/ 11::usONS ,\NI : FAM I I.\' lt.1:.-:t.ATION.

S
C\Sf:S - l'INAI,',
\
Oclobrr 2~. , 011
PAl r:Rl'f fl'Y ANO l'ILIATION
163 - 171 - Jrcswnpt1on or legitimacy if hom within a valid marriagt~
1

Status of children ,:oncci..-cd thm oniliciol in~rwU.ion, rcqui;11es

Suuus of cbih.lrcn o\1tsi<lc c1f :1v11lin mnrri,1g.c, cxc1.:1ltion$
- Ground.<, periods lo impugn legi1imacy of lhc child, and "!"' may
impugn
Absence of proqf. prC"Sumption of tilia1io11 ir marriage i$ tcnninated and
wifo contracts tt sub$cquttn1 nKtrria~c within 300 days frum tennination
When mo> h,:irs impugu legitimacy of child in lieu or foth<:r
CASES: l. IIAOUA , .. CA 229 S 468
2. llAUIF:RA ,. CATOTA i, 3.l.l S 19~
3. DE JESUS,.. II EIRS OF' OI ZON .l6~ S 499
4. l,IYA(), JR.,.. TANIIOTl-1, IY AO 378 S %.l
5. CO,' -C~; rc:ION , . CA OR/31/200~
6. ONG , .. l>IAZ 540 S 480
l'ROOI-' OF FILIATION
172 - J76 - Prim:u) 300 st.-co11da.ry proofs whether lcgi1imt1te or illcgi1im:ne
CASES: I. FERNANln:z \', CA 2.lO S 130
2. Ff.RNAN OEZ ,. f'ERNAN llEZ 363 S 81 1
3. I.AllAGAl, A , . SANTIAGO 12/04/2001
4. tOCSIN v. LOC:;IN. JR. 12/10/2001
S. llERNAllE v. AL.10 01/21/2002
6. llE I.A ROSA v. VOA. llF. l)AM IAN OJ/27/2006
7. Vf.RCEtliS ,. l'OSAOA 52Z :S 51.8
~. llF. LA C RllZ , .. GRAC IA 594 $ 64~
9. NEPOMUCF.iiO ... 1.011:;,, 0~11Rn o111
10. GOTARl>O v. II UUNG 678 S 436
I I. S/\1 ,AS v. MA'l"lfSAl, EM 705 S 51;0
12. A<: UltAR , .. SIASAT GRl/200169 01/28/21115
13. ARAl>O v. ALCORA:-1 762 S 37
13. Gl~RONIMO v. S,\Nl'()S GRU19709? 09/28/15
14. CALI MAG,.. MA(;Al'AZ GR# l91?.l6 06/01/2016
IS. SAN AGUSTIN v. SAl.f$ C:IU/189289 08/31/2016
. Rights of legi1imatc tmd illc>tilirn:itc children
RA 9255 - AN ACT 1\l.l.()WING IU.EGITIM ATE CHI LORENT() USE
T II E SIJRNAMEUP'll!E FATIIF.R
LEGITIMATE!) Cllll.DRt:N
177 182 - Who mo)' be legitimatcJ, uff:1ivi1y of lciitimation
- Effec-ts of lcgitim.:uion, rig.his of legi1im;;icd children
- Impugning lcgitimalion. grounds and period to file ac1io11
RA 9858 - AN ACT l'ROVIDING l'OR tECITIMATION Of' CH fl.OREN
ll()f! N TO l'AlltNTS Hf.LOW MARRYING ACF.
ADOPTION
l ,AWS ON ADOIYflON I. FAMILY COD~: - most provisions of the Family
Code on adoption are repealed by Iv\ 8552 exccp1 Anicle 190 of said <:ode
2. RA 8043 - INTF.RCOUNTRY ADOl' rtON ACT OF 1995
3. RA 8552 - DOMJ;;.sTIC ADOl'TION ACT OP 1998
4. RA 9523 - AN ACT REQURING CERTIFICATION OF
TUE OSWO 1'0 DECLARE Cllll,I> 'LEGALi, Y
AVALLA Ill. FOR AOOP'l'ION
Applicability and dis1ine1ions between the Family Code. RA 804) wid
RA8552
CAS.E S: I. TAMARGO v. CA 209 S 518
2. LAFIOM , .. SIBULO 07/14/2003,
I
I
3. LANOINGIN v. REPUJlLIC 0(;/27!7906
4. IN R.: PETITION FOU @)On-ION Ol-' Ml6'(Q;:Lt.P.
AND MJCJIAEL JllOE'L(M 58!-li~S
 5. CAl.,RO v. CIU!CORIQ 738S 415
(>.BARTOLOME,.. i<..<;S 740 S 78
Distribu1ion of J)f'Qpert)' of adopted child if he/she die$ intc.-.1u1e
SUl'l'ORT
194 - 208 - 0)UC('PI ;mJ its ch:m~lcri~te.,,
- Persons ohligc.-d to .,iippo,1 each other, umuum
- Order of preforcncc
- When is it dcm.andablc
- Opti(m of pro.on/s obliged to giVe Sllppon
CASI~~: I. OE ASIS v. CA 30.l S 176
1. t;AN v. 1u:yi,:s osnsnooz
., . M ANGONON , ,. CA _.9-t S t
4. LIM,. LIM r.tM S 691
S. llO I.I NA v. VAl,Lt :CERA GIWIM2367 12fl5f.?0 IO
6. LIM-1.UA v. LUA Glt/1 175279-S0 01,,osno 13
7. Ullll ,. AAA 750 S 188
PARt;NTAL AlJIIORITY
209-227 - Who cxcrci$CS a..) if bo1h r,arcuts MC alive: b.) in ca.~of
annulment or leg.ally :;cparolion; c.) in cases of remarriage; and d.) iu
c;L~s of uhsenc:e or- UJlSuitability
o Who shall .xcr<ise SIJBSTl'ltJ11: l'ARliNT,\I . AllTIIORIT \'
o CA RA VAN T ltAVII.I, TOURS v . AIIKl,\lt 7k3 S 368 (l ,EONEX)
o Co11tcpt of the FILIAL PRIVILEGE RULE, its cxcc:p<ions
o Who exm:iscs srr.Cl1\I, I'ARE:-.'l',\I, AU'lliO!Un'
o CASE: SCHOOL OF 1101.Y sr1RIT OF ()C ,.. T AGUIAM 558 S
22~
o Lbhilil)' of person." cxcrd~ing pa.n:ntal :md $.J)C(:ial 1"'1rcou.i nuthnrily
for 1he hln or 0:euumission C-On11ni1tc:J hy a cl11ld
('ASES: I. F:Sl'IIO TlJ ,,. CA 242 S .162
2. SANTOS:, SR,,. CA 242 S 407
3. ESLAO ,,. CA 266 S 31 7
4. L A..XA.\IANA v. LAX,\,\IANA 09/03/2002
5. <:IJA l,IJERTI) ,,. GUALlll:RTO \1461 S 451
6. SAI.IF;NTt ~~ ,,. AIIANILLA 0S/l?ll006
7, (;AMIIOA-II IRSCII ,,. <'A 527 S 380
8. l)A<"AS IN v. llACASIN 02/0~0111
. Righb u.nd duuc::<. of p:1rt.n1s to 11\eir uncmancipated child
. Gmtrdianl 3dmini.stra1or tW~'1 lh'I! property of unemancipatcd chikl.
rcqui,-c,nents
. When slull Article 225 of the family Code apply and when shall ordill8r)'
rukson guardianship givc.. n l!lpplication
l)efoult S13-f\da.rd t.m child cu:>tody pn.:x:ccdin,r.s
-1>e:iiult '-'11s1oJi:d n:iime i11 child CU$1od)' pro-codings
Principles or "lll~~T IN'f'l:Rl~~T Of T l IE Cl 111.r>; ..TEN DER AGE
PRl!SUMMlON"
T li:RMINATIONISUSl'V.NSION/01'1U \IATION Ot' l'ARf:NTAL AtrfHORITY
228 - 233 - GrowK.ls - pennancnl termination
Other grounds for termination bu1 may be revived
Suspension
. Pcrmoncnt deprivation
RA 76 10 -CIIILO AllUSls, t:xr1.O.ITATION ANO DISCRIMINATION
EMANCIPATION
234 and 236 np,cndrd by RA 680.9
TITLEXl
238 - 256 - PROCF. DURE RE. SlJl\1 l\1ARY PROCEEDINGS in th e Family
Code
CASE.5 : I. REl'UIILIC v. CA 05/06/2005
2. REPUBLIC v. LORINO 01/09/2005
3. REPUBLIC v. TANGO CR.# 161062 07/31/2009
NE\V CIV IL CODE
SURNAMES
364 - 380 CASES: I. RF.P llflLIC v. CA and VICENCIO 300 S 138
2. IN RE: PETITION OF .JULIAN LIN CARU L ASAN WANG
454 S 2155
3. IN TIJ E l\l A'ITER OF Tl-IE Al>O l'TION O F NATIIY
ASTORGA GARC I A 03{31 /2005
4. ltEl'UHLIC v. CA POTE 514 S 76
S. R EMO,,. SECRKTARY OF UFA 03/05'2010
6. CRAN DE v. ANT ON I O 7 16 S 698
R f.I.ATE!) LA \VS: I . RA 9048
2. RA 92S5
3. RA 101 72
AIISENCE
3!11 - 3')6 -Judicial dcclardlion ofnbscncc - period a). if wich adminislrdl0r and
h.) if without adminiscmtor
Who may ask f,>r the dcclamcion of absence
Presumption of dench - t .) ordinary: 2.) exlr.lordinary
FUNERA L 305 - 310 - Liability of persons who shows d isrespect to the
dcnd/wrongfully interfere.< wich a funeral
CIVO, R ECISTF-ll 407 . 4 1'.\
-AcL,. events. judicial decrees entered in the Civil Register
-Prohacive value of books making up chc civil register
-1.iabilicy/dcfcnscs of Civil Registrar in cases of unauthori~ alteration in
chc book$
CASES: I. S I LVERIO v. REr U0LIC 537 S 373
2. REPUllLIC v. CAGANDAIIAN 565 S 72
3. CORPUZ v. STO. TOMAS 08/ 11/2010
4. I\VASA \VA,,. GANGAN 705 S 669
S. REPUllLIC v. OLA YBAR 02/10'2014