Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ent1
by James Perrett
Instructor
36
You have done a good job of addressing all
aspects of the assessment, making good
connections between some of the
recommendations of the researchers and your
modif ications to the lesson plan. I am not exactly
sure how the game relates to the smoking
lesson, but both lesson and game are well
/0 explained.
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
QM possessive apostrophe
T here should be a possessive apostrophe here. T he Uni T une In app has a good section on
apostrophes.
Comment 1
T his is not the right choice f or the context.
QM possessive apostrophe
T here should be a possessive apostrophe here. T he Uni T une In app has a good section on
apostrophes.
PAGE 3
QM no possessive apostrophe
A possessive apostrophe is not necessary here. T he Uni T une In app has a good section on
apostrophes.
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
RUBRIC: 10 20 9 6 : ASSIGNMENT #1 36 / 50
DESCRIPT ION 7 / 10
Provides a clear and coherent description of the chosen educational issue, highlighting its relevance f or
teaching practice. /10
FAIL Lacks description of chosen educational issue and/or f ails to highlight relevance
(0) f or teaching practice.
FAIL Lacks description of chosen educational issue and/or f ails to highlight relevance
(2) f or teaching practice.
FAIL Lacks description of chosen educational issue and/or f ails to highlight relevance
(4) f or teaching practice.
CREDIT Clearly describes chosen educational issue and overviews relevance f or teaching
(6.50) practice.
CREDIT Clearly describes chosen educational issue and overviews relevance f or teaching
(7) practice.
DISTINCTION Concisely and coherently describes chosen educational issue and convincingly
(7.50) supports its relevance f or teaching practice.
DISTINCTION Concisely and coherently describes chosen educational issue and convincingly
(8) supports its relevance f or teaching practice.
HIGH DISTINCTION Chosen educational issue and its relevance f or teaching practice are engagingly
(8.50) and accurately highlighted at the outset.
HIGH DISTINCTION Chosen educational issue and its relevance f or teaching practice are engagingly
(9) and accurately highlighted at the outset.
HIGH DISTINCTION Chosen educational issue and its relevance f or teaching practice are engagingly
(10) and accurately highlighted at the outset.
CRIT READING 7 / 10
Demonstrates critical reading of chosen article, highlighting articles justif ication f or recommendations.
/10
FAIL Lacks evidence of critical reading of the chosen article. Does not discuss
(0) author(s) process of moving f rom research question to recommendations f or
practice.
FAIL Lacks evidence of critical reading of the chosen article. Does not discuss
(2) author(s) process of moving f rom research question to recommendations f or
practice.
FAIL Lacks evidence of critical reading of the chosen article. Does not discuss
(4) author(s) process of moving f rom research question to recommendations f or
practice.
PASS Some critical reading apparent. Attempts to critically track the author(s) research
(5) process. Identif ies articles use of research f indings to justif y recommendations.
PASS Some critical reading apparent. Attempts to critically track the author(s) research
(6) process. Identif ies articles use of research f indings to justif y recommendations.
CREDIT Sound critical reading attempted. Reasonably attempts to critically track the
(6.50) author(s) research process by highlighting and evaluating elements of the article.
Articulates process by which research f indings are used to justif y
recommendations.
CREDIT Sound critical reading attempted. Reasonably attempts to critically track the
(7) author(s) research process by highlighting and evaluating elements of the article.
Articulates process by which research f indings are used to justif y
recommendations.
DISTINCTION Critical reading of the article is strong and balanced. Good attempt to critically
(7.50) analyse the journal article under evaluation and demonstrates thorough
understanding of the research process by which recommendations are generated.
DISTINCTION Critical reading of the article is strong and balanced. Good attempt to critically
(8) analyse the journal article under evaluation and demonstrates thorough
understanding of the research process by which recommendations are generated.
HIGH DISTINCTION Evaluation of the various elements of the research process as articulated in the
(8.50) article is excellent. Evidence of a strong, critical understanding of the process by
which recommendations are generated.
HIGH DISTINCTION Evaluation of the various elements of the research process as articulated in the
(9) article is excellent. Evidence of a strong, critical understanding of the process by
which recommendations are generated.
HIGH DISTINCTION Evaluation of the various elements of the research process as articulated in the
(10) article is excellent. Evidence of a strong, critical understanding of the process by
which recommendations are generated.
EDUC ISSUE 7 / 10
Provides clear and coherent description of chosen learning activity, highlighting links to chosen
educational issue. /10
CREDIT Provides a clear, straightf orward description of learning activity, making strategic
(6.50) links throughout to the chosen educational issue and to the KLA more broadly.
CREDIT Provides a clear, straightf orward description of learning activity, making strategic
(7) links throughout to the chosen educational issue and to the KLA more broadly.
DISTINCTION Provides a rich description of learning activity, including screen shots and imagery
(7.50) where appropriate. Convincingly argues relevancy of chosen educational issue to
learning activity and the KLA more broadly, using supplementary research texts.
DISTINCTION Provides a rich description of learning activity, including screen shots and imagery
(8) where appropriate. Convincingly argues relevancy of chosen educational issue to
learning activity and the KLA more broadly, using supplementary research texts.
HIGH DISTINCTION Provides an excellent description of learning activity, including screen shots and
(8.50) imagery where appropriate. Demonstrates sophisticated use of supplementary
research texts to argue the relevancy of chosen educational issue to learning
activity and their KLA more broadly.
HIGH DISTINCTION Provides an excellent description of learning activity, including screen shots and
(9) imagery where appropriate. Demonstrates sophisticated use of supplementary
research texts to argue the relevancy of chosen educational issue to learning
activity and their KLA more broadly.
HIGH DISTINCTION Provides an excellent description of learning activity, including screen shots and
(10) imagery where appropriate. Demonstrates sophisticated use of supplementary
research texts to argue the relevancy of chosen educational issue to learning
activity and their KLA more broadly.
PASS Provides basic links between suggested revisions/additions to the chosen learning
(5) activity and recommendations f rom the chosen article.
PASS Provides basic links between suggested revisions/additions to the chosen learning
(6) activity and recommendations f rom the chosen article.
DISTINCTION Coherently justif ies revisions/additions to the learning activity using the chosen
(7.50) article. Strategically employs supplementary research texts to strengthen this
justif ication. Some attempt to look outwards to consider implications f or practice
beyond this single activity.
DISTINCTION Coherently justif ies revisions/additions to the learning activity using the chosen
(8) article. Strategically employs supplementary research texts to strengthen this
justif ication. Some attempt to look outwards to consider implications f or practice
beyond this single activity.
HIGH DISTINCTION Provides highly insightf ul and cohesive revisions/additions to the learning activity
(8.50) using article recommendations and supplementary research texts as justif ication
f or these changes. Acknowledges the wide-ranging possibilities and af f ordances
of such considerations across their chosen KLA.
HIGH DISTINCTION Provides highly insightf ul and cohesive revisions/additions to the learning activity
(9) using article recommendations and supplementary research texts as justif ication
f or these changes. Acknowledges the wide-ranging possibilities and af f ordances
of such considerations across their chosen KLA.
HIGH DISTINCTION Provides highly insightf ul and cohesive revisions/additions to the learning activity
(10) using article recommendations and supplementary research texts as justif ication
f or these changes. Acknowledges the wide-ranging possibilities and af f ordances
of such considerations across their chosen KLA.
FAIL Work lacks structure; little evidence paper has been edited; terminology
(0) inappropriate; f requent spelling/ typographic errors. Poor paraphrasing; over-
reliance on quotes; no or inaccurate ref erence list and poor in-text ref erencing;
not submitted to T urnitin or high level of matches.
FAIL Work lacks structure; little evidence paper has been edited; terminology
(2) inappropriate; f requent spelling/ typographic errors. Poor paraphrasing; over-
reliance on quotes; no or inaccurate ref erence list and poor in-text ref erencing;
not submitted to T urnitin or high level of matches.
FAIL Work lacks structure; little evidence paper has been edited; terminology
(4) inappropriate; f requent spelling/ typographic errors. Poor paraphrasing; over-
reliance on quotes; no or inaccurate ref erence list and poor in-text ref erencing;
not submitted to T urnitin or high level of matches.
DISTINCTION Clear and concise structure; strengthened by relevant research; grammar and
(7.50) syntax mostly correct; cohesive text within word/time length; discriminating use of
appropriate vocabulary; f ew typographic or spelling errors.<br /><br />Consistently
accurate APA ref erencing; competent integration of evidence, low percentage f or
T urnitin; original work with insignif icant matches.<br />
DISTINCTION Clear and concise structure; strengthened by relevant research; grammar and
(8) syntax mostly correct; cohesive text within word/time length; discriminating use of
appropriate vocabulary; f ew typographic or spelling errors.<br /><br />Consistently
accurate APA ref erencing; competent integration of evidence, low percentage f or
T urnitin; original work with insignif icant matches.<br />
HIGH DISTINCTION Well-structured paper or innovative presentation; explicitly identif ies the key
(8.50) issues; cohesive, grammatically correct structure; very f ew typographic or spelling
errors.<br /><br />Consistently accurate APA ref erencing; highly competent
integration of evidence, submitted to T urnitin; original work with insignif icant
matches<br />
HIGH DISTINCTION Well-structured paper or innovative presentation; explicitly identif ies the key
(9) issues; cohesive, grammatically correct structure; very f ew typographic or spelling
errors.<br /><br />Consistently accurate APA ref erencing; highly competent
integration of evidence, submitted to T urnitin; original work with insignif icant
matches<br />
HIGH DISTINCTION Well-structured paper or innovative presentation; explicitly identif ies the key
(10) issues; cohesive, grammatically correct structure; very f ew typographic or spelling
errors.<br /><br />Consistently accurate APA ref erencing; highly competent
integration of evidence, submitted to T urnitin; original work with insignif icant
matches<br />