Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stephanie Bautista
Chism
Pre-English
August 10, 2017
Audience Analysis
In the position paper, The Controversy Regarding Physician Assisted Suicide it demonstrates
two contrasting viewpoints. One viewpoint is pro physician assisted suicide believing that
individuals should have the right to decide the extent their illness can affect them. The alternative
viewpoint is that physician assisted suicide should not become legal in the United States as it is
unethical and can be abused by physicians. The academic audience which the paper leans
towards is young United States citizens and future doctors. Firstly, the paper is guided towards
young US citizens as they have the ability to change the legality of the situation, it should also be
a concern for their future health. Secondly, the paper is also guided towards future doctors as
they should learn about the medical controversy as its future legal status may change their
decision to be a doctor. If it is legalized and a pre-medical student views it as a problem ethically
for them, it may change their career path. The position paper was made for the purpose to
convince the young public that physician assisted suicide should become legal in the United
States as the government illegalizing the procedure in some states strips the public of their
constitutional right. The audience will be informed more of reasons why assisted suicide should
be legal compared to reasons why it should remain illegal. The paper will cover real life medical
scenarios of how illegalizing physician assisted suicide creates difficulty for terminally ill
patients, yet the paper will also explain how even though the majority of US citizens are pro
assisted suicide the government still will not legalize it nation wide. Having the audience of
young US citizens and potential doctors is appropriate for the topic of physician assisted suicide
as its current legal status will affect their future.
Stephanie Bautista
Chism
Pre-English 101
August 10, 2017
The United States and medical field officials are faced with a controversial issue,
Physician-assisted suicide. In some states assisted suicide is legal, while in others it caused court
cases and homicidal convictions. Although assisted suicide is legal in states like Washington, it
is still a rare procedure, in 2011 only 70 individuals took lethal prescription doses (Karaim).
Assisted suicide has become a controversial topic because firstly there are no set guidelines made
by medical organizations as this is a new procedure. Secondly, this causes conflict with morality
issues. This topic holds importance to my future career choice of being a doctor, as various states
have different stances on this causing court cases to arise. I have personally seen when a
terminally ill patient is gasping for their last breath and seeing the pain they have suffered made
me question the topic of physician assisted suicide. I began to wonder if the government is being
unfair by not legalizing physician assisted suicide nationally. Personally seeing the difficulties
that a terminally ill patient face led me to the question, to what extent is it ethically right to allow
lethal dose of drugs to a terminally ill patient to terminate their own life (Context). Assisted
illegal procedure where a patient's life can be ending voluntarily or involuntarily with drugs,
while passive euthanasia is a legal procedure where doctors can remove life-prolonging
technology (Context). This began to arise some questions like what determines the legality of
Bautista 3
procedures? Passive euthanasia could be seen as a type of suicide yet it is legal, unlike assisted
suicide.
Assisted suicide has grown popularity in the US, yet the government will not allow it to
become legal nationwide. The only states where assisted suicide is legal is in Oregon, Montana,
Washington, Vermont, California, Colorado, and Washington DC. But what happens to a
terminally ill patient in a different state that wishes to pass away peacefully? Scenarios like that
are what sparked court cases around America. A doctor, David Muller, documented what it was
like to have a 91 year old named Charlie ask for assisted suicide yet not be granted their wish as
it was illegal in their state (Muller). Charlie is one example of where an ill patient sought
starvation as an alternative method to assisted suicide. Around the US there are various cases like
Charlie which are brought up to the supreme court, yet there is no set government position on
assisted suicide.
In regards to physician assisted suicide some issues that arise are if it is ethically right for
a physician to help a patient kill themselves. The ethical question is brought up because typically
a patient will see a physician to cure them, not help kill them. Some argue that the physician is
not taking any part in the killing as the patient is the one who self-administers the drug, yet some
believe they should take blame as they provide it (Context). Some arguments which support
assisted suicide is that firstly it helps make death comforting for the patient and the family. I will
then mention another supporting argument which claims that it is better to legalize assisted
suicide as its become a wanted procedure that patients will find alternative methods. But, there
are also some claims as to why assisted suicide should not be allowed like firstly some
individuals may use it as a way to end their financial burdens that come with medical bills. Then
I will introduce the last argument of why assisted suicide should stay illegal, as there are no set
Bautista 4
guidelines for medical officials to follow. A lot of the argument regarding assisted suicide comes
An argument made in regards to why assisted suicide should be legalized is that it's better
to give individuals the option of the procedure instead of them finding their own means of doing
it. In the article, Physician-Assisted Death Is Illegal In Most States, So My Patient Made
Another Choice by David Muller focuses on the case in which a patient desired to end their
terminal illness so bad that they instead starved themselves as assisted-suicide was not legal in
their state. The article focuses on Mullers medical case in New York with Charlie a ninety-one
year old who was suffering excruciating pain. Charlie came to the conclusion that he no longer
wanted to live in pain so he asked Muller for assisted suicide, yet in New York the procedure is
deemed as illegal so Muller could not grant his wish. Muller and Charlie instead found an
alternative method for the procedure, Charlie would stop eating and drinking to slowly kill
himself as in the state of New York the court concluded that its legal for mentally competent
(Muller). Within a week after living off of only pain medication Charlie died of malnutrition and
starvation, this caused Muller to question the legality of assisted suicide. By the end of the article
Mullers ethical dilemma led him to the conclusion that the government should not control
whether or not a patient can continue to suffer, as it is a personal matter and if a patient truly
majority of Americans agree with the procedure. In the article, Americans Attitudes Towards
Euthanasia and Physician-assisted suicide, 1936-2002 by The Journal of Sociology and Social
Welfare goes in depth on multiple views regarding assisted suicide from religion to physician
Bautista 5
organizations. The article reveals that US opinion polls show that most Americans support
assisted suicide as many believe that an individual has the right to end their life if their life
quality has diminished (Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare). Historical evidence then
backs up why assisted suicide should be legal, as it states that the ancient Greeks believed it was
morally right to terminate one's life if it's not considered to be worthwhile (Journal of Sociology
and Social Welfare). Assisted suicide should become legal in the US as the majority of the
population agrees with it. If a person feels like their illness is belittling their life, then they
better and easier experience for patients and their loved ones. The article Medical Aid in Dying:
The Cornerstone of Patient-Centered Care by Barbara Coombs Lee and David Grube goes in
depth on how doctors strive to make medical decisions through patient centered care which has
to do with a patients wants and values. For some individuals assisted suicide may be what a
terminally ill patient wants, like a last wish. Instead of preventing them from getting their last
Although some individuals see benefits to legalizing assisted suicide, others argue that it
should not become legalized in the United States. Daniel E Lee released an essay called,
physician-assisted suicide is not ready to be legalized in society. The essay starts off with the
statement, Uncomfortable with the idea of physicians, who are trained to preserve life,
dispensing lethal drugs to be used to end life (Lee) and is later explained in depth how doctors
swore an oath to preserve an individual's life as long as possible. Another point to why assisted-
suicide should not be allowed is that doctors may abuse their new power, Voluntary physician-
Bautista 6
assisted suicide invites abuse, such as physicians taking it upon themselves to end the lives of
terminally ill patients. (Lee) this is then explained further with an incident in Netherlands which
argue that assisted suicide should not be legal as doctors may abuse their power and start
involuntarily administering lethal doses of medicine. Others believe that assisted suicide is too
difficult to control yet also going against the oaths that physicians swear to before they begin
their practice. Yet many are for the legalization of assisted suicide as they believe that a patient
has the right to determine the extent they want their medical suffering to be. Assisted suicide
should be allowed all across the US as it has become in demand to at least have it open as an
option. Reviewing multiple positions has allowed me to come to the conclusion that to a great
extent it is ethically right to allow physician assisted suicide to be allowed in the United States as
Work Cited
Coombs Lee, Barbara. "Medical Aid in Dying: The Cornerstone of Patient-Centered Care."
Generations 41.1 (2017): 39-41. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 July 2017.
Allen, Jen, et al. "Americans' attitudes toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide,
1936-2002." Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, vol. 33, no. 2, 2006, p. 5.
link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A147522547/OVIC?u=umd_um&xid=a33c8cdb. Accessed
4 Aug. 2017.
link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A97755129/OVIC?u=umd_um&xid=01845409. Accessed
10 Aug. 2017.
Dresser, Rebecca. "On Legalizing Physician-Assisted Death for Dementia." The Hastings Center
link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A499348930/OVIC?u=umd_um&xid=ebe3ab41. Accessed
4 Aug. 2017.
link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/EJ3010020118/OVIC?u=umd_um&xid=fff36c1b.
Muller, David. "Physician-Assisted Death Is Illegal In Most States, So My Patient Made Another
Choice." Health Affairs 31.10 (2012): 2343-346. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28
July 2017.
Bautista 8