Scribd
Upload
47 views5 pages

Logistic Regression Analysis in SPSS

The document describes using logistic regression to analyze factors related to CHC_ser_use using data from the Field SPSS.sav dataset. It finds that the variables Land_cultivated, Loan_avai, and Easeoffinance are significant predictors of CHC_ser_use based on the Variables not in the Equation output. The full logistic regression model correctly classifies 90% of cases according to the Classification Table.

Uploaded by

Gaurav Singhal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
47 views5 pages

Logistic Regression Analysis in SPSS

The document describes using logistic regression to analyze factors related to CHC_ser_use using data from the Field SPSS.sav dataset. It finds that the variables Land_cultivated, Loan_avai, and Easeoffinance are significant predictors of CHC_ser_use based on the Variables not in the Equation output. The full logistic regression model correctly classifies 90% of cases according to the Classification Table.

Uploaded by

Gaurav Singhal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

GET

FILE='C:\Users\Gaurav\Desktop\Field SPSS.sav'.
DATASET NAME DataSet0 WINDOW=FRONT.
LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES CHC_ser_use
/METHOD=ENTER Land_owned Land_cultivated Landt_ype Peryearserviceuse Loan_avai Easeoffinance
/CONTRAST (Landt_ype)=Indicator
/CONTRAST (Easeoffinance)=Indicator
/CONTRAST (Loan_avai)=Indicator
/SAVE=PRED PGROUP
/CLASSPLOT
/PRINT=GOODFIT CI(90)

/CRITERIA=PIN(0.05) POUT(0.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(0.5).

Logistic Regression

Notes

Output Created 21-Sep-2017 23:10:51

Comments

Input Data C:\Users\Gaurav\Desktop\Field SPSS.sav

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter <none>

Weight <none>

Split File <none>

N of Rows in Working Data File 30

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as
missing

Syntax LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES


CHC_ser_use
/METHOD=ENTER Land_owned
Land_cultivated Landt_ype
Peryearserviceuse Loan_avai
Easeoffinance
/CONTRAST (Landt_ype)=Indicator
/CONTRAST (Easeoffinance)=Indicator
/CONTRAST (Loan_avai)=Indicator
/SAVE=PRED PGROUP
/CLASSPLOT
/PRINT=GOODFIT CI(90)
/CRITERIA=PIN(0.05) POUT(0.10)
ITERATE(20) CUT(0.5).

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.047

Elapsed Time 00:00:00.031

Variables Created or Modified PRE_1 Predicted probability


PGR_1 Predicted group

[DataSet1] C:\Users\Gaurav\Desktop\Field SPSS.sav

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 30 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable
Encoding

Original
Value Internal Value

no 0

Yes 1

Categorical Variables Codings

Parameter coding

Frequency (1)

Easeoffinance 0 15 1.000

1 15 .000

Loan_avai 0 14 1.000

Easyavailability 16 .000

Landt_ype 0 10 1.000

Fragmented 20 .000

Block 0: Beginning Block


Classification Tablea,b

Predicted

CHC_ser_use
Percentage
Observed no Yes Correct

Step 0 CHC_ser_use no 0 15 .0

Yes 0 15 100.0

Overall Percentage 50.0

a. Constant is included in the model.

b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant .000 .365 .000 1 1.000 1.000

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Step 0 Variables Land_owned 3.763 1 .052

Land_cultivated 6.944 1 .008

Landt_ype(1) .600 1 .439

Peryearserviceuse 2.368 1 .124

Loan_avai(1) 4.821 1 .028

Easeoffinance(1) 1.200 1 .273

Overall Statistics 15.857 6 .015

Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 23.240 6 .001

Block 23.240 6 .001

Model 23.240 6 .001


Model Summary

Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R


Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square

1 18.349a .539 .719

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter


estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.

1 12.496 8 .130

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

CHC_ser_use = no CHC_ser_use = Yes

Observed Expected Observed Expected Total

Step 1 1 3 2.982 0 .018 3

2 2 2.898 1 .102 3

3 3 2.792 0 .208 3

4 3 2.417 0 .583 3

5 3 1.760 0 1.240 3

6 1 1.220 2 1.780 3

7 0 .770 3 2.230 3

8 0 .094 3 2.906 3

9 0 .055 3 2.945 3

10 0 .013 3 2.987 3

Classification Tablea

Predicted

CHC_ser_use
Percentage
Observed no Yes Correct

Step 1 CHC_ser_use no 13 2 86.7

Yes 1 14 93.3
Overall Percentage 90.0

a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

90.0% C.I.for EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a Land_owned .694 .734 .894 1 .345 2.002 .598 6.695

Land_cultivated -1.522 .906 2.821 1 .093 .218 .049 .969

Landt_ype(1) -3.717 2.515 2.184 1 .139 .024 .000 1.521

Peryearserviceuse -2.705 1.706 2.513 1 .113 .067 .004 1.107

Loan_avai(1) .281 2.047 .019 1 .891 1.324 .046 38.394

Easeoffinance(1) -3.254 2.193 2.202 1 .138 .039 .001 1.424

Constant 18.787 9.496 3.914 1 .048 1.442E8

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Land_owned, Land_cultivated, Landt_ype, Peryearserviceuse, Loan_avai, Easeoffinance.

Step number: 1

Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities

4


F
R 3 Y Y
E Y Y
Q Y Y
U Y Y
E 2 n n Y YYY
N n n Y YYY
C n n Y YYY
Y n n Y YYY
1 nnnnY n n nn nn n nY nY Y Y Y YYY
nnnnY n n nn nn n nY nY Y Y Y YYY
nnnnY n n nn nn n nY nY Y Y Y YYY
nnnnY n n nn nn n nY nY Y Y Y YYY
Predicted
Prob: 0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1
Group: nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Predicted Probability is of Membership for Yes


The Cut Value is .50
Symbols: n - no
Y - Yes

Each Symbol Represents .25 Cases.

You might also like