It's a brief critique of Arundhati Roy's new novel The Ministry of Utmost Happiness.It examines the author's preoccupation with her preset values, her activism and her obsessive preoccupation with Human rights.
Original Title
Review Article on Arundhati Roy's" The Ministry of utmost Happiness."
It's a brief critique of Arundhati Roy's new novel The Ministry of Utmost Happiness.It examines the author's preoccupation with her preset values, her activism and her obsessive preoccupation with Human rights.
It's a brief critique of Arundhati Roy's new novel The Ministry of Utmost Happiness.It examines the author's preoccupation with her preset values, her activism and her obsessive preoccupation with Human rights.
Ministry of Utmost Happiness,"is a gritty and baggy fictional tome that defies the binaries that operate the narrative structure of fiction.Rather, the novel makes an attempt to agglutinate as much as possible into its narrative structure.The spa able to be able absorb hefty details by closely moving towards the genre of realism that became most popular with writers like Naipaul It's the mid-space between fiction and meta-fiction that becomes a leeway for creatively exploiting the post- truth reality as lucidly and autthentically as possible.Roy's deft choice of the subject is so geared as to encompass contemporary reality of twenty-years period that spans between her first novel "THe God of Small Things " and the present.She says:" I write a book when I've to write.The only ambition I've is the ambition of art.I wanted to experiment to be able to throw it away."This the solid core of the novel that reveals Roy in her most ambitious best, with material of the twenty long eventful years of contemporary Indian history shaping the finer contours of her fiction.It also carries her felt-experience recorded with utmost fidelity so as to achieve fictional verisimilude.As a "performative radicalyst",Roy shifts the whole axis of the novel into an exposition of the political and social realities as she confronts them.As Human Right's activist who is wedded to HUaman Rights and civil liberties she has cherished, and aspired to continue with them, her ciri de couer is as much against the architecture of a political hegemony that denies freedom to individuals as against "man's in humanity to man." Her activism so pervasive that it, at times, throws up the fictional deriguer larboard that destroys the ambient narrative movement. In fact, there is not much of a story in thenovel.It centres around Anjum, who runs out of her family to join the hijra commune intending to lead a life of freedom and seclusion , away from the glare and glitter ofthe civilised urban Delhi's life.In fact, the self-chosen her privacy becomes her modus vivendi, Here is succinctly the description of her predicament painted by the novelist in the starkest of details: "She lived in the graveyard like a tree.At dawn she saw the crows off and welcomed the bats home.At dusk she did the opposite,Between shifts she confirred the ghosts of vultures that loomed in the high branche.p.1"She calls her home "Kwabgah" , a parallel world whose inhabitants are marginalised and dispossessed individualslike Sayeeda,Zainab,Ustad Khusloom,Saddam, and Mary, and the irrepressible Nimmo Gorukpuri with whom she shares her life of privation.Hell closes in on them with the shift occurs in their lives when there is a change in the politics of the country with the advent of the BJP rule that ushers in the politics of division. Roy describes the evntualities that followed in some telling details:"Gujarat ka Lalla had swept the polls and was the new Primew Minister.A devotee giftedtakes on him a pin-striped suit with Lalla Lalla Lalla woven into the fabric.He wore it to greet the visiting Heads of State.Every week, he addressed the people of the country directly in an emotional radio broadcast.He disseminated his message of Cleanliness, Purity and Sacrifice for the nation...p.401".This bears a resemblance with real persons, but one cannot read too much between the lines.Here reality merges with the fictive nature of the narrative.The truth is that Roy fails to play down her suppressio vari such that her anger takes over the sobriety she could have allowed to seep through the pages of her book.She writes elsewhere:"How to tell a shattered story? By slowly becoming it and everybody.p.416 "3.This is her own admission as to why the novel became so discursive and rambling that one needs to piece th togeth to arriv at the meaning. This sets the tone and texture of the whole novel that takes on the establishment in the form of an extended diatribe .Roy is as much against the forces of evil let lose by the present-day rulers as against the agendising politics unleashed by the ruling government.Though Anjum becomes a celebrity on her own, and being visited by politicians of all hues, cinema personalities, and journalists seeking her favour, she is haunted by the social ostracism that impedes her flight into freedom."Anjum would ordinarily have been in danger.But her desolation pretected her.Unleashed at last from her social protocall,it rose her up in all her majesty.p.61".And she fights back the saffron brigade that tried to sujugate her.She defends all her flock from any humiliation from politicians or social groups which hindered their progress towards self- definition and recognition as homo sapiens.This quest for self-definition made her stubborn and revolting, and transformed into a veritable viragom and a woman with a substance. It's only in the second half of the book, when ths scene shifts to Kashmir, that the narrative acquires both self-defining precision and inrernal cohesion by shifting the locus on the triadic characters- Tilottama,Naga and Musa, the architecture students of Delhi university whose lives take diverse courses of experiential awareness..Naga becomes a journalist ,and takes on the establishment, while Musa tries to dangle with bellicose insurrection ,and joins the band of Kashmiri jihadis only to be hunted down, and rendered a homeless.In his serach for freedom and with a missionary zeal for collective happines, he espouses the cause of all the people of Kasmir.With his mission turning shattered and dented, he turns to unbridled violence, aspiring to liberate the land and his people from military occupation,The love- story that could have run smoothly between Tillo and Musad edges them out into a series of traumatic shits .Musa is caught by the Captain Amrik Sigh, the miltary officer postsed in Kashmir to supress jihadism, but manages escape into freedom.Roy describes how militancy in Kashmir raised its hydra-head abetted by terrorists in Pakistan, and how the Indian military rulers failed to curb terrorism in spite of the strong-arm techniques they deployed to extirminate terrorism from Kashmir.The army camps became veritable torture chambers.Poeple were arrested and beaten up, and many times they became so distraught that they have lost their hope to to live peacefully .Schools were closed and colleges and universities shut down for months.Roy describes the trauma that Kashmir went through in telling details:"As the war progressed in the Kashmir valley, garveyards became as common as multy- storey parking lots that were springing up like burgeoning cities in the plains.When they ran out of space,they became double deckered like the buses in Srinagar..P.319."4.The narrative ends with rhe hope of a new resurgent Kashmir ,where its people could live peacefully without hysterics and hysteria that so for wrapped them up into jejune discomfiture.The apt quote from Mandalstam amply sums up a happy ending: "This is also a journey, and they can't take it away from us."Hopefully,Tillo and Musa are reunited when the scene shits to Delhi again.
The trouble with Roy is that she attempts to
plunge so deeply into the facade of reality that she forgets she is bound to "the art", of fiction rather than hankering after her pet theme of ferreting out a rebellion for a cause 7uat a heavy toll on the fictive nature of the narrative.She takes a detours into sentimen gluey setimentality and rubuctious vituparation.But her extensive use of "magical realism" takes us so closer to V S Naipaul to Marquez and Rushdie saves her dystpic vision.Nonetheless Roy joins the canon of writing that gratuitously zooms her into a celebrity status, especially in the west that heaps a lavish praise on her novel.And if her novel is short- listed for the Booker again,it reveals the gravitas and aural ambience that controls the structure of the narrative..As one of her critics,James Wouldm had asked her rightly;"Which way will the ambitious contemporary novel go?Will it dare a picture of life or just a shout a spectacle." I think, she did both to abide as a novelist of no mean talent. *****