Gutenberg-Richter Law

logN(M)=a-bM
 Introduction

Earthquake magnitude number/per year

>9.0 0
8~8.9 1
7~7.9 18
6~6.9 108
5~5.9 800
4~4.9 6200
3~3.9 49000
2~2.9 300000
Dashed line: N is the number of earthquake
per year of magnitude= M M / 2
Solid line: N is the number of earthquake per
year of magnitude M
Gutenberg - Richter Relation

logN vs. M are typically modeled with a

Gutenberg - Richter relation:
logN(M)=a-bM
M is the earthquake magnitude
N is the number of earthquake per
year of magnitude.
a is called the productivity
b is called the b-value, and is typically
in the range of 0.8-1.1.
The b-value has served as a kind of
tectonic parameter.
1.8-1.0 oceanic ridge
1.0-0.7 interplate
0.7-0.4 intraplate
 Using the GR Relation

Suppose b=1, and you are given that there is

one M 5.0+ earthquake per year in the
region. How often does an M 7.0+ occur?
logN(M)=a-bM
log(1)=a-(1)(5) --> a=5.0
logN(7)=5-(1)(7)=-2
N(7)=10-2=0.01/year
 Some subtleties with GR
Need to distinguish between N(M) and n(M)
N(M) is a cumulative curve, giving the number of
earthquakes of magnitude M or larger per year.
n(M) is incremental, such that n(M)dM gives the
number of earthquakes in a magnitude range of
width dM, centered on M
dN ( M )
They are related: n ( M ) =
dM
Watch notation: some authors are not careful
with which symbol they use.
 How to find the b-value?
Two ways.
Count n(M) or N(M), then fit a least-squares line
to logN or logn vs M.
The alternative is the maximum likelihood
method: log10 e 0.434
b= =
(M M min ) (M M min )
Mmin is the smallest earthquake in the catalog.
M is the average.
Minimum magnitude is 4.8.
Average magnitude: 5.15
 Application to find the b-value:
1966 data
Least squares: We had b=0.84
Maximum likelihood:
0.434 0.434
b= = =1.24
(M Mmin) (5.15 4.80)

Dont be surprised if the two methods disagree.

Maximum likelihood puts more weight on smaller
magnitudes.
But the two approaches usually give closer results
for larger data sets.