Liu, H., & Garrett, W. E. (2014). Prevention and rehabilitation of non-contact
ACL
injury: New information in recent studies. International Conference of
Biomechanics in Sports. Retrieved from https://ojs.ub.uni-
konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/5908/5393