Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Final Accuracy

    Uploaded by

    omzep
    6 views11 pages
    This document appears to contain results from an experimental analysis comparing different machine learning classifiers and feature sets on a classification task. It includes accuracy results for support vector machine (SVM) classifiers using linear, polynomial and radial basis function (RBF) kernels, and random forest (RF) classifiers, using different feature scales and combinations. The highest individual accuracies were around 89% for linear SVM and RF classifiers. Combining multiple features such as Gabor filter responses, first order statistics and second order statistics achieved further improved accuracies up to around 91% for linear SVM classifiers.

    Original Description:

    Accuracy

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document appears to contain results from an experimental analysis comparing different machine learning classifiers and feature sets on a classification task. It includes accuracy results for support vector machine (SVM) classifiers using linear, polynomial and radial basis function (RBF) kernels, and random forest (RF) classifiers, using different feature scales and combinations. The highest individual accuracies were around 89% for linear SVM and RF classifiers. Combining multiple features such as Gabor filter responses, first order statistics and second order statistics achieved further improved accuracies up to around 91% for linear SVM classifiers.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views11 pages

    Final Accuracy

    Uploaded by

    omzep
    This document appears to contain results from an experimental analysis comparing different machine learning classifiers and feature sets on a classification task. It includes accuracy results for support vector machine (SVM) classifiers using linear, polynomial and radial basis function (RBF) kernels, and random forest (RF) classifiers, using different feature scales and combinations. The highest individual accuracies were around 89% for linear SVM and RF classifiers. Combining multiple features such as Gabor filter responses, first order statistics and second order statistics achieved further improved accuracies up to around 91% for linear SVM classifiers.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 11

    Experimental analysis

    scale12
    SVM_linear 89.2
    scale12 scale-13 scale-23 scale123 SVM_poly 72.4
    SVM_linear 89.2 83.2 76.8 75.4 SVM_rbf 64.8
    SVM_poly 72.4 63.2 73.8 69.2
    SVM_rbf 64.8 71 64.8 72.4 scale-13
    SVM_linear 83.2
    SVM_poly 63.2
    SVM_rbf 71
    scale12 scale-13 scale-23 scale123
    RF_linear 86.2 81.4 78.4 78.6 scale-23
    RF_poly 77 80 75.4 77.2 SVM_linear 76.8
    RF_rbf 66.2 77.2 76.8 73.8 SVM_poly 73.8
    SVM_rbf 64.8
    100
    90 scale123
    80
    70 SVM_linear 75.4
    60 SVM_poly 69.2
    50
    SVM_rbf 72.4
    40
    30
    20
    10
    0
    scale12 scale-13 scale-23 scale123
    SVM_linear
    SVM_poly
    SVM_rbf

    100
    90
    80
    70
    60
    50
    40
    30
    20
    10
    0
    scale12 scale-13 scale-23 scale123
    RF_linear
    RF_poly
    RF_rbf
    scale12 Individual lamda values
    RF_linear 86.2
    RF_poly 77
    RF_rbf 66.2 lamda5 lamda4 lamda3 lamda2 lamda1
    classifier
    scale-13 svm-poly 80 86 71 80 75
    RF_linear 81.4 RF-poly 76.8 91 72 74 74
    RF_poly 80
    RF_rbf 77.2
    classifier
    scale-23 svm-linear 86.2 85 80 77 85
    RF_linear 78.4 RF-linear 81.6 85 75 82 82
    RF_poly 75.4
    RF_rbf 76.8
    classifier
    scale123 svm-rbf 67.8 78 72 69 77
    RF_linear 78.6 RF-rbf 86.4 74 83 76 82
    RF_poly 77.2
    RF_rbf 73.8
    lamda3 lamda2 lamda1
    svm-poly 71 80 75 RF-poly
    svm-linear 80 77 85 RF-linear
    svm-rbf 72 69 77 RF-rbf

    svm-poly svm-linear svm-rbf

    90
    80
    70
    60
    50
    40
    30
    20
    10
    0
    lamda3 lamda2 lamda1
    lamda3 lamda2 lamda1
    72 74 74
    75 82 82
    83 76 82

    RF-poly RF-linear RF-rbf


    84
    82
    80
    78
    76
    74
    72
    70
    68
    66
    lamda3 lamda2 lamda1
    Gabor_as filter gabor as feature

    svm-poly 68.2 svm-poly 78.6


    RF-poly 66.6 RF-poly 84.6

    svm-linea 42.6 svmlinear 89.2


    RF-linear 46.4 RF-linear 86.2

    svm-rbf 49.2 svm-rbf 75.4


    RF-rbf 57.2 RF-rbf 78.4

    poly linear rbf poly linear rbf


    svm 68.2 42.6 49.2 svm 78.6 89.2 75.4
    RF 66.6 46.4 57.2 RF 84.6 86.2 78.4

    70 90

    60
    85
    50

    40 80
    svm svm
    30 RF RF
    75
    20
    70
    10

    0 65
    poly linear rbf poly linear rbf
    svm
    RF
    Individual_features Accuracy First+Second+Gabor
    Accuracy
    FO SO FSO classifiers FSO
    svm-rbf 84.8 69.4 77 svm-rbf 77
    RF-rbf 86.2 81.6 81.6 RF-rbf 81.6

    FO SO FSO FSO
    svm-linear 80.2 81.8 73.8 svm-linear 73.8
    RF-linear 72.2 73.8 80 RF-linear 80

    FO SO FSO FSO
    svm-poly 69 75.4 67.8 svm-poly 67.8
    RF-poly 80 78.4 78.4 RF-poly 78.4

    100
    80
    60
    40 svm-rbf
    RF-rbf
    20
    0
    FO SO FSO

    84
    82
    80
    78
    76
    74 svm-
    linear
    72
    70
    68
    66
    FO SO FSO

    85

    80

    75

    70 svm-
    poly
    65

    60
    FO SO FSO
    First+Second+Gabor Accuracy Table
    Accuracy
    GF GF+FSO classifiers FSO GF GF+FSO
    64.8 75.4 svm-rbf 77 64.8 75.4
    66.2 78.4 RF-rbf 81.6 66.2 78.4
    svm-linear 73.8 89.2 90.6
    GF GF+FSO RF-linear 80 86.2 83.4
    89.2 90.6 svm-poly 67.8 72.4 78.6
    86.2 83.4 RF-poly 78.4 77 84.6

    GF GF+FSO
    72.4 78.6 Accuracy Table
    77 84.6
    classifiers FSO GF GF+FSO
    svm-rbf 77 64.8 75.4
    svm-linear 73.8 89.2 90.6
    svm-poly 67.8 72.4 78.6

    SVM-LINEAR 12 13 20 23 26
    sensitivity 88 83 100 91 100 462
    specificity 80 100 80 100 80 440

    RF-linear 13 17 19 22 23
    sensitivity 83 86 88 75 64 396
    specificity 71 83 100 80 100 434
    Accuracy Table

    classifiers FSO GF GF+FSO


    RF-rbf 81.6 66.2 78.4
    RF-linear 80 86.2 83.4
    RF-poly 78.4 77 84.6

    92.4 92
    88 88

    79.2 79
    86.8 87
    Transformation

    classifiers FSO GF GF+FSO


    accuracy _after applying quadratic(exponential
    svm-linear 73.8 89.2 90.6
    RF-linear 80 86.2 83.4 gabor-exponential 13 16
    svm-linear 100 92
    rf-linear 77 85

    Gabor +statistical Transformation(Gabor+Statistical)

    classifiers FSO GF GF+FSO

    svm-linear 73.8 89.2 90.6 92.2


    RF-linear 80 86.2 83.4 87.6

    SVM-LINEAR
    sensitivity 92 94.4
    specificity 88 93.2

    RF-linear
    sensitivity 79 90.2
    specificity 87 70.6
    g quadratic(exponential) transformation in the final feature gabor-exponential
    svm sensitivity
    17 20 21 Specificity
    92 92 85 461 92.2
    92 92 92 438 87.6
    gabor-exponential
    RF Sensitivity
    Specificity

    mation(Gabor+Statistical)
    13 14 16 17 21
    100 90 100 100 82 472 94.4 94.4
    100 100 86 80 100 466 93.2 93.2

    100 80 100 89 82 451 90.2 90.2


    40 67 71 75 100 353 70.6 70.6

    You might also like