Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rajat Dang
THE DENTURE IN THE ORAL ENVIRONMENT Placement of a removable prosthesis in the oral
cavity produces profound changes of the oral environment that may have an adverse
effect on the integrity of the oral tissues .Mucosal reactions could result from a
mechanical irritation by the dentures, an accumulation of microbial plaque on the
dentures, or occasionally, a toxic or allergic reaction to constituents of the
denture material. The continuous wearing of dentures may have a negative effect on
residual ridge form because of bone resorption.
Direct
Sequelae
Caused
by
Wearing
Removable
Prostheses:
Furthermore, wearing complete dentures that function poorly and that impair
masticatory function could be a negative factor with regard to maintenance of
adequate muscle function and nutritional status,
particularly in older persons.There are several aspects of the interaction between
the prosthesis and the oral environment.Surface properties of the prosthetic
material may affect plaque formation on the prosthesis; however the original
surface chemistry of the prosthetic material is modified by the acquired pellicle
and thus is of minor importance for the establishment of plaque . On the contrary,
surface irregularities or microporosities greatly promote plaque accumulation by
enhancing the surface area exposed to microbial colonization and by enhancing the
attachment of plaque. Furthermore, plaque formation is greatly influenced by
environmental conditions such as the design of the prosthesis, health of
adjacentmucosa, composition of saliva, salivary secretion rate, oral hygiene, and
denture-wearing habits of the patient. The presence of different types of dental
materials in the oral cavity may give rise to electrochemical corrosion, but
changes in the oral environment due to bacterial plaque may constitute an important
cofactor in this process. Corrosive galvanic currents have been implicated in the
burning mouth syndrome (BMS), oral lichen planus, and altered taste perception.
Most often it is difficult to establish a definite causal relationship because
mechanical irritation or infection may also be involved. For instance, local
irritation of the mucosa by the dentures may increase mucosal permeability to
allergens or microbial antigens. This makes it difficult to distinguish between a
simple irritation and an allergic reaction against the prosthetic material,
microbial antigens, or agents absorbed to the prosthesis capable of eliciting an
allergic response. The matter is further complicated by the fact that certain
microorganisms (e.g., yeasts) are able to use methylmethacrylate as a carbon
source, thereby causing a chemical degradation of the denture resin.
DIRECT SEQUELAE CAUSED BY WEARING DENTURES Denture Stomatitis The pathological
reactions of the denture-bearing palatal mucosa appear under several titles and
terms such as denture-induced stomatitis. denture sore mouth. denture stomatitis,
inflammatory papillary hyperplasia, and chronic atrophic candidosis. In the
following sections, the term denture stomatitis will be used with the prefix
Candida-associated if the yeast Candida is involved. In the randomized populations,
the prevalence of denture stomatitis is about 50% among complete denture wearer.
3. The patient should be instructed in meticulous oral and denture hygiene; the
patient should be told to wear the dentures as seldom as possible and
to keep them dry or in a disinfectant solution of 0.2% to 2.0% chlorhexidine during
nights
REDUNDANT TISSUE The forces of the mandibular teeth on the maxilla cause an
excessive resorption of the anterior aspect of the maxilla and the mandibular teeth
supererupt. The tissue in this region becomes hyperplastic and may form an epulis
fissuratum in the anterior maxillary fold. As the anterior aspect of the maxilla
resorbs, there is a concurrent resorption of bone under the mandibular partial
denture base. The occlusal plane drops posteriorly and rises anteriorly. Denture
Irritation Hyperplasia
A common sequela of wearing ill-fitting dentures is the occurrence of tissue
hyperplasia of the mucosa in contact with the denture border. The lesions are the
result of chronic injury by unstable dentures or by thin, overextended denture
flanges. The proliferation of tissue may take place relatively quickly after
placement of new dentures and is normally not associated with marked symptoms. The
lesions may be single or quite numerous and are composed of flaps of hyperplastic
connective tissue.
Traumatic Ulcers Traumatic ulcers or sore spots most commonly develop within 1 to 2
days after placement of new dentures. The ulcers are small and painful lesions,
covered by a gray necrotic membrane and surrounded by an inflammatory halo with
fine, elevated borders .The direct cause is usually overextended denture flanges or
unbalanced occlusion. Conditions that suppress resistance of the mucosa to
mechanical irritation are
Burning Mouth Syndrome Local Factors Mechanical irritation Allergy Infection Oral
habits and parafunctions Myofascial pain Systemic Factors Vitamin deficiency Iron
deficiency anemia Xerostomia Menopause Diabetes Parkinson's disease Medication
Psychogenic Factors Depression Anxiety Psychosocial stressors
Management
In denture wearers in whom no organic basis for the complaints is identified, the
approach of the prosthodontist should be very careful. The situation may be further
complicated by the fact that the patients often claim that their psychiatric
disorders are due to the poor dentures and the inadequate prosthetic treatment they
have received. The patient's symptoms should always be taken seriously, but any
comprehensive
prosthetic
treatment,
including
treatment
with
implant-supported
Gagging The gag reflex is a normal, healthy defense mechanism. Its function is to
prevent foreign bodies from entering the trachea. Gagging can be triggered by
tactile stimulation of the soft palate, the posterior part of the tongue, and the
fauces. In sensitive patients, the gag reflex is easily released after placement of
new dentures, but it usually disappears in a few days as the patient adapts to the
dentures. Persistent complaints of gagging may be due to overextended borders
(especially the posterior part of the maxillary denture and the distolingual part
of the mandibular denture) or poor retention of the maxillary denture. However, the
condition is often due to unstable occlusal conditions or increased vertical
dimension of occlusion because the unbalanced or frequent occlusal contacts may
prevent adaptation and trigger gagging reflexes. Patients who develop a gagging or
vomiting problem with dentures are frequently difficult to treat, and the
difficulty is primarily one of determining the cause. Some patients have a
hypersensitive gagging reflex evident prior to and during the denture construction.
The insertion or removal of complete dentures may elicit gagging. However,
occasionally a patient develops a gagging problem after denture insertion.
Longitudinal studies of the form and weight of the edentulous residual ridge in
wearers of complete dentures have demonstrated a continuous loss of bone tissue
after tooth extraction and placement of
complete dentures. The reduction is a sequel of alveolar remodeling due to altered
functional stimulus of the bone tissue. The process of remodeling is particularly
important in areas with thin cortical bone (e.g., the buccal and labial parts of
the maxilla and the lingual parts of the mandible). During the first year after
tooth extraction, the reduction of the residual ridge height in the midsagittal
plane is about 2 to 3 mm for the maxilla and 4 to 5 mm for the mandible. Jahangiri
et al (1998) describes the clinical feature of residual ridges. • Continuous size
reduction of the residual ridge, largely due to bone loss after tooth extraction. •
General feature: RRR is chronic progressive ,and irreversible. • The rate is
fastest in first six month of extraction. • • • Rate is variable between different
persons ,within the same person at different times, within same person at different
sites. Has a multifactorial cause Anatomic factor, prosthetic factor, metabolic and
systemic factor, fundamental factor.
Anatomical Factors 1. More important in the mandible versus the maxilla 2. Short
and square face associated with elevated masticatory forces 3. Alveoloplasty
INDIRECT SEQUELAE
Masticatory Ability and Performance One of the strong indications for prosthodontic
treatment is to improve masticatory function. In this context, the term masticatory
ability is used for an individual's own assessment of his or her masticatory
function,
whereas efficiency is to be understood as the capacity to reduce food during
mastication. There is no striking evidence that malnutrition could be a direct
sequelae of wearing dentures. However, edentulous women have a higher intake of fat
and a higher consumption of coffee and a lower intake of ascorbic acid compared
with dentate subjects within the same age group.
Nutritional Status and Masticatory Function Four factors are related to dietary
selection and the nutritional status of wearers of complete dentures: masticatory
function and oral health, general health, socioeconomic status, and dietary habits.
In healthy individuals there is no evidence that the nutritional intake is impaired
in wearers of complete dentures or that replacement of ill-fitting dentures with
well-fitting new dentures will causea major improvement . Also, reduced salivary
secretion rate during mastication has a negative effect on masticatory ability and
efficiency
2. The patient should be motivated to practice proper denture wearing habits such
as not wearing dentures during the night. Finally, it is
important to remind and to explain to our patients that treatment with complete
dentures is not a "definitive" treatment and that their collaboration is important
to prevent the long-term risks associated with the consequences of wearing comlete
dentures.