Anorexia Nervosa:
Medical Management
Richard A, Lenon, MD
Abstract
‘The major medical issues in anorexia ner~
‘yosa are assessment of risk and the manage
ment of refeeding. Responsibility for risk
assessment will generally be shared by the
internist and the psychotherapist; both cur-
rent medical condition and spticipated
‘behavior must be taken into account. This
paper begins with a discussion of the medical
‘consequences of starvation in anorecties, and
proceeds to offer suggestions on medical
assessment of the individual patient. An
‘argument is then made for the desirability
of earlfer and ongomg medical assessment,
with close collaboration between the interm=
ist and the psychotherapist. Finally, the
management of refeeding is discussed.
Medical Consequences of Starvation
in Anorexia Nervosa
Anorexia nervosa is clearly a disease
associated with considerable morbidity and
mortality. Death rates from 0 to 19% have been
reported (Baker & Lyen, 1982), with much of
the variance undoubtedly attributable to dif-
ferences in patient populations and follow-up.
Voluntary programs with strict admission
enteria and short follow-up predictably report
low mortality. Some programs do not readtrit
their own faifures, Programs with a high pro
portion. of involuntary patieats and previous
treatment failures would be expected to have
highes mortality. An interesting statistical argu-
ment has been ‘made chat the superiority of
results reported by experienced, highly siruc-
tured programs can be adequately explained by
their patient selection (Goldberg, Ecker,
Casper, Halmi, Davis & Roper, 1980). While
the overall mortality of anorexia nervoss is
unknown, the mortality of ongoing starvation
will eventually be 100%,
2
Starvation in initiolly healthy amorecies is
ferent from that seen in other citoustances.
Most anorectic cat enough to slow protein loss
dramatically, making them unlike the strict
hhunger-srikers, who generally died in SO to 80
ays, Famines are generally not subject to
sophisticated medical observation, but what ine
formation we do have from such setings has
infeetion playing a much more significant role
than it does in fatal anorexia. Protein-
conserving mechanisms are much more effec-
tive im the absence of severe infection or
maligaaney: failing cancer patients rerely sur-
Sive lose of more then 308 of initial weight,
while anorexies ean often lose $0% or more
(Donaldson & Lenon, 15779). When anorecties
develop a medical condition that announces its
presence, they will generally receive prompt
cffective treatment, Fatal outcomes in anorexia
are usally relatively sudden and without ob-
vious prior warring.
‘Cause of death in anorexia is often debatable.
Nine series, inchuding. 654 patients and 38
deaths, were reviewed hy Baker and T yen
({882), Bight ofthese deaths were reporied as
suicides; but most oF the rest were open to ques
thon, Bight were attributed 10 “starvation,""
‘without further explanation, ‘There were an
unspecified muber from eardiapolmenary
causes and infection. Bight deaths were af
‘ributed to miscellaneous causes, incfuding
three with “electrolyte dsturbances."" One was
attributed to hypoglycemia. There have been
at least three deaths among patients treated at
Stanford im te last threc years: one was m=
den and unexplained, one was probably a s
cide, and the third was of fiver failure in a pa
tiem who was also alcoholic. A fourth patient
spent four months in te intensive care uni after
suffering severe damage during documested
hyposlyeemic coma: she survived, but was sig-
mfieantly impaired when last’ secn scven
‘rmsacemal Avalos Journalmonths after the insult. The more than
eaths reported in patients on protein
diets may well be a consequence of voluntary
starvation; they remain poorly understor, but
arrhythmis are thought to have played a role
(Lamtigua, Arvatruda, Bild, Forbes, & Lock
wood, 1980}. Significant arrhythmias have
been ciserved in anorecticsas well (Gotiliener,
Gross, Henry, Borer & Bbert, 1978; Mitchell
& Gilium, 1980),
Archythimia may well be the cause of many
of the sudden deaths seen in anorexia, Elec
twolyte disturbances ure not the only possible
basis. Sericis ventricular arrhythmias have
been observed during protein-sparing niodified
fasts (SMF), and in snorectics in the absence
‘of significant serum electrolyte abnorraalitis.
“The physiologic basis of these arrhythmias may
be simple starvation; lass of eardiae mass dur-
ing starvation is well-documented. There is
probably considerable variability in the popul
tion's sensitivity to starvation-induced ar-
rhythmias; 3 of 6 closely monitored patients on
4 PSME (Lantigua, et al, 1980) and 4 of 11
similarly followed anorecties showed serious
Ventricular arshythmias (Goudiener, et al,
1978), but the incidence of syncope and sud-
den death in such popolations is obviously far
lower. The true incidence of arrhythmic deaths
in arorectics will not be known until long term
monitoring becomes more practical
‘Organic mental impairment is another well-
recosnized consequence of starvation. A gross
organic brain syndrome is present in the end-
stages of starvation: significant impairme
begins well before it is clinically obvious
Descriptions of starving non-anorectics agree
that they are obsessed with thoughts of food,
and have little time ar attention for other eon
siderations. Attention span and ability 0.eon-
centrate are impaired. Irritability and lability
increase, Eventually, the victims become in
creasingly listless (Leyton, 1946). Convincing
documentation of an organic effect in anorec
ties is available. Computed tomography was
done on 23 anorectic with 2 mean weight love
of 16.5 kg: 21 had definite signs of loss of brain
tissue mass. Bleven of these patients were
restudied four weeks after regaining significant
Weight, and showed substantial improvements.
Psychometric testing done on the I patients
showed parallel improvement in concentration
time, perceptual speed, and reaction time: IQ
Wo, 43, No, te Jamar 1985
ANOREXIA NERVOSA: MEDICAL MANAGEMENT
changes were not statistically significant
(Kohlmeyer, Lehmkuhl & Poutska, 1983).
While such mental impairment is alarming in
its own right, it may well have special impor-
tance in making some anorectics less amenable
to therapy. At some point, the impairment is
severe enough that refeeding becomes a
necessary preliminary to psychotherapy.
Assessment of Risk
‘The above is sutficient justification for stating
that there is significant risk of mortality in
fnorexia nervosa, that there are a variety of
possible causes, and thatthe specific cause may
not announce itself hefore the event. Since we
cannot rely on our ability 1 foresee specific
‘aus of death, we must in large degree depend
‘on our assessment of overall damage. What is
most needed is a method of assessing risk of
death from any and all causes. Baker snd Lyen
(1982) regard a history of laxative abuse,
diuretic abuse, or “bizarre dictary intake" a
associated with increased risk. They also con-
sidered degree of weight loss helpful; ofthe 38
dlaths in their 9 series, in 13 cases it was possi-
ble to assess weight loss. The mean weight loss
was SLT, with a standard ceror of 3.6%
Other physical findings they’ mentioned. were
hhypotbernia (ess than 95°F), hypotension, and
“mental stalus changes suggestive of toxie
cencephalopaky.” Laborslory findings men-
tioned includ! low serum potassiany, EKG ab-
normalities, hypoglycemia, and the absenee of
ketonaria despite starvation
Baker and Lyen (1982) did not choose to rank
the urgency af their ominous signs. It seems
possible to suggest at least three levels of
tmedical risk; from high, to moderate, to
relatively low. High risk patients would be
those for whom immediate medical hosptalza-
tion should be strongly considered. Mocerate
risk patients would be those requiring at least
closé medica follow-up. For low risk patients,
the role of the internist might be limited to an
initial assessment and one oF 140 follow-up
Visits, if all goes well
‘The high risk category cerainly includes ps-
tients with 50% weight loss, symptoms
hypoglycemia, “toxic encephalopathy."” or
significant EXG abnormalities. Hypothermia
and absence of ketonuria may also warrant a
high risk designation. Recent onset of syncope
and rapidly progressive weakness were not
aRICHARD A, LENON, MD.
mentioned by Baker and Lyen (1982), but we
regand these also as high Fisk findings. Syn-
‘copal episodes may represent serious ar-
rhytimia oF hypoglycemia (Zalin & Lant,
1984). Patients too weak to walk are an obvious
‘easo, Li they cannot stand from ¢ chair without
using their hands, hospitalization and ag-
gressive altention are indicated. Clumsiness,
hystagmus, oF impaired eye movement can
herald Wemicke's encephalopathy (Handler &
Perkin, 1982); prompt attention is again in-
dicated, Wernicke’s is more likely to be seen
in patients with “bizarre dietary intake.” Inthe
laboratory, low white counts are not uncom
‘man, but an absolute neutrophil count less tha.
1000 should receive prompt attention. Serum
albumin ard transferrin are clearly indications
fof advanced starvation, but in anorexia they are
very insensitive; anorecties ean clearly die of
starvation with @ normal serom albumin.
‘The moderate risk category can safely in-
‘clude many patients who abuse laxatives or
diuretics, or admit bizarre dietary intake. Blood
pressures as Tow as 90 systolic and serum
Dorassium values as low as 3.0 meg/l are
relatively common, and would wot necessarily
demand that medical concerns take precedence
over all others. Edema will not always occur
inthe course of starvation, and does not always
indiewe high risk when present. ILis more fre
quent and occurs earkier in patients with a
history of laxative or diuretic abuse. Minor
liver enzyme abnormalities are fairly common,
and do not necessarily disqualify the patient
from the moderate risk category.
‘Conservatively, the /ow risk category could
include otherwise healthy patients who have
lost Jess than 15% of inital body weight, and
tare also less than 15% below idcal body weight.
Amenorthea does not necessarily disqualify
them.
‘The medical assessment of risk in anorectics
jg much more sensitive and reliable when pa
Gents can be followed over a period of time.
Many of the important indicators mentioned
above are relatively subjective: deterioration of
strength, coordination, and mental functioning
are obviously better assessed from a baseline.
Even weipht requires subjective interpresation,
since changes in total body water can obscure
significant changes in body composition. Total
body water increases as starvation progresses,
‘especially in patients with a history of diuredie
4
or laxative abuse. Weight can thus actualy in-
cxease while starvation proceeds. AL least LO
to 15% increase in. water as a percentage of
bhady weight is possible before edemn even
‘becomes apparent, since in starved patients,
‘uch of this excess wator will be intracellular
(Heymsficid & Dept, of Medicine, Emory Uni-
versity, 1952). Measurements of total body
water and dry mass are possible using isotope
methods; but such measurements are stil
cumbersome, expensive, and too insensitive to
register changes in individual patients over
periods of less then a month or more. Arm eit-
cumference measurements can be useful here,
singe they are somewhat less affected than
‘weight by fluid gains; they are relatively vscless
im anoreetes without baseline values, however
‘As a gross rule of thumb, itis useful to
‘remember that over time an anorectic will lose
about 0.2 kg por day on a water-only fast, iF
there is no water retention. Conversely, if she
cats 3500-4000 calorics, the average gain
should be about 0.2 kg per day; “real” weight
sain of 0.2 kg requires at least 1800 calories
above maintenance. or ahout 4000 calories per
pound (Allardyce & Groves, 1974). Larger
changes in cither direction can be assuined
reflect changes in tal body water, Fluctuations
are understandably greater in patierts whose
total body water is increased, Rapid aceamuls
tion of uid is common in refeeding, and
especially severe im laxative abusers; 5-10 ky
increases in the first week sre not uncommon
In following patients daily, drops of up to a
kilogram and more are often unexplained. A
sharp dectease in intake may be responsible.
‘When a well-outished person initiates & water-
only fast, 35% weight loss in the first 24 to
48 hours is not uncommon. Because thei total
body water is high t begin with, sudden
decrease in intake can cause an anorectic wo lose
even more. One mechenism is salt and water
Joss due to impairment of renal function: as
soon as the patient takes in more than sbout 100
calories. in. carbohydrate, function will be
restored to norml and most ofthe weight loss
will be regained (Cahill, 1970). Some loss is
also accounted for by food in tansit; every
calorie requires the presence of about 1 ec of
water. A pariemt who suddenly drops from 4000,
calories per day down to 3000 can transiently
show a loss of a kilogram. Of course, surrep:
titious laxative or diuretic abuse must be con-
rawsatonal Anclts Soursidered, Over time, however, fasters tend (0
lose about 0.2 kg per day in ““real’* weight,
and a 3500-4000 caloric intake willbe requited
for “real” gain at the same rate
‘Though ratc of change in medical status is
‘ powerlul indicator, 2 caution is necessary. It
is quite possible to be lulled into a false sense
of security when a patient remains stable at
very low weight for Jong periods of time,
especially if substantially lower weights have
been recorded inthe past. The unstated assurnp-
‘ion is thatthe risk of catastrophic events begins
at some discreet point, A much stronger case
‘can be mage thal rigk increases more gradually;
‘ovo months at 70% of idex! weight may be ss
dangerous as one month as 60%. In any case,
the physiology of starvation contributes to mak
ing true stbility difficult Zor the anorectic. The
‘uid retention associated with starvation often
provokes them to redouble their efforts.
‘Though weight my be stable or even increas
ing, total body protein can comtinue to decline.
Management of Refeeding
‘the meaical management ot voluntary
sefeeding is relatively straightforward. The
‘edema that can occur is wsualy not dangerous,
inthe absence of other signs of congestive heart
failure. The distress the patient experiences at
her “puffiness” and rapid weight gain will
‘often respond fairly well to repeated reassur-
ance. Tn some cases, carefully controlled use
of diurctics may be justified to help decrease
the anxiety. Congestive heart failure can oc~
cur during voluntary refeeding in anorectics,
but it is quite uncommon and should give ade~
‘quate warning
‘When volumiary incake is not sufficient, and
‘decision fas been made that prompt improve
‘mene in nutritional status is imperative, we must
choose hetween tube feeding and intravenous
hyperalimeniation. Both methods require close
medical supervision. In almost all cases, tube
feeding will be simpler and safer. Starvation
alone virtually never renders the gut unusable
(Baker & Lyen, 1982), and there is general
‘agreement among nutritional support specialists
thatthe gut should be used in preference to the
iniravenous route whenever possible. Patients
who vomit can usually be fed distal t9 the
pylorus, by pump-controlled continuous infu
Sion. The risk oF aspiration is lowest with con-
‘tinuous infusion, but even bolus feeding should
VoL 15, No, 1 January 1985
[ANOREXIA NERVOSA: MEDICAL MANAGEMENT:
de acceptable in alert patienms who are compe
sent to vomit. Tube feeding can certainly cavse
_ypophosphatemia or hypokalemia. Both tend
+9 occur early in feeding. when demand is
especially high. Precipitation of folate
hiamine defiieney by the same mechani
atleast a theoretical possbily. However, i
Aerting a tube is smuch less dangerous tha i
serting a central venous eatheter, which can
Jead to laceration of the great vessels and/or
pneumothorax. Intravenous feeding. is also
associated with serious infection, air embolus,
_uced thrombosis of the great veins, and reac”
live hypoglycemia, Theze isa zeported fatality
attributed to hypophosphatemia in an anorec-
{ic on intravenous feeding @erschuk, Forster,
Burhy, & Mallen, 1981). IFpatiens are going
wo tamper with their feeding, cleary the risk
oftampering with tube feeding s much Lower
The expense of tbe feeding should be at most
20% that of intravenous feeding. Neither is
likely to have any significant advantage in
efficacy.
"There is great deal at stake in the treatment
or anorexia, For most patients who achieve and
inaintain normal weight the damage wuffered
during sn episode of starvation seems to be
largely reversible. Resummpion of menses oc-
curs to the majority oF sueh patients (Hsu,
1980), though it may be delayed; we have pa-
sient with a 15-year history of amenorshea
‘whose menses resumed 3 months afier she
achieved normal weight t age 35. Even loss
‘oF cerebral mass Seems to be reversible. The
‘steoporosis that occurs in anorecties has been
emphasized only recently (Ayers, Gidwani,
Schmid & Gross, 1984): we do not know hew
seversibe it will be, While anozectics can be
extremely frustrating, the reeaveries possible
can be as spectacular as any in medicine, ac
‘quite rewarding tothe inernises involved, as
‘well as tothe psychotberapiss
Richard Lenon, MD, is a Palo Alto, Califor-
xia, intemist and oncologist. Starvation in
cancer patients was an early interest, from
‘which the interest in anorexia evolved.
REFERENCES
Alar, DB, & Gromen, AD (197A. A coravisons
sional pi ring rom anos ael ena
Seong Supers, Cyneclogy and Obmerics 730,
a
5RICHARD A. LENON, M.D.
Ayers AW, Gide, CLP. Seti, EM. GSM
"GOis) tegen in tnpige: yng ween
Snore nerves. Feri and Sety #224228.
Baker Le Lyen, (1982), Anoreia nervosa, Carers
‘Concept arin, 17. 196188,
Cai GF (19M Searvaon i ma, New England ror
al of Meng, 292, 608-573,
Doalion, 5.8, Lamon, RA, (279). Aeration of
‘ational satus Tact of cheater al ration
ety Cancer 43,2006 5.
Goiderg $C. Fer, ED. Caper, RC. Ha, KA,
Danis Me Roper, MCT (1), Fao ini
‘ng Bool erent a weg ain acess ee
own Jonmial of Nervous and Mental Disease, 168,
Tabi
Goce 1S. Geass, WA. Henry, W. Le, Borer. 1S..
1 Ebon, MH, (1978). fects of self ndced saree
‘ion on sardine sve and futon io arrears.
Gratin, $8, 2S833,
Handler, CE. & Pekin, GD, (198, Oxtber 2. Anes
Tn nereoes aad Wernicke' enepialnatly Aa ence
ignores atcison. (Later) Lancet, 2, 720-72
eget. the Deperimeat of Medicine, Citic
Revere Faciliy. Emory Universi, Schl of
“
Medicine, ilar, Georgia 1982). Bivcerriea com
ston of mal nord setustived aa ib
Jess. Relotance to amopometic extremes.
Arerian Journal of Cat Nuarion, #0, 131-142.
Ha, 1K. (198). Oucome in aporeda nero, reer
(of Gant Paonia 17, YON OS
Kehlmeyee, K., Let, G., & Pouska, F (1985)
“Compuid temography of anorexia avon, America
Jounal of Neral, 4. 437-438
Lamigus, RAL, Amstrad, JM, idle, TL, Forbes,
GB. & Lockwous. D.H. (190. Cavdac sty ht
ssa wih gud protein defor te emmenn of
hesiqy New Raphand Touma! of Mediipe, 408,
TS73,
pon, 6.8, (846, July 20), Fess of sow sara
om tance, 74-83
Mitchel, LE, & Gil, K(199D). Weight dependent
auchyania ina pica wil nore ros, deca
Searaa of senior, 157, 377318
Penschuk, MJ., Forster, J, Busby, & Mallen, JL,
{A981}. “The eaten of asoresieporvcin wl tal
furl mitiion Bllogial Paha, 18,532 53)
Zoli, AM, & Lal, AF (1963), Ayoesin zen
‘wesoning a overs iypolycactsc com Jounal
ofthe Raj Sockets of Medicine, 77, 193-195
Promo Anais Jour