Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Feedback can help an employee get better at what they do, and surprisingly employees
crave feedback.
Most managers dont provide enough feedback, and when they do, either make it too
negative or are too vague while trying to keep it positive.
As simple as it might seem, giving feedback is incredibly complex because of how delicate
we are as humans.
Most of these are so ingrained in a companys DNA that it only makes sense to learn how to
do these effectively.
Helping employees grow will not only make them happier and more engaged, but it will
make them provide better service to customers, leading to more profits.
Its in the companys best interests to take the feedback process very seriously.
There is also a sense that managers arent authentic enough. The feeling among many
employees is that managers dont care enough about employees to genuinely want to make
them better.
This is a very important point for managers:Employees will be able to tell very easily if
youre being genuine when giving feedback.
Do you genuinely want to help them get better? Are you genuinely trying to make them
improve? Or are you just venting your frustrations at them.
Besides being open and honest, give your feedback to employees in real time. The closer to
the event that you give feedback, the better it is.
14.9% lower turnover rates in companies that implement regular employee feedback.
2X as likely to be actively disengaged if employees are ignored by their manager.
4 out of 10 workers are actively disengaged when they get little or no feedback.
43% of highly engaged employees receive feedback at least once a week compared to
only 18% of employees with low engagement.
65% of employees said they wanted more feedback
58% of managers think they give enough.
These statistics show that there is clearly something wrong with the way feedback is done in
most companies.
Employees dont receive enough, most managers think they give enough, and feedback has
a direct connection with engagement.
Employee engagement is such a sensitive issue, and an employees psyche can be really
hard to deal with.
Whats interesting about their research, is that employees want this even more than praise, if
its provided in a constructive manner.
What they found was that by roughly a three to one margin, employees believe that
constructive feedback does more to improve their performance than positive feedback.
Within the same job satisfaction poll, employees were asked if they would prefer to receive
praise or corrective feedback, and 57% said they preferred to receive corrective feedback
versus 43% that said they would want the praise.
When they asked what was most helpful for their career, 72% of people said their
performance would improve if their managers would provide corrective feedback on their
employee appraisal forms.
The satisfaction forms also found a strong positive correlation between a persons level
confidence and his or her preference for receiving negative feedback.
A research paper, Tell Me What I Did Wrong Experts Seek and Respond to Negative
Feedback in The Journal of Consumer Research, says that when people are experts on a
subject, or consider themselves experts, theyre more eager to hear negative feedback, while
beginners are more likely to seek positive responses.
The reason for this is as people gain expertise feedback serves a different purpose.
When people are just beginning, they may not have much confidence, and they need
encouragement. But with experts, their focus is on their progress, and getting better.
Your manager, a few co-workers, and maybe even customers can give you feedback.
What a 360-degree performance appraisal does, is get everyone on the team to improve in
areas that might be hindering their personal or the teams growth.
One very important point about 360-degree feedback is that they should not be used in the
performance review process.
Many companies make that mistake, and its not the right thing to do. Remember, 360-
degree feedback measures strengths and weaknesses, not performance.
Global View
Getting feedback from different people can help you create a global view of who you are
and what your strengths and weaknesses are. Youll start to see patterns and repeated
themes from all of the feedback that comes in.
Continuous Growth
Career Development
With everyone telling you what your strengths and weaknesses are, youll be able to
develop a plan to improve yourself based on all of the feedback. As you continue to
develop and grow yourself, your career will develop based on improving your
weaknesses and focusing on your strengths.
Lack Of Follow-Up
Whenever someone sets goals and works on improving themselves or the team, its
important to continuously check in on the progress and see if anything can be
improved. If there is no follow up in the process, all of that initial effort will be wasted.
Many managers focus too much on weaknesses when giving feedback. Dont forget
about the strengths, you can always improve on your strengths, and people like hearing
what they do well.
More than anything, it depends on the culture inside your organization. if your company
allows open and honest feedback, annual performance reviews can be a great thing.
On the other hand, if there is a lot of fear and politics inside your culture, then it wont be a
good process.
If managers are close with their employees, and use annual performance reviews as part of a
much larger communication/feedback strategy, then it can be great.
Doing an introspective, and looking back on the year that passed is an important part of
growing.
That reflection allows you to plan smarter for the year ahead. Here are a few problems with
annual performance reviews.
Because it relies on opinion, and usually its one personas opinion, the way that they
are conducted is flawed. Sometimes perceptions make a manager think that an
employee is performing worse than they actually are,, which can lead to a poor review.
If an annual performance review is tied to a salary increase, then the whole process
becomes sensitive. A manager might feel bad about giving an employee a negative
review, and the employee might get defensive if anything negative is said about them.
Humans by nature are very sensitive, and since employee happiness is such an
important subject, managers dont want to have an open and honest conversation,
which again, leads to a flawed review.
Managers Wait To Deal With Issues
Managers Wait To Deal With Issues
Feedback needs to happen in real-time, otherwise, problems will just fester, and
nothing will be improved. What managers will often do, is wait until a review session to
discuss an issue instead of tackling it head on.
This can have a negative effect on company morale and culture, because during that
waiting time, the poor performer is demoralizing the rest of the team.
Would a basketball coach wait until the end of the season to give their players
feedback? Absolutely not.
Rater Bias is a huge problem with performance reviews, and most of the time we dont
even know that we have these biases.
Managers hire employees that are similar to them. When its time for these managers to
give reviews, their opinion is biased, and they end up giving a high review, regardless of
if they deserve it or not.
On the other side, managers that review employees that are different than them will be
biased to give them a lower review.
Too often, the review will be an hour-long session where the manager is telling the
employee what they did wrong, when in fact, it should be a 2-way conversation, with
the employee doing most of the talking. Ideally, employees would use that opportunity
to help managers improve their own performance.
Even if employees are allowed to give feedback, they are so anxious, that they choose
not to.
One of the most interesting parts of the study, was that employees would only react to the
negative feedback.
As an example, if a manager were to say something like youre doing great, but I think one
area to improve would be., the employee would only start listening after the but.
Another interesting finding in the study was that the more an employee feedback an
employee heard, the worse their performance was after the appraisal.
The study found that short-term goal setting was much more likely to improve performance
than annual performance reviews.
As an example, you could say, in this quarter I want our company to be the industry leader
(objective), and here is what will have to be done to get there:
Those are your three key results for that objective. Notice how specific and measurable the
key results are.
It doesnt say get a few guest blogs or get some new signups, these are very easy to
measure if youre hitting your target or not.
The company is supposed to set their own OKRs, and every employee is supposed to set
their own personal OKRs. Ideally, the personal OKRs are aligned with the companys OKRs.
The fact that the personal OKR is aligned with the company OKR is probably the best feature
of the system.
It aligns employees around the purpose of your company. One of the biggest motivators for
engagement is intrinsic motivation, and having employees work towards the same goals as
the company is incredibly satisfying.
Another important part of the OKR system is that everything is made public, meaning
anyone can see the companys OKRs and my personal OKR at any time.
This creates a sense of accountability among the team, and everyone helps each other reach
their goals.
In the book, he offers an alternative to the performance review, and its called the
performance preview.
His argument, is that performance reviews are backwards-looking, so theyre not very
productive.
Essentially, what youre doing is saying, lets sit down in a room, and look back at what
youve done in the last year, and see where you went wrong.
A much smarter idea, is to look forward, and define goals that you want to hit, that are
aligned with the companys core values, and then have regular check-ins to see how
youre doing on meeting those goals.
As he describes in his book, the performance preview has a chance to create true teams, with
everyone being held accountable for achieving team goals that reflect business objectives.
The one caveat that he mentions though, is that in order to work, there has to be trust and
honesty between everyone at every level of the organization.
This is easier said than done, but he warns that the performance preview process will fail if
there isnt trust and honesty between everyone.
The performance preview is incredibly similar to the OKR methodology described earlier.
Setting short term goals, and reviewing them consistently, working together as a team, is the
best way to create engaged, productive teams.
It turns out, according to research, that the frequency of feedback is probably the most
important element of all.
A study on feedback and performance by Harvard researchers, found that students success
was not correlated with size of the class, but the biggest factor was the frequency of
feedback from their teachers.
In Malcolm Gladwells book Blink, he reveals data that shows that most people who suffer an
injury due to doctor negligence dont actually sue their doctor.
According to polls gathered from interviews of these injured patients, it turns out that there
was a common factor that predicted which patients would be more likely to sue: those who
felt like they didnt get enough quality time with their doctor.
Its important that you have frequent feedback sessions with your employees as it will allow
yourself, the employee, and the company to grow.
In the long run, theyll thank you for it. Schedule time to meet with each of your employees
at least once every two weeks. When you meet with them, find out how you can help them
be better at what they do.
Feedback needs to be informal, frequent, and done authentically with an employees best
interests in mind.
Key Takeaways