Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An agglutinin, a monomeric glycoprotein with a molecular mass of about 6.5 kDa and containing 18% sugar has been
purified to an apparent homogeneity from a 21 days old culture filtrate of an anthropophilic dermatophyte Tricophyton
rubrum. It is a human blood group non-specific agglutinin which also agglutinates animal erythrocytes and Ehrlich ascites
carcinoma and Sarcoma-180 cells. It is thermally stable and exhibits maximum activity at pH 8. Amino acid analysis shows
a significant amount of glycine, with no cysteine. Glycoproteins inhibited the hemagglutination of the agglutinin, but not the
simple sugars, including sialic acid. Fetuin is the most potent inhibitor among the glycoproteins tested. This inhibition gives
a hint to binding with Gal1-3GalNAc or Gal1-4GlcNAc residue containing sialic acid at the terminal position with 2-6
or 2-3 linkage.
carbonic anhydrase (29,000), trypsinogen (24,000), was calculated27 from the intercept on the ordinate of
trypsin inhibitor (20,000), lactalbumin (14,200) and plot [S]/A against [S], where [S] is the concentration
aprotinin (6,500). of fetuin and A is the difference of UV absorptions
The molecular weight of purified agglutinin was of agglutinin and agglutinin-fetuin complex.
further confirmed by gel filtration chromatography in
an FPLC system. Purified agglutinin (100 l) was Interaction with transformed cells
applied to the column and eluted with 100 mM Tris- The interaction of agglutinin (50 g/ml) with
HCl buffer (pH 8) at a flow rate of 0.25 ml/min. The Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) and Sarcoma (S-
protein peaks were assayed by automated UV 180) cells (1.2106 cells/ml each) was performed by
detection. Carbonic anhydrase (29,000), cytochrome c agglutination and the specificity of reaction was
(12,400) and aprotinin (6,500) were used as protein determined by agglutination-inhibition test, using the
markers for calibration in the FPLC system. cells instead of erythrocytes28.
Table 2Amino acid composition of T. rubrum agglutinin Table 3Hemagglutination inhibition of T. rubrum agglutinin
by various glycoproteins
Amino acid g/100 g mole/mole of agglutinin [Tests were performed with normal human B-erythrocytes]
those from Saccharomyces cerevisiae33, Agaricus despite triantennary structure of same sugar-like chain
blazei34, Beauveria bassiana35 and M. phaseolina36. (Fig. 5) of human transferrin showed equal inhibitory
Its thermostable nature may be due to high sugar potency, indicating that one additional
content (18%), which could protect the protein moiety oligosaccharide chain did not enhance binding. It is
against heating action, as reported in phytopathogenic interesting to note that porcine thyroglobulin41 (Fig. 5)
fungus M. phaseolina36 and edible mushroom with biantennary structure having one Neu5Ac2-
Psilocybe barrerae37 and dermatophyte agglutinins4. 6Gal1-4GlcNAc unit contributed equally in the
TRA agglutinated EAC cells like Ficus cunia27 and binding (Table 3). The inhibitory potency of birds
jack fruit28 lectins. Besides, TRA could also have an nest glycoprotein44 (Fig. 5), porcine salivary mucin
antiproliferative effect against cancer cells, like jack glycoprotein45 and 9.5S glycoprotein46 is 4 times less
fruit28 lectin. than fetuin and could be referred to a single
Hapten inhibition studies showed that no carbohydrate side chain consisting of Neu5Ac2-
monosaccharides, including free Neu5Ac and 3Gal1-3GalNAc, -O-glycosidically linked to Ser or
Neu5Gc, and oligosaccharides, including Gal1- Thr, which is common in fetuin and glycophorin.
4GlcNAc and Gal1-3GalNAc, inhibited TRA- Non-inhibitory effect of bovine submaxillary mucin
induced hemagglutination. Although neuraminic acid suggests that Neu5Ac2-6GalNAc -sequence is not
itself was non-inhibitory, several glycoproteins the strict requirement for the binding site of TRA.
containing terminal neuraminic acid-linked Colominic acid, a homopolymer of neuraminic acid
oligosaccharide chains inhibited hemagglutination linked in (2-8) fashion is not favourable for the
(Table 3), indicating the specificity of TRA towards binding site.
the complex carbohydrate chains of glycoproteins. Our results clearly demonstrate that TRA does not
However, surprisingly Neu5Ac2-3/2-6Gal1-4Glc bind free neuraminic acid, but recognizes terminal
was non-inhibitory. The highest inhibitory potency of Neu5Ac having both 2-6 and 2-3 linkage with
fetuin is suggested to be attributed to the glycoside either Gal1-3GalNAc or Gal1-4GlcNAc units
cluster effect38 generated by the three O-linked present in glycoproteins. Lectins isolated from the
oligosaccharide chains of Neu5Ac2-3Gal1-3 fruiting bodies of A. cylindracea8 and P. squamosus9
GalNAc1-O-Ser/Thr and three N-linked show weak or no binding for sialic acid, but have a
carbohydrate chains of Neu5Ac2-3/2-6Gal1-4 strong affinity towards sialoglycoconjugates
GlcNAc sequences to the protein core per molecule. containing Neu5Ac(2-3)Gal(1-3)GlcNAc/GalNAc
Although different sialooligosaccharide chains are and Neu5Ac(2-6)Gal(1-4)Glc/GlcNAc sequences,
present in glycophorin A39, 2-macroglobulin40 respectively. A lectin from the filament of Saraca
and 1-acid glycoprotein41 (Fig. 5), where the indica flower exhibits binding specificity towards
terminal sialic acid is either 2-6 and 2-3 Neu5Ac(2-6)Gal(1-4)Glc/GlcNAc47. The extra
cellular agglutinin from the phytopathogenic fungus
linked to T-disaccharide (Gal1-3GalNAc) and
M. phaseolina shows that among sialic acid-
N-acetyllactosamine (Gal1-4GlcNAc) units, yet they
containing trisaccharides, Neu5Ac2-3Gal1-
inhibited the hemagglutination with equal potency.
4GlcNAc possess the highest specificity10. However,
Asialoglycoproteins, N-acetyllactosamine, and
the present study could not define the exact linkage
T-disaccharide have no inhibitory effect (Table 3).
specificity of neuraminyl oligosaccharides.
So, Neu5Ac is required in conjugation with the
Quantitative inhibition studies, using different
carbohydrate chain of glycoprotein for inhibitory
neuraminyl oligosaccharides of specific linkage will
activity. The non-inhibitory effect of neuraminyllac-
be required to determine the preferred linkage
tose may allude to the importance of the acetamido
specificity of Neu5Ac, 2-3 or 2-6, as well as the
group at C-2 of GlcNAc for binding, since
penultimate sugar of Neu5Ac2-3/2-6Gal1-3/4- for
neuraminyllactosamine unit present in the
the highest binding.
glycoprotein is responsible for binding.
It is surprising that human transferrin42 having Conclusion
analogous biantennary oligosaccharide structure to It can be suggested from the foregoing results that
2-macroglobulin (Fig. 5) showed a less inhibitory TRA (having specificity for sialic acid-containing
effect than the latter. However, ceruloplasmin43 complex carbohydrate) may find as a valuable tool in
BHOWAL et al: EXTRACELLULAR AGGLUTININ FROM TRICOPHYTON RUBRUM 87
glycobiological research, particularly in the studies of 4 Bouchara, J P, Robert R, Chabasse D & Senet J M (1987)
sialic acid-containing glycoconjugates on the cell Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol 138, 729-736
5 Chabasse D & Robert R (1986) Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol
surface. In addition, this agglutinin may contribute to 137B, 187-193
the attachment of fungus to the host cells through the 6 Wang H, Gao J & Ng T B (2000) Biochem Biophys Res
specific recognition of glycoconjugates on the cell Commun 275, 810-816
surface. 7 Kochibe N & Matta K L (1989) J Biol Chem 264, 173-177
8 Yagi F, Miyamoto M, Abe T, Minami Y, Tadera K &
Goldstein I J, Glycoconj J (1997) 14, 281-288
Acknowledgement 9 Mo H, Winter H C & Goldstein I J (2000) J Biol Chem 275,
The authors wish to thank Dr Mainak Majumder of 10623-10629
this department for his help in preparing the 10 Bhowal J, Ghosh S, Chatterjee B P & Guha A K (2003) 6th
manuscript. Int Symp on Eukaryotic Cell Surface Macromolecules, pp.
47, Kolkata, India
11 Mitra A, Guha A K & Chatterjee B P (1994) Biochem Arch
References 10, 33-39
1 Kocourek J (1986) in The Lectins, Properties, Functions and 12 Sarkar M & Kabat E A (1979) Carbohydr Res 69, 143-149
Applications in Biology and Medicine (Liener I E, Sharon N 13 Ahmed H & Chatterjee B P (1989) J Biol Chem 264, 9365-
& Goldtein I J, eds.), pp.1-32, Academic Press, Orlando 9372
2 Kawagishi H, Mori H, Uno A, Kimura A & Chiba S (1994) 14 Ray S & Chatterjee B P (1989) Carbohydr Res 191, 305-314
FEBS Lett 340, 56-58 15 Aminoff D (1961) Biochem J 81, 384-392
3 Tronchin G, Esnault K, Sanchez M, Larcher G, Marot- 16 Davis B J (1964) Ann NY Acad Sci 121, 404-427
Leblond A & Bouchara J P (2002) Infect Immun 70, 6891- 17 Lowry O H, Rosebrough N J, Farr A L & Randall R J (1951)
6895 J Biol Chem 193, 265-275
88 INDIAN J. BIOCHEM. BIOPHYS., VOL. 41, APRIL-JUNE 2004
18 Ahmed H & Chatterjee B P (1986) in Lectins, Biology, 35 Kossowska B, Lamer-Zarawska E, Olczak M & Katnik-
Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (Bg-Hansen T C & Prastowaska I (1999) Comp Biochem Physiol B 123, 23-31
Van Driessche E, eds.), Vol 5, pp. 125-133, W de Gruyter, 36 Bhowal J (2002) Studies on Agglutinin from
Berlin Phytopathogenic Fungus Macrophomina phaseolina with
19 Laemmli U K (1970) Nature (London) 227, 680-685 respect to Biochemical and Physiological Properties, Ph.D.
20 Dubois M, Gilles K A, Hamilton J K, Rebers P A & Smith F thesis, Jadavpur University, Kolkata
(1956) Anal Chem 28, 350-356 37 Hernandez E, Ortiz R, Lopez F, Masso F, Montano LF,
21 Lindahl U (1970) Biochem J 116, 27-34 Martinage A & Zenteno E (1993) Phytochemistry 32, 1209-
22 Sarkar N & Chatterjee B P (1983) Carbohydr Res 112, 113- 1211
121 38 Wu J H, Song S C, Chen Y Y, Tsai M C, Kabat E A & Wu A
23 Pal R, Ahmed H & Chatterjee B P (1987) Biochem Arch 3, M (1998) FEBS Lett 427, 134-138
399-412
39 Lisowska E (2001) in The Molecular Immunolgy of Complex
24 Heinrikson R L & Meredith S C (1984) Anal Biochem 136,
Carbohydrates-2 Kluwer, (Wu A M, ed), pp.155-169,
65-74
Academic Publishers
25 Goodwin T W & Morton R A (1946) Biochem J 40, 628-632
26 Matsumoto I, Jinbo A, Kitagaki H, Galovtchenko- 40 Hanaoka K, Pritchett T J, Takasaki S, Kochibe N, Sabesan S,
Matsumoto A M & Seno N (1980) J Biochem (Tokyo) 88, Paulson J C & Kobata A (1989) J Biol Chem 264, 9842-9849
1093-1096 41 Heerze L D & Armstrong G D (1990) Biochem Biophys Res
27 Ray S, Ahmed H, Basu S & Chatterjee B P (1992) Commun 172, 1224-1229
Carbohydr Res 242, 247-263 42 Spik G, Bayard B, Fournet B, Strecker G, Bouquelet S &
28 Ahmed H, Chatterjee B P & Debnath A K (1988) J Biosci Montreuil J (1975) FEBS Lett 50, 296-299
13, 419-424 43 Endo M, Suzuki K, Schmid K, Fournet B, Karamanos Y,
29 Al-Mahmood S, Colin S & Bonaly R (1991) J Biol Chem Montreuil J, Dorland L, van Halveek H & Vliegenthart J F G
266, 20882-20887 (1982) J Biol Chem 257, 8755-8760
30 Ishikawa F, Oishi K & Aida K (1983) Agric Biol Chem 47, 44 Wieruszeski J M, Michalski J C, Montreuil J, Strecker G,
587-592 Peter-Katalinic J P, Egge H, van Halbeek H, Mutsaers J H &
31 Ishikawa F & Oishi K (1989) Agric Biol Chem 53, 1769- Vliegenthart J F G (1987) J Biol Chem 262, 6650-6657
1776 45 Herp A, Wu A M & Moschera J (1979) Mol Cell Biochem
32 Weinstock K & Ballous C E (1986) J Biol Chem 261, 16174- 23, 27-44
16179
33 Basu J, Kundu M, Mukherjee K & Chakrabarti P (1986) 46 Chatterjee B P, Vaith P, Chatterjee S, Karduck D &
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 136, 596-602 Uhlenbruck G (1979) Int J Biochem 10, 321-327
34 Kawagishi H, Nomura A, Yumen T & Mizuno T (1988) 47 Majumder M & Chatterjee B P (2001) XVI Int Symp on
Carbohydr Res 183, 150-154 Glycoconjugates, The Hague, The Netherlands