Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rosentino Jr. A. J. P., Saraiva E., Delaiba A. C., Guimarães R., Lynce M., De Oliveira J. C.
Faculty of Electrical Engineering
Federal University of Uberlândia
Uberlândia-MG, Brazil
arnaldo@ieee.org, elise.saraiva@yahoo.com.br, delaiba@ufu.br, ronaldoguimaraes@yahoo.com.br, lynce@ufu.br,
jcoliveira@ufu.br
Abstract— This paper presents the mechanical effect on relays, etc. Thus, this situation can affect the power quality
transformers when subjected to one of the power quality supplied by the power system and thus reduce the transformer
indicators, i.e., the electromagnetic transients. A common reason life.
for internal faults in transformers windings is the weak In general, it is very difficult to note an electromechanical
insulation. This effect can be caused and accelerated by the
defect in the transformers windings, since even with the
electromechanical efforts produced by the inrush and short-
circuit currents. Even though the transformer energizing is winding deformed, equipment can operate normally. However,
considered a normal operation, it produces high currents and this the transformer winding with some defect becomes less
phenomenon significantly reduces the transformer life robust, reducing the equipment life expectancy. Moreover, it is
expectancy and may even lead to its instantaneous or timing noteworthy that the frequent action of forces in the windings
destruction. Moreover, taking into account the same magnitude results in a cumulative phenomenon, reducing even more the
of current, the inrush currents can produce greater forces than mechanical supportability of the conductors.
those caused by short-circuit currents. Therefore, this papers The electromechanical stresses characteristics in the
aims to present and compare the electromechanical effects windings caused by inrush and short-circuit current are
produced by the inrush and short-circuit currents in the
different. While the short-circuit current causes forces
transformers windings. To conduct this research, FLUX software
in its 3D version, based on the finite element method (FEM) will involving the various windings of the transformer, the inrush
be used. To highlight the overall model and the software current involves only it’s energizing. The high inrush currents
performance, a laboratory 15 kVA transformer is utilized. It has cause the core saturation as well its effective permeability
been built with concentric double-layer windings and reduction. Thus, the components produced by the leakage flux
ferromagnetic core with three columns. can be neglected, as well as, if existent, the currents in the
secondary. Then, in the forces analysis under inrush
conditions, only the field components produced by the
Keywords- Power quality, Inrush currents, Short-circuit currents in the conductors of the primary winding are
currents, Three-phase transformers, Electromechanical efforts,
Finite element method.
considered [1].
The inrush currents, even with peaks 30% lower than those
I. INTRODUCTION caused by short circuit currents can produce forces with
It is known that high magnitude currents that occur during amplitudes similar to those caused by short circuit. This is due
transformers energizing are caused by saturation of its to the exposure time of the inrush currents being considerably
ferromagnetic core. These high currents, called by inrush higher than the short-circuit current. Another fact to consider
currents, can cause a variety of adverse effects on the is that the presence of inrush current is much more frequent as
electrical system supplier, as well as in the transformers, such this can be considered as normal service operation [2].
as momentary voltage sags, harmonics, electromechanical This paper will make an electromechanical stresses
stress in the winding transformers, insulation deterioration of analysis that occur in transformers windings when they are
conductors, incorrect operation of differential and overcurrent subjected to the inrush and short circuit current. Subsequently,
The axial force caused by the radial flux at the ends of the
coils is directed toward the winding midpoint.
The axial forces due to inrush current are higher than those
produced by short-circuit current (both effects at the same
current). Note that the magnetic flux during transformer
energizing is higher than that produced by short-circuit
Figure 1. Radial force direction in a transformer winding under inrush (a) current, under the same induction [3].
and short-circuit (b) current. However, in general, the inrush currents are much smaller
than the short-circuit current. Thus, the forces due to inrush
The occurrence of some radial defect in the inner winding current, which are proportional to the square of current, will
is more common than in the outer winding [3], since the also be smaller. However, the major problem of axial forces
compressive forces on the inner winding can experience a caused by inrush current is due to the fact that the transformers
force from the core and axial supports in the opposite are connected to the electrical system more frequently than the
direction. As only the short-circuit current causes this effect, short-circuit occurs. Then, the repeated action of axial forces
transformer energizing does not cause such damage for the may result in the accumulation of residual deformations
This work was sponsored by CHESF - Hydroelectric Company of San
Francisco.
(cumulative phenomenon) [1, 3]. Fig. 4 illustrates typical
deformations in the winding due the axial force [7].
Figure 10. Forces direction in the outer winding of the phase B for
Figure 8. Inrush current waveform obtained by the FLUX3D. transformer energizing condition.
Fig. 9 shows the leakage flux distribution for phase B for Table I summarizes some results of electrical, magnetic
this condition. It can be seen that the highest intensity of the and mechanical parameters obtained in the phase B outer
magnetic induction is found in a layer of the outer winding winding for transformer energizing condition. These values
and in all inner winding (yellow intensity). It occurs because will be compared with the next case, i.e., the short-circuit
of the magnetic flux directed toward the iron core. condition.
TABLE I. ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC AND MECHANICAL VALUES IN THE
PHASE B OUTER WINDING FOR TRANSFORMER ENERGIZING CONDITION.
Variable Value
Inrush current 514.63 A
Axial magnetic field in the midpoint 119.76 x 10-3 T
Radial force in the midpoint 33.49 N
Mean radial force 523.0 N
Radial magnetic field at the end 96.03 x 10-3 T
Axial force at the end 36.35 N
Total axial force 155.56 N
Variable Value
Short-circuit current 514.67 A
Axial magnetic field in the midpoint 125.89 x 10-3 T
Radial force in the midpoint 35.77 N
Mean radial force 534.13 N
Radial magnetic field at the end 71.53 x 10-3 T
Axial force at the end 28.4 N
Total axial force 68.6 N
Table III shows the variation of the parameters between the • Characterization of the electromechanical effects that
both analyzed cases. Positive and negative results mean, occur in the transformers windings when submitted to
respectively, an increase and a decrease of the variables, energizing and short-circuit current;
according to the difference between the inrush and short- • Computational modeling based on 3D finite element
circuit values. method. The equipment used was a laboratory
transformer of the Federal University of Uberlândia;
TABLE III. PERCENTUAL DIFFERENCE OF THE VARIABLES BETWEEN THE
TRANSFORMER ENERGIZING AND SHORT-CIRCUIT CONDITION.
• Analyses of the radial and axial forces in the
transformer windings caused by inrush and short-
Variable Percentual difference [%] circuit current, through computer simulations.
Current -0.0078
Axial magnetic field in the midpoint -4.87
Radial force in the midpoint -6.37 It has been confirmed that the axial mechanical forces
Mean radial force -2.08 caused by the inrush currents, at the same peak current, are
Radial magnetic field at the end +34.25 higher than those caused by short-circuit current. It is
Axial force at the end +27.99 noteworthy that transformers are frequently connected to the
Total axial force +126.76 electrical power system, and the exposure time of the inrush
currents is considerably higher than the short-circuit current. In
Note that the difference between the currents in the two this way, the importance of knowing the physical conditions of
cases is small. In this way all results will have the same a given transformer arises, to prevent it from causing supply
reference. Note that the radial forces due to inrush current interruption of black-outs.
experienced a slight reduction compared to those produced by
short-circuit current. For example, at the midpoint of the ACKNOWLEDGMENT
winding, where the greatest radial forces are produced, a This paper is a partial result of a Research and
reduction of 6.37% was obtained. This small change was due Development project titled: "Electromechanical stress in
to little change in the magnetic field in the axial direction, transformer caused by the high inrush and short-circuit
which at this point was 4.87%. Considering the mean radial currents", managed by the Hydroelectric Company of San
force, the variation is even smaller, i.e., 2.08%. However, Francisco - CHESF, with support from the Federal University
analyzing the results for axial forces, there is an increase in of Uberlandia - UFU and the Federal University of Campina
strength of approximately 28% at the end of the coil, where Grande – UFCG. Thus, the authors gratefully appreciate the
axial forces are the highest. This high variation was due to a Hydroelectric Company of San Francisco - CHESF for the
financial support.
great change in the magnetic field in the radial direction,
which at the winding end was 34.25%. The variation is even REFERENCES
more pronounced when comparing the axial forces directed to [1] Addly, A. A. “Computation of inrush current forces on transformer
the midpoint of the winding. There is an increase of over windings”. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, v. 37, n. 4, pp. 2855 –
100% at this point. It is noteworthy that the total force for 2857, July 2001.
short-circuit condition, taking both windings, has been [2] Steurer, M.; Frohlich, K. “The impact of inrush currents on the
obtained in simulation with a value of 173.29 N. However, mechanical stress of high voltage power transformer coils”. IEEE
Transactions on Power Delivery, v. 17, n. 1, pp. 155-160, January 2002.
only 40% of this force (68.6 N) is concentrated in the outer
[3] Lur’e, A. I. “Transformer connection under no-load and short-circuit
winding. Consequently, a high variation in relation to the events”. Russian Electrical Engineering, v. 79, n. 2, pp. 57-70, 2008.
transformer energizing condition was obtained, as in this case, [4] Waters, M.. “The Short-Circuit Strength of Power Transformers”. 5. ed.:
besides the radial component of magnetic field is exceeding Macdonald and Co., London, 1966.
the one in short-circuit condition, all the force is concentrated [5] DOBLE. “The Life of a Transformer. Seminar and Industry Expo”.
just in one winding. Florida February 19-25, 2006.
[6] Bjerkan, E.. “High Frequency Modeling of Power Transformers –
IV. CONCLUSION Stresses and Diagnostics”. Doctoral Thesis – Faculty of Information
Technology, Mathematics and Electrical Engineering, Trondheim, May
This paper presented the differences between the 2005.
electromagnetic forces imposed on the transformer windings [7] Nigris, M.; Passaglia, R.; Berti, R.; Bergonzi, L.; Maggi, R..
due to one of the power quality indicators, i.e., the “Application of modern techniques for the condition assessment of
electromagnetic transients. power transformers”. Session CIGRE, A2-207, 2004.
The following steps were analyzed: [8] Saraiva, E.; Chaves, M. L. R.; Camacho, J. R. “Three-phase transformer
representation using FEMM, and a methodology for air gap calculation”.
Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Electrical
Machines (ICEM 2008) – Vilamoura (Algarve), Portugal, September
2008.