Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transition Metals
Crystal field theory states that d or f orbital degeneracy can be broken by the electric
field produced by ligands, stabilizing the complex.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Discuss the relationships between ligand binding in a metal complex and the
degeneracy of the d orbitals and between the geometry of a metal complex
and the splitting of the d orbitals.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Key Points
The crystal field stabilization energy (CFSE) is the stability that results
from ligand binding.
Key Terms
The Crystal Field Theory (CFT) is a model for the bonding interaction between transition
metals and ligands. It describes the effect of the attraction between the positive charge
of the metal cation and negative charge on the non-bonding electrons of the ligand.
When the ligands approach the central metal ion, the degeneracy of electronic orbital
states, usually d or f orbitals, are broken due to the static electric field produced by a
surrounding charge distribution. CFT successfully accounts for some magnetic
properties, colors, and hydration energies of transition metal complexes, but it does not
attempt to describe bonding.
The electrons in the d orbitals of the central metal ion and those in the ligand repel each
other due to repulsion between like charges. Therefore, the d electrons closer to the
ligands will have a higher energy than those further away, which results in the d orbitals
splitting in energy. This splitting is affected by:
the metal’s oxidation state (a higher oxidation state leads to a larger splitting)
All of the d orbitals have four lobes of electron density, except for the dz2 orbital, which
has two opposing lobes and a doughnut of electron density around the middle. The d
orbitals can also be divided into two smaller sets. The dx2–y2 and dz2 all point directly
along the x, y, and z axes. They form an eg set. On the other hand, the lobes of the dxy,
dxz, and dyz all line up in the quadrants, with no electron density on the axes. These
three orbitals form the t2g set. In most cases, the d orbitals are degenerate, but
sometimes they can split, with the eg and t2g subsets having different energy. The CFT
accounts for this.
d x 2-y 2 dz2
d orbitals: This gives an overview of the d orbitals. The central model shows the
combined d-orbitals on one set of axes.
The crystal field stabilization energy (CFSE) is the stability that results from placing a
transition metal ion in the crystal field generated by a set of ligands. It arises due to the
fact that when the d orbitals are split in a ligand field, some of them become lower in
energy than before. For example, in the case of an octahedron, the t2g set becomes
lower in energy. As a result, if there are any electrons occupying these orbitals, the
metal ion is more stable in the ligand field by the amount known as the CFSE.
Conversely, the eg orbitals are higher in energy. So, putting electrons in them reduces
the amount of CFSE.
Octahedral Complexes
Octahedral complexes have six ligands symmetrically arranged around a central atom,
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Key Points
Key Terms
vertex: The common point of the two rays of the angle, or its equivalent
structure in polyhedra (meeting of edges) and higher order polytopes.
The term octahedral is used somewhat loosely by chemists, focusing on the geometry of
the bonds to the central atom and not considering differences among the ligands
themselves. For example, [Co(NH3)6]3+, which is not octahedral in the mathematical
sense due to the orientation of the N-H bonds, is referred to as octahedral.
Given that such a variety of octahedral complexes exist, it is not surprising that a wide
variety of reactions have been described. These reactions can be classified as follows:
Many reactions of octahedral transition metal complexes occur in water. For example,
[Co(NH3)5Cl]2+ slowly aquates to give [Co(NH3)5(H2O)]3+ in water, especially in the
presence of acid or base.
Both tetrahedral and square planar complexes have a central atom with four
substituents.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Key Points
The CFT diagram for tetrahedral complexes has dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals
equally low in energy because they are between the ligand axis and
experience little repulsion.
The CFT diagram for square planar complexes can be derived from
octahedral complexes yet the dx2-y2 level is the most destabilized and
is left unfilled.
Key Terms
Tetrahedral Complexes
The
image removal
of a pair
of
ligands
from the
Carboplatin: 2- and 3-
z-axis of dimensional representations of
the anti-cancer drug carboplatin
an
CFT energy diagram for square planar removal of the two ligands stabilizes the dz2
complexes: Notice how the dx2 – y2 level, leaving the dx2-y2 level as the most
orbital is unfilled.
destabilized. Consequently, the dx2-y2
remains unoccupied in complexes of metals
with the d8 configuration. These compounds typically have sixteen valence electrons
(eight from ligands, eight from the metal)
Color
Transition metal complexes are often colored due to either d-d or change band electron
transitions induced by the absorption of light.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Key Points
The colors in metal complexes come from the d orbitals because they
are not involved in bonding.
Key Terms
Metal complexes often have spectacular colors caused by electronic transitions induced
by the absorption of light. For this reason, they are often applied as pigments. We know
that light can be emitted corresponding to the difference in energy levels. We could
expect them to come from the d-orbitals. This is because they are not involved in
bonding, since they do not overlap with the s and p orbitals of the ligands. Most
transitions that are related to colored metal complexes are either d–d transitions or
charge band transfer.
d-d Transitions
Electrons can also be transferred between the orbitals of the metal and the ligands. In
Metal-to-Ligand Charge Transfer (MLCT), electrons can be promoted from a metal-based
orbital into an empty ligand-based orbital. These are most likely to occur when the metal
is in a low oxidation state and the ligand is easily reduced. Ligands that are easily
reduced include 2,2′-bipyridine (bipy), 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), CO, CN-, and SCN-. An
example of color due to MLCT is tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II), which is a versatile
photochemical redox reagent.
“Seeing” Color
We can perceive colors for two reasons: either we see it because that color is the only
color not absorbed or because all colors of visible light are absorbed except for a
particular color known as its complimentary color.
Large energy differences should correspond to smaller wavelengths and purple colors,
while small energy differences should result in large wavelengths and colors closer to
red. For example, you might expect to see red for a complex with a small energy gap
and large wavelength. Green is the compliment of red, so complexes with a small energy
gap will actually appear green.
Magnetic Properties
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Key Points
Key Terms
For example, monomeric Ti(III) species have one d electron and must be (para)magnetic,
regardless of the geometry or the nature of the ligands. Ti(II), with two d electrons, forms
some complexes that have two unpaired electrons and others with none.
Crystal field theory splitting diagram: Example of influence of ligand electronic properties
on d orbital splitting. This shows the comparison of low-spin versus high-spin electrons.
In order for this to make sense, there must be some sort of energy benefit to having
paired spins for our cyanide complex. That is, the energy level difference must be more
than the repulsive energy of pairing electrons together. Since systems strive to achieve
the lowest energy possible, the electrons will pair up before they will move to the higher
orbitals. This is referred to as low spin, and an electron moving up before pairing is
known as high spin.
Tetrahedral complexes have naturally weaker splitting because none of the ligands lie
within the plane of the orbitals. As a result, they have either have too many or too few d
electrons to warrant worrying about high or low spin. Square planar compounds, on the
other hand, stem solely from transition metals with eight d electrons. [Ni(CN)4]2-,
[Pt(NH3)3Cl]+, and [PtCl4]2- are all diamagnetic.
Since this encompasses the full spectrum of ligand strength, we can conclude that
square planar compounds are always low spin and therefore are weakly magnetic. In bi-
If there is interaction between the two (or more) metal centers, the electrons may couple,
resulting in a weak magnet, or they may enhance each other. When there is no
interaction, the two (or more) individual metal centers behave as if in two separate
molecules.
Previous Next