Professional Documents
Culture Documents
he bone-added osteotome si- Purpose: This article describes were used. Of the 138 implants that
and Opal Lumbsden for their encour- 14. Diss A, Dohan DM, Mouhyi J, et al. of dental implants placed using an os-
agement and support. Osteotome sinus floor elevation using teotome technique. J Periodontol. 2005;
Choukrouns platelet-rich fibrin as grafting 76:385-390.
material: A 1-year prospective pilot study 27. Nedir R, Bischof M, Vazquez L, et
REFERENCES with microthreaded implants. Oral Surg al. Osteotome sinus floor elevation without
1. Summers R. The osteotome Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. grafting material: A one year prospective
technique: Part 3. Less invasive methods 2008;105:572-579. pilot study with ITI implants. Clin Oral Im-
of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium. 15. Komarnyckyj OG, London RM. Os- plants Res. 2006;17:679-686.
1994;15:698-704. teotome single-stage dental implant place- 28. Lai Hong-Chang, Zhang Zhi-Yong,
2. Cavicchia F, Bravi F, Petrelli G. Lo- ment with and without sinus elevation: A Wang Feng, et al. Resonance frequency
calized augmentation of the maxillary sinus clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im-
analysis of stability on ITI implants with os-
floor through a coronal approach for the plants. 1998;13:799-804.
teotome sinus floor elevation technique
placement of implants. Int J Periodontics 16. Deporter D, Todescan R, Caudry
S. Simplifying management of the poste- without grafting: A 5-month prospective
Restorative Dent. 2001;21:475-485.
3. Toffler M. Osteotome-mediated si- rior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:
nus floor elevation: A clinical report. Int dental implants and simultaneous indirect 469-475.
J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:266- sinus elevation. Int J Periodontics Restor- 29. Choukroun J, Diss A, Simonpieri A,
273. ative Dent. 2000;20:476-485. et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): A second
4. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Tecu- 17. Coatoam GW, Krieger JT. A four- generation platelet concentrate. Part V:
cianu JF, et al. The modified osteotome year study examining the results of indirect Histologic evaluations of PRF effects on
technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative sinus augmentation procedures. J Oral Im- bone allograft maturation in sinus lift. Oral
Dent. 2001;21:599-607. plantol. 1997;23:117-127. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
5. Fugazzotto PA, De Paoli S. Sinus 18. Horowitz RA. The use of os- Endod. 2006;101:299-303.
floor augmentation at the time of maxillary teotomes for sinus augmentation at time of 30. Ling H, Lin Y, Hu X, et al. Compara-
molar extraction: Success and failure rates implant placement. Compend Contin Educ tive study of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and
of 137 implants in function for up to 3 Dent. 1997;18:441-452. platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the effect of
years. J Periodontol. 2002;73:39-44. 19. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus el- proliferation and differentiation of rat osteo-
6. Cosci F, Luccioli M. A new sinus lift evation procedures in the resorbed poste- blasts in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
technique in conjunction with placement of rior maxilla. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:707-713.
265 implants: A 6 year retrospective study. Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85:8-17. 31. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A,
Implant Dent. 2000;9:363-368. 20. Rosen PS, Summers R, Mellado et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): A second-
7. Nkenke E, Schlegel A, Schultze- JR, et al. The bone-added osteotome si- generation platelet concentrate. Part I:
Mosgau S, et al. The endoscopically con- nus floor elevation technique: Multicenter
Technological concepts and evolution.
trolled osteotome sinus floor elevation: A retrospective report of consecutively
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
preliminary prospective study. Int J Oral treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im-
plants. 1999;14:853-858. Endod. 2006;101:e37-e44.
Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:557-566.
8. Chen L, Cha J. An 8-year retro- 21. Emmerich D, Att W, Stappert C. Si- 32. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A,
spective study: 1,100 patients receiving nus floor elevation using osteotomes: A et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): A second-
1,557 implants using the minimally invasive systematic review and meta-analysis. generation platelet concentrate. Part II:
hydraulic sinus condensing technique. J Periodontol. 2005;76:1237-1251. Platelet-related biologic features. Oral
J Periodontol. 2005;76:482-491. 22. Ferrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
9. Yamada JM, Park H-J. Internal si- Dental implants placed in conjunction with Endod. 2006;101:e45-e50.
nus manipulation (ISM) procedure: A tech- osteotome sinus floor elevation: A 12-year 33. Simonpieri A, Del Corso M,
nical report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. life-table analysis from a prospective study Sammartino G, et al. The Relevance of
2007;9:128-135. on 588 ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. Choukrouns platelet-rich fibrin and metro-
10. Tilotta F, Lazaroo B, Gaudy JF. 2006;17:194-205. nidazole during complex maxillary rehabil-
Gradual and safe technique for sinus floor 23. Schleier P, Bierfreund G, Schultze- itations using bone allograft. Part I: A new
elevation using trephines and osteotomes Mosgau S, et al. Simultaneous dental im- grafting protocol. Implant Dent. 2009;18:
with stops: A cadaveric anatomic study. plant placement and endoscope-guided 102-111.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol internal sinus floor elevation: 2-year post- 34. Simonpieri A, Del Corso M,
Endod. 2008;106:210-216. loading outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. Sammartino G, et al. The Relevance of
11. Bruschi GB, Scipioni A, Calesini G, 2008;19:1163-1170. Choukrouns platelet-rich fibrin and metro-
et al. Localized management of sinus floor 24. Reiser GM, Rabinovitz Z, Bruno J, nidazole during complex maxillary rehabil-
with simultaneous implant placement: A et al. Evaluation of maxillary sinus mem- itations using bone allograft. Part II: Implant
clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im- brane response following elevation with
surgery, prosthodontics, and survival. Im-
plants. 1998;13:219-226. the crestal osteotome technique in human
plant Dent. 2009;18:220-229.
12. Fermergrd R, strand P. Os- cadavers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
teotome sinus floor elevation and simulta- 2001;16:833-840. 35. Choi BH, Zhu SJ, Jung JH, et al.
neous placement of implantsA 1-year 25. Artzi Z, Parson A, Nemcovsky CE. The use of autologous fibrin glue for clos-
retrospective study with Astra Tech im- Wide-diameter implant placement and in- ing sinus membrane perforations during si-
plants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008; ternal sinus membrane elevation in the im- nus lifts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
10:62-69. mediate postextraction phase: Clinical and Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:150-154.
13. Schmidlin PR, Muller J, Bindl A, et radiographic observations in 12 consecu- 36. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti
al. Sinus floor elevation using an os- tive molar sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im- L, et al. Systematic review of survival rates
teotome technique without grafting mate- plants. 2003;18:242-249. for implants placed in the grafted maxillary
rials or membranes. Int J Periodontics 26. Leblebicioglu B, Ersanli S, sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.
Restorative Dent. 2008;28:401-409. Karabuda C, et al. Radiographic evaluation 2004;24:65-577.
IMPLANT DENTISTRY / VOLUME 19, NUMBER 5 2010 453
37. Garg AK, Quinones CR. Augmen- 44. Toffler M. Site development in the 52. Boyne PJ. Analysis of performance
tation of the maxillary sinus: A surgical posterior maxilla using osteocompression of root-form endosseous implants placed
technique. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent. and apical alveolar displacement. Compend in the maxillary sinus. J Long Term Eff Med
1997;9:211-219. Contin Educ Dent. 2001;22:775-790. Implants. 1993;3:143-159.
38. Krennmair G, Krainhofner M, 45. Toffler M. Minimally invasive sinus 53. Jung J-H, Choi B-H, Zhu S-J, et
Schmid-Schwap M, et al. Maxillary sinus lift floor elevation procedures for simulta- al. The effects of exposing dental im-
for single implant-supported restorations: A neous and staged implant placement. N Y plants to the maxillary sinus cavity on si-
clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. State Dent J. 2004;38-44. nus complications. Oral Surg Oral Med
2007;22:351-358. 46. Summers R. The osteotome Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;
39. ten Bruggenkate CM, van den technique: Part 4Future site develop- 102:602-605.
Bergh JPA. Maxillary sinus floor elevation: ment. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1995; 54. Nedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM, et
A valuable preprosthetic procedure. Peri- 16:1080-1092. al. A 7-year life table analysis from a pro-
odontol 2000. 1998;17:176-182. 47. Summers R. Osteotome technique spective study on ITI implants with special
40. Thor A, Sennerby L, Hirsch J-M, et for site development and sinus floor aug- emphasis on the use of short implants. Re-
al. Bone formation at the maxillary sinus floor mentation. In: Jensen OT, ed. The Sinus sults from a private practice. Clin Oral Im-
following simultaneous elevation of the mu- Bone Graft. 2nd ed. Hanover Park, IL: Quin- plants Res. 2004;15:150-157.
tessence Publishing Co., Inc.; 2006:263-
cosal lining and implant installation without 55. Toffler M. Osteotome-mediated si-
272.
graft materialAn evaluation of 20 patients nus floor elevation. In: Sonick M, Hwang D,
48. Kahnberg Kahnberg K-E, Vannas-
treated with 44 Astra Tech implants. J Oral eds. Implant Site Development. 1st ed.
Lofqvist L. Sinus lift procedure using a
Maxillofac Surg. 2007;7(suppl 1):64-67. 2-stage surgical technique: I. Clinical and Hanover Park, IL: Quintessence Publishing;
41. Valentini P, Abensur D, Wenz B, et radiographic report up to 5 years. J Oral In press.
al. Sinus grafting with porous bone mineral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:876-884. 56. Toffler M. Treating the atrophic
(Bio-Oss) for implant placement: A 5-year 49. Block MS, Kent JN. Sinus aug- posterior maxilla by combining short im-
study on 15 patients. Int J Periodontics Re- mentation for dental implants: The use of plants with minimally invasive osteotome
storative Dent. 2000;20:245-253. autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. procedures. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent.
42. Toffler M. Staged sinus augmen- 1997;55:1281-1286. 2006;18:185-192.
tation using a crestal core elevation pro- 50. Doud Galli SK, Lebowitz RA, Giac- 57. Toffler M. Short implants: A viable
cedure (CCE) to minimize membrane chi RJ, et al. Chronic sinusitis complicating treatment option in the anatomically-
perforation. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. sinus-lift surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2001;15: challenged patient. Inside Dent. 2009;5:
2002;14:767-774. 181-186. 44-50.
43. Fugazzotto PA. Immediate implant 51. Tidwell JK, Blijdorp PA, Stoelinga 58. Toffler M, Toscano N, Holtzclaw
placement following a modified trephine/ PJW, et al. Composite grafting of the max- D, et al. Introducing Choukrouns platelet
osteotome approach: Success rates of 116 illary sinus for placement of endosteal im- rich fibrin (PRF) to the reconstructive sur-
implants to 4 years in function. Int J Oral plants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;21: gery milieu. J Implant Adv Clin Dent.
Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:113-120. 204-209. 2009;1:21-32.
Abstract Translations
schnittliche verbleibende Knochengewebshohe im Bereich
GERMAN / DEUTSCH unter der Kieferhohle (RSBH) des alveolaren Kamms lag bei
AUTOR(EN): Michael Toffler, DDS, Nicholas Toscano, 6.6 mm (Werte zwischen 4 bis 8 mm). Das durchschnittliche
DDS, MS, Dan Holtzclaw, DDS, MS Wachstum der Hohe der Implantierungsbereiche mit
Anhebung des Sinusbodens mittels Osteotomie (OMSFE) OMSFE/PRF lag bei 3.4 mm (Werte zwischen 2.5 bis 5 mm).
unter ausschlielicher Verwendung von thrombozyten- Es wurde eine Auswahl von 8 bis 11.5 mm langen (durch-
reichem Fibrin: Ein fruher Bericht unter Einbeziehung von schnittliche Lange 10.1 mm) und 3.5 bis 6 mm breiten
110 Patienten (durchschnittliche Breite 4.4 mm) Schraubimplantaten ver-
wendet. Von den insgesamt 138 eingepflanzten Implantaten
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG: Zielsetzung: Die vorliegende Ar- wurden 97 wiederhergestellt und blieben uber eine durch-
beit beschreibt eine Methodik sowie die fruhen Heilerfolge schnittliche Belastungszeit von 5.2 Monaten (Werte zwischen 1
bei einer lokalen Sinusanreicherung unter Verwendung eines bis 11 Monaten) vital und in Funktion. Die durchschnittliche
Kammgerichteten Ansatzes in Kombination mit einem Heilungsdauer fur die belasteten Implantate lag bei 4 Monaten
autologen Leukozyten- und Thrombozytenreichen Fi- bis zur Einsetzung der Stutzapparatur (Werte zwischen 3 bis 5
brinkonzentrat (PRF). Materialien und Methoden: Von Monaten). 3 Implantate versagten bereits vor Belastung fur eine
November 2008 bis Januar 2010 wurden 110 Patienten ins- fruhe Uberlebensrate von sowohl belasteten als auch un-
gesamt 138 Implantate durch Anhebung des Sinusbodens belasteten Implantaten in Hohe von 97.8%. Schlussfolgerung:
mittels Osteotomie (OMSFE) und unter zusatzlicher Ver- Eine fruhe Prufung der OMSFE/PRF Methodik fur eine lokal-
wendung von PRF eingepflanzt. Ergebnisse: Die durch- isierte Anhebung des Sinusbodens sowie Implantatsetzung
454 ABSTRACT TRANSLATIONS TOFFLER ET AL
zeigte ein hohes Ma an Sicherheit und Erfolg in den Bereichen concentrado de leucocitos autologos e fibrina rica em plaqu-
mit einer verbleibenden Knochengewebshohe im Bereich unter etas (PRF). Materiais e Metodos: De novembro de 2008 a
der Kieferhohle von 5 bis 8 mm. janeiro de 2010, 138 implantes foram colocados em 110
pacientes usando-se OMSFE com PRF. Resultados: A altura
SCHLUSSELWORTER: Wachstumsfaktoren, verbleibende residual media do osso subantral (RSBH) do rebordo alveolar
Knochengewebshohe im Bereich unter der Kieferhohle, Infraktur era 6.6 mm (variacao 4 a 8 mm). O aumento medio na altura
dos locais de implante por OMSFE/PRF era 3.4 mm (varia-
cao 2.5 a 5 mm). Uma variedade de implantes tipo parafuso
SPANISH / ESPAOL de 8 a 11.5 mm de comprimento (extensao media 10.1 mm)
AUTOR(ES): Michael Toffler, DDS, Nicholas Toscano, e 3.5 a 6 mm de largura (largura media 4.4 mm) foi usada.
DDS, MS, Dan Holtzclaw, DDS, MS Dos 138 implantes que haviam sido colocados, 97 foram res-
Elevacion del piso del seno a traves de osteotomos taurados e estiveram em funcionamento por um tempo de car-
(OMSFE) usando solamente fibrina rica en plaquetas: regamento medio de 5.2 meses (variacao 1 a 11 meses). O tempo
Primer informe sobre 110 pacientes de cura medio para os implantes carregados foi 4 meses ate a
insercao do suporte (variacao 3 a 5 meses). Tres implantes
ABSTRACTO: Proposito: Este trabajo describe una tecnica e falharam antes do carregamento para uma taxa de sobrevivencia
informa sobre la curacion inicial del aumento localizado del precoce tanto dos implantes carregados quanto dos descarrega-
seno usando un metodo crestal en combinacion con concen- dos de 97.8%. Conclusao: A revisao precoce da tecnica
trado de fibrina rica en plaquetas (PRF por sus siglas en OMSFE/PRF apresentada para elevacao localizada da superfcie
ingles) y leucocitos autologos. Materiales y metodos: Desde da cavidade e colocacao de implante demonstra um alto grau de
noviembre de 2008 a enero de 2010, se colocaron 138 im- seguranca e sucesso em locais com RSBH de 5 a 8 mm.
plantes en 110 pacientes usando una OMSFE con PRF.
Resultados: El altura media residual del hueso subantral PALAVRAS-CHAVE: fatores de crescimento, altura residual
(RSBH) de la cresta alveolar fue 6.6 mm (variacion de 4 a 8 do osso subantral, fratura incompleta
mm). El aumento medio de la altura en los lugares de los
implantes con OMSFE/PRF fue 3.4 mm (variacion de 2.5 a 5
mm). Se usaron una variedad de implantes tipo tornillo de 8 a RUSSIAN /
11.5 mm de largo (longitud media de 10.1 mm) y de 3.5 a 6 : Michael Toffler,
-
mm de ancho (ancho medio de 4.4 mm). De los 138 implantes , Nicholas Toscano,
que se haban colocado, 97 fueron restaurados y en funcion , , Dan Holtz-
durante un perodo de carga promedio de 5.2 meses (varia- claw,
,
cion de 1 a 11 meses). El perodo medio de curacion para los
implantes cargados fue de 4 meses hasta la colocacion del
pilar (variacion de 3 a 5 meses). Tres implantes fallaron antes (Osteotome-Mediated Sinus Floor Elevation, OMSFE)
de la carga para lograr una tasa de supervivencia inicial de los
implantes cargados y sin cargar del 97.8%. Conclusion: Una
:
!" # 110
evaluacion inicial de la tecnica OMSFE/PRF presentada para
la elevacion localizada del piso del seno y colocacion del
implante demuestra un alto grado de seguridad y exito en $%&'$. (.
lugares con RSBH de 5 a 8 mm.
PALABRAS CLAVES: Factores de crecimiento, altura resid-
ual del hueso subantral, infractura
,
(PRF).
'
!
!. 2008 .
PORTUGUESE / PORTUGUS 2010 . 110 138 -
AUTOR(ES): Michael Toffler, Cirurgiao-Dentista, Nicholas ,
OMSFE
Toscano, Cirurgiao-Dentista, Mestre em Ciencia, Dan Holtz- PRF. !.
claw, Cirurgiao-Dentista, Mestre em Ciencia
(RSBH)
Elevacao da Superfcie da Cavidade Mediada por Os- 6,6 ( -
teotomo (OMSFE) Usando-se Apenas Fibrina Rica em Pla- 4 8 ).
quetas: Relatorio Precoce Sobre 110 Pacientes ,
OMSFE/PRF, 3,4 ( 2,5
RESUMO: Objetivo: Este artigo descreve uma tecnica e 5 ). !
-
relata a cura precoce para aumento localizado da cavidade
8 11,5 ( 10,1
usando-se uma abordagem de crista em combinacao com um )
3,5 6 ( 4,4
IMPLANT DENTISTRY / VOLUME 19, NUMBER 5 2010 455
). " 97 138 , OZET: Amac: Bu calsma, bir kret yaklasmyla birlikte
otolog lokosit ve trombositten zengin fibrin (TZF) kon-
5,2 ( santresi kullanlarak yaplan lokalize sinus ogmantasyonu
1 11 ). teknigini tanmlamakta ve erken evrede iyilesmeyi anlatmak-
- tadr. Gerec ve Yontem: Kasm 2008den ocak 2010a kadar
4 ( 110 olguda TZF ile birlikte OASY kullanlarak 138 implant
3 5 ). # yerlestirildi. Bulgular: Alveoler srtn ortalama reziduel sub-
. # ,
antral kemik yuksekligi 6.6 mm (4 ile 8 mm arasnda) idi.
OASY/TZF ile implant yerlerinde ortalama yukseklik arts
97,8%. !. 3.4 mm (2.5 ile 5 mm arasnda) olarak bulundu. 8 ile 11.5 mm
$
OMSFE/PRF, uzunlugunda (ortalama uzunlugu 10.1 mm olan) ve 3.5 ile 6
mm genisliginde (ortalama genisligi 4.4 mm olan) vida tu-
,
runden cesitli implantlar kullanld. Yerlestirilen 138 implant-
, tan 97sine restorasyon uyguland ve ortalama olarak 5.2
RSBH 5 8 . aylk yukleme suresinde fonksiyon saglad (1 ile 11 ay aras-
nda). Yuklenen implantlarn abutman yerlestirmeye kadar
&+$$ : ,
ortalama iyilesme suresi 4 ay idi (3 ile 5 ay arasnda). Yukl-
, eme yaplmadan once 3 implant basarszlga ugrad ve boy-
lece, yuklenmis ve yuklenmemis implantlarn erken sagkalm
oran %97.8 olarak bulundu. Sonuclar: Lokalize sinus yuk-
TURKISH / TURKCE seltme ve implant yerlestirme icin sunulan bu OASY/TZF teknigi-
nin erken evrede degerlendirmesi, bu teknigin 5 ile 8 mm arasnda
YAZARLAR: Michael Toffler, DDS, Nicholas Toscano, reziduel subantral kemik yuksekligi ile birlikte yuksek duzeyde
DDS, MS, Dan Holtzclaw, DDS, MS guvenlik ve basar sagladgna isaret etmektedir.
Sadece Trombositten Zengin Fibrin Kullanlarak Osteotom
Araclgyla Sinus Yukseltme (OASY): 110 Hastadan Erken ANAHTAR KELIMELER: buyume faktorleri, reziduel sub-
Rapor antral kemik yuksekligi, infraktur.
JAPANESE /
456 ABSTRACT TRANSLATIONS TOFFLER ET AL
CHINESE /
KOREAN /