Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report Assignment 1
GROUP 2
GROUP PERSONNEL:
DENIS YANUARDI (1106053003)
LATIF ALFANSYAH (1106008946)
NAHIDA RANI (1106013555)
STELLA LYDIA MARIA (1106052953)
TRI ALI HERVIANSYAH (1106068434)
ii
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
TABLE OF FIGURE
iii
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
LIST OF TABLE
Table 3.1. The Grouping and Ranking for Customer’s Needs of Anti-Scratch
Product for Gadget .................................................................................. 18
Table 4.1. List of Metrics for Anti-Scratch on Gadget Product ................................ 21
iv
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
A very rapid technological development makes many new devices
invented to meet the needs of human beings or just to give more specific function.
One that we often hear is “gadget”. Gadget is a small technological object that has
small size and some particular functions. Besides that, gadget has newer
technology which is more sophisticated than technology that was first invented.
For example, laptop and handphone, each is a form of gadget of a computer and
telephone that had been developed.
Human dependence on gadget will be increased because there are a lot of
function that can be performed by gadget. For example from the existing
technology, such as handphone. It is not only used as a communication tool, but
also as a camera, music player, video recorder, map & navigation, internet
connection, etc. Besides that, gadget can also indicate one’s social status. The
more expensive and sophisticated gadget that one have, the higher social status
that one get. However, protection and maintenance is strongly needed by the
owner of gadget, especially for the touch screen gadget which is more risky to be
broken.
Touchscreen is a visual electronic display that is easy to be used. One just
have to touch the screen with a special stylus/pen or fingers. This technology
becomes very vital because when it is damaged, the other features on the gadget
could not be started. One of the most common damage is scratch that could reduce
the aesthetic value of gadget or even interfere the function of gadget. Scratch can
appear on the screen as well as on the casing since the owner show less caution of
falling or rub against other objects when it is stored.
Protection could be done by using anti scratch product on gadget.
Nowadays there are a lot of anti scratch product that is available in the market.
However, none of them have met the needs of consumers. The better the quality,
the higher the price is, and vice versa. For example, those which have a good price
are easily to get damage, they only last for a few months.
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
2
Based on the National Statistics Agency, Indonesia GDP per capita income
for upper-middle class in 2013 is US$3000 a year whereas for lower-middle class
is US$1000 a year. Besides that, based on the Indonesian Provincial Wage
Councils, the price of a decent life for upper-middle class is US$2700, so all that
remains is US$300 for the additional needs, and the price of the decent life for
lower-middle class is US$950, so all that remains is US$50 for the additional
needs. Back to the anti-scratch products, the average price of a good quality anti
scratch products that exist today is US$20, and for the poor quality anti scratch
product is only US$2 (source : www.amazon.com).
The good quality anti scratch products are usually lasted at least one year,
which means one in the upper-middle class need 6,67% of their remaining money
and one in the lower-middle class need 40% of their remaining money just for a
good quality anti scratch. As we know that the cheap anti scratch products always
have a poor quality. Its are usually lasted for only three months, so that if one use
those poor quality anti scratch, they will need four anti scratch in a year, which
means the cost required for poor quality anti scratch is US$8 in a year. If we
compare it with one’s remaining money, one in the upper-middle class need
2,67% of their remaining money, and one in the lower-middle class need 16% of
their remaining money. Surely this is not worth, because there are many other
additional needs that are more important.
Therefore, anti scratch product innovation is needed. With the problems
that exist today (good quality anti scratch products are expensive and those that
are cheap, have a poor quality), we decided to make a new innovation of anti
scratch product which have a good quality such as lasted for at least one year, and
also has a friendly price for both upper-middle class and lower-middle class.
1.2 Objective
Our objective in writing this paper is to develop a general concept and
design of a product that specializes in protecting screen and case of gadget
especially from scratch. This new product would have a better design than the
existing product and solve all the main problems and consumers needs, such as
lasted for at least one year, and also has a friendly price for both upper-middle
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
3
class and lower-middle class.. By writing this paper and propose the design, we
hope that we could help people to protect their gadget from scratch in a better
way.
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
4
CHAPTER 2
BASIC THEORY
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
5
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
6
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
7
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
8
limit the user’s perspective on the screen. Just users who have 0° angle to the
screen are able to see the display clearly, so the other people who have more
than 20° angle can not see what’s on the display. Thus, the user’s privacy can
be protected.
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
9
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
10
2.3.2 Case
When a body of gadget is contacted with a rough surface, it is can make
a scratch. So, the body of gadget must be protected also. Here is an overview of
some the best types of cases to protect gadgets.
a. Polycarbonate Cases
Polycarbonate is type of tough, durable plastic used in some gadget
cases today. Polycarbonate is the same material used in bulletproof windows,
so user can be assured it will offer maximum protection for user’s gadget.
Many polycarbonate gadget manufacturers also offer additives or optional
coatings to prevent scratching or degradation from UV ray exposure.
Advantages of Polycarbonate:
Polycarbonate is a thick type of plastic that is very strong.
It is durable.
The polycarbonate is designed to resist the impact and disperse the
shock of the fall.
The best polycarbonate gadget cases even have an inner silicone or
fabric lining for added shock protection.
Disadvantages of Polycarbonate :
Polycarbonate is prone to changing color with prolonged exposure to
sunlight.
Polycarbonate tends to scratch more easily than plastic or leather.
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
11
b. Plastic Cases
Plastic cases offer protection from bumps and scratches. Plastic
cases are a durable and inexpensive way to protect gadget from potential chips
and cracks. Hard plastic cases can help save gadget from cracking or breaking
by absorbing the shock of a fall.
Advantages of Plastic Gadget Cases:
Absorb the shock of a fall or drop
Easy to hold or slide in a pocket or purse
Affordable and offered at all price points
Sold everywhere
Allow user to express their personal style, with simple or fun colors,
shapes and designs.
Disadvantages of Plastic Gadget Cases:
It is less durable and less stylish than leather or metal.
It is a rigid material.
Plastic cases are typically not waterproof, so they would not protect
gadget if it falls in water.
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
12
d. Silicone Cases
Silicone is another popular material used for making gadget
cases. Silicone cases are flexible skins which offer great protection against
low-impact drops by helping absorb the impact of a fall to reduce damage to
user gadget. These cases also offer protection from scratches and minor dings.
Silicone cases come in a variety of colors and designs and are perfect for
protecting them from life’s everyday bumps and damage.
e. Metal Cases
Metal cases, sometimes made of aluminum, are hard and sturdy.
Metal cases offer protection from falls and daily scratches and chips to help
preserve the appearance of user gadget. Metal cases generally come out on top
of plastic cases in terms of protection. The hard exterior of a metal case would
not crack, break, or chip like a plastic case can.
.
f. Leather Cases
Leather cases are a popular aesthetic choice for gadget protection.
Though leather cases can protect gadgets from scratches and chips, they do not
provide the strongest protection when it comes to dropping user’s gadget. A
leather case may be right for user if users are only looking for minimal
protection from daily wear.
From slide-in pouches and leather flip-books to leather-covered snap-on
cases, the variety of leather cases on the market is astounding.
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
13
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
14
generally made specifically for each individual device, providing the user with a
better fitting protector.
With the fast development of technology, electronic devise available now
generally include a display screen for performing/displaying an operation state of
the device. However, a liquid crystal screen generally gets scratched easily. Thus
a screen surface is applied with a screen protector to prevent the screen from
getting scratched. The screen protector has been widely used in electronic devices
such as mobile phones, cameras or portable multimedia players.
Most of screen protectors in prior generation are in a single-layer structure
made from `transparent plastic material. The bottom of the single layer structure
includes an adhesive layer covered with a piece of release film.
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
15
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
CHAPTER 3
COSTUMER’S NEEDS IDENTIFICATION
16
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
17
Based on figure A.4 (Appendix A), the respondents that use the
most types of gadgets are handphones. Those percentages of gadgets that
are often used are 84% of handphone, 11% of tablet, and 5% of laptop.
c. The Intensity and The Usage of Respondents Using Gadgets
The average intensity of the using their gadget is high. That is can
be looked on Appendix A that the most percentage of the using gadgets is
over than 7 hours per day. Thus, we can get a information that their gadget
have higher chance to be scratched.
The high intensity of using gadgets can be seen from the frequent
using of those gadgets are used for what. From the result in the chart
(Figure 6.) are shown 41% of gadgets are used to communicate.
Additionally, 27% is used as browsing. So mostly, those gadgets are used
for communicating and browsing.
d. The User’s Anti-Scratch
We surveyed to respondent about how importance level using anti-
scracth for their gadget. Mostly, their answers are important and very
important, each are 48% and 45%. Based on all of respondents’ answers,
92% of them use anti-scratches, either on screen or on body of gadgets.
This percentage is the most. So, they still need anti-scratch to protect their
gadgets from scratches. These are can be shown on figure A.7. and figure
A.8.
e. Form of Products
From 92% of respondent that answer is use anti-scratch for their
gadget, we also asked about types of anti-scratch that they are used. Are
on screen, body, or both of them? According chart in figure 15, 53% of
respondents that use anti-scratch answered to use anti-scratch on screen
only. They are use screen protector. Also, there are 36% that use both of
screen protector and case.
f. Price Range of Anti-Scratch Product
Based on our survey, the figure A.10 and A.11 shows that
variations of price to buy an anti-scratch. For price range of screen
protector, the most respondents bought screen protector are more
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
18
expensive that 50,000 IDR (39%). For price range of case, the most
respondents bought case are 50,000 – 99,999 IDR. From the results
obtained, the price range is not significantly different. The purchase price
of anti-scratch is still variaty, but this is still relatively cheap.
g. The Reasons to Use Anti-Scratch Product
Mostly, the reasons of respondents are quality. From the result
obtained, there are 83% that choose quality of anti-scratch, 12% of cost,
2% of brands, and 3% of the others like function and design. Anti-
scratches’ quality are still become number one to determine that will be
purchased.
Table 3.1. The Grouping and Ranking for Customer’s Needs of Anti-Scratch Product for Gadget
Needs Needs
Customers Needs
number Rank
Performance
1 More resistant to the rough surface. 5
2 More resistant to the sharps. 5
3 Makes the screen clearly visible, eventhough in sunlight. 3
4 Doesn’t reduce brightness from the screen. 4
5 Helps gadget withstand high impact. 4
6 Doesn’t reduce the sensitivity of the screen. 5
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
19
Needs Needs
Customers Needs
number Rank
Resistance to Impurities
7 Hard to be plastered by dust 4
8 Doesn’t leave fingerprints of the users. 3
Perceptions
9 Eye-catching. 3
10 Comfortable to be gripped (casing). 3
Applications
11 Easily installed. 3
12 Sticks strongly to the screen. 5
13 Doesn’t show up the bubble. 5
Doesn’t leave any marks when it is removed from the
14 3
handphone.
Retailing
15 Has a cheap price. 3
16 Has a match size with the gadget. 3
Regulations
17 Doesn,t make eyes tired easily. 5
18 Doesn’t irritate human skin. 5
19 Doesn’t generate toxic 5
The customer’s needs above also can be arranged into a mind map diagram
to ease us what needs that should be kept in our mind. In this figure below, the
needs has been arranged by its priority.
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
Figure 3.1 Mind Map Diagram for Customer’s Needs With Ranks
20
CHAPTER 4
PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
After finding what consumers needs, the next step is specify the product.
The purpose of making the specification of the product is to quantify the needs
and convert the needs into a units that can be measured. So that we know what
would our product looks like. There are some steps to get product specification.
Those are listing of metrics, benchmarking, and listing of specification. Below
are some steps to specify our product.
21
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
22
From this table, we could conclude that some needs could have same
specification. Some of the needs can’t be measured in an exact number. In order
to make a right spec for that ‘needs’, we change it into subjective with y/n as a
unit. We also will do a benchmarking step to determine the superiority of our
products when it’s being compared with the existing product.
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
23
4.2 Benchmarking
Benchmarking is a way to determine the superiority of our products to be
the production of other products that similar and have been producing in the
market. The necessity to conduct benchmarking is vital, because we will produce
a product that must be able to compete with existing products in the market
overally. This way, we can market a product which will be preferred by public
compared to other similar products, or competitor products.
Along with the development of technology, the function of screen
protector become widely expanded. The are many screen protector product sale on
market with various additional function. But we can simplify them become 2 kind
based on its material, glass and plastic. We also benchmark for both expensive
and cheap protector as comparation. We choose these brand because of several
analysis. Here is the product we benchmark
1. Sir Lancelot's Armor Holy Grail
This product is made from tampered glass, the same material as
bulletproof glass. So the hardness and the strength of this product is undoubtable.
It has clear surface with high transparency. But the expensive cost of this product
makes it only suit for materially wealth guy. Sir Lancelot's Armor Holy Grail
protector’s great feel, its durability and design, make it awarded for
TopTenREVIEWS Gold Award winner.
2. Zagg Invisible Shield
ZAGG invisibleSHIELD screen protectors are well known for a reason.
These screen protectors are durable, go on smooth, have self-healing qualities and
come with a lifetime guarantee. Although these screen protectors feel a little
rubbery, they resist oil, allow your finger to glide along the screen, and reduce
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
24
glare. For these reasons and more, the ZAGG invisibleSHIELD series is awarded
as TopTenREVIEWS Silver Award winner.
3. Good Gadget Glass Guard
This screen protectors are made from tampered glass that have similar
protection as Sir Lancelot's Armor Holy Grail, but with additional anti glare
system that reduce eye constrain
4. YI-YI Protective Screen Protector
Ordinary screen protector made from PET. This product seems only
designed for minimum scratch protection, but this is the cheapest product
compared to other benchmark product.
We make two kinds of benchmarking table, the first one is the
benchmarking result based on needs and benchmarking result based on
specification. We do this because there are differences between needs and
specifications. Benchmarking result based on needs gives us analysis to
understand how well the existance product fits the customer satisfaction as we
know that list of needs show us the list of things we must satisfy to the customer.
While benchmarking result based on specifications gives information about how
well the existence products fit the needs of customer. The tables of benchmarking
can be looked on Appendix C.
From the benchmarking table, we can see that there’s huge differences
between Performance group and Retailing group. The high performance product
have really expensive cost and inversely, low cost products have really poor
performance. The two of benchmarking product are made from tampered glass
that are very strong against impact and scratch still can’t guard the screen from
dust and impurities, despite of their high cost.
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
Based on the customer’s needs elaboration and benchmark with existing anti-
scratch product, we can conclude several points:
1. Nowadays anti scratch is a familiar product in Indonesia, so that there are a lot
of gadget users that use it.
2. Over 90% gadget user said that it is important to protect their gadget. But,
existing anti scratch doesn’t give satisfaction to the users.
3. Customers want a new innovation of anti scratch that is more resistant to
rough surface and sharps objects, doesn’t reduce the sensitivity, sticks strongly
to the screen, and doesn’t show up the bubble.
25
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
26
REFERENCE
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
27
Schlegel, H., Paul Kummel. Removable Protective Cover for Television Having a
Tinted Portion in the Screen Area. Google Patent: US 3418426 A.
Willingham, Stephanie. 2013. The best types of cases to help protect your
smartphone. In http://www.freshlytechy.com/oops-the-best-types-of-cases-
to-help-protect-your-smartphone/ (accessed on 14 February 2013, 20:20
WIB)
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
28
Appendix A
Gender of Respondent
44%
Male
56% Female
Occupation Distribution
10%
Student
11% Independent Employee
9% Governmental Employee
59% Entrepreneur
11%
etc.
34% Handphon
e
Tablet
62%
4%
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
29
11%
Handphone
Tablet
Laptop
84%
12%
< 1 hour a day
34%
1 - 3 hours a day
26% 3 - 5 hours a day
5 - 7 hours a day
28% > 7 hours a day
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
30
1% 6%
1 (Not Important)
8%
Yes
No
92%
8%
36%
No
Screen Protector
Case
53% Both
3%
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
31
< 20,000
39% 20% 20,000 - 29,999
30,000 - 39,999
15% 40,000 - 50,000
>50,000
20%
12%
Cost
Quality
Brand
etc.
83%
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
3.
2.
1.
No.
More
More
screen
clearly
visible,
surface.
the rough
Makes the
Needs
the sharps.
resistant to
resistant to
in sunlight.
eventhough
Abbrasion
•
test
Hardness
•
Reflection
•
Transparency
Impact test
Thickness
Electrostatic
Ability
Oleophobic
Aesthetical
value
Smootheness
Dificulty
Addition
Even
distribution of
Adhesive
Self-wetting
adhesive layer
Price
Precut to fit
the screen
Glare
reduction
Contain
irritating
Appendix B
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
32
material
Contain toxic
material
6.
5.
4.
No.
of the
Helps
gadget
reduce
screen.
screen.
Doesn’t
Doesn’t
from the
Needs
withstand
sensitivity
reduce the
brightness
high impact.
Abbrasion test
Hardness
Reflection
Transparency
•
Impact test
• Thickness
•
Electrostatic
Ability
Oleophobic
Aesthetical
value
Smootheness
Dificulty
Addition
Even
distribution of
Adhesive
Self-wetting
adhesive layer
Price
Precut to fit
the screen
Glare
reduction
Contain
irritating
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
33
(continued)
material
Contain toxic
material
9.
8.
7.
10.
No.
Eye-
dust.
to be
leave
gripped
Doesn’t
(casing).
catching.
Needs
Hard to be
fingerprints
of the users.
plastered by
Comfortable
Abbrasion test
Hardness
Reflection
Transparency
Impact test
Thickness
Electrostatic
•
Ability
Oleophobic
•
Aesthetical
•
value
Smootheness
•
Dificulty
Addition
Even
distribution of
Adhesive
Self-wetting
adhesive layer
Price
Precut to fit
the screen
Glare
reduction
Contain
irritating
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
34
(continued)
material
Contain toxic
material
13.
12.
11.
No.
Sticks
Easily
bubble.
Doesn’t
installed.
Needs
the screen
strongly to
show up the
Abbrasion test
Hardness
Reflection
Transparency
Impact test
Thickness
Electrostatic
Ability
Oleophobic
Aesthetical
value
Smootheness
Dificulty
•
Addition
•
Even
distribution of
• •
Adhesive
Self-wetting
adhesive layer
Price
Precut to fit
the screen
Glare
reduction
Contain
irritating
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
35
(continued)
material
Contain toxic
material
16.
15.
14.
No.
it is
price.
gadget.
Doesn’t
from the
removed
Needs
leave any
handphone.
Has a cheap
marks when
Has a match
size with the
Abbrasion test
Hardness
Reflection
Transparency
Impact test
Thickness
Electrostatic
Ability
Oleophobic
Aesthetical
value
Smootheness
Dificulty
Addition
Even
distribution of
Adhesive
Self-wetting
•
adhesive layer
Price
•
Precut to fit
•
the screen
Glare
reduction
Contain
irritating
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
36
(continued)
material
Contain toxic
material
19.
18.
17.
No.
toxic
irritate
Doesn’t
Doesn’t
Doesn’t
generate
Needs
make eyes
tired easily.
human skin.
Abbrasion test
Hardness
Reflection
Transparency
Impact test
Thickness
Electrostatic
Ability
Oleophobic
Aesthetical
value
Smootheness
Dificulty
Addition
Even
distribution of
Adhesive
Self-wetting
adhesive layer
Price
Precut to fit the
screen
Glare reduction
•
Contain
irritating
•
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
37
(continued)
material
Contain toxic
•
material
38
Appendix C
Benchmarking Result
Table C.1 Benchmarking Result Based on Needs
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
39
(continued)
Hard
Tampered Glass Self Healing
Tampered PET
Needs Needs (Sir Lancelot’s Plastic
Customers Needs Glass (YI-YI Protective
number Rank Armor Holy (Zagg Invisible
(Good Gadget Screen Protector)
Grail) Shield)
Glass Guard )
Resistance to Impurities
7 Hard to be plastered by dust. 4 •• • •• •
Doesn’t leave fingerprints
8
of the users.
3 •••• ••••• •••• •
Perceptions
9 Eye-catching. 3 •• •• •••• •
Comfortable to be gripped
10
(casing).
3 •••• ••• •••• ••
Applications
11 Easily installed. 3 ••• •• ••• ••
12 Sticks strongly to the screen 5 ••••• •••• •• ••
13 Doesn’t show up the bubble. 5 ••••• •••• ••••• •
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
40
(continued)
Hard
Tampered Glass Self Healing
Tampered PET
Needs Needs (Sir Lancelot’s Plastic
Customers Needs Glass (YI-YI Protective
number Rank Armor Holy (Zagg Invisible
(Good Gadget Screen Protector)
Grail) Shield)
Glass Guard )
Applications
Doesn’t leave any marks
14 when it is removed from 3 •••• •• ••••• ••
the handphone.
Retailing
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
41
Hard
Tampered Self Healing PET
Tampered
Glass (Sir Plastic (YI-YI
Needs Needs Metriks Glass
Customers Needs Specification Lancelot’s (Zagg Protective
number Rank Unit (Good
Armor Holy Invisible Screen
Gadget Glass
Grail) Shield) Protector)
Guard )
Performance
More resistant to the Abrasion test y/n
1 5 No Scratch Self healing No scratch Scratched
rough surface. by steel wool scratched
More resistant to the Pencil
2 Hardness 5 9H Not tested yet 9H Not tested
sharps. hardness
Makes the screen
clearly visible,
3 Reflection 3 Percent > 20% 10% 1.5 % >30%
eventhough in
sunlight.
Doesn’t reduce
4 brightness from the Transparency 4 Percent 95% 90% 96% 85%
screen.
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
42
(continued)
Hard
Tampered Self Healing PET
Tampered
Glass (Sir Plastic (YI-YI
Needs Needs Metriks Glass
Customers Needs Specification Lancelot’s (Zagg Protective
number Rank Unit (Good
Armor Holy Invisible Screen
Gadget Glass
Grail) Shield) Protector)
Guard )
Performance
Impact test
Helps gadget
(250 g metal
5 withstand high 4 y/n break Not break break Not break Break
ball drop
impact.
from 30 cm)
Doesn’t reduce the
6 sensitivity of the Thickness 5 mm 0.4 0.2 0.38 1
screen.
Resistance to Impurities
Hard to be plastered Electrostatic
7 4 y/n Electrostatic Electrostatic Electrostatic Electrostatic
by dust. Ability
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
43
(continued)
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
44
(continued)
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
45
(continued)
Self
Tampered PET
Healing Hard Tampered
Glass (Sir (YI-YI
Needs Needs Metriks Plastic Glass
Customers Needs Specification Lancelot’s Protective
number Rank Unit (Zagg (Good Gadget
Armor Holy Screen
Invisible Glass Guard )
Grail) Protector)
Shield)
Retailing
15 Has a cheap price. Price 3 IDR 420,000 180,000 360,000 30,000
Has a match size Precut to fit
16
with the gadget. the screen
3 y/n ••••• ••••• ••• •••
Regulations
Doesn’t make eyes Glare
17
tired easily. reduction
5 Percent
•••• ••••• •••• ••
Contain
Doesn’t irritate No irritant No irritant No irritant No irritant
18 irritating 5 y/n
human skin. material material material material
material
Doesn’t generate Contain toxic No toxic No toxic No toxic
19 5 y/n No toxic material
toxic material material material material
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
46
Appendix D
Product Specification
Table D.1. Table of Product Specifications
Needs Needs Marginal
Customers Needs Specification Own Ideal value
number Rank value
Performance
1 More resistant to the rough surface. Abrasion test 5 No Scratch No scratch Scratched
2 More resistant to the sharps. Hardness 5 9H 9H >4H
Makes the screen clearly visible,
3 Reflection 3 5% 1.5% <50%
eventhough in sunlight.
Doesn’t reduce brightness from the
4 Transparency 4 95% 99% >70%
screen.
5 Helps gadget withstand high impact. Impact test 4 Not Break Not break Break
Doesn’t reduce the sensitivity of the
6 Thickness 5 0.3 0.2 <1
screen.
Resistance to Impurities
7 Hard to be plastered by dust. Electrostatic Ability 4 Electrostatic Electrostatic Electrostatic
(continued)
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
47
(continued)
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
48
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
49
Table D.2.
Needs
Customers Needs Specification Ideal value Marginal value
number
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
50
(Continued)
Needs
Customers Needs Specification Ideal value Marginal value
number
7 Hard to be plastered by dust. Electrostatic Ability n/a n/a
Ordinary screen protector
8 Doesn’t leave fingerprints of the users. Oleophobic Oleophobic
(Not Oleophobic)
9 Eye-catching. Aesthetical Value n/a n/a
10 Comfortable to be gripped (casing). Smootheness n/a n/a
11 Easily installed. Difficulty n/a n/a
Patent EP2535792 A1
12 Sticks strongly to the screen Adhesion n/a
(0% peel)
Adhesion n/a n/a
13 Doesn’t show up the bubble. Even distribution of
n/a n/a
adhesive
Doesn’t leave any marks when it is Self-wetting
14 n/a n/a
removed from the handphone. adhesive layer.
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
51
(Continued)
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
52
Appendix E
Interview and Quesioner Results
We present question and some answer for survey to respondents.
KUESIONER “ ANTI GORES GADGET”
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
53
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
54
o < 25.000
(Pertanyaan nomor 4 - selesai mengacu pada jawaban pertanyaan o 25.000 – 49.999
nomor 3) o 50.000 – 99.999
4. Untuk keperluan apa gadget tersebut paling sering anda gunakan? o 100.000 – 249.999
o Bisnis online o 250.000 – 500.000
o Pekerjaan o > 500.000
o Belajar
o Game 11. Apa pertimbangan utama Anda dalam memilih produk anti gores?
o Komunikasi o Harga
o Internetan/browsing o Kualitas
o Lainnya__________ o Merek tertentu
5. Seberapa tinggi intensitas anda menggunakan gadget tersebut? o Yang lain _____
o 1 (sangat tinggi)
o 2 (tinggi) 12. Apakah penyebab munculnya goresan di gadget anda?
o 3 (cukup tinggi) Bersentuhan dengan kunci mobil di saku celana
o 4 (jarang)
o 5 (sangat jarang) 13. Menurut anda, apa kekurangan dari anti gores yang sudah ada?
6. Seberapa penting supaya gadget anda tidak tergores? Cepat rusak, masih suka tergores
o 1 (tidak penting)
o 2 (kurang penting) 14. Anti gores seperti apakah yang anda inginkan? (pilih 3 yang paling
o 3 (penting) sesuai)
o 4 (sangat penting) o Lebih murah
7. Apakah gadget tersebut menggunakan anti gores? o Lebih mudah dipasang
o Ya o Terbuat dari bahan yang mudah terurai
o Tidak o Lebih aman (Mampu mereduksi radiasi ke mata)
o Punya nilai estetika (keindahan)
Jika Ya, Lanjut Pertanyaan Nomor 8-14. Jika Tidak, Langsung o Lebih tahan goresan (lebih tahan lama)
Lompat ke Nomor 12 o Tidak gelap ketika di bawah sinar matahari
o Tidak mudah tertempeli debu/kotoran
8. Bagian manakah yang terpasang anti gores? o Tidak muncul gelembung pada layar
o Layar o Yang lain ___________
o Casing
o Layar dan casing
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
55
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
56
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
57
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA