Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Iep 1
Iep 1
were assigned at birth and their own internal gender does not match. (Glaad, par 1) Gender Dysphoria: A
conflict between a person’s physical or assigned gender and the gender with he/she/they identity with.
(Parekh, par 1). Until June 2016, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense
openly prohibited transgender individuals from accession in the U.S. military as well as discharge of such
individuals. Before President Obama left office, the administration permitted transgender individuals to
serve openly in the U.S. Military. As of July 26, President Donald Trump announced that the U.S. military
would no longer accept or allow transgender people in its rank. The question that arises for me with this
topic is should transgender Americans be allowed to serve in the military? If so, why or why not? This
really impacted me when I heard about this because I couldn’t comprehend why these individuals are
being deprived of serving their country. My initial thoughts were this is discrimination or maybe there is a
real potential danger of them serving in the military. I want to start my research with the reasons why this
transgender ban was put into place. I feel like once that is established then I can branch off of that.
In “Should Transgender Americans be Allowed in the Military? Not so Fast: Military Readiness
Has to be First Concern”, Thomas Spoehr claims that Transgender Americans don’t meet the
requirements for military readiness, if soldiers were going to need continuing medical attention to treat
their condition are automatically not allowed to serve. Spoehr adds, is the how these implements affect
their brain functions- though again he is unclear on how this is harmful or affect them from serving. He
states it would be immoral to send these individuals into a harsh environment if they don’t have the
mental capacity to perform such a rigorous act. Though these individuals want to serve it’s not good
enough if you do not meet the requirements. Another factor is the additional cost to support these medical
treatments and hormonal therapy. Spoehr states that is why President Trump came to the conclusion of
This article was very persuasive and effective in shifting my opinion. It would have been more
persuasive if he had actual statistics to prove his points. For example, what is the estimation of total
amount of transgender’s serving? How many of these individuals would be getting hormonal therapy or
some type of medical care? What is the estimated additional cost? Which leads me to the conclusion if
they don’t meet the requirements, could we implement a way of making them military readiness? Though
Spoehr did bring up the point of how it would be immoral to deploy transgenders- if they weren’t mentally
capable- even if they wanted to serve anway. I never thought of it being an immoral act to deploy
transgender individuals due to the fact of their mental state. I liked that it made me think from a new
perspective. But his argument was still ultimately weakened due to the fact he wasn’t able to give any
statistics to back up his arguments. Now after reading this, I see the potential threat with transgenders
serving in the U.S. military but still doesn’t shift my opinion. I think they need to but back in the policy that
Obama Administration set in 2016 until they are able to give actual evidence of what they are stating.
In “Fact Checking Trump’s reasons for a transgender military ban”, William Brangham interviews
Agnes Gereben Schaefer who is a senior political scientist at the RAND Corporation. In addition,
Schaefer was the lead author of the 2016 study for the Defense Department about Transgenders in the
military. Brangham asks Schaefer about the estimated additional cost for transgenders serving in the
military and are they mentally capable of performing such a task? The estimation of the cost came to $2.4
and $8.4 million per year, which is four-tenths to one-tenth of a percent of the active component health
care budget for 2014- which is a miniscule of a fraction. But not all transgender service members will
undertake medical treatments. Though the costs were proven to be between $2.4 and 8.4 million per
year, this would represent only 0.05% to .017% of the departments overall health care cost. O
verall, the
study estimated that only 29–129 service members would seek gender transition–related care per year,
and 30 to 140 personnel would seek hormone therapy She is saying that transgenders should be able to
serve in the military and that the government's reasons for military ban are not as significant as they
seem. Something I also found interesting is in 2016, 18 countries — Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bolivia,
Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands, New
Zealand, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom — allowed transgender military personnel to
serve openly.
I found this to be very useful towards my research because he asked her the two most relevant
questions. Donald Trump’s main reasons for transgender military ban are the cost and uncertainty of their
mental state. This source as well as proved to be reliable due to the fact Brangham asked these
questions from Schaefer- she again was apart of the study for the Defense Department for the
transgenders in the military- which was back in 2016 when the Obama administration was trying to figure
out what to do with the regards to transgender service members. She is able to answer all the questions
with no problem (side note: this interview was done live) and she had research to back up her answers.
Though I wish she went into more depth about the transgender military programs, for example, how do
they prepare transgender individuals? Is it the same as they do for non-transgender individuals? I think
her response to these questions proved strong- though I wish she gave more description in addition to her
statistics. I think Brangham should of asked Schaefer, “Are transgenders mentally capable of serving?”
And then given a simple yes or no answer. This Interview was extremely convincing and has answered
some important questions for me, I have a more positive outlook about transgender individuals serving in
the military.
In the article, “Bioidentical Hormones” Cleveland Clinic gives a clear definition and description
about the different types of hormonal therapies. What are bioidentical hormones? Cleveland Clinic
describe them as, “Hormones are special chemicals made by parts of the body called glands. They are
messengers that tell other parts of the body how and when to work.” Though the definition of bioidentical
hormones: man-made hormones that are similar to the hormones produced by the human body. The
Cleveland Clinic also states that these hormones control almost all tasks in the body. These functions
include sex, brain function, growth and the breakdown of food. When these hormones are out of balance
symptoms can occur. Common hormones that are matched are estrogen, progesterone and testosterone
and these are used as a treatment for men and women who have a low or out of balance hormones. Are
bioidentical hormones safe? Yes, they are approved by the FDA and have been tested for safety. Though
there are side effects would you first begin treatment- but gradually go away once your body adjusts to
hormonal therapy safe? I don’t have personal knowledge of hormonal therapy but it’s essential that I do
for this topic. This article was useful because it defined hormone therapy and gave a description. I liked
that it give a specific description of what parts of the body it impairs and the effects, also how long it
affects the body. I never considered that it would only affect the body for a certain part of the time. This
article provided useful information about the different types of hormones and stated it was proved by the
FDA which I found it to strengthen the point that it’s safe. Though it still doesn’t answer if transgenders
meet the criteria military readiness. This article has clouded my judgement because hormone therapy
does affect the brain functions but it doesn’t state in a negative way and it states the side effects go away
once your body adjusts to the hormone. I would have to consider the fact that not all transgender
In, “The Trans Military Ban is Already Causing Harm- But There’s a Way to Stop it”, Jim Mattis
issued interim guidance on President Donald Trump’s transgender troop ban. This caused concern
among military service members. President Trump said the pentagon must implement a complete ban in
early 2018. Under the president’s order, Secretary Mattis asked the DoD panel to study recruitment ban,
medical care ban, and purging current service members. The president ordered to ban military
procedures related to gender transition and already some service members have had procedures abruptly
cancelled, even though those procedures were prescribed by military health care professionals. The
article states, “This policy is beyond is beyond unjust - it is self-contradictory, nonsensical, and
dangerous. This policy will not only cause real harm to transgender troops- and any transgender
dependants of service members- it will be detrimental to readiness and morale at every level of the armed
forces.”
I liked this article a lot because it was very different point of a view, compared to all the other
articles I read. Because the two authors who wrote it obviously are against transgender military ban.
Though that makes it biased it still give me a view from the pro transgender military side. Though I wish
they would elaborated more on their argument of being unjust because it was really great. When reading
it, they made President Trump sound dictatorial, like he was discriminating against transgender
individuals, which gave me another perspective that I hadn’t thought about. Though President Trump has
given his reasons for military to ban these people- they still are taking away a right of an fellow American.
I wish the writers maybe interviewed one of the transgender individuals or someone there at the rally who
was supporting these rights. I think that would have strengthened their arguments by a lot. This article did
shift my opinion a little bit towards the pro side, though it still doesn’t prove that Transgender’s should
As of July 26, President Donald Trump announced that the U.S. military would no longer accept
or allow transgender people in its rank. He says it is because of the cost and the effects of hormonal
therapy. But that has been proven to not be valid points. The cost would only be an additional .05% to
.017% and hormonal therapy hasn’t been proven that it would affect the function that these individuals
would need to perform. 18 countries have now allowed transgenders to serve in the military. None of the
government’s reasons are significant as they state. I have concluded that this is discrimination. I hope that
people continue to protest against this. If the government doesn’t think they are military ready then they
Work Cited:
Glaad. “Transgender FAQ.” Glaad Media Program 18 September 2017, from
https://www.glaad.org/transgender/trans
Thomas Spoehr. “Should Transgender Americans be Allowed in the Military? Not So Fast:
Military Readiness Has to be First Concern.” The Heritage Foundation 8 August 2017, from
http://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/should-transgender-americans-be-allowed-the-military-not-s
o-fast-military
William Brangham. “Fact-checking Trump's reasons for a transgender military ban.” Pbs 28
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/fact-checking-trumps-reasons-transgender-military-ban
Cleveland Clinic. “Bioidentical Hormones.” Cleveland Clinic 2 December 2017, from
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/bioidentical-hormonesfaq
Bill Chappell, “Mattis Puts Hold On Transgender Ban For Current Military Service Members.”
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/08/30/547258742/mattis-puts-hold-on-transgender-ban-for-c
urrent-military-service-members
Office of the Press Secretary, “Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Homeland Security.” The White House 25 August 2017, from
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/08/25/presidential-memorandum-secretary-defense-an
d-secretary-homeland