Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Versus
JUDGMENT
Dipak Misra, J.
Leave granted.
Page1
2
Act, 1986 (for brevity the Act) before the learned Judicial
Page2
3
cruelty and had been living separately and hence, she was
code in Misc. Crl. Case No. 188 of 2005. Before the High
Page3
4
Iddat period. It was also urged that the wife was only
Quite apart from the above, both the parties also had
factual score.
Page4
5
Page5
6
the courts below had rightly concluded that the wife was
125 of the Code; and further that the said orders deserved
jurisdiction.
Page6
7
Act after the divorce for grant of mahr and return of gifts
1
(1985) 2 SCC 556
Page7
8
Code and that mahr is not such a quantum which can ipso
Code.
2
(2001) 7 SCC 740
Page8
9
Page9
10
Page10
11
Page11
12
Page12
13
Act are complied with. The Court noticed that in the said
3
2002 (6) SCALE 165
Page13
14
while taking note of the factual score to the effect that the
Page14
15
of ultimate consequence.
4
(2010) 1 SCC 666
Page15
16
Page16
17
Page17
18
hold that the proceeding after the divorce took place was
not maintainable.
Page18
19
case.
hereinabove.
J.
[Dipak Misra]
Page19
20
J.
[Vikramajit Sen]
New Delhi;
April 16, 2014.
Page20