Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Definitional Argument
Jessica Halley
Before 2007, in America alone, there were an estimated 2.5 to 3.5 million people
homeless each year and this number has only risen (Foscarinis, 2012, par. 1). Now imagine, on
top of knowing how many established citizens already need help, birth tourism or travel from
one country to another for the purpose of giving birth in the second country, thereby endowing
the newborn child with citizenship of the second country (birth-tourism, yourdictionary.com), is
still very common. This is possible thanks to the 14th amendment of the constitution. Though
American citizens needs should take precedence over non-American citizens receiving
citizenship, American citizens should still be willing to help those from other countries. A
The majority of the world participates in birth tourism, though it raises the most
controversy in The United States. There are many American citizens who are against giving
citizenship to people from outside countries, especially when taking into consideration how
many Americans are already without healthcare, jobs, food, and/or are homeless or lacking a
place of residence (homeless, yourdictionary.com). The citizens who are against birth tourism
feel as though the homeless American citizens should be provided housing and better resources
It could be argued that noncitizens do not have the intentions of obtaining citizenship
simply for American healthcare and/or jobs. Some have hopes of making a better life for
themselves and their families and are legitimately hard workers. For example, there are doctors,
lawyers, teachers, etc. who have come to the United States from other countries and have worked
hard to establish a good life for themselves and their families, and a good reputation. Plenty of
individuals from other countries look to expand their education in America. There are also some
who may even go back to their home country while still maintaining their American citizenship
CONTROVERSIES OF BIRTH TOURISM Page 3
in case it becomes needed in the future. This could be due to terrorist attacks a surprise attack
involving the deliberate use of violence against civilians in the hope of attaining political or
religious aims (terrorist attack, webster-dictionary.org), an example of this being the mass
shooting that occurred in Paris in 2016. These events make residents of that country feel unsafe,
causing them to want to relocate somewhere safer. Other reasons an individual could keep their
American citizenship on hand is if they become deathly ill and their country is not as advanced
in medicine as the United States are. There are a plethora of reasons one may need to leave their
country immediately.
While there are those individuals who have the best of intentions when looking to obtain
American citizenship, unfortunately there are some who take advantage of the many benefits
America has to offer. An example of this includes illegal birth tourism agencies. These
businesses are mainly in California and have had undercover investigations reveal that the
groups were evading taxes, encouraging women to lie to immigration officials and sometimes
defrauding hospitals (Sheehan, 2015, par. 4-5). The agencies located in California are majorly
known to home pregnant Chinese women and while no reliable data exists on the number of
Chinese births in the U.S, estimates by industry publications projected a total of 60,000 for
2014 (Sheehan, 2015, par. 6). Instances such as this, where individuals come from other
countries and participate in illegal acts, make it hard for American citizens to view birth tourism
as beneficial.
With this being said, Americans should also know that some of these women are having
their second child in America to avoid being punished for the one child policy, which limits
couples to one child and where fines, pressures to abort a pregnancy, and even forced
sterilization accompany second or subsequent pregnancies (Rosenberg, 2017, par. 1). However,
CONTROVERSIES OF BIRTH TOURISM Page 4
it is not an all-encompassing rule because it has always been restricted to ethnic Han Chinese
living in urban areas. Citizens living in rural areas and minorities living in China are not subject
to the law (Rosenberg, 2017, par. 2-3). Imagine having to choose between giving up a child or
simply relocating in order to save them. Americans today are constantly having more and more
children, so if one of them were put in that position, they would more than likely relocate.
As for the established American citizens who need better accommodations, there are
numerous scenarios to take into consideration. Individuals from other countries may be the ones
who develop more housing and/or more jobs for these people and they may also be the ones who
come up with a plan to provide health care to the citizens who need it. Preventing noncitizens
from entering a country other than their own, could actually be preventing others, such as
homeless Americans, from a better chance at life. Something else to consider when an American
is upset with the idea of noncitizens being given attention prior to the established citizens is that
some of these established citizens may have already been given the opportunity to better their
life. They may have been offered a job and turned it down. They may have been offered help and
refused. You cant always help those who dont want to help themselves.
There are endless amounts of topics that could be argued when it comes to birth tourism,
especially since it is not something that just takes place in America. In fact there have recently
been petitions to remove the first section of the14th amendment which guarantees citizenship
to any and all persons born or naturalized in U.S. It also guarantees all Americans their
constitutional rights and denies states the right to limit those rights through legislation. It also
ensures a citizen's "life, liberty, or property" will not be denied without due legal process
(Kelly, 2017, Par. 9). Removing this section of the amendment would end birth tourism
This being said, it would be unfair to say that all noncitizens simply are just looking for a
better chance at life, but it is fair to say that everyone should be given the chance to try. No one
country should be able to deny anyone that opportunity, especially if theyre willing to work hard
for it. Maybe the individual who is looking to better their life in America, is the one who will end
world hunger. Maybe theyll find a cure for cancer. Whos to say they wont find a solution to
homelessness or start a better healthcare system? If Americans tried a little harder to look at the
positive side at allowing others into the United States and imagining how life must feel from
their point of view, maybe they would start to be a little more understanding and accepting.
Maybe this would be the start of finding a common ground to accommodate both, established
References:
tourism
Foscarinis, M. (2012). Homelessness in America: a human rights crisis. Journal of Law in Society.
Retrieved from:
http://link.galegroup.com.libproxy.maricopa.edu/apps/doc/A312105447/AONE?u=mcc_main&si
d=AONE&xid=6c514fce
constitution-14th-amendment-summary-105382
https://www.thoughtco.com/chinas-one-child-policy-1435466
Sheehan, M. (2015). Born In the USA: Why Chinese Birth Tourism Is Booming In California.
tourism_n_7187180.html
dictionary.org/definition/terrorist%20attack