TOPIC: Property Relations between Spouses; General Provisions
FACTS: Walter Stevenson married another British subject Beatrice Stevenson in the Philippines in 1909. They continued living in the Philippines until they decided to leave for California in 1945. Walter instituted his wife as his sole heiress in 1947 before he died in 1951. Thereafter, administration proceedings were initiated in CFI Manila for settling their estates including their Baguio real property and 210,000 stock shares in local mines. Ian Statt, the appointed ancillary administrator, filed estate and inheritance tax returns in order to secure CIR waiver on the inheritance tax due on the shares. Later, Statt amended the estate and inheritance tax return pursuant to NIRC. Among the changes was the devaluation of the shares. Meanwhile, Beatrice assigned her estate rights and interests to the respondent-spouses Fisher. Later, another amendment containing further reductions was made pursuant to reciprocity rule of NIRC. This led to their position that they had overpaid the government. Case was heard by the Court of Tax Appeals but both the petitioner and respondent appealed from this decision. ISSUE: WON half of the decedents estate (as share of the surviving spouse) must be deducted from the taxable net estate pursuant conjugal partnership laws HELD: Yes. It is a well-known doctrine (at that time) that in the absence of any pre-nuptial agreement with regard to marriage settlements, CPG will govern property regime of spouses. This entails that half of the estate, as the wifes share, must be deducted from the taxable net estate. According to the Old Civil Code, it is the nationality principle that should apply to the case at hand but the petitioner must adduce proof about British laws not following CPG regime and vesting all the properties to the husband. The petitioner wasnt able to adduce proof. Therefore, Whartons processual presumption applies: The law of England is the same as ours with regard to the property regime that governs - CPG.