Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CME 300 Lab 1
CME 300 Lab 1
CME 300
Composition and Properties of Concrete
Page 1
Medrano-Martinez, Gerardo
ABSTRACT:
The results of the laboratory experiment were consistent except for the moisture content
for the coarse aggregatea.
INTRODUCTION:
The concrete mixture involves testing of the materials to collect data and formulate the
best mixture proportions based on aggregate properties found. Aggregates are
commonly found in stockpiles exposed to the weather elements and properties such as
moisture content, and bulk density will vary and should be measured before each
mixture and adjust proportions as needed. Moisture content is of great importance and
should be a property of aggregates to be considered when testing. Moisture content
could add water to the mixture if found to be saturated and wet surface. This extra water
or moisture content could affect the mix significantly as it will add water to the water-
ratio already established. On the contrary, if moisture content found in aggregates is
low, it means the aggregate is dry and unsaturated, an extra water volume should be
added to compensate for such condition. As stated earlier, Bulk density is another
property of aggregate that should be considered to be tested before a concrete mixture.
Bulk density reflects the volume taken up by an aggregate or cement, plus any air that
is trapped in the voids between the aggregate particlesb. An aggregate that has been
compacted will have a bulk density value higher than one that hasn’t.
The objective of the experiment is using the standard methods outlined in the ASTM
C566, and ASTM C29 standards aimed the following. First, to determine the moisture
content for a coarse and fine aggregates of wet (original) and dry (after 24 hours in the
oven) samples. Then to determine the bulk density of dry fine and coarse aggregates
that weighted by being compacted (rodded 20 times in three layers) and loose in a unit
weight measurement of 0.1ft3. It is expected to have a high percentage of moisture in
our sample as we were instructed to take our aggregates from a stockpile that was
saturated. It is anticipated that fine aggregates will have a higher moisture content than
coarse aggregates because there is more surface area in the fine aggregate that will be
carried away. When scooping the material out of the stockpile, it was easier to drain
water from the coarse than the fine aggregate resulting in more liquid adhering to the
fine aggregate.
EXPERIMENTAL:
Materials: Materials: The following materials and apparatus were used in the
completion of both sections of the experiment with small deviations that will explain the
preceding section.
Determination of Moisture
Saturated Fine (1 kg) and Coarse (2 kg.) Aggregates
a
Please, refer to Results and Appendix sections for Numerical values and in-depth description.
b
Aggregate particles refers to the unit of matter that constitutes that aggregate (grains or rock size)
Page 2
Medrano-Martinez, Gerardo
Procedure:
Determination of Moisture
Deviations from the ASTM C566 standard procedure are noted as follow: the
samples should have weighted about 15lb. for the coarse aggregate and 10
lb. for the fine aggregate. We were instructed to sample materials of 2 kg (4.4
lb.) and 1 kg (2.2 lb.) and mechanical balances were used instead of digitals
that could have resulted in the moisture content being negative for the coarse
sample.
o Methodology
1. Obtain material weight of about 15 lb. of coarse aggregate (in large pan) and
for 10 lb. of fine aggregate (in small pan).
2. Determine the mass of the sample to the nearest 0.1% avoiding loss of
moisture.
3. Using the available heat source, dry the sample to constant mass, taking care
not to lose any particles. Stir the sample during drying to ensure uniform
heating.
4. Determine the mass of the sample in this condition. Record this mass and all
subsequent masses to the nearest 0.5 g
Page 3
Medrano-Martinez, Gerardo
𝐺−𝑇
𝑀= 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 2
𝑉
M=Unit weight of aggregate (kg/m3 or lb/ft3)
G=mass of aggregate plus the measure (kg or lb.)
D= mass of the measure (kg or lb.)
V=volume of the measure(m3 or ft3)
Results:
Page 4
Medrano-Martinez, Gerardo
Fine Aggregate:
The moisture content in this material was 5.3%. This value is acceptable
because the sample was taken from a saturated wet surface stockpile. Table
1 illustrates that moisture content of 5.3% translates to a loss of water of
about 0.053 kg. As expected, the moisture content in fine aggregate is higher
than of coarse aggregate.
DISCUSSION:
Determination of Moisture
Moisture content was obtained by the procedure outlined in the ASTM C566. It was
found that 5.3% moisture content was in the fine aggregate(Sand). This high
percentage was because sand might have a high absorption value and retain a
significant amount of water within and in its surface. Another explanation that might
have contributed to the high moisture content was the fact that when the material was
obtained from the stockpile with a scoop, an attempt to drain as much water possible
resulted in being hard because the water was trapped or adhere to the fine aggregate
and resisted to drain out of the scoop. For the crushed stone, the moisture content was
found to be -0.275%. I Believe that the scale used was not sensitive enough to illustrate
the change in weight, and also, we approximated the weight by balancing the scale, and
Page 5
Medrano-Martinez, Gerardo
human error is possible. Another working theory is that gravel's absorption value might
be minimal and in conjunction sensitivity of the scale, an erroneous result was obtained.
I assume river gravel will have a similar moisture content as crushed stone, because in
similarities of its composition but there was no sample tested in the experiment and
remains the plausible theory.
Moisture content percent of sand, river gravel, and crushed stone in a saturated surface
dry condition also referred to as SSD did not participate in the completion of the
experiment. This moisture content under this condition implies that all of the aggregates'
pores are filled with water, but no water is found in the surface of the aggregate. This
closely resembles the condition that could be found in the field. The experiment used
the method of oven-dry to determine the moisture that was in the sample from the
stockpile. This will unlikely be the scenario in the field because it implies that all
moisture is remove from the aggregate.
As stated earlier, Moisture content plays a key role in the mixing design of concrete.
Moisture content could add water to the mixture if found to be saturated and wet
surface. This extra water or moisture content could affect significant the mixture as it will
add water to the water-ratio already e stablish. On the contrary, if moisture content
found in aggregates is low, meaning is dry, an extra volume should be added to
compensate for such condition.
The unit weight of the aggregates such as sand, river gravel, and crushed stone can be
calculated under SSD condition. Unit weight or commonly refer to as Bulk density is
independent of the state of the aggregate. If a sample under SSD condition is provided,
the unit weight is inversely proportional to the mass of the aggregate and the volume of
the container used. This measurement will be yield results that are optimal because
under this conditions the aggregate will not provide or take off the water of the mixture.
This state should be the standard when performing mixes to avoid any adjustments of
water ratios.
I refuse think unit weight is constant for an aggregate in a given stockpile. Unit weight is
calculated using mass and volume of a container measurements. The mass of an
aggregate that will be contained in a constant volume container will vary. A stockpile will
have particles of aggregates of different sizes. Thus, the unit weight will vary because
Page 6
Medrano-Martinez, Gerardo
depending on the size of the particles a given sample could have mostly small particles
yielding a high unit weight compared to another sample of an aggregate that could
contain significant size particles producing a lower unit weight. An average unit weight
might be used having in mind there will be a marginal error that results in erroneous
proportions when mixing. In the unlikely scenario where all the particles of an aggregate
are the same size, then there is a high possibility of having a constant unit weight. This
scenario is almost unlikely as aggregates are processed in quarries where equipment
breaks stone[1] down into the desired particle size such as 4” down to 3/8”[2]. There are
inconsistencies in the particle size produce due to erosion or any other weather
elements that weaken the stone resulting in varying sizes.
CONCLUSIONS:
Determination of Moisture
• The values obtain and shown in Table 1 for moisture content were acceptable. It
was expected to have a high value because the sample aggregates were taken
from a saturated wet surface stock pile for both fine and coarse aggregates
Fine aggregate holds a higher moisture content than coarse and Table 1 illustrates
this. The negative moisture content value in coarse aggregate further reinforces
the statement above. The moisture content value in the coarse aggregate must
have to be so small that the scale sensitive might have been very low in
conjunction with human error that the changed was not notable and reflected.
• In addition, the absorption percent was not calculated but sand the fine aggregate
used is commonly known as an absorbent agent. For example, in the automotive
industry, sand is used to absorb liquids such as oil. On the contrary, rocks, the
coarse aggregate is commonly known for its rigid structure and not as an
absorbent agent. In the end, it all boils down to the chemical and structural
properties of the aggregates that affect directly their absorptive properties and the
ability to remove water content found in the sample itself from the stockpile that will
contribute to a given moisture value content.
• Close attention should be focus on fine aggregates as based on the data
presented, their absorption rate is higher and could potentially affect the mix ratios
if not found in a SSD condition
Page 7
Medrano-Martinez, Gerardo
sense because having a small particle size (fine aggregate) voids are reduced and
more material can be impregnated in the container resulting in a higher bulk
density
• Compacted values for both aggregates are higher than their loose values
counterparts. These values are produced because more materials are occupying
the voids as they are rodded following ASTM C29 procedures. As a result, higher
values in bulk density are found in the compacted material. However, insignificant
increase is found in fine aggregate that almost is negligible. Voids are already
minimized by using fine aggregates and compacting the material does not increase
the bulk density significantly as voids are minimal and less content can be
impregnated.
REFERENCES:
Standard Reference:
ASTM C566 Determination of Moisture Content and Fine Coarse Aggregate, ASTM
International.
ASTM C29/ Test Method for Bulk Density (“Unit Weight”), ASTM International
Other References:
[1]
“Sedimentary Rocks.” Geology - Rocks and Minerals, 2005,
flexiblelearning.auckland.ac.nz/rocks_minerals/rocks/limestone.html.
[2]
Braen, Dirk. “Crushed Stone Grades: A Complete Guide.” Braen Stone, 3 May 2017,
www.braenstone.com/2017/05/crushed-stone-grades/.
APPENDIX:
100(𝑊 − 𝐷)
𝑃= 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 1
𝐷
P=Percent moisture content of sample
W=mass, in grams (or pounds), of original sample
D= mass, in grams (or pounds), of dried sample
𝐺−𝑇
𝑀= 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 2
𝑉
Page 8
Medrano-Martinez, Gerardo
Table 1
COARSE FINE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE 2 Kg 1 kg
DRIED SAMPLE 2.0055 kg 0.947 kg
MOISTURE CONTENT -0.275% 5.3%
Table 2
Page 9