You are on page 1of 1

Journal of Visceral Surgery (2014) 151, 161

Available online at

ScienceDirect
www.sciencedirect.com

CORRESPONDENCE

Is regular depilation really both mechanisms potentially contribute to recurrence by


necessary after a pilonidal sinus favoring cutaneous penetration of the stalk into the gluteal
excision? cleft [5].
Post-operative depilation, while seemingly logical, can-
not be recommended. Denitive depilation is the only
To the editor, method that seems to be of value, although the level of
evidence is low and the method is not currently reim-
We read with great interest the recent update on supra- bursed, which makes implementation difcult in France.
infected pilonidal sinus disease [1]. The authors are to be Post-operative mechanical razor depilation should be aban-
commended for their work on this difcult topic, a disease so doned. Electric razor or depilatory creams have not been
frequent, yet often neglected. Many publications exist, but specically investigated. Notwithstanding, post-operative
studies with a high level of evidence are rare. The authors, removal of all hair seems logical to facilitate post-operative
as well as the doctoral thesis currently being written by one care and decrease the risk of recurrence by eliminating the
of us (C.G.), underscore the high prevalence of recurrence, cause of the disease. The best way to ensure this depila-
a problem relatively specic to pilonidal sinus disease, a tion therefore remains to be shown, and this is an excellent
commonplace occurrence in the young population, despite topic for a future study by the French Association for Clinical
the myriad of techniques described in the literature. Research (FRENCH).
One particular point that caught our attention and is
far from negligible in this disease, is routine post-operative Disclosure of interest
depilation by whatever method (shaving, depilatory creams
or denitive depilation). The study that the authors cite The authors declare that they have no conicts of interest
to support this policy is a descriptive study on denitive concerning this article.
depilation [2]. This study does not allow to conclude as to
References
its efcacy in the prevention of recurrence after excision
of pilonidal sinus disease. Other studies on denitive epila- [1] Parades V, Bouchard D, Janier M, Berger A. Pilonidal sinus dis-
tion after pilonidal sinus disease excision have also shown ease. J Visc Surg 2013;150(4):23747.
a tendency toward less recurrence [3,4] but their level of [2] Oram Y, Kahraman F, Karincaoglu Y, Koyuncu E. Evaluation of
evidence is weak. 60 patients with pilonidal sinus treated with laser epilation after
Conversely, the study on razor depilation by Petersen surgery. Dermatol Surg 2010;36:8891.
et al. clearly establishes that the risk of recurrence is [3] Badawy EA, Kanawati MN. Effect of hair removal by Nd:YAG
increased by post-operative shaving [5]. This retrospective laser on the recurrence of pilonidal sinus. J Eur Acad Dermatol
study included a large population of German military person- Venereol 2009;23:8836.
[4] Odili J, Gault D. Laser depilation of the natal cleft: an aid to
nel. The goal was to analyze the recurrence rate according
healing the pilonidal sinus. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2002;84:2932.
to whether or not post-operative shaving was performed. [5] Petersen S, Wietelmann K, Evers T, Hser N, Matevossian E, Doll
They selected 504 patients at random from a cohort of D. Long-term effects of postoperative razor epilation in pilonidal
1960 patients undergoing operation for pilonidal sinus dis- sinus disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52:1314.
ease between 1980 and 1996. [6] Mise jour de la confrence de consensus. Gestion propra-
Patients were contacted by telephone to determine toire du risque infectieux Hygines 2013, Volume XXI, no 4, ISSN
whether a recurrence had occurred or not. Of 504 patients 1249-0075.
contacted, 113 had performed regular razor hair removal
post-operatively for a mean duration of 7.5 months while C. Gaudin , J. Podevin , P.-A. Lehur
391 had not. The recurrence rate was 30.1 % (34/113) in Clinique de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne,
the razor group vs. 19.7 % (77/391) in the non-razor group Htel-Dieu, CHU de Nantes, 1, place A.-Ricordeau,
(P = 0.01). One possible explanation for this increased recur- 44093 Nantes cedex 1, France
rence rate could be the creation of cutaneous micro-lesions Corresponding author.

related to razor shaving (well recognized in pre-operative E-mail address: christophe.gaudin@chu-nantes.fr


skin preps [6] where such procedures are contra- (C. Gaudin)
indicated) and because the shaved hair stalk is beveled; Available online 27 March 2014

1878-7886/$ see front matter 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.02.001

You might also like