You are on page 1of 29

Simulation of

Fluid-Structure Interactions
in Aeronautical Applications
Martin Kuntz
Jorge Carregal Ferreira
ANSYS Germany
D-83624 Otterfing
Martin.Kuntz@ansys.com

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 1


Outline

• Flow Analysis with CFX-5.6


– Numerical scheme
– Turbulence modeling
– Applications
• Structural Analysis with ANSYS
– Applications
• Fluid-Structure Interaction with ANSYS / CFX
– Multiphysics
– Applications

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 2


ANSYS Organisation

ANSYS, Inc.

Business
Units Mechanical Meshing Fluids

ANSYS ICEM-CFD CFX


Core
Technologies

Integration
Platform ANSYS Workbench

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 3


CFX-5 Numerical Method

• Finite volume method for hybrid grids

• Conservative, vertex-based discretization


• Implicitly coupling of equations
• Rhie/Chow pressure-velocity coupling
• Algebraic multigrid
• Scalable parallelization
• Second order space and time discretization
• Suitable for whole range of Mach- and Reynolds
numbers
December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 4
CFX-5 Turbulence Modeling
k-ε model

• Variety of models
– For different types of flow
– With different SST model

computational effort
• Examples
– One-equation models
(KE1E)
– Two-equation models
(SST, k-eps)
– Reynolds stress models
(LLR, SSG)
– DES / LES models
December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 5
NACA 4412 Airfoil

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 6


Shear-Stress Transport Model

• Optimized model for flow with separation and


adverse pressure gradients
• Zonal model
– k-omega model near the wall
– k-epsilon model in freestream
• Blending dependent on solution
• Additional limiter for turbulent viscosity
• Automatic blending between
• Wall treatment
– Logarithmic law on coarse grids
– Low-Re formulation on fine grids
December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 7
Aerodynamic Applications

• DLR F6 Wing/Body/Nacelle/Pylon configuration


– Particpation at AIAA drag prediction workshop 2003,
Orlando
– Analysis of accuracy and performance of CFD codes
– Participants
• Industry: Airbus, Boeing, CESNA
• Research centers: NASA; DLR, ONERA, NAL, QinetiQ
• Universities
• Two Configurations
• Wing / body
• Wing / body/
nacelle / pylon

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 8


DLR F6: Lift for Wing Body

• Wing / body
Configuration
– Medium grid
– 5.8 million nodes
– ICEM-Hexa
• Excellent Lift Coefficient
agreement for
complete range
of incident

Angle of Attack [Deg]

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 9


DLR F6: Turbulence Model

NASA Codes CFX 5

CL increased by 0.015
when SST A1 changed
from 0.31 to 0.33 (Reduced
separation, comparable to
S-A turbulence model)

⎡ ρk a1 ρk ⎤
µ t = min ⎢α *
ω ΩF2 ⎥⎦
;

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 10


DLR F6: Lift vs. Drag

CFX-5

Lift Coefficient Drag Coefficient


Drag Coefficient
• Design parameter drag
• Good agreement with SST model
• Constant deviation for Spalart-Almaras model
December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 11
Computational Performance

• Lift and Drag


converged
after 120
iterations
• Oscillations in
residuals due
to transient
separation
• Computation
time about
12h fort 6 M
nodes on 16
processors

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 12


Structural Analysis

• Initial focus on
analysis of solids Magnetic
– Structural
Fluid
analysis, thermal
analysis Electrostatic

• Expanding focus Structural

to other fields Thermal


– Multiphysics Electrical
environment HF
EMAG

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 13


Strategy: Multiphysics

ANSYS MultiPhysics

Heat
Electricity
Transfer

Solid
Mechanics

Fluid
Magnetism
Mechanics

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 14


Fluid-Structure Interaction

• Simultaneous • Simultaneous run of


solution of multiple individual software
fields in single solver – Using advanced and
– Non-optimal software validated features of
for individual fields participating codes
– Requirement for
– Exchanging data at
common grid
common boundaries
– Large problems
or overlapping
become
computationally domains
expensive
⇒ ANSYS / CFX code
coupling
December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 15
FSI Classification

CFD Structural
Multiphysics
Electromagnetics Thermal

Iterative Explicit Implicit


Coupling algorithm
One-way Two-way

Interaction domain Surface Volume

Pressure Force Displacement

Exchange variables Velocity Mom. source

Heat flux Heat source Temperature

Transfer medium Files MPI

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 16


Two-way Coupling

FSI FSI
Time Time
loop loop

ANSYS CFX-5
solver solver
Stagger Coef.
loop loop

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 17


Interaction Domain

• Surface coupling Fluid Solid


at 2D interface
• Volume coupling Fluid Electro-
at 3D domain Structure magnetics

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 18


Data Transfer

• Variables
– Variables available in both fields
• Transformation
– System of units, scaling
• Interpolation
– Dissimilar meshes
• Data transfer media
– Files, MpCCI

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 19


FSI Examples

• Gas turbine
• Heart valve
• Aerofoil flutter

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 20


FSI Application: Gas Turbine

• Gas turbine rotor: 113 blades


• Interaction: Structural / thermal / fluid
• CFX
– Fluid flow and CHT in blades
• ANSYS
– Directly coupled elements
– Thermal and structural analysis of blades

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 21


Turbine: CFD

Pressure

Streamlines

Temperature

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 22


Turbine: Thermal/Mechanical

Displacement

Temperature

Equivalent stress (SEQV)


December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 23
St Jude Heart Valve

• Popular bi-leaflet design


• Coupling CFX-5 and Dynamic Rigid Body
Module
• Several re-meshing steps

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 24


St Jude Heart Valve

Static Result Animation

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 25


St Jude Validation

• Valve Angle against time

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 26


Wing Flutter

• AGARD 445.6 testcase


• Experimental set-up
described in AGARD
Report 765
• Wall-mounted semispan
model, mahogany
• Wing aspect ratio:
1.6525, quarter-chord
sweepback angle 45 deg.

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 27


Wing Flutter

• Test case : Mach number 0.901


• CFD grid: 272.600 nodes, CSA grid: 960 nodes
• Grid generation ICEM-HEXA

December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 28


Summary

• Fluid Structure Interaction software for


aerodynamic applications
– Accurate prediction of flow field and global
parameters
– High performance
– Efficient coupling algorithms
• Future
– Continuation of validation work
– Improvement of usability
December 2003 3rd FENET Annual Industry Meeting Slide 29

You might also like