The learned trial court has recorded the conviction on the basis of

uncorroborated testimony of Aradhana, the sole interested alleged

eye witness, despite the fact that prosecution failed to prove
beyond doubt that she was present at the spot at the time of alleged
occurrence and without noticing the contradiction and
improvements made by her in her testimony.
The learned trial court failed to appreciate evidence regarding
unreliability, contradictions and large scale improvements made by
her.
The learned trail court misread the oral and documentary evidence
and gave the finding on sunrises and conjectures.
It dismissed the major lacunas as minor lacunas.
The learned trial court failed to appreciate effective delay in
lodging complaint/memorandum and manipulated documents by
the prosecution.
The probable story contended by the accused was not considered
The defence evidence and defence versions were neither examined
nor considered.
So no reason has been given for ignoring/rejecting the defense
evidence and defense versions in totality.
Equal treatment is required to be given to the defense evidence and
witness as two witnesses platoo and Thomas was not put among
the court.
The prosecution did not bring the coach Thomas in witness box.
The fact shows that during investigation deceased Ruchika was not
examined by investigating officers.when there are two different
points are available then one favoring the accused must be
accepted.
The story propounded by the prosecution itself disprove the
intention .
 The prosecution story that Ruchika came to meet appellant in his
office para-3
As per the version of prosecution girls remained silent for two
days, they did not show any reaction in MTA.she did not mention
any incident to Thomas and paltoo.
It is also argued that act of molestation by the accused is totally
false as it was impossible to commit that type of act at very that
moment and at very that spot.