Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Week 2 Tutorial. Anarchism and Voluntarism

    Uploaded by

    Deimante Blikertaite
    22 views6 pages
    Wolff's text on anarchy and analysis of the text step-by-step

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Wolff's text on anarchy and analysis of the text step-by-step

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    22 views6 pages

    Week 2 Tutorial. Anarchism and Voluntarism

    Uploaded by

    Deimante Blikertaite
    Wolff's text on anarchy and analysis of the text step-by-step

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 6
    POLI10702 Introduction to Political Theory 2016-17 2! Semester ‘Week 2 Tutorial: Anarchism and Voluntarism 1. What kind of right does the state claim to have? Claims fo ave We rid to be obeyed willdn Us specific territory Chale sopceme awiorily to cL, monopoly of pawer. .. What is the difference between authority and power? Power come from daceats and violence, and not Legiltmacy Aothorlly means following comman) becasse pur believes Ch Commanderls Ligilimacy. Cuuptiey Hee commander nas the ly to Unpoe a duly on you) What is the concept of autonomy, according to Wolff? ae . Freo-witliny individual who taxes Tesponsiellaty for ss acttons bot os escoly te Anat decison manor, An avlonomous man mild comakuas choo to give up lus awhouowsy in reom of belug provi se leg doctors vie) Ay avlonomons Sihdual gets Ws own Weak touelcalids for yoorset, and reypeds others wel-belag and Laereds. 4. According to Wolff, there is an irreconcilable conflict between authority and autonomy. Why does Wolff think so? Be Surly Ueteqeces wih, Uadidual alonauy a5 vgs the cog Lo Lompose ifs “rules on an Dadividuall, eon wlure Le woued disagree’ €o Bo combing ~Untih Can Ler ade Tb; Hac Inbal of Ws wutenonty 5. What will be the possible argument against Wolff's anarchist view? ce Difference. in poli yt ums ~ SME (egies Lie wore rotlroreky ‘WK 01 Se deta *stale ch nature” which (6 wor Ldroughe elate WMhbalbas. en whioely WH som Bes proledts \wilvibual Whonovy Leg. hum rn rigds de. = sone eeu wah wok Nave groper morals Uve Wolff tins, and Hy mage Howe, WAlug Us OY. = Domroue wigs WOE Seeortly wore Wan wlonomy, = WWE cb aulonomous elacice Ao Que LP some of LUs frecdous Wr relutn for ains from Wu dake. (cout) ~\n a State of nature, accoming PRO COCR OTD eC ee ern COCR Wwerardies and group, ake, i = Collackue gomrelivus Uwhance ovr avloromy - cones We Can eee talluc than jes aispoling ob oor atone’ at ~ Ws waive to assume Maal iy Hie Sate ef vature ath won uve) SHOL flow werad cole and would nok iudecfere wilh olters! Welt_beiu e Rosi a applicable 4o Rs and madmen doedo tuir imabivhy te easy RP. Wolff "In Defence of 4 ‘The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy Anarcldsian 1. The Concept of Authority -Poitics the exer of he poner ofthe tae othe atmp fo uence that exercise Pita ‘hlosopy fe therefore. peaking. the phono ofthe state I we are o deters the cvtet ‘of poll pono. an whether ed ext, we mast Pepin wih econo he sae ‘The sate i group of persone who have an eerie spree autor within given tei, ‘State shoud sn hat sate roy of pero ho ave supreme aunt within a ier temtor or over crn poplaion A nomad tbe may eb the suthorty Sasa ofa sat So eng its subjects do not ll der the superior aon ofa terol sate The sate may include alte persons who fll under ts euthory as does he democratic state according ois theo ‘may also const ofa singe ned to whom al the ret are subject We may doubt wheter the one- Peron ste ar eer aly existe, altho Loui XIV evenly thought so when he anounced, Flat cest mi The datnctve carci ofthe state supreme author, what pole hb sve Ths te pas "pp aig whch ihe {crn that he pope ae thes ond of sure te ae of overeigy o ea “Ling” eles the stops cone syprene abot ay ‘pint otros rr as nt eal ae eicere terete een rar thick he tetas me ws than the 1s of money which am made sue {gra tht he as Power over me, ut ould hasly suppose a he has authority, hat, that he as ight demand ‘ry money anda have at eligation to give itt him. When the government presents me with il fartnces onthe oer hand py roma) even though dot wish and even tk can fetay sith not poying se aera the dul censaed goverment and ence thas igh ox Ine It has authority over me Same, ofcourse, cheat he goverment, But evens ‘knowledge autor, or who Would speak of heating” thie? ree ceas Soret sire ere directed. The eatin Sey ae SSeS Ere te ‘dscrptve see refers to sams o oiations of sour, bi tess y deen hat men Ialleve they out odo rater thn by asserting hat hey ought odo ‘Coresponing to theo senses of auhoniy, hee re Wo concepts ofthe sate the ‘sic be iota ppot mms acta in tery int hn oar on i ay ee Te yo oes ‘harass, insta and facing of de acto tas, we may al poli science IF we ke the Fase the ihe exer The aiscover, analysis and ‘emonaratton ofthe forms and pcp leptimate authority ~ ofthe right fle scaled palit hsophy ‘What meant by saprome authority? Some politcal piasopers, peaking of auhority in he ont sense vc held ht he trust as ultimate author over ll ates whatsoever ha ‘scr wins ven Jealaegbes Rousseau or example, essere hat he socal contact by whch ‘a just political community is formed "gives tothe | dover the members of \. Wht eng of rigid does te Sate lain to aye? Mere CONfLLE - wun Sicgulmk xe a5 oN iio. 35% ahaN wots, ALA’ Ter "GS. Bch XS ueWH WL cwn wer oer, uhh ti formed andi when directed hth gone wl. that bears the name of “Sovereign ah Locke one rh, eh te ree ary he at eens Se may pan a Anauthriatve command must aso be distinguished fom a persuasive argue ‘Suan dose Lmey choses tscomly even tap st bg react Va Tam robo Believe hat ote aa “The person who ses the “command” futons merely the ocason for ‘my becoming avare of my uy and his ole might moter instanees be ile by af admonish fend. or even by my on concen. I might, yan extension othe em a a he pescrpion tas authority aver me, meaning imply dat ought ate acordance wih But the person himself as authority othe wh is nt consti an scknowledent ony prt of they poses it ‘inde they doa ally ve of who cre of what they command. My tobe i dty owed thom, nto the moral law oo the Beetcares ofthe ations may be emmonded to perform, ‘There ae of couse actly acknowledge cams of athaiy The mest mening leo tay. sy he ep cso on, The x at done cern vay srs most mena perie ade eso fo

    You might also like