Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Implementing A UV Disinfection System - Ex-Sum
Implementing A UV Disinfection System - Ex-Sum
Executive Summary
ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................................1
OBJECTIVE OF THIS STUDY ..................................................................................................1
BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................2
STUDY AREA ...........................................................................................................................3
IMPLEMENTING A UV DISINFECTION SYSTEM ................................................................5
AN ALTERNATIVE POWER SYSTEM ....................................................................................6
COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF THE UV UNIT ..............................................................7
ASSESSING UV DISINFECTION IN A LOW-INCOME COMMUNITY .................................8
CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................................................... 11
REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 11
ABSTRACT
According to the World Health Organization, diarrheal diseases, many of which are
waterborne, kill 2.2 million children under the age of five every year. However, water,
sanitation, and hygiene practices may reduce diarrheal disease between 25% and 33%, on the
average. In Bolivia, a developing country, the access to improved water sources in urban
areas is about 96%, but in rural areas it drops to about 69%. The estimated percentage of
disinfected water supplied by water agencies is 52% when the rural sector is included.
Taking into account the sustainability of water supply projects in low-income regions, the
disinfection by ultraviolet (UV) light becomes an attractive alternative because of its
affordable capital and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs. Also, its reliability against
parasites such as Giardia and Cryptosporidium, which are difficult to treat otherwise, has
been greatly proven.
Definitions
Some useful definitions are presented below to gain a better understanding of the present
document.
Ultraviolet disinfection of water is a physical method that does not produce any harmful by-
products, and has been proven very effective in the inactivation of highly chlorine-resistant
organisms, such as protozoa. UV disinfection is defined as the absorption of light by
microorganisms in the 200-300 nm wavelength range (germicidal range), which causes
changes in the DNA and RNA of such microorganisms thus rendering them unviable. UV
light is usually emitted by mercury discharge lamps. Among the advantages of UV
disinfection are the features of being a physical method not producing any harmful by-
products, highly effective against protozoa, such as Cryptosporidium and Giardia, along with
being a relatively inexpensive process with a small footprint and fast operation. However, it
Implementing a Ultraviolet Disinfection System in a Low-Income 2
Area of Bolivia, South America
Executive Summary
has some disadvantages, such as a lack of a residual after treatment, difficulty in monitoring
the applied UV dose, and high dependence on a continuous electrical supply.
Operation and maintenance (O&M) costs of UV-based disinfection systems have been
estimated between US$0.02-0.04 per cubic meter (m3) in locations with access to the
electrical grid, and between US$0.14-0.19/m3 in off-grid locations. Other estimates include
US$10-100 the O&M costs per family per year and US$0.03 per family per week. The
capital costs, that is, the costs of the initial investment have been reported between US$300
and US$900, and as high as US$86,419, though these costs clearly depend on the size of the
systems and the community they are serving. The life cycle costs of water disinfection with
UV-based technologies, that is, the capital and O&M costs over their lifetimes have been
estimated to range from US$0.14 to US$2.35 per m3.
The equipment used in UV disinfection systems includes basic components such as the UV
reactor chamber, discharge UV lamps and quartz sleeves that protect the lamp from the
surrounding water. Additional equipment includes tanks, piping and pipe fittings, UV
sensors, alarms (depending on the source water quality), and alternative power systems in
those sites where an electrical grid is not readily available. All of these components should
provide durability, reliability and robustness if they are to operate in low-income areas.
However, in the case of the UV lamps, it is recommended that they are used for a maximum
period of one year, regardless of the actual time they spend on.
Regulatory background
STUDY AREA
The community of Cerro Grande is a rural community located about 60 km northwest of the
urban area of Ascensin, province of Santa Cruz, Bolivia, South America (Figure 1). Cerro
Considering all the physical and economic constraints found during the field work in Cerro
Grande, a UV disinfection unit was designed, built and validated to be implemented there.
Also, another commercially-available unit, donated by Trojan Technologies (London, ON),
was validated and installed in Cerro Grande. The main criterion for choosing the building
materials of the designed UV unit was their availability in Bolivia. In fact, the building of a
similar unit was quoted by a plastic workshop in Santa Cruz, Bolivia, for a lower price than
in Canada. The final look of the designed UV unit is shown in Figure 3.
After operating for a couple months in the field, the designed UV unit was replaced by
the commercial one in order to undergo further testing.
Given that there is no currently an electrical utility in the community, it was decided to
design and implement an alternative power system for the UV system. Also given the high
levels of solar radiation reaching the study area, it was decided to design a photovoltaic
system. This system consists of a solar panel, which is an array of solar cells that convert the
solar energy in electricity; a battery, to accumulate the energy provided by the solar cells; an
inverter, to change the current produced by the solar cells from direct current (DC) to
alternate current (AC), so it is delivered in a smooth way to the electrical appliances; and a
charge controller, to avoid an overload of the battery on very sunny days. It is worth noting
that the battery, the inverter and the charge controller would not be required if the UV lamp
worked under DC. This might be useful since the battery need to be replaced every three or
four years. However, DC UV lamps are recommended only in low potency applications and,
thus, in the treatment of water for small communities. Also, solar light should be available
when performing water treatment, since there would be no electricity storage. The final
electric system is shown in Figure 4.
DC switch Ballast
120 V 120 V
50 A 65 W
UV lamp
Inverter 55 W
300 W 110 V
Charge controller Battery
10 A 65 Ah 12 V/115 V
12 V 12 V
For the designed UV unit computational models for the flow inside it and for the amount of
UV light emitted were implemented. The computational model for the flow simulates the
fluid dynamics inside the reactor, that is, how the flow behaves as to its velocity, pressure
and trajectories followed by particles. The model for the UV light determines how the UV
light is distributed across the reactor. By combining the runs of both programs it is possible
to determine the approximate amount of UV energy that each microorganism is receiving and
thus to model the performance of the UV unit before carrying out its validation. The software
employed to perform the fluid dynamics simulations was ANSYS-CFX v11.0 while the
program that determines the UV distribution inside the reactor was UVCalc3D. As
mentioned early, the experiments for the validation of the designed UV unit are still in
progress until the UV sensitivity of the surrogate microorganism can be figured out. In
consequence, a comparison chart between the modeled and measured performance of the UV
unit is not currently available. However, Figure 5 displays an approximate distribution of the
UV light for conditions of a flow rate about 1.7 L/s and a UV transmittance (UVT) the
percentage of light that gets through a given medium, in this case, water of 100%. As seen,
the highest levels are located in the center of the reactor, namely along the quartz sleeve (the
UV lamp is inside this sleeve), so it is reasonable to assume that most of the microbiological
reduction takes place in this area.
It was stated earlier that the designed UV unit stayed in operation for a couple of months in
field, until it was replaced for the commercial UV unit. During this period, its performance as
to the operation and maintenance routines, the use of an alternative power system, the
effectiveness of the treatment and the perception of the people, was evaluated. It was
unfortunate, however, that the quality of the feed water did not allow for a more thorough
assessment of the effectiveness of treatment. This happened because the original site for the
UV unit hook-up, that is, the hand pump shown in Figure 2, would no longer be used, in
favour of a newer water supply system. This water system consists of a 70 m-deep well and a
pump that takes the water to a elevated reservoir, from where the water it is distributed to the
community. Although this is a system that very well fits to the requirements of running water
for the community, the first stages of its operation have to deal with turbid water. This was
exactly what happened in this case and thus why the UV system operation was hampered.
Despite the heavy turbidity of the feed water to the UV unit, microbiological lab testing
confirmed that some degree of bacteriological inactivation was being achieved. However,
this is a reminder that the water to be treated with UV light should have low turbidity and
content of organic matter and metals. If this is not the case, especially for surface water
sources that often experience surges of turbidity, the installation of a granular (sand and/or
gravel) filter before the UV unit is strongly recommended. One of the options that were
explored to cover this point in Bolivia is the Bio Sand filter (BSF), which is promoted by a
local NGO and has been used successfully in hundred of households in rural Bolivia.
Another option for pre-treatment that has been widely used in southern Bolivia, according to
Implementing a Ultraviolet Disinfection System in a Low-Income 8
Area of Bolivia, South America
Executive Summary
the account of some community residents, is the aloe vera. More experimentation and hard
evidence are required though to confirm the aloe as a viable alternative for pre-treatment.
Another subject explored during the field campaign was the UV unit maintenance. As
noted, a granular filter would help in those situations where the water turbidity changes very
often. However, in many parts of rural Bolivia, and of the world for that matter, the water
comes from shallow or deep wells. It is common that the water coming out of these wells
does not have high contents of turbidity and organic matter; although some metals, as iron
and manganese may be present, their concentration is usually not that high so to affect the
operation of UV systems. In any case, whether a granular filter is present or not, the quartz
sleeve should be cleaned with certain frequency and one especially higher in those sites with
no filter. Also, in those cases where a filter is not present, an alarm may alert the water
operator of a condition going on in the system.
Considering all the conditions that were assessed when in field, an analysis of costs was
performed for a UV system to be installed in a rural community of Bolivia. It is important to
remark, however, that the results of this exercise may be extrapolated to other locations since
the range of conditions reviewed may be applicable elsewhere. These costs were capital
(initial investment), operation and maintenance, life cycle (accounting for the depreciation of
the equipment and the cost of the money over the years that the technology is in operation)
and unit (cost of treated water per unit of volume). Below, some considerations are listed for
the estimation of costs.
A quick inspection in the community revealed that people are willing (and able) to pay
for the treatment of water up to US$2 per month.
A multiplier factor was added to the costs of all imported equipment to account for costs
of import, nationalization, taxes and retail. This factor was derived based on information
provided by a UV equipment retailer in Santa Cruz (only two in Bolivia).
The cost of a man-hour of work was derived from the legal minimum wage in place in
Bolivia. It should be noted that the labour is usually provided as an in-kind contribution
by the residents but, still, it must be accounted for.
Interest rates (prime and lending) were those for the year 2010 in Bolivia.
The cost of a sand filter was scaled-up from the current costs of such a filter for a single
household, as reported by the local NGO.
If a granular filter is considered, the costs of an alarm system are not included since it is
assumed that the water turbidity will keep steadily low. Also, the costs of maintenance
are reduced as the fouling of the quartz sleeve takes place over a longer period of time.
It was assumed that reservoirs would be required for treated water storage and operation
of the system. However, instead of using the fabricated reservoirs shown in Figure 3, it
Implementing a Ultraviolet Disinfection System in a Low-Income 9
Area of Bolivia, South America
Executive Summary
was decided to use as many 200-L plastic barrels as necessary, connected in series or
parallel. Usually, a number of 4 to 5 barrels is enough to deal with water treatment. These
barrels are readily available anywhere in Bolivia.
DC UV lamps were also considered, so the costs of battery, inverter and charge controller
are discounted, and so are the derived maintenance costs.
When the scenario of a distribution network for treated water was analyzed, a percentage
of unaccounted-for water was considered. This is because, even for brand-new piping,
there are some system losses of water that is treated but not billed. However, as the flow
rates are usually higher, the amount of treated water is higher but the unit costs are lower.
To account for a scenario where an electrical grid is present, the cost of a single kilowatt-
hour (kWh) was defined according to the fees charged by the nearest local utility.
From Table 1 it is clear that the various combinations of components and requirements
lead to a range of 7 to 29 US per cubic meter (m3) of treated water. The minimum number
of users is the number of users that a UV system must have in order for it to be sustainable. It
was calculated assuming a fixed quantity of water per person per day, according to the
Bolivian guidelines for water supply, and the monthly US$2 that people are willing to pay
for the treatment of their water. By taking into account the rates of water consumption, which
Implementing a Ultraviolet Disinfection System in a Low-Income 10
Area of Bolivia, South America
Executive Summary
actually depend on the capacity of the system, the lowest unit cost does not automatically
result in the lowest number of users, as well as the highest unit cost does not result in the
highest number of users. Rather, the lowest number of users results for the situation of
modest requirements (no pre-treatment, presence of grid and network) whereas the highest
number of users comes up for situations of advanced requirements (no grid, no network, need
for pre-treatment/alarm).
CONCLUSIONS
It is remarked that this technology is affordable for low-income communities, but also
that it can be used alongside other existing technologies. Since this is an approach that is best
suited for communal than individual use, it is strongly recommended in locations where the
community organizations are strong, organized and somewhat experienced in pursuing
funding for communal projects.
REFERENCES
ANSYS (2006c). ANSYS CFX-Solver theory guide ANSYS CFX Release 11.0, ANSYS
Europe, Ltd., Canonsburg, PA.
Bolton JR (2008). Manual for UVCalc version 1.0, Bolton Photosciences Inc., Edmonton,
AB.
Bolton JR and Cotton CA. 2008. The ultraviolet disinfection handbook. Denver, CO:
American Water Works Association.
Brownell SA, Chakrabarti AR, Kaser FM, Connelly LG, Peletz RL, Reygadas F, Lang MJ,
Kammen DM, and Nelson KL (2008). Assessment of a low-cost, point-of-use,
ultraviolet water disinfection technology, J Water Health 6: 1, 53 65.
Chen S and Ravallion M (2008). The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less
successful in the fight against poverty, The World Bank, Development Research
Group, Washington DC. Available at: http://www-
wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2010/01/21/000158
349_20100121133109/Rendered/PDF/WPS4703.pdf
First MW, Banahan KF, and Dumyahn TS (2007). Performance of ultraviolet germicidal
irradiation lamps and luminaries in long-term service, Leukos 3: 3, 181 188.