Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bennett, Jonathan - State of Practice Micropile Structural and Geotechnical Design PDF
Bennett, Jonathan - State of Practice Micropile Structural and Geotechnical Design PDF
StateofPractice:Micropile
StructuralandGeotechnicalDesign
Presentedby:
JonathanK.Bennett,PE,D.GE
Presentedto:
DFI/ADSCMicropile Seminar,SaltLakeCity,UT
March21,2013
Introduction
ThisSessionsObjectives:
Explorethestateofpracticeintermsofdesign.
WellDoThatByCovering:
AQuickIntroductiontoMicropiles inGeneral
CurrentDesignCodesandPractice
DesignExampleandComparison
Micropile ResearchFindingsthatExtendtheStateofPractice
1
WhatisaMicropile?
WhatisaMicropile?
Saidanotherway,AMicropile isapilethat
Isdrilledandgrouted,
Is12inchesorlessindiameter,
Isareplacementvs adisplacementpile,
Istypicallyreinforced,and
Mayormaynothavesteelcasingleftinplace
permanently.
2
Micropile Installation
Micropiles aretypicallyinstalledbydrillingtheminto
thegroundusingeithercasedoruncasedconstruction
androtary,rotarypercussiveordownholehammer
drillingsystems.
Temporaryorpermanentcasingcanbeutilizedfor
installationofmicropiles wheresupportofthedrilled
holesidesisrequired(cavingsoils).
Generally,theholeisdrilledandcleaned,the
reinforcingcoreinsertedintotheholeandthenthe
holeisgroutedfromthebottomupusingatremie
groutingmethods.
Whererockdrillingisrequired,rotarypercussiveor
downholehammerequipmentisusedforrapidhole
advancement.
Micropile Features
Micropiles canbeinstalledatanglesandare
abletoresistbothaxialandlateralloads.
Micropiles developtheiraxialcapacity
primarilythroughthebondbetweengrout
andsoilorrockinthebondedzoneofthe
pile.Becauseofthis,micropiles provideboth
tensionandcompressionresistancethus
makingthemusefulinavarietyof
applications.
Theyareinstalledusingmostlythesame
drillingandgroutingequipmentthatisused
fortiebacksandsoilnailing.
3
Micropile Features
Becauseoftheinstallationmethodsused
(DHHandrotarypercussivedrilling),
micropiles canbeusedinsoilandrock
conditionswheretheuseofconventional
deepfoundationsystemsarenota
reasonablealternative(suchasKarst
topography,wheremodestobstructionsare
present,orinlowheadroomconditions).
Micropile Origins
4
Micropile Origins
Dr.Lizzi startedtoworkforthecompanySACIFin1947,butshortlyafterwardswasthefirst(andfor
sometime,theonly)civilengineerofthenewlyformedcompany,Fondedile,whereheremainedas
TechnicalDirectorfornearly50years.Duringthistimewhile,Italyspecifically,andEuropegenerally,
werebeingreconstructed,hedevelopedthetechnologylaternamedpali radice (rootpile,micropile)
fortherestorationofdamagedmonumentsandbuildingsattheScuola Angiulli inNaples.Thefirst
internationalapplicationofmicropiles wasseeninGermanyin1952fortheunderpinningofKrupp,in
EssenBochumandthentheKerkini DaminGreece.Thetechniquewaslaterappliedinhundredsof
worksbyFondedile invariouscountries.Pali radice havebeenusedextensivelyintherestorationof
monuments,e.g.PonteVecchio inFlorencein1966andthestabilizationoftheLeaningTowerof
Burano inVenice.HediedinNaplesonAugust28,2003.[Wikipedia]
Micropile Origins
10
5
Micropile Origins
11
HistoryandIncreaseinUsage
6
TypesofMicropiles
13
TypesofMicropiles
TypicalHighCapacity
Micropile
14
7
TypesofMicropiles:HollowBar
HollowBarMicropile
AkaInjectionBoreor
SelfDrillingAnchor
Advantages:
Highbondtransfervalues.
Canbeinstalledincavingsoils
withoutcasing.
15
TypesofMicropiles:HollowBar
16
8
TypesofMicropiles:HollowBar
17
TypesofMicropiles
FHWADesignApplicationClassifications
18
9
TypesofMicropiles
FHWAConstructionTypeClassifications
TypeA GravityGrouted
TypeB PressureGroutedThroughCasing
TypeC SingleGlobalPostGrout
TypeD MultipleRepeatablePostGrout
TypeE* HollowBar
19
Micropile Materials
PipeCasing(typicallymillsecondaryoilfieldcasing)
SolidorHollowReinforcingBars
NeatCementGrout
20
10
Micropile Materials:Casing
Typically,80ksi MillSecondary
OilfieldTubularisthenational
normformicropile casing.
21
Micropile Materials:CoreSteel
CoresteelcanbesolidorhollowbarsandistypicallyASTM
A615grades75,80or95orASTMA722Grade150.
22
11
Micropile Materials:Grout
Groutusedformicropiles istypicallyaneatwater cementmixthat
mayormaynotcontainplasticizingadmixturesforflowability.
23
Micropile InstallationEquipment
Useessentiallythesameorsimilardrillingandgroutingequipment
usedforinstallationofdrilledandgroutedgroundanchors.Thereis
awiderangeofsizesandconfigurationsformicropile drills.
24
12
Micropile InstallationEquipment
25
Micropile InstallationEquipment
26
13
Micropile InstallationEquipment
27
Micropile InstallationEquipment
28
14
Micropile InstallationEquipment
29
Micropile InstallationEquipment
30
15
Micropile InstallationEquipment
31
Micropile InstallationEquipment
32
16
Micropile InstallationEquipment
33
Micropile InstallationEquipment
34
17
Micropile InstallationEquipment
35
Micropile InstallationEquipment
36
18
Micropile InstallationEquipment
37
Micropile InstallationEquipment
38
19
Micropile InstallationEquipment
39
Micropile InstallationEquipment
40
20
Micropile InstallationEquipment
41
Micropile InstallationEquipment
42
21
Micropile Applications
FoundationPiles
FoundationSupportthroughDifficultSubsurface
Conditions
FoundationUnderpinning/Retrofit
SlopeStabilization
EarthRetention(AFrame&ReticulatedStructures)
VerticalSoilReinforcement Micropiles forSettlement
ControlinSoftSoils
GroundSourceHeating/Cooling EnergyPiles
43
Micropile Applications
44
22
DifficultSubsurfaceConditions
Karstisadistinctivetopographyinwhichthelandscapeislargelyshapedbythedissolving
actionofwateroncarbonatebedrock(usuallylimestone,dolomite,ormarble).
Thisgeologicprocess,occurringoverlongperiodsoftime,resultsinunusualsurfaceand
subsurfacefeaturesrangingfromsinkholes,verticalshafts,disappearingstreams,and
springs,tocomplexundergrounddrainagesystemsandcaves.
45
KarstFeatures
46
23
KarstFeatures:PinnacledLimestone
47
KarstFeatures:PinnacledLimestone
48
24
KarstMap
49
Micropile Feasibility
Micropiles aremostcosteffectivewhenoneormoreofthe
followingconditionsexist:
Difficultsubsurfaceconditions,e.g.soilswithboulders,or
debris,existingfoundations,highgroundwater,etc.
Restrictedaccessorlimitedoverheadclearance.
Subsurfacevoids(karst).
Vibrationsandnoisemustbeminimized.
Settlementmustbeminimized.
Relativelyhighunitloadsarerequired(50k 1000k)and
otherdrillingmethodsareineffective.
50
25
Micropile Design
Fundamentally,Micropile designistheprocessof
properlymatchingmicropile componentsand
overallconfigurationtotheloadsrequired.
Intheinterestoftimeandforsimplicity,wewillbe
examiningdesignfromtheperspectiveof
structuralandgeotechnicaldesignforresisting
axialloadsonly.
51
Micropile Design
LoadTransferMechanism
Formicropiles,theaxialloadisresistedprimarilyby
thegrouttosoilorgrouttorockbondcapacityin
thebondedzoneofthepile.Thisallowsresistance
tobothtensionandcompressionforces.
Endbearingisnottypicallyconsideredexceptinthe
caseofacasingonlymicropile withaminimalrock
socket.Inthatcase,werelyontheconfinement
conditionoftherocksockettoprovideresistancefar
inexcessofwhatwouldtypicallybeconsidered
basedonpublishedbearingcapacities.
52
26
Micropile Design
LoadTransfer FullyBonded
53
Micropile Design
LoadTransfer SocketedCasing
54
27
Micropile Design
LoadTransfer Casedw/Reinforcing
55
Micropile Design
BasicConsiderationsforMicropile Design
DeterminationofAxialandLateralLoading
Conditions
Micropile StructuralDesign
CasedSection
UncasedSection
GeotechnicalDesignCapacity
PiletoFoundationConnection
Deformations/Serviceability
VerificationofAssumptionsthroughTestingandQC
56
28
Micropile Design
Micropile DesignGuidesandSpecifications
1997FHWAMicropile StateofPractice
2000FHWAMicropile Guidelines
2003DFIGuideSpecification
2005NHI/FHWAMicropile ReferenceManual
2006IBCMicropile Section(2009Rev)
2007AASHTOLRFDDesignSpecification(2010Rev)
ForthcomingADSC/DFIMicropile Specification
ForthcomingAASHTOLRFDConstructionSpecification
ForthcomingNHI/FHWAReferenceManualRevions (LRFD)
57
Micropile Design
58
29
Micropile Design
CurrentDesignApproachesforMicropiles
ServiceLoadDesign
FederalHighwayAdministrationManuals
InternationalBuildingCode
MostLocalBuildingCodes
LRFDDesign
AASHTOLRFDBridgeDesignSpecifications
ForthcomingFHWA/NHIManual
59
Micropile Design
60
30
Micropile DesignSLDvs LRFD
ServiceLoadorWorkingLoadDesign
ServiceLoadUltimateLoad/FS
AllowableStressorWorkingStressDesign
ActualStressYieldorUltimateStress/FS
61
LoadandResistanceFactorDesign(LRFD)
utilizesvariousLoadFactorswithmagnitudes
basedontypeofloadtoaccountforvariability
inloadingandvariousResistanceFactorsof
varyingmagnitudesbasedonmaterialor
resistancetypetoaccountforvariabilityin
resistance.
62
31
Micropile DesignSLDvs LRFD
63
(FHWA,1997)
64
32
Micropile DesignSLDvs LRFD
LOADCOMBINATIONS
BuildingcodesspecifydifferentloadcombinationsforASDandLRFDduetothe
differenceinthewayloadsareconsideredinthetwodifferentmethods.The
combinationsbelowarefromASCE7andthe2010IBC.
ASDLoadCombinations LRFDLoadCombinations
D+F 1.4(D+F)
D+H+F+L+T 1.2(D+F+T)+1.6(L+H)+0.5(Lr orSorR)
D+H+F+(Lr orSorR) 1.2D+1.6(Lr orSorR)+(L or0.8W)
D+H+F+0.75(L+T)+0.75(Lr orSorR) 1.2D+1.6W+L+0.5(Lr orSorR)
D+H+F+(Wor0.7E) 1.2D+1.0E+L+0.2S
D+H+F+0.75(W or0.7E)+0.75L+0.75(Lr or 0.9D+1.6W+1.6H
SorR)
0.6D+W+H 0.9D+1.0E+1.6H
0.6D+0.7E+H
65
Itisdifficulttodirectly compareSLDresultsand
LRFDresultsbecauseinLRFD,thefactoredloads
usedincomputingrequiredresistancevary
basedonhowmuchofdifferenttypesofload
arepresentbecauseloadfactorsaredifferent
fordifferenttypesofload.Otherwise,the
relationshipbetweenSLDandLRFDwouldbe
thesimplerelationship:
LoadFactor/ResistanceFactor=Factorof
Safety
66
33
Micropile StructuralDesign
BasicConsiderationsforMicropile Structural
Design
CasedLengthAnalysis/Design
UncasedLengthAnalysis/Design
DesignofComponentsinthosezones
Youmightincludepilecapconnectiondesignin
thestructuraldesigncategory.
67
Micropile StructuralDesign
68
34
Micropile StructuralDesign
CompressionStrength(Ultimate)
Puc =fcAg +Fy As
CompressionStrength(Allowable)
Pac =AfcAg +BFy Ac +CFy Ab
TensionStrength(Ultimate)
Put =Fy As
TensionStrength(Allowable)
Pat =DFy As
WhereA,B,CandDarereductionfactorswhichexpresstheallowablestressesasa
percentageofultimatestress.Themagnitudeofthesereductionfactorsvariesdependingon
whichdesigncodeyouareusing.
Thecoreassumptionwithregardtotheabovecompressivestrengthformulasisthatthepile
issufficientlysupportedalongitslengthbysoilorrocksuchthatbucklingcannotoccur.Most
soilswillprovidealevelofsupportthatissufficienttoprecludeoutrightbuckling.However,
thestiffnessoftheoverburdensoilscaneffecttheactualpilecapacity.Thisisnottakeninto
accountintheformulas.
69
CompressionStrength(Allowable)
Pac =0.40fcAg +0.47Fy As
TensionStrength(Allowable)
Pat =0.55Fy Ab
MaximumTestLoad(Allowable)
Ptc =0.8(fcAg +Fy As)
Ptt =0.8Fy Ab forASTMA615material
Ptt =0.8Fu Ab forASTMA722material
70
35
Micropile StructuralDesign IBC
CompressionLoading
Pac =0.33fcAg +0.40Fy As
TensionLoading
Pat =0.60Fy Ab(sameasPTI)
Steelyieldstresslimitedto80ksi.
Steelreinforcementmustcarryatleast40%of
theload.
71
Micropile StructuralDesignComparison
FHWADesignCriteria
Compression: Pa =0.40fcAg +0.47FyAb
Tension: Pa =0.55FyAb
DFI/IBCDesignCriteria
Compression: Pa =0.33fcAg +0.40FyAb
Tension: Pa =0.60FyAb(sameasPTI)
ImposedLimitations
FHWACompression: Fy =87ksi max(straincompatibility)
DFICompression: Fy =87ksi max(straincompatibility)
IBCCompression: Fy =80ksi max
IBCCompression: 0.40FyAb >=0.40Pa
72
36
Micropile StructuralDesign
73
74
37
Micropile StructuralDesign LRFD
Notethatinthisformat,theproductofload
factorsandmeanloadeffectsarecombinedas
opposedtocombiningloadeffectsalone.This
differsfromtraditionalWorkingStressorService
Loadanalysiswheretheloadeffectsaloneare
combinedwithoutloadfactors.
75
10.9.3.10.2 AxialCompressiveResistance
76
38
Micropile StructuralDesign LRFD
10.9.3.10.2 AxialCompressiveResistance
10.9.3.10.2a CasedLength
77
10.9.3.10.2 AxialCompressiveResistance
10.9.3.10.2b UncasedLength
78
39
Micropile StructuralDesign LRFD
10.9.3.10.3 AxialTensionResistance
79
10.5.5 ResistanceFactors
10.5.5.2.5 Micropiles
ResistancefactorsshallbeselectedfromTable10.5.5.2.51basedon
themethodusedfordeterminingthenominalaxialpileresistance.If
theresistancefactorsprovidedinTable10.5.5.2.51aretobeapplied
topilesinpotentiallycreepingsoils,highlyplasticsoils,weakrock,or
othermarginalgroundtype,theresistancefactorvaluesintheTable
shouldbereducedby20percenttoreflectgreaterdesignuncertainty.
TheresistancefactorsinTable10.5.5.2.51werecalibratedbyfittingto
ASDprocedurestemperedwithengineeringjudgment.Theresistance
factorsinTable10.5.5.2.5.2forstructuralresistancewerecalibrated
byfittingtoASDproceduresandareequaltoorslightlymore
conservativethancorrespondingresistancefactorsfromSection5of
theAASHTOLRFDSpecificationsforreinforcedconcretecolumndesign.
80
40
Micropile StructuralDesign LRFD
81
82
41
Micropile StructuralDesign LRFDComparison
StructuralDesign Comparison
CompressionCase
FHWAASD
Pac =0.40fcAg +0.47fy As
IBCASD
Pac =0.33fcAg +0.40fy As
AASHTOLRFDEQUIVALENTASDFORMULA
Pac =0.36fcAg +0.425fy As (LFavg =1.5)
Pac =0.38fcAg +0.45fy As (LFavg =1.42)
83
StructuralDesign Comparison
TensionCase
FHWAASD
Pat =0.55fy Ab
IBCASD
Pat =0.60fy Ab
AASHTOLRFDEQUIVALENTASDFORMULA
Pat =0.533fy Ab (LFavg =1.5)
Pat =0.563fy Ab (LFavg =1.42)
84
42
Micropile StructuralDesign LRFDComparison
Micropile Information(Given)
CasingSize: 7ODX0.500
CasingStrength: N80MillSecondary
Fy =80ksi minimum
CoreSize: #18FullLength
CoreStrength: ASTMA615Gr 80
Fy =80ksi
GroutStrength: fc=4000psi
CasedLength: 40.00
RockType: Limestone
SocketDiameter: 7.5=0.625
PlungeLength: 1.00
85
CASEDSECTION
Abar =4.00in2 (#18)
Acasing =3.1416(ro2ri2)=10.21in2
Agrout =3.1416(3)24.00=24.27in2
UNCASEDSECTION
Abar =4.00in2 (#18)
Agrout =3.1416(3.75)24.00=40.18in2
86
43
Micropile StructuralDesign LRFDComparison
CompressionStructuralDesign CasedLength
87
CompressionStructuralDesign UncasedLength
88
44
Micropile StructuralDesign LRFDComparison
TensionStructuralDesign
89
TensionStructuralDesign
90
45
Micropile StructuralDesign LRFDComparison
StructuralDesign Comparison
91
StructuralDesign Comparison
CompressionAllowableServiceLoadCasedLength
580
560
540
AxialLoad(kips)
520
500
480
460
440
FHWAASD IBCASD AASHTOLRFD(LF=1.50) AASHTOLRFD(LF=1.42)
92
46
Micropile StructuralDesign LRFDComparison
StructuralDesign Comparison
CompressionAllowableServiceLoadUncasedLength
220
210
200
AxialLoad(kips)
190
180
170
160
FHWAASD IBCASD AASHTOLRFD(LF=1.50) AASHTOLRFD(LF=1.42)
93
StructuralDesign Comparison
TensionAllowableServiceLoad
195
190
185
AxialLoad(kips)
180
175
170
165
160
FHWAASD IBCASD AASHTOLRFD(LF=1.50) AASHTOLRFD(LF=1.42)
94
47
Micropile /FoundationConnection
95
Micropile GeotechnicalDesign
Fordesignpurposes,micropiles areusuallyassumed
totransfertheirloadtothegroundthroughgrout
togroundskinfriction,withoutanycontribution
fromendbearing(FHWA,1997).
Thisassumptionresultsinapilethatisforthemost
partgeotechnically equivalentintensionand
compression.
SuggestedbondvaluescanbefoundintheFHWA
ManualsaswellasinthePTIRecommendationsfor
Prestressed RockandSoilAnchors.
96
48
Micropile GeotechnicalDesign
97
Micropile GeotechnicalDesign
AllowableGeotechnicalCapacity FHWA
IBCCodedoesnotofferspecificguidancefor
bondvaluesforgeotechnicaldesignofmicropiles.
98
49
Micropile GeotechnicalDesign
Summary of Typical Grout to Ground Bond Values for Preliminary Micropile Design
Soil / Rock Description Typical Range of Grout-to-Ground Nominal Strength
Type A Type B Type C Type D
English (psi) SI (kPa) English (psi) SI (kPa) English (psi) SI (kPa) English (psi) SI (kPa)
min max avg min max avg min max avg min max avg min max avg min max avg min max avg min max avg
Silt and Clay (some sand) 5.1 10.2 7.6 35 70 52.5 5.1 13.8 9.4 35 95 65 7.3 17.4 12.3 50 120 85 7.3 21.0 14.1 50 145 97.5
soft, medium plastic
Silt and Clay (some sand) 7.3 17.4 12.3 50 120 85 10.2 27.6 18.9 70 190 130 13.8 27.6 20.7 95 190 142.5 13.8 27.6 20.7 95 190 142.5
stiff, dense to very dense
Sand (some silt) 10.2 21.0 15.6 70 145 107.5 10.2 27.6 18.9 70 190 130 13.8 27.6 20.7 95 190 142.5 13.8 34.8 24.3 95 240 167.5
fine, loose-medium dense
Sand (some silt, gravel) 13.8 31.2 22.5 95 215 155 17.4 52.2 34.8 120 360 240 21.0 52.2 36.6 145 360 252.5 21.0 55.8 38.4 145 385 265
fine-coarse, med-very dense
Gravel (some sand) 13.8 38.4 26.1 95 265 180 17.4 52.2 34.8 120 360 240 21.0 52.2 36.6 145 360 252.5 21.0 55.8 38.4 145 385 265
medium-very dense
Glacial Till (silt, sand, gravel) 13.8 27.6 20.7 95 190 142.5 13.8 45.0 29.4 95 310 202.5 17.4 45.0 31.2 120 310 215 17.4 48.6 33.0 120 335 227.5
medium-very dense, cemented
Soft Shales 29.7 79.8 54.8 205 550 377.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
fresh-moderate fracturing
little to no weathering
Slates and Hard Shales 74.7 200.2 137.4 515 1380 947.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
fresh-moderate fracturing
little to no weathering
Limestone 150.1 300.2 225.2 1035 2070 1553 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
fresh-moderate fracturing
little to no weathering
Sandstone 75.4 250.2 162.8 520 1725 1123 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
fresh-moderate fracturing
little to no weathering
Granite and Basalt 200.2 609.2 404.7 1380 4200 2790 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
fresh-moderate fracturing
little to no weathering
Type C - Primary grout placed under gravity head, then one phase of secondary "global" pressure grouting.
Type D - Primary grout placed under gravity head, then one or more phases of secondary "global" pressure grouting.
99
Micropile GeotechnicalDesign
10
0
50
Micropile GeotechnicalDesign
10
1
Section10.9.3 StrengthLimitStateDesign
10.9.3.5 NominalAxialCompression
ResistanceofaSingleMicropile
Micropiles shallbedesignedtoresistfailureof
thebondedlengthinsoilandrock,orfor
micropiles bearingonrock,failureoftherockat
themicropile tip.
10
2
51
Micropile GeotechnicalDesign LRFD
Section10.9.3.5 NominalAxialCompression
ResistanceofaSingleMicropile
Thefactoredresistanceofamicropile,RR,shallbetakenas:
10
3
Section10.9.3.5 NominalAxialCompression
ResistanceofaSingleMicropile
10
4
52
Micropile GeotechnicalDesign LRFD
10
5
10.9.3.5 NominalAxialCompressionResistanceofaSingle
Micropile
TheloadtestshallfollowtheproceduresspecifiedinASTM
D1143forcompressionandASTMD3689fortension.The
loadingprocedureshouldfollowtheQuickLoadTestMethod,
unlessdetailedlongertermloadsettlementdataisneeded,in
whichcasethestandardloadingprocedureshouldbeused.
UnlessspecifiedotherwisebytheEngineer,thepileaxial
(nominal)resistance shallbedeterminedfromthetestdata
usingtheDavissonMethodaspresentedinArticle10.7.3.8.2.
10
6
53
Micropile StructuralDesign LRFDLimitations
LoadCombinationsandLoadFactorsinSection3(Table
3.4.11)weredevelopedspecificallyforbridgesandmay
notbeapplicabletootherstructures.
CurrentResistanceFactorsarecalibratedbasedonfittingto
ASD,notonreliabilitytheory.Thereforedoesnottruly
reflectreliabilitybaseddesignatthistimeexceptinformat.
NoStrengthLimitStateChecksforlateralloads.Not
enoughconsensusexistsintermsofdesignmethodology
forLRFD.
Includesstraincompatibilityrelatedstresslimitationswhich
havebeenshowntobeerroneousforreinforcingina
confinedcondition.
DavissonisthecriteriafordeterminingtheResistanceofa
micropile.Davissonisconsideredbymanytobeoverly
conservativeandinappropriateformicropiles.
10
7
Micropile Testing
Itistypicalforanysubstantialmicropile projecttoinclude
somesortoftestingprogram.
GenerallybasedonASTMD1143QuickTest.
TheolderFHWAspecificationsprescribedtestingto2.5X
ServiceDesignLoad.
NewerFHWApublicationsrecommend2.0XDL.2.0DLis
appropriateinmostcases.Testto2.0DLforbesteconomy.
Tensiontestingisgenerallyconsideredtobeconservative
comparedtocompressiontestingbecauseitneglectsanyend
bearingandisoftenmoreeconomicalforcheckingcapacity.
Howevertensiontestresultswillnotgiverepresentative
movementresultsforcompressioncase.
Compressiontestingrequiresanchorstoholddowntesting
apparatusaddingtocostbutgivesrepresentativeresultsfor
compressionloading.
10
8
54
Micropile Testing
10
9
Micropile Testing
11
0
55
Micropile NewFrontiers
ADSC/DFIJointMicropile Committee
TheMicropile Committeeisajointcommitteecomprisedof
membersfromboththeADSCIAFDandtheDeepFoundations
Institute(DFI),andiscomprisedofinterestedengineering
professionalsdedicatedtoproviding:
primaryassistanceinthewritingofapplicablespecifications
review,commentaryandformalacceptanceofdesignand
constructionspecifications
anetworkofindustryprofessionalstoperformresearch
necessaryfortheadvancementofMicropile technologies
111
Micropile NewFrontiers
CommitteeObjectives
Havefour(4)committeemeetingsperyeartoconductthe
businessoftheCommittee,
Sponsorandexecuteone(1)totwo(2)industryeducational
seminarseachyear,
Canvasthecommitteemembershiptoinvestigatefutureresearch
activitiesandneedsthatmaybesuitabletoparticipateinor
recommendtotheADSCIASC(IndustryAdvancementSteering
Committee)orDFICommitteeProjectFund forsponsorship.
11
2
56
Micropile NewFrontiers
Specifications
DFI/ADSCGuidetoDraftingaSpecificationforMicropiles
AASHTOLRFDBridgeDesignSpecification Micropiles
AASHTOLRFDBridgeConstructionSpecifications Micropiles
InputonDevelopmentandMaintenanceofIBCMicropiles Section
CurrentlyupdatingDFI/ADSCMicropile GuideSpecification
WillprovideinputonNewFHWA/NHIMicropile Manual
11
3
Micropile NewFrontiers
Research
Micropile StrainCompatibilityTesting
Micropile BearingPlates:AreTheyNecessary
PositionPaperontheUseofMillSecondaryCasing
ReticulatedMicropile StateofPractice
11
4
57
Micropile NewFrontiers
Micropile StrainCompatibilityTesting
11
5
Micropile NewFrontiers
Micropile BearingPlates:AreTheyNecessary
11
6
58
Micropile NewFrontiers
PositionPaperontheUseofMillSecondaryCasing
11
7
Micropile NewFrontiers
ReticulatedMicropile StateofPractice
11
8
59
Questions?
Whatsa
Micropile?
11
9
Questions?
GeneralQ&A
12
0
60
Questions?
Formoreinformationonmicropiles:
ContactmeandIwillscheduleatimetocometoyourofficeandprovide
specificmicropile trainingtailoredtoyourneeds.
JonBennett j_bennett@brayman.com
(724)4431533x54107Office/(304)7074840Mobile
12
1
Questions?
THANKYOU!
forYourTimeandAttention
12
2
61
62