Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
1 History
2 Bonding
2.1 -bonding (sigma bonding)
2.2 -bonding (pi bonding)
2.3 Role of metal p-orbitals
3 High and low spin and the spectrochemical series
4 See also
5 References
6 External links
History
Ligand field theory resulted from combining the principles laid out in molecular orbital theory and cry stal field
theory , which describes the loss of degeneracy of metal d orbitals in transition metal complexes. Griffith and
Orgel[5] championed ligand field theory as a more accurate description of such complexes. They used the
electrostatic principles established in cry stal field theory to describe transition metal ions in solution, and they
used molecular orbital theory to explain the differences in metal-ligand interactions. In their paper, they
propose that the chief cause of color differences in transition metal complexes in solution is the incomplete d
orbital subshells. [5] That is, the unoccupied d orbitals of transition metals participate in bonding, which
influences the colors they absorb in solution. In ligand field theory , the v arious d orbitals are affected differently
when surrounded by a field of neighboring ligands and are raised or lowered in energy based on the strength of
their interaction with the ligands. [5]
Bonding
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligand_field_theory 1/4
11/2/2017 Ligand field theory - Wikipedia
combinations with the dz 2 and dx 2y 2 orbitals. The dxy , dxz and dyz orbitals remain non-bonding orbitals. Some
weak bonding (and anti-bonding) interactions with the s and p orbitals of the metal also occur, to make a total of
6 bonding (and 6 anti-bonding) molecular orbitals
In molecular sy mmetry terms, the six lone-pair orbitals from the ligands (one from each ligand) form six
sy mmetry adapted linear combinations (SALCs) of orbitals, also sometimes called ligand group orbitals (LGOs).
The irreducible representations that these span are a1g , t1u and e g . The metal also has six v alence orbitals that
span these irreducible representations - the s orbital is labeled a1g , a set of three p-orbitals is labeled t1u , and the
dz 2 and dx 2y 2 orbitals are labeled e g . The six -bonding molecular orbitals result from the combinations of
ligand SALC's with metal orbitals of the same sy mmetry .
In the usual analy sis, the p-orbitals of the metal are used for bonding (and hav e the wrong sy mmetry to
ov erlap with the ligand p or or * orbitals any way ), so the interactions take place with the appropriate metal
d-orbitals, i.e. dxy , dxz and dyz . These are the orbitals that are non-bonding when only bonding takes place.
One important bonding in coordination complexes is metal-to-ligand bonding, also called backbonding. It
occurs when the LUMOs (lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals) of the ligand are anti-bonding * orbitals. These
orbitals are close in energy to the dxy , dxz and dyz orbitals, with which they combine to form bonding orbitals
(i.e. orbitals of lower energy than the aforementioned set of d-orbitals). The corresponding anti-bonding orbitals
are higher in energy than the anti-bonding orbitals from bonding so, after the new bonding orbitals are filled
with electrons from the metal d-orbitals, O has increased and the bond between the ligand and the metal
strengthens. The ligands end up with electrons in their * molecular orbital, so the corresponding bond within
the ligand weakens.
The other form of coordination bonding is ligand-to-metal bonding. This situation arises when the -sy mmetry
p or orbitals on the ligands are filled. They combine with the dxy , dxz and dyz orbitals on the metal and donate
electrons to the resulting -sy mmetry bonding orbital between them and the metal. The metal-ligand bond is
somewhat strengthened by this interaction, but the complementary anti-bonding molecular orbital from ligand-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligand_field_theory 2/4
11/2/2017 Ligand field theory - Wikipedia
to-metal bonding is not higher in energy than the anti-bonding molecular orbital from the bonding. It is filled
with electrons from the metal d-orbitals, howev er, becoming the HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) of
the complex. For that reason, O decreases when ligand-to-metal bonding occurs.
The greater stabilization that results from metal-to-ligand bonding is caused by the donation of negativ e charge
away from the metal ion, towards the ligands. This allows the metal to accept the bonds more easily . The
combination of ligand-to-metal -bonding and metal-to-ligand -bonding is a sy nergic effect, as each enhances
the other.
As each of the six ligands has two orbitals of -sy mmetry , there are twelv e in total. The sy mmetry adapted linear
combinations of these fall into four triply degenerate irreducible representations, one of which is of t2g
sy mmetry . The dxy , dxz and dyz orbitals on the metal also hav e this sy mmetry , and so the -bonds formed
between a central metal and six ligands also hav e it (as these -bonds are just formed by the ov erlap of two sets
of orbitals with t2g sy mmetry .)
The size of O determines the electronic structure of the d4 - d7 ions. In complexes of metals with these d-
electron configurations, the non-bonding and anti-bonding molecular orbitals can be filled in two way s: one in
which as many electrons as possible are put in the non-bonding orbitals before filling the anti-bonding orbitals,
and one in which as many unpaired electrons as possible are put in. The former case is called low-spin, while the
latter is called high-spin. A small O can be ov ercome by the energetic gain from not pairing the electrons,
leading to high-spin. When O is large, howev er, the spin-pairing energy becomes negligible by comparison and
a low-spin state arises.
The spectrochemical series is an empirically -deriv ed list of ligands ordered by the size of the splitting that they
produce. It can be seen that the low-field ligands are all -donors (such as I ), the high field ligands are -
acceptors (such as CN and CO), and ligands such as H2 O and NH3 , which are neither, are in the middle.
I < Br < S2 < SCN < Cl < NO3 < N3 < F < OH < C2 O4 2 < H2 O < NCS < CH3 CN < py (py ridine) < NH3 <
en (ethy lenediamine) < bipy (2,2'-bipy ridine) < phen (1,10-phenanthroline) < NO2 < PPh3 < CN < CO
See also
Crystal field theory
Ligand dependent pathway
Molecular orbital theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligand_field_theory 3/4
11/2/2017 Ligand field theory - Wikipedia
References
1. Ballhausen, Carl Johan,"Introduction to Ligand Field Theory",McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1962
2. Griffith, J.S. (2009). The Theory of Transition-Metal Ions (re-issue ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-
0521115995.
3. Schlfer, H. L.; Gliemann, G. "Basic Principles of Ligand Field Theory" Wiley Interscience: New York; 1969
4. G. L. Miessler and D. A. Tarr Inorganic Chemistry 3rd Ed, Pearson/Prentice Hall publisher, ISBN 0-13-035471-6.
5. Griffith, J.S. and L.E. Orgel. "Ligand Field Theory". (http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1957/qr/qr95711003
81#!divAbstract) Q. Rev. Chem. Soc. 1957, 11, 381-383
6. Frenking, Gernot; Shaik, Sason, eds. (May 2014). "Chapter 7: Chemical bonding in Transition Metal Compounds".
The Chemical Bond: Chemical Bonding Across the Periodic Table. Wiley -VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-33315-8.
7. C. R. Landis, F. Weinhold (2007). "Valence and extra-valence orbitals in main group and transition metal bonding".
Journal of Computational Chemistry. 28 (1): 198203. doi:10.1002/jcc.20492 (https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fjcc.20492).
External links
Crystal-field Theory, Tight-binding Method, and Jahn-Teller Effect (http://www.cond-mat.de/events/correl12/manuscript
s/pavarini.pdf) in E. Pavarini, E. Koch, F. Anders, and M. Jarrell (eds.): Correlated Electrons: From Models to
Materials, Jlich 2012, ISBN 978-3-89336-796-2
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this
site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligand_field_theory 4/4