You are on page 1of 3

Leading Change

and the Use of Self

Organization Development in Practice

Carrie Foster

Abstract: Change is changing. It is loud and noisy, c­ haotic


and demanding. In dynamic work situations, change
programs are a continuous stream of multiple projects
­running concurrently and demanding constant ­attention
as part of everyday business. For a change p ­ rogram to
be credible and have a critical impact, the change leader
needs to ensure that the intervention c­ onnects on a h
­ uman
level. The question, therefore, is not whether a leader
needs to instigate ­organization change but how change
can be led in a way that m ­ anages the c­ onsequences of
change and delivers a f­ avorable outcome.
This article reviews the roles and tasks of the OD
practitioner as a change leader and the use of self in the
change process.

Keywords: Change, Group dynamics, Organization


development, Power, Self as instrument, Systems
Carrie Foster specializes in the theory, Use of self
facilitation of coaching, people
management, and organization
development (OD) interventions that Introduction
deliver added value and a measurable The purpose of this article is to review the organization
ROI to bottom-line performance. As a development (OD) practitioner’s role as a change leader
proven commercial OD practitioner,
and the use of self in the change process. This includes
executive coach, practicing academic,
and published author with a successful a review of how the change leaders’ own ­development
commercial career covering FMCG, journey enables OD practitioners to o ­ perate in ­dynamic
industrial, manufacturing, and work situations, which results in credibility for the
professional services, she has a track change program and the ability to connect on a h ­ uman
record of providing OD and coaching
programs across the United Kingdom,
level in order to deliver a critical impact through
Europe, Russia, and the Middle East ­presence. This article will also provide a brief overview
that have met both individual and of the roles and tasks of OD practitioners, leading to a
business needs. conversation about the concept of “self as instrument”
and what the “use of self” means in theory and practice.
Leading change and the use of self are in many ways the
basic requirements for a successful practice of OD in an

© Business Expert Press 978-1-63157-993-6 (2018) Expert Insights


1
www.businessexpertpress.com
Leading Change and the Use of Self

organization and be of interest to anyone of multiple projects running concurrently


who is planning to develop a career in OD. demanding attention constantly as part of
It is probably pertinent to begin this everyday business. There is no let up, no
­article by exploring the concept of change. escape from, and no respite. Change has
Many articles cover change management, in many ways become ordinary, while at
change leadership, change methods, but the same time the extraordinary level of
what is change? What is being managed change that is taking place in organiza-
and led that needs a methodology? tions, politics, society, and the world is
Change, in the organizational sense, means breathtaking and even alarming when you
something being altered, or made ­different. It stand back and really observe the frenetic
could be ­explained as a shift, ­transformation, pace of it.
or transition that moves the o ­ rganization There are many reasons for the shift
from where it was to where it will be in in how and why change happens. Our
the future. Change from this perspec- world is no longer simple and there is no
tive is neither good nor bad, it just is a normal. Like many of the conundrums of
­process that is occurring. The ­outcomes the Digital economy, we no longer know
of change are what makes it good or bad, what is cause and what is effect, only
but change happens replacing what was that the causes are many and the effects
prior to what will be. This is an important profound. Globalization has ­accelerated,
point to remember when considering the ­although many commentators would note
idea of leading change. In many ways, it that in ­recent years it too has changed,
could be argued that the axiom “change is and perhaps we are entering a period of
inevitable” is true because nothing stands de-globalization. ­ Although perhaps not,
still, even the permanency of rock will because technology has stripped the
change with the shifting sands of time. world of time and distance barriers, and
Therefore, it is not so much change that meant that geography is ­almost irrelevant
someone leads, but rather the need for when it comes to trade. An organization
someone to lead in order that change doesn’t have to be a large multinational
­delivers favorable outcomes that occur as behemoth to trade ­globally, an individual
a consequence of change. It is these con- working from their iPad in café can trade
sequences of change that are important across the world with little difficulty.
to those experiencing change, not the fact The current Brexit negotiations between
that change is happening. the UK and EU are perhaps indicative of
What is perhaps most interesting in the complexities of borders and trade,
any foray into the world of change is to but this won’t prevent the entrepreneurs
­understand how change itself is c­ hanging. and internet gurus from going about
From an organizational perspective, change their business. Therefore, change isn’t
appears never ending, as if the very act of a simple mathematical problem with a
change is now not something that creeps ­solution, which can be simply calculated
up on us unannounced but is ­ instead by logic. There are so many intricate
loud and noisy, chaotic, and ­demanding. ­networks, and networks within networks
It screams at business leaders, seeking that systems, processes, and policies
attention, urging radical responses and
­ that gave so much certainty to managing
­immediate solutions to complex problems. change in years past, are no longer easy
Change programs are endemic within to u
­ nderstand in terms of how changing
­organizational life; they are no longer huge one aspect will impact something else.
transformation projects demanding s­ pecial There is no logical flow even in structural
attention for a period of time. Instead, and technical systems. Traditional para-
change programs are a constant stream digms of o­ rganization design are moving

2 © Business Expert Press 978-1-63157-993-6 (2018) Expert Insights


www.businessexpertpress.com
Leading Change and the Use of Self

away from ­ hierarchical structures that rise of apps. There is little doubt that we
impose strictures on the change capac- would not have barriers at the train stations
ity of ­ employees. The shift in Organi- that can read ­mobile tickets, mobile banking
zational ­Design is t­oward an agile and apps or A ­ pple Pay without the popularity of
flexible form, which allows for coopera- iPhone. At the same time organizations are
tion, collaboration, and full ­engagement equally affected by the changes in our soci-
by all organizational ­actors. The bound- ety. The shifts in ­demographics, women in
aryless nature of life and work has meant the workplace, migration, education, and
that change is invading every aspect of occupation levels all impact what products
our ­human life, whether in our roles as and services are in d ­ emand and therefore
employees or in our life as consumers. produced and sold. For example, changing
We cannot possibly keep up with all that styles, fashions, and consumer preferences
change is throwing at us. In technology have led to a rise in the on-the-go products
for example, the change is so rapid, the and services available in the marketplace
issue is that things are b
­ ecoming obsolete and working mothers and busier lives have
before they have had a chance to take resulted in the reintroduction of grocery to
root. The same is true in organizational home deliveries. In this r­espect, some of
life. No sooner has one change project the new is ­familiar as if we are ­reinventing
finished and people pack away the proj- the wheel, or at least the delivery round,
ect files, than another round of change but in other ways it is completely different.
begins. There is no time to catch breath, ­Inventions and innovation go hand in hand
to take stock and decide whether the as needs and wants shift and morph. As
­effort and investment made was actually ­demands are met, new needs arise.
worthwhile and useful. The workplace itself, and changing needs
of the workforce, have also been ­responsible
Summary Points for change. For the first time in history
■■ Change in the organizational sense, means there are four generations working side by
something being altered, or made different. side in the workplace. This ­creates tension
■■ The outcomes of change are what makes and o ­ pportunity in regard to the needs of
it good or bad. each generation and ­demands for different
■■ Change itself is changing. ­working conditions, ­benefits, and career
opportunities are thrown ­together. This
Where Change Happens wrangling of knowledge, ­experience, and
Change usually costs organizations money, energy in a single office building brings
productivity, efficiency, and quite o ­ften with it a unique opportunity to tap into
­employee engagement. That change happens change agency from across the ages. There
is not under dispute, but where change hap- are those who have been there, done it, and
pens is also important. There is a symbiotic bought the T-shirt, who have seen change
relationship between change that ­happens succeed and change fail. Who have felt the
within the organization, and change that call of change from birth to an age where
happens outside it. It could be argued that many would have ­retired, and found within
organizations determine ­societal change. If it patterns that are familiar and d
­ ependable.
Facebook hadn’t grown in size and influence Alongside them work those who are the
then the changes in our society wrought by bridging generation, born in an age where
its presence causing millions to be in the computers were not yet common, but
thrall of social media would doubtless e
­ xist. brought into common usage. Adopters and
It could be argued that introduction of the innovators, who have taken the baton of
iPhone by Apple in 2007 would not have led innovation and swift change and run with
to our reliance on mobile ­devices, and the it, familiar and unfamiliar with the changes

© Business Expert Press 978-1-63157-993-6 (2018) Expert Insights


3
www.businessexpertpress.com

You might also like