REVISED SYLLABUS REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW? SCHOOL YEAR 2017-2018 REMEDIAL LAW. REVIEW I (Covers Civil and Criminal Procedures) HENEDINO M. BRONDIAL CIVIL PROCEDURE 1. JURISDICTION ‘A. Classes of Jurisdiction ~ Jurisdiction according to its nature: original, appellate ~ Jurisdiction according to its object; corresponding principles i. over the subject matter ii, over the persons of the parties iii. over the “res” iv. over the issues Vs over the territory B. Elements of Jurisdiction C. Jurisdiction of Regular Courts . Supreme Court . Courts of Appeals Regional Trial Court A. Intellectual Property Courts B. Special Courts 4. Family Courts 5, Metropolitan Trial Courts Municipal Trial Courts in cities Municipal Trial Courts and Municipal Circuit Courts 6. Sandiganbayan 7. Court of Tax-Appeals 8. & Quasi-Judicial Bodies . Quasi-Courts 10.Sharia’h Courts: appellate, district, circuit D. Discuss the concept, description and application of the following: 1. Delegated jurisdiction 7, Universal jurisdiction 2. Special jurisdiction 8. Epistolary jurisdiction 3. Limited jurisdiction 9. Expanded jurisdiction 4, Primary jurisdiction 5. Residual jurisdiction 6. Equity jurisdictionReferences: J. Section 5, Article VIN, 1986 Constitution 2. Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980 3. BP. Big. 129 4, RA 7691 5. RA 8369 (Family Courts Act) 6. SC-AO No. 113-95- Intellectual Property Courts 7. PD 1486; 1606 (Sandiganbayan) 8. RA 7975; 8249; 10660 (Sandiganbayan) 9. RA 9282 (Court of Tax Appeals) 10.RA 9054 (Sharia*h Courts) Cases: 1. Duero vs CA ~373 SCRA 11 * 2. Donato vs. Court of Appeals — 417 SCRA 216 3. Gonzaga vs CA - 394 SCRA 472 4. Escobal vs Garchitorena— 422 SCRA 45 5. Duncano vs. Sandiganbayan, 762 SCRA 663 * 6. Agan, Jr. vs Phil Intemational Air Terminal, Co. Inc.- 420 SCRA 575 7. Liga Ng Mga Barangay National vs Atienza, Jr. 420 SCRA 562 8. Manila Bankers Like Insurance Corp. vs. Nz Kok Wei— 418 SCRA 454 9. Office of the Court Administrator vs. Sardillo—401 SCRA 583 14, Katon vs. Palanca — 437 SCRA 565 15. Figueroa vs. People, 558 SCRA 63 * 16. Hannah Serana vs. Sandiganbayan, 653 SCRA (7/6/11) * 17. Pat-og Sr. vs. Civil Service Commission, 697 SCRA 567 (June, 2013) * 18. Boston Equity Resources, Inc. vs. CA, 699 SCRA * 19. People vs. Henry T. Go, March 25, 2014 * 20. City of Manila vs, Judge Cuerdo, February 4, 2014 * 21. City of Lapu-Lapu vs. Phil. Eco. Zone Authority, Nov. 26, 2014 22, St. Mary Crusade Foundation, Inc. vs. Riel, 745 SCRA 73 23, Lomondot vs. Balindong, 762 SCRA 494 * (read together with Mun. of Tangkal vs. Balindong, Jan. 11, 2017 24, Regulus Dev. Inc. vs. De la Cruz, 781 SCRA 607 (1/25/16)* * must readI. RULES I to $ A, Actions: Commencement (Sections 3 and §, R-1) Cases: |. Alday vs, FGU Insurance~ 350 SCRA 2. Korea Technologies vs. Lerma, 542 SCRA, 3. Mercado vs. CA, 569 SCRA 4. Navarro vs. MBTC — 429 SCRA 439 5. Proton Pilipinas vs. Banque Nationale de Paris, 460 SCRA 6, Bautista vs. Unangst, 557 SCRA 256 7. Ruby Shelter Builders vs. Formaran, 578 SCRA 283 8. St. Louis University vs. Cobarrubias, 626 SCRA 649 * 9. Gipa vs. Southern Luzon Institute, 726 SCRA, June 18, 2014 * 10. Reyes vs. People, 763 SCRA 226 (2015) B. One suit for one action (Sec. 3, R-2) Splitting a single cause of action (Sec. 4, R-2) Joinder of Causes of action (8-5, R-2) Case: Dynamic Builders vs. Presbitero, 755 SCRA 90 (2015) C. Parties to Civil Actions (S-1, R-3) Joinder of Parties (S-6, 7, R-3) Indispensable and Necessary Parties (S-7,8, R-3) Class Suit (S-12, R-3) Death or Separation of a Party (S-16,17,18, R-3) Transfer of Interest (S-19, R-3) Contractual Money Claims (S-20, R-3) Cases: 1, Relucio vs. Lopez, 373 SCRA 578 2. De Castro vs CA 386 SCRA 301 * 3. Orguiola vs CA ~ 389 SCRA 461 4. China Banking Corp., vs Oliver— 390 SCRA 263 * 5. David vs. Paragas, Jr. 751 SCRA 648 * 6. Land Bank vs. Cacayuran, 757 SCRA, April 22, 2015 * 7. Lotte Phils. Co. Inc, vs. De la Cruz— 464 SCRA 591 8. Carabeo vs. Dingco, 647 SCRA 200 * 9. De la Cruz vs, Joaquin - 464 SCRA 576 10. Navarro vs. Escobido, 606 SCRA I 11, Divinagracia vs. Parilla, 753 SCRA 87 D. Venue of Actions: real actions, personal actions Case: 1. Pacific Consultants International Asia vs. Schonfeld - 516 SCRA 2. Biaco vs. Counbtryside Rural bank — 515 SCRA 106 3. BPI Saviungs bank vs. Sps, Yujuico — 763 SCRA 486 (7/2015)*Mi. E, Summary Procedure vs. Small Claims suit ~ What are their salient characteristics ~ How to determine if the case is summery or under smell claims Case: ALL. Ang Network Inc, vs. Mondejar, 714 SCRA (1/28/14) RULES 6-9 A. Kinds of Pleadings (R-6) Complaint and Answer (S-3,4, R-6) Defenses: Negative and Affirmative (S-5, R-6) Counterclaims: Compulsory and Permissive (S-6, R-6) Reply (S-10, R-6) Cases: Alba vs. Malapajo—780 SCRA 534 . Lim Teck Chuan vs. Uy -752 SCRA 268 . Metrobank vs. CPR Promotions -760 SCRA 59 Valdez vs. Dabon - 775 SCRA 1 - Republic vs. Sandiganbayan — 406 SCRA 190 Caneland Sugar Corp. vs. Alon — 533 SCRA 28 B. Parts of a Pleading (R-7) Verification and Certification ($-4,5, R-7) Cases: 1. Alma Jose vs, Javellana— 664 SCRA 1 2. Medado vs. Heirs of Antonio Consing — 665 SCRA 534 3. COA vs. Paler - 614 SCRA 4. Basan vs. Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils. — 749 SCRA 541 5. Uy vs. CA~770 SCRA 513 6. People vs. Arojado — 774 SCRA 193 C, Allegations in Pleadings (R-8) Actionable documents (S-6,7, R-8) Specific denial (S-10, R-8) Cases: 1. Femando Medical Enterprises vs. Wesleyan University 781 SCRA 508, January 20, 2016 2. Go Tong Electrical Supply vs. BPI Family Savings Bank 760 SCRA 486 3. Asian Const. & Dev. Corp. vs. CA - 458 SCRA. 4. Benguet Exploration Inc. ys. CA — 351 SCRA.D. Effect of Failure to Plead (R-9) Waiver of defenses and objections (S-1, R-9) Default ($-3, R-9) Cases: 1. BDO vs. Tansipek ~ 593 SCRA 456 2. Salvador vs. Rabaja — 749 SCRA 654 3. Bitte vs. Jonas — 777 SCRA 489 IV. RULES 10-13 A. Amended and Supplemental Pleadings (R-10) Kinds of Amendments (8-2.3,4,5, R-10) ‘Supplemental Pleadings (S-6, R-10) B, Time/Period for Filing Responsive Pleadings (R-11) Answer (S-1,2,3,4,5, R-11) Reply (8-6, R-11) C. Bill of Particulars (R-12) D. Filing and Service of P.J. and other papers (R-13) Distinction between Filing and Service (S-2, R-13) Filing: Manner, completeness, Proof (S-3,12, R-13) Service: Mode, Completeness, Proof (S-5,6,7,8,10,13, R-13) Priorites in Modes of Service (S-11, R-13) Cases: 1. Yujuico vs. United Resources Asset Mgt. Corp. — 760 SCRA. 2. Lisam Enterprises vs. Banco De Oro ~ 670 SCRA 3. Tiu vs. Phil. Bank of Communications - 596 SCRA 432 4, Remington Industrial Sales Corp. vs. CA -382 SCRA 499 5. Palileo vs. Planters Dev. Bank -738 SCRA 6. Heirs of Numetiano Miranda vs, Miranda — 700 SCRA V. RULE 14— Summons A. What is a Summons (S-2,5, R-14) B. Who issues (S-1, R-14) C. Who serves (8-3,4, R-14) D. Kinds of Sumimons a. Service in person (S-6, R-14) b. Substituted (S-7, R-14) c. Extraterritorial (8-15, R-14) 1. personal 2. publication 3. any mode 4. Publication Is service of summons thru the DFA upon persons outside the country valid?E. On whom served 2, On Corporations 1. public (S-13, R-14) 2. Private (a) domestic (S-11, R-14} (b) foreign (S-12, R-14) b. On natural persons 1. prisoners ($-9, R-14) 2. minors and incompetent (S-10, R-14) 3. unknown identity and whereabouts (S-14, R-14) c. On entities without judicial personality (8-8, R-14) F. Proofs of Service (S-18,19, R-14) Cases: 1. Valmonte vs CA-252 SCRA * 2. Millenium Ind. & Com, Corp., vs Tan- 326 SCRA 3. EB. Villarosa vs. Benito 312 SCRA * 4. Santos vs. PNOC Exploration, 566 SCRA 272 5. Mason ys. CA, 413 SCRA 6. Jose vs. Boyon, 414 SCRA 7. Manotoc vs. CA ~ 499 SCRA 21 * 8. Ong vs. Co, February 25, 2015 * 9. Domagas vs. Jensen ~ 448 SCRA 663 10. Dole Phil. Vs. Quilala — 557 SCRA 433 * 11, Green Star Express v. Nissin Universal Robina Corp - 761 SCRA 12. Guy vs. Gacott — 780 SCRA $79 (1/13/16) G. Voluntary Appearance (S-20, R-14) 1, Sunrise Garden Corp. vs. CA~771 SCRA 616 VIL RULES 15-19 A. Motions (R-15) Definition (S-1,2,3) Requirements (S-4,5,6) Omnibus Motion (S-8) B. Motion to Dismiss (R-16) Grounds (S-1) Distinction: a. Jurisdiction over the person from jurisdiction over the subject matter b. Notice of Lis Pendens (S-14, R-13) from Litis Pendentia ©. Lack of cause of action from failure to state a cause of action 4. Bar by prior judgment from conclusiveness of judgment . Prescription from laches Effect of Dismissal (S-5)C. Dismissal of Actions (R-17) Dismissal Upon Notice (S-1) Dismissal Upon Motion (S-2) Failure to Prosecutc ($-3) D. Pre-Trial (R-18) - AM, No. 03-1-09 Supreme Court effective August 16, 2004 (Guidelines to be observed by trial courts judges and clerks of Court in the conduct of pre-trial and use of deposition-discovery measures) - Failure to appear at the pre-trial (S-5) - Pre-Trial Brief (S-6) E, Intervention (R-19) Who may intervene (S-1) When to intervene (S-2) Cases: + Acampado ys. Cosmilla~771 SCRA 535 . Laude vs. Gines-Jabalde 775 SCRA 408 ‘De Guzman Ir, vs. Ochoa, 648 SCRA 677" Office of the Ombudsman vs. Sison, 612 SCRA* Anonuevo vs. Intestate Estate of Jalandoni, 636 SCRA Rodriguez vs. CA, 698 SCRA 352 Femandez ys. CA, 691 SCRA 167 Ching vs. Cheng, 737 SCRA 610, 10/8/2014" ‘Yao vs. Perello, 414 SCRA 10. Pinlac vs. CA, 410 SCRA 11. Chipongian vs. Benitez-Lirio -768 SCRA 204 Per avawyE VII. RULES 23 to 32 A. Modes of Discovery (R-23 to 29) 1 Depositions Pending Action (R-23) a. Use of depositions (S-4) b. Officers to take depositions (S-10, 11,12) ¢. Deposition upon written examination (S-15) d. Deposition upon written interrogatories (S-25) oe. Effects of errors and irregularities (S-29) 2. Depositions before Actions or Pending Appeal (R-24) 3. Interrogatories to Parties (R-25) a, Effect of failure to serve written interrogatories (S-6) 4, Admission by Adverse Party (R-26) a. Effect to failure to file and serve request for admission (S-25) 5. Production or Inspection of Documents or things (R-27) 6. Physical and Menta] Examination (R-28) ~ Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery (R.29)B, Trial (R30) Notice (S-1) Adjournments and Postponement (S-2,3,4) Order of Trial (S-5) €. Consolidation or Severance (R-31) Consolidation (S-1) Severance (S-2) D. Trial By Commissioner (R-23) Distinguish from trial with Assessors Cases: Dasmarinas Garments, Inc. vs. Reyes, 225 SCRA 622 (1993) Go vs. People, 677 SCRA 213 * ‘Vda. De Manguerra vs, Risos, 563 SCRA 499 * |. Allied Agri-Business Development Co. Inc. vs. CA, 299 SCRA 680 5. People vs. Webb, 312 SCRA 573 * 6. Afulugencia vs. Metro Bank, 715 SCRA 399, February 5, 2014 * 7. Disini vs, Sandiganbayan, 623 SCRA 8. People vs. Bustamante, 697 SCRA 9. Metrobank vs. Sandoval, 691 SCRA 92 * 10. Republic vs. Heirs of Enrique Oribello, 692 SCRA 645 * 11. Marano vs. Pryce Gases Inc. 755 SCRA 56 12. Phil. Health vs. Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, 744 SCRA “must read aye VII. RULES 33 to 38 A. Demutrer to Evidence (R-33) - Distinguish between civil and criminal actions Cases: 1. Bernardo vs. CA ~ 278 SCRA 782 2. Radiowealth Finance Co. vs, Del Rosario — 335 SCRA 288 Cabador vs. People ~ 602 SCRA 760 Claudio vs. Saraza~ 768 SCRA 356 Felipe vs. MGM Motor Trading Corp. ~ 771 SCRA 360 Republic vs. Gimenez ~778 SCRA 261 (1/11/16) ayay B. Judgment on the Pleadings (R-34) C. Summary Judgment (R-35) Cases: 1. Republic vs. Shell Petroleum Corp. —777 SCRA393 2. Comglas Corp. vs. Santos Car Check Center — 754 SCRA 481 3. Phil Bank of Communications vs. Go. — 642 SCRA 4. Adolfo vs. Adolfo -753 SCRA 580D. Entry of Judgments and Final Orders (R-36) ~ Several judgments (8-4) ~ Separate judgments (S-5) Judgments against entities without personality ($-6) REMEDIES AGAINST FINAL JUDGMENTS IX. RULE37 A. New Trial or Reconsideration (R-37) Grounds for New Trial ($-1 > Grounds for Reconsideration (S-1) Effects of a Grant or Denial (S-6,7,8) Cases: 1. Mendezona vs. Ozamis 376 SCRA 2. People vs. Li Ka Kim ~ 429 SCRA 169 3, Padilla Rumbaua vs, Rumbaua ~ 596 SCRA 15 4. Chua vs. People -762 SCRA 523 5. Senit vs. Peo[ple ~ 778 SCRA 425 (1/11/16) X. RULES 40-45 (APPEALS) A. Appeal from MTC to RTC (R-40) Perfection of Appeal (S-4) Docket Fees (S-5) Appeals from order of dismissal ($-8) B. Appeal from RTC to CA (R-41) Modes of Appeal (S-2) Notice of Appeal vs Record on Appeal (S-5,6) Perfection of Appeal (S-9) C. Petition for Review from RTC to CA (R-42) How appeal taken (S-1) Failure to comply with requirements (S-3) Perfection of Appeal (S-8) D. Appeals from QUA to CA (R-43) Contents of Petition (8-6) Action on Petition (S-8) Effect of Appeal (S-12) B, Ordinary Appealed Cases to the CA (R-44) Appellants Brief (S-7) Appellees Brief (S-8) F. Appeal by Certiorari (R-45) Contents of Petition (S-4) Requirements (S-7)G. Dismissal of Appeal (R-50) Material Data Rule (S-1) Cases: 1, Estinozo vs. CA —544 SCRA 422, 2. Heirs of Sps. Reterta vs. Sps. Mores, 655 SCRA 580 3. Manaloto vs. Veloso III, 632 SCRA 4. Latorre vs. Latorre, 617 SCRA * 5. De Pedro vs. Romesan Dev. Corp., 743 SCRA 52 * 6. Alfredo vs. Borras, 404 SCRA 145 7. People vs. Corpuz, 412 SCRA 479 8. PAL vs. CA, 417 SCRA 196 9. Augusto vs. Rios, 417 SCRA 408 10.Escueta vs. Lim ~512 SCRA 411 11 Springfield Dev. Corp. vs. RTC Judge of Mis. Occ. - $14 SCRA 326 12.Maravilla vs. Rios — 767 SCRA 522 REMEDIES AGAINST EXECUTORY JUDGMENTS XI. RULES 38 and 47 A. Relief fiom Judgments (R-38) Petition for Relief from Judgment (S-1) Petition for Relief from Denial of Appeal (S-2) Time for filing Petition (S-3) Preliminary Injunction ($-5) Cases: 1, Mesina vs, Meer— 383 SCRA625 2. The Provincial Government of Aurora Vs. Mateo ~757 SCRA 222 3. Thomasites Center for Intemational Studies Vs, Rodriguez — 782 SCRA 391 (1/27/16) B. Annulment of Judgment (R-47) Coverage. Grounds, Period (S-1,2,3) Contents (S-4) Effect (S-7) Cases: 1. Diona vs. Balanque— 688 SCRA 22 2. Santos vs. Santos ~ 737 SCRA 637 3. Yuk Lik Ong vs. Co—752 SCRA 42 3. Lasala vs. National Food Authority — 767 SCRA 430 4. Manguba vs, Morga-Seva -775 SCRA 312 5. Sibal vs. Buquel = 778 SCRA 517 (1/11/16) 10‘XI. RULE 39 - EXECUTION AND SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENTS A. Kinds of Execution 1. Matter of right, ministerial (S-1) 2. Discretionary (S-2) 8. stay of discretionary execution (S-3) b. judgments not stayed by appeal ($-4) B. Mode of Execution 1, By motion (S-6) 2. By independent action (S-6) C. Manner of Execution 1. when party is dead (S-7) 2. when judgment is for money (S-6) 3. when judgment is for specific act (S-10) 4, when it is a special judgment ($-11) D. Properties exempt from execution (S-13) B, Third Party Claim (S-16) F, Execution Sale ($-17 to 26) G. Redemption: 1. The right of redemption vs equity of redemption 2. Who may redeem (S-27) 3. Effects of redemption ($-29) H. Other remedies to filly satisfy judgment 1. Examination of judgment obligor (8-36) 2. Examination of obligor of judgment-obligor (S-37) 3. Appointment of receiver (5-41) 4. Sale of ascertainable interest (S-42) 1. Judgment: principal vs surety (S-46) J. Bffect of Judgment (S-47) 1.in rem 2. in personam 3. res judicata K. Bffect of foreign judgment (S-48) - Bailes vs Bafies~ 374 SCRA 340 Fajardo vs. Quitalig, 400 SCRA 25 . Santos vs. COMELEC ~ 399 SCRA 611 . City of Iligan vs. Principal Mngmt Gr. 407 SCRA 554 . Villaruel vs. Fernando, 412 SCRA 54* Morta vs. Bagagnan, 415 SCRA 624 * . Serrano vs. CA, 417 SCRA 415 . D’ Armoured Sec. Agency vs. Orpia~ 461 SCRA 312 . FEBTC vs. Toh Sr. — 404 SCRA 590 * 10. Panotes vs. Townhouse Dev. Corp. ~ 512 SCRA 269 11, Stronghold Insurance vs. Felix - 508 SCRA 357 * 12. Fujiki vs. Marinay, 700 SCRA 69 * 13. RCBC vs. Serra, 701 SCRA 124 14, Heirs of Magdaleno Ypon vs. Ricaforte, 700 SCRA 778 15. City of Cebu vs. Dedamo, 689 SCRA 547 * 16. BPI vs. Guevarra, 752 SCRA 342 * PNAWAULS © uCRIMINAL PROCEDURE ON JURISDICTION A, Supreme Court: 1. No original Jurisdiction over criminal cases 2. Appellate jurisdiction: a) by petition for review b) by notice of appeal B, Court of Appeals 1. No original jurisdiction 2. Appellate jurisdiction: a) by notice of appeal b) by petition for review C. Sandiganbayan 1. Original and exclusive jurisdiction under the ff. guidelines: a. what offense or crime was committed a) R.A. 3019 — Anti Graft and Corrupt Practices Act b) R.A, 1379 —the law on Tll-gotten Wealth ©) Chap. Il, Title VII, Bk. 2 of RPC — Bribery d) Exec. Orders 1,2, 14, 14-A —PCGG cases ¢) Estafa under the Hannah Serana case, 542 SCRA, 1/22/08 4 Falsification under the Ramiscal vs Sandiganbayan, 630 SCRA b. Who committed the offense/crime b-1. Public officers in the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the government with salary grade 27 according to R.A. 6758. ‘The Compensation and Position Classification Act of 1989 Read: Escobal vs. Garchitorena, 422 SCRA b-2. Private individuals committing the offense/crime with public officers, Read: People vs. Henry T. Go, March 25, 2014 Garcia vs. Sandiganbayan, 603 SCRA People vs. Benipayo, 586 SCRA . How was the offense/erime committed Read; Lacson vs. Executive Secretary, 301 SCRA Sanchez vs. Demetriou, 227 SCRA Hannah Serana vs. Sandiganbayan, 542 SCRA Sen. Leila M. De Lima vs. Hon. Juanita Guerrero GR. No. 229781, October 10, 2017 2. Appellate Jurisdiction All cases decided by the RTC in the exercise of original or appellate jurisdiction over cases of public officers with salary grade less than 27 Charged with offenses/crimes aforementioned D. Regional Trial Courts 1, Original exclusive: all criminal cases which are not within the exclusive Jurisdiction of any court. The offense must catty a penalty of more than six years or prision major 2. Appellate jurisdiction: all criminal cases from the MTC Note: The ff. offenses are cognizable only by the RTC regardless of the penalty impossible: 2Violations of the Omnibus Election Code Violations of the Intellectual Property Law Violations of the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 Violations of the Anti- Money Laundering Law ‘Violations of the Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002 Cases of Written Defamations po eae ge E, Family Courts (RA 8369) 1, Exclusive original: @, where a party is a minor at the time of commission b. violence against women and children ©. child abuse a. drug cases F. Metropolitan/Municipal Trial Court 1. All violations of city/municipal ordinances 2. Alll offenses punishable with imprisonment of not more than 6 years 3. Violations of traffic rules and regulations 4, Violations of the Bouncing Check Law 5. Damage to property with fine of not more than P10,000.00 G. Courts of Muslim Mindanao (RA 6734 as amended by 9054) 1. Shari'ah Circuit courts 2. Shari*ah District courts 3. Shati’ah Appellate courts ~ All personal, family and property relations cases between muslims residing in the autonomous region of muslim mindanao H, What are military courts? Only service-oriented cases... Note: Read the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (RA 10175) Read Bonifacio vs. RTC of Makati, Br. 149, 620 SCRA Read Disini Jr. vs. Secretary of Justice, Feb. 18, 2014, 716 SCRA RULE 110 — Prosecution of offenses A. Institution of Criminal Actions (See. 1) ~ how is criminal action instituted - when is it deemed instituted ~ who is qualified to institute it: a) by complaint, de parte b) by information, de oficio Read: Jimenez vs. Sorongon, 687 SCRA 151 B. Sufficiency of Complaint or Information (Sec. 6) ~ name of accused ~ name of offended party ~ name of offense ~ cause of accusation: qualifying and aggravating circumstances ~ place of commission = date of commission BRead: People vs. Valdez, 663 SCRA 272 Miguel vs. Sandiganbayais, 675 SCRA 560 People vs. Soria, 685 SCRA 483 C. Amendment vs. Substitution (Sec. 14) ~ distinguish ~ compare with rule 10 D. Place where action is to be instituted (Sec. 15) ~ venue is jurisdictional in criminal cases Read: Union Bank vs. People, 667 SCRA 113 E. Intervention of the offended party (Sec. 16); compare with rule 19 RULE 11] ~Prosecution of Civil Action A. Civil liability arising from the offense is deemed instituted (Sec. 1) ~ Exceptions: waiver, reservation, prior institution (WaRP) ~ on filing fees; counterclaim, cross-claim, 3" party complaint ~ compare with Sees. 7,8,11 of Rule 6 ~ peculiar nature of BP. 22 Read: Solidum vs. People, 718 SCRA 263 Castillo vs. Salvador, July, 2014 B. Suspension of Civil Action (Sec. 2) - when suspended; consolidated ~ what is the Bar Rule in Amparo and Habeas Data Read: Lim vs, Kou Co Ping, 679 SCRA 114 C. Independent Civil Action (Sec. 3) - Articles 32,33,34 and 2176 Read: Casupanan vs. Laroya, 388 SCRA 28 D. Effect of death on the Civil Action (Sec. 4) ~ compare with Secs. 17, 18, an 20 of Rule 3 Read: People vs. Romero, 306 SCRA 90 "I - Prejudicial Question (Sees. 6 and7) Read: Magistrado vs. People, 527 SCRA 125 Pimentel vs. Pimentel, 630 SCRA 436 JM. Dominguez vs. Lielican, July 28, 2015 RULE 112—Preliminary Investigation A. Definition/Description ~ when a matter of right - distinguish from Preliminary Examination Read: Fenequito vs. Vergara, J, 677 SCRA 113 Burgundy Realty Corporation vs. Reyes, 687 SCRA 524 “4B. Who may conduct P. 1. Read: Abanado vs. Bayona, 677 SCRA 595 Heirs of Nestor Tria vs. Obias, 635 SCRA 91 C. Procedure in Metro Manila vs. Outside Metco Monile Read: Uy vs. Javellana, 680 SCRA 13 D. Inquest, what is ~ when applied ~ waiver of Art. 125 of RPC Read: People vs. Valencia, 214 SCRA 89 E. Quantum of Evidence - probable cause vs. prima facie RULE 113 - Arrest A. Definition ~ how made; when; time, method - who may arrest, B. Warrantless Arrests (Sec. 5) a. in flagrante delicto rule b. hot pursuit rule ©. “escape” rule 4. “absconding” rule (sec. 23, par. 2, rule 114 Procedure: delivery to the nearest police station/precinct Read: Luz vs. People, 667 SCRA 421 Antiquera vs, People, 712 SCRA, 12/11/2013 People vs. Vasquez, 714 SCRA, 1/15/2014 Read: RA 7438 ~ The Rights of Persons Arrested RULE 114 - Bail A. Definition/Description B, Conditions/Requirements ~ effective upon approval and shall remain in force at all stages of the proceedings until promulgation of judgment by the RTC - when appearance is required C. When: ~ bail is a matter of right; a matter of discretion; ~ bail as a constitutional right D. Kinds: a. corporate surety b. property bond . cash bond 4. recognizance: is an obligation of record entered into before some court 18or magistrate duly authorized to take it, with the condition to do some particular act particularly the appearance of the accused for trial E. Amount of bail; guidelines F. Where to file bail - RTC; MTC exercising special jurisdiction G. Forfeiture vs. Cancellation of Bail - forfeiture: failure to appear; jumping bail ~ cancellation: death; convietion; acquittal; dismissal Read: 1. Floresta vs. Ubiadas, 429 SCRA 270 2. Zuno vs. Cabebe, 444 SCRA 382 3. Govt of HK Spec. Adm. Region vs, Olalia, 521 SCRA 4. People vs. Sandiganbayan, 529 SCRA 764 5. Okabe vs. Gutierrez, 426 SCRA 685 6. Leviste vs. CA, 615 SCRA 619 7. Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, 767 SCRA 282, August 18,2015 RULE 115 ~—Rights of the Accused ~ Distinguish the constitutional from statutory rights of the accused Presumption of Innocence, Del Castillo vs. People, 664 SCRA Right to be Heard, Miguel vs. Sandiganbayan, 675 SCRA Right to Counsel, People vs. Lara, 678 SCRA; People vs. Espiritu, 302 Right Against Self-Incrimination, People vs. Ayson, 175 SCRA 216 Right to Speedy, Impartial and Public Trial, Villareal vs. People 664 SCRA ARNE RULE 116 - Arraignment and Plea A. What is arraignment How; When, Where, Why B. Kinds of Plea: (a) conditional (b) unconditional (©) negative/indirect (refusal to plead) (@) inverted (pleads guilty with exculpatory evidence) (©) improvident plea (not knowing fully well) C. Plea of guilty to a capital offense vs. non-capital offense + equirements 16D, Presentation or Inspection of evidence in prosecution’s possession ~ modes of discovery (Rules 23-29) E, Suspension of arraignment a) when suffering from unsound mental condition b) prejudicial question ) petition for review 4) absence of judicial personnel Read: 1. People vs. Estomaca ~ 256 SCRA 421 2. People vs. Pangilinan — 518 SCRA 359 3. Daan vs. Sandiganbayan — 560 SCRA 233 4. People vs. Janjalani -639 SCRA 157 F. Bill of Particulars, Read Enrile vs. People, August 11, 2015 RULE 117 Motion to Quash A. Motion to Quash vs. Motion to Dismiss; Grounds B. When and How to move to quash C. Effects when motion is granted; denied D. Remedies against denial/grant of motion Read: J. People vs. Lacson — 400 SCRA 267 2. Panaguiton vs. DOJ—571 SCRA 549 3. People vs. Dumlao— 580 SCRA 409 4. Soriano vs. People ~ 591 SCRA 244 5. Cerezo vs. People - 650 SCRA 222 6. Cows. New Prosperity Plastic Products, 727 SCRA 503,6/30/14 RULE 118 Pre-Trial A. Pre-trial in civil cases vs. Pre-trial in criminal cases. Dis B. Non appearance at the pre-trial; effects C. The Pre-trial Order; when and how done; effect of lack of Order inguish RULE 119 Trial A. The Speedy Trial Act/RA 8493 as amended by OCA Circular No. 101-2017 - the time requirement - exclusions =remedies B. Order of Trial - civil vs. criminal cases C. Modes of Discovery in criminal cases D. The “State-Witness” rule; requirements E. Mistake in charging the proper offenses; effects F. Demurrer to Evidence G. Reopening vs. New Trial 7Read: 1 Salvanera vs. People — 523 SCRA 147 2. Vda de Manguerra vs. Risos — 563 SCRA 471 3. Jimenez vs. People, 735 SCRA, Sept. 17, 2014 4. People vs. De Grano ~ 588 SCRA 550 5. Asistio vs. People, April 20, 2015 6. Cabador vs. People — 602 SCRA 760 7. People vs. Tan — 625 SCRA 388 8, Imperial vs, Joson ~ 635 SCRA 71 9. People vs. Sandiganbayan ~ 645 SCRA 726 10. Bangayan, Jr. vs. Bangayan ~ 659 SCRA 11. People vs. Jose Go, 732 SCRA, Aug. 6, 2014 12. People vs. Pepino, 779 SCRA 170 RULE 120 - JUDGMENT 1. Nature of judgment in criminal cases vs. civil cases 2. Judgment of conviction vs. judgment of acquittal 3. Judgment for two or more offenses; accused 4. Promulgation, modification and entry of judgment Cases: 1. Llamas vs. CA ~ 601 SCRA 288 2. People vs. Monteclaros ~ 589 SCRA 320 3. Hipos Sr. vs. Bay ~ 581 SCRA 674 4, People vs. Lorenzo ~ 619 SCRA 389 5. People vs. Baron~ 621 SCRA 646 6. Abellana vs. People — 655 SCRA 683 7. People vs. Asis — 629 SCRA 250 8, Basilonia vs. Villaruz, 765 SCRA 489 9. Morillo vs. People, 777 SCRA 207 Rule 121 - NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERATION 1. In civil cases vs. criminal cases 2. Grounds; effect Cases: 1. Estino vs, People — 584 SCRA 304 2. Briones vs. People 588 SCRA 345 3. Saludaga vs. Sandigenbayan ~ 619 SCRA 364 4, Lumanog vs. People — 642 SCRA 248 + 5. Payumo vs.Sandiganbayan — 654 SCRA 277 6. De Villa vs. Director of New Bilibid Prisons, 442 SCRA Rules 122-125 — APPEALS 1, Appeals in Civil cases vs. appeals in criminal cases 2. Similarities and differences 18Cases: 1, Macapagal vs. People, 717 SCRA 425, 2/26/14 2. People vs. Morales — 616 SCRA 223 3. Quidet vs. People ~ 618 SCRA 1 4, Balaba vs. People ~ 593 SCRA 210 5. People vs. Olivo ~ 594 SCRA 77 6. Guasch vs, Dela Cruz—589 SCRA 297 7. People vs. Taruc ~ 579 SCRA 682 8. Tiu vs. People — 586 SCRA 118 9. Colinares vs. People ~ 662 SCRA 266 (probation lev) 10. Villareal vs. People, 743 SCRA (probation law) 11. Dungo vs. People, 761 SCRA 375 12. Manansala vs. People, 777 SCRA 563 Rule 126— SEARCH AND SEIZURE 1. The constitutional provision on searches and seizures 2. Search Warrant vs. Warrant of Arrest 3. When searches and seizures allowed without warrants 4, Motion to Quash Cases: 1. Miclat vs, People ~ 656 SCRA 539 2. People vs, Mariacos — 621 SCRA 327 3. People vs. Tuan ~ 628 SCRA 226 4, Esquillo vs. People ~ 629 SCRA 370 5. “The constitutional Validity of Warrantless Search And Seizures of Prohibited Drugs and Eventual Arrest” = 610 SCRA 670 6, Marimla vs. People, 604 SCRA 57, Oct. 16, 2009 7. People vs. Punzalan 127 — PROVISIONAL REMEDIES 1, Relate to Rules $7-61 a. Preliminary Attachment ‘b. Preliminary Injunction c. Receivership 4. Replevin e. Support Pendente Lite 2. What provisional remedies are not applicable in criminal cases 3. Is petition for relief from judgment available in criminal cases? ‘Yes, according to Hilario ys. People, 551 SCRA 191, April 14, 2008 19