You are on page 1of 2

880 AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST [76,1974]

Bauman’s excellent summary and introduc- Reviewed by HOWARD K. KAUFMAN


tion, the thirteen articles are heterogeneous Ripon College
in content and eclectic in approach. Re-
jecting universal classification systems, they Blacking endeavors but fails to explain, as
are more concerned with locally defined, the title would indicate, “How musical is
culturally specific categories in style, form, man?” The reader, in the end, is more in the
and function. The collection is unified by dark than when he began.
the common view of folklore as communica- In his first of three essays, “Humanly
tion and performance. This clearly repre- Organized Sound,” he argues that the func-
sents the new wave of folklore research, for tionalist approach to ethnomusicology is not
while the search for definition continues, the correct one, yet he tells us that to
nowhere are the concepts of other dis- properly understand a people’s music, we
ciplines rejected. The three lead articles by must analyze it in terms of its role within
Ben-Amos, Abrahams, and Bauman again the culture. He argues that one must live in
grapple with the problems of defining the the culture, and preferably, be born in the
field, but along with the other essays, they culture t o fully comprehend both denotative
do not hesitate t o draw on linguistics, and connotative aspects of the music. Black-
ethnology, psychology, and aesthetics t o ing does not demonstrate how this would
establish the main point that the component assist us in arriving at the “musicality of
aspects of folklore are inextricably linked t o man.” If music reflects culture, as Blacking
their psychological and cultural contexts. claims, why is it that at the premiere of
Although the essays are patently theoretical Stravinsky’s “The Firebird Suite” half the
in nature, the writers do not subscribe to audience walked out in media res? How
any common theory. For them the study of would Blacking explain the appeal of a
folklore becomes the study of human ex- Palistrina motet to a twentieth century
pressive behavior, and their researches are American audience, or why a child raised on
enriched by the expanded cross-disciplinary music by the Beatles may show a preference
approach. Ben-Amos’ paper is particularly for Bach, which he has heard only once or
interesting in this respect, arguing that folk- twice?
lore study should focus on the processes of Blacking states that music is a combina-
artistic communication in small groups tion of cultural, societal, psychological, and
rather than on the folklore item itself. In his physiological phenomena, without explain-
paper, Hymes maintains that the study of ing in what ways and to what extent. More
folklore performance and genre are crucial important, he does not discuss the interrela-
to research in sociolinguistics. Sutton-Smith tionships of the four phenomena. He speaks
borrows from developmental psychology of the social setting as the sine qua non of
and literary criticism in his analysis of music, yet tells of the shepherd playing his
children’s dreams, stories, nursery rhymes, flute, alone in the fields. He waxes meta-
and games. Drawing upon semiotic and physical and concludes that we must first
psychological theory, Robert Smith’s essay study the “nature of man.” The reader is left
focuses on audience response rather than to conclude that the ethnomusicologist has
performance of folklore. In fact, each of the no alternative but to turn philosopher before
papers in this volume cuts across folklore he does his fieldwork.
genres and related fields to point the direc- Later, he discusses the separate functions
tion for future folklore research and analy- of audience, composer, and performer, and
sis. While some of the concepts and argu- implies that all three are equally musical. He
ments invite critical discussion, on the whole does not treat any of them in depth. He goes
this collection of essays is an excellent and on to say that Venda music is no better and
innovative contribution. no worse than a Bach cantata, but fails to
clarify how he arrives at this conclusion. He
states that music has not evolved, and the
How Musical Is Man? JOHN BLACKING. reader must conclude that a Venda girl finds
John Danz Lecture Series. Seattle: Univer- it as difficult t o learn a puberty dance song
sity of Washington Press, 1973. xii + 116 as would a pubescent American, a Bach toc-
pp., figures, plates. $6.95 (cloth). cata and fugue. Blacking fails to note that
GENERAL, APPLIED AND THEORETICAL 881

there might be hierarchies of music within from kissing games of adolescents in Ohio to
each culture, and that perhaps at the higher unorganized games of Maori children. Sex
levels, musical creativity and performance differences, roles, power, and strategy are
work in inverse proportion to Leslie White’s among the topics discussed.
cultural evolutionary thesis. Genius, for ex- The articles included in the section “An-
ample, has been described as 90% sweat and thropological Approaches” deal with games
only 10% inspiration. as cultural forms, forms particularly related
I do not argue with the idea that culture to child rearing practices. Sutton-Smith
places limitations on musical evolution. I proposes t h e “con flictenculturation
merely claim that a complex culture, here theory,” wherein it is explained that “con-
measured by the number of available alterna- flicts induced by child training processes and
tives, will produce complex music; that com- subsequent learning lead to involvement in
plexity is a symptom of a higher level of games and other expressive models which in
musical evolution, in terms of thematic turn provide buffered learning or encultura-
structure, tonal progression, harmonic struc- tion important both to the players and to
ture, though not necessarily in terms of their societies” (pp. 341-342).Also in this
rhythmic patterns, since we are dealing with section, Sutton-Smith relates folktales to
the musicality and not the rhythmic poten- games and extra-game behavior to behavior
tialities of man. displayed in games. Further, he correlates
The book is provocative, but I would types of societies with types of games.
prefer had the author expanded his writings The Folkgames of Children is a fine
within his forte, i.e., that he had delved source of concepts and methods relevant to
further into Venda culture in terms of the a topic that is relatively ill-represented in
reactions of the Venda to other African anthropological literature. This book has the
music rather than attempt to generalize in potential to achieve an extremely desirable
simplistic fashion on the musicality of man, effect on its readers, that is, a reinforcement
based primarily on one small ethnic group. of sensitivity to the cultural significance of
children’s games. The Folkgames of Children
is recommended to those with a well estab-
The Folkgames of Children. BRIAN lished interest in children’s games, to those
SUTTON-SMITH. Foreword by William developing an interest in this cultural form,
Hugh Jansen. Publications of the American and to those merely curious about kissing
Fdklore Society Bibliographical and Special games of adolescents in Ohio.
Series, 24. Austin & London: University of
Texas Press (published for the American
Folklore Society), 1972 (publication date
1973). xvi + 559 pp., figures, map, tables, The Social Construction of Communities.
section appendices, section references, GERALD D. SU’M’LES. Studies of Urban
published works of Brian Sutton-Smith, Society. Chicago & London: University of
index. $12.50 (cloth). Chicago Press, 1974. X + 278 pp., maps,
tables, index. $9.50 (cloth).
Reuiewed by SANDRA L. SCHULTZ
University of Arizona Reviewed by LEONARD D. BORMAN
Evanston, Illinois
Brian Sutton-Smith’s book is of consider-
able value to folklorists, psychologists, and This volume consists of nine papers by
anthropologists, as it focuses deserved atten- Suttles, one co-authored with Albert J.
tion on a largely ignored facet of human Hunter, designed to have us see local
behavior, children’s folkgames. The book residential urban communities, primarily in
consists of sixteen of Sutton-Smith’s articles the United States, as essentially the creatures
on varying aspects of children’s games. These of a larger society. The citations alone make
articles are arranged in four sections accord- interesting reading, with over 270 clarifying
ing to methodological and theoretical a p footnotes. In two of the papers, Suttles
proach: historical, anthropological, psycho- elaborates on some of his observations and
logical, and “unified.” Subject matter ranges fieldwork in the Near South Side (“The

You might also like