Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Globalization of Labor PDF
The Globalization of Labor PDF
chapter
O
ver the past two decades, labor mar- • How rapidly has the global labor supply
kets around the world have become grown, and which channels of labor globaliza-
increasingly integrated. Political tion have been most important?
changes and economic reforms • To what extent can recent trends in labor
have transformed China, India, and the former shares and labor compensation in advanced
Eastern bloc countries, effectively involving their economies be explained by the changing
large labor forces in open market economies. global labor supply relative to other factors
At the same time, the development of technol- such as technological change and labor mar-
ogy, combined with the progressive removal of ket reform? Has the impact been different in
restrictions on cross-border trade and capital skilled and unskilled sectors?
flows, has made it possible for production pro- • What policies can help the advanced econo-
cesses to be unbundled and located farther from mies meet the challenges of further labor
target markets for a growing universe of goods market globalization?
and services. The location of production has This chapter finds that the effective global
become much more responsive to relative labor labor force has risen fourfold over the past
costs across countries. There have also been two decades. This growing pool of global labor
increasing flows of migrants across borders, is being accessed by advanced economies
through both legal and informal routes. through various channels, including imports
This ongoing globalization of the labor of final goods, offshoring of the production of
market has drawn increasing attention from intermediates, and immigration. The ongoing
policymakers and the media, particularly in the globalization of labor has contributed to rising
advanced economies. The most asked question labor compensation in advanced economies by
is whether the addition of this unprecedent- boosting productivity and output, while emerg-
edly large pool of labor from emerging market ing market countries have also benefited from
and developing countries is adversely affecting rising wages. Nevertheless, globalization is one
compensation and employment in the advanced of several factors that have acted to reduce the
economies. share of income accruing to labor in advanced
This chapter addresses this important and economies, although rapid technological change
emotive question. In contrast with most previ- has had a bigger impact, especially on work-
ous studies, which focus on one country or ers in unskilled sectors. The analysis finds that
a single channel of transmission, it takes a countries that have enacted reforms to lower
broad approach, considering a large sample of the cost of labor to business and improve labor
advanced economies and a full range of trans- market flexibility have generally experienced
mission channels (competing imports of final a smaller decline in the labor income share.
products, offshoring of intermediate products, Looking ahead, it is important for countries to
and immigration). The chapter focuses on the maximize the benefits from labor globalization
following issues: and technological change, while also working to
address the distributional impact. To this end,
policies should seek to improve the functioning
Note: The main authors of this chapter are Florence of labor markets; strengthen access to education
Jaumotte and Irina Tytell, with support from Christian de
Guzman and Stephanie Denis. Robert Feenstra provided and training; and ensure adequate social safety
consultancy support. nets that cushion the impact on those adversely
161
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
Figure 5.1. Alternative Measures of Global Labor Supply affected, without obstructing the process of
adjustment.
East Asia's marked rise in working-age population and increasing trade openness
have contributed to about half of the quadrupling of the effective global labor
supply, while South Asia and the former Eastern bloc accounted for smaller
increases. How Globalized Is Labor?
Global Labor Supply 400
A first question to address is how the opening
(index, 1980 = 100)
350 up of China, India, and the former Eastern bloc
Export-weighted 300 countries, together with ongoing demographic
labor force1
Working-age 250 developments, has affected the global labor
population
200
supply. This is not easy to answer because much
150
depends on the assumptions made about how
100
50 much of a country’s labor force is in, or could
Labor force
0 potentially compete in, the global market. One
1980 85 90 95 2000 05
simple approach is to weigh each country’s
Advanced economies Central and Eastern Europe and
Commonwealth of Independent
labor force by its export-to-GDP ratio. By
East Asia
South Asia States this measure, the effective global labor supply
Other developing countries 2
quadrupled between 1980 and 2005, with most
Export-Weighted Labor Force by Region1 1000 of the increase taking place after 1990 (Fig-
(index, 1980 = 100)
800
ure 5.1). East Asia contributed about half of
the increase, due to a marked rise in working-
600
age population and rising trade openness, while
400 South Asia and the former Eastern bloc coun-
200
tries accounted for smaller increases. While
most of the absolute increase in the global
0
1980 85 90 95 2000 05 labor supply consisted of less-educated workers
(defined as those without higher education), the
1500 Working-Age Population Non-Oil Export-to-GDP Ratio by 70
by Region (millions of Region (percent) relative supply of workers with higher education
1250 people) 60
50
increased by about 50 percent over the last 25
1000
40
years, owing mostly to advanced economies, but
750 also to China.
30
500
20 Advanced economies can access this increased
250 10 pool of global labor both through imports of
0 0 goods and services and through immigration.
1980 85 90 95 2000 05 1980 85 90 95 2000 05
Trade has been the more important channel
1, 3 and has grown more rapidly, not least because
Export-Weighted Global Labor Force by Education Level 800
(millions of people) 700
600
Less educated 500 This approach, which follows Harrigan and Balaban
400 (1999), is more accurate for developing countries special-
300 ized in labor-intensive activities than for advanced econo-
200 mies whose exports are relatively capital intensive. In
More educated 100 order to capture the export of labor through emigration,
0 emigration weights could be added to the trade weights.
1980 85 90 95 2000 05 However, these weights are generally very small.
This compares to estimates in Freeman (2006) that
Sources: United Nations, Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision Population database; the integration of China, India, and the former Eastern
World Bank, World Development Indicators; and IMF staff calculations. bloc countries doubled the number of workers in the
1 National labor forces scaled by export-to-GDP ratios.
2 Includes Western Hemisphere, Middle East and North Africa, and sub-Saharan Africa. global economy. The difference is due to the weighing
3 More educated labor force is defined by persons with university-level education. Less of national labor forces by export-to-GDP ratios in this
educated is defined by labor force with primary and secondary education plus the chapter’s estimates.
uneducated.
162
How Globalized Is Labor?
immigration remains highly restricted in most Figure 5.2. Immigration and Trade
countries (Figure 5.2). A similar picture emerges (Percent of labor force and GDP, respectively)
for developing and emerging market countries,
where the export-to-GDP ratio is in general Although immigration has expanded significantly over the past two decades in
some large European countries and the United States, trade remains as the more
much higher than the ratio of emigrants to the important channel for accessing the large global labor force.
domestic labor force. Nevertheless, immigra-
tion has expanded significantly over the past 1990 2005 1
two decades in some large European economies
(Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom) and 45 Advanced Economies Developing Countries 45
in the United States. The share of immigrants in 40 40
the U.S. labor force is now close to 15 percent 35 35
and hence comparable to the share of imports 30 30
in GDP. Elsewhere the share of immigrants is 25 25
20 20
still substantially less than the share of imports
15 15
in GDP, but it is not negligible.
10 10
Focusing on trade, the share of developing
5 5
country products in the manufacturing imports
0 0
of advanced economies has doubled since the Immigration2 Imports of goods Emigration2 Exports of goods
and services and services
early 1990s (Figure 5.3). This owes much to
China. Developing countries have also been United States France Canada
capturing an increasing share of world mar- United Kingdom Germany
Japan Italy
kets. At the aggregate level, however, trade is a
win-win game. As China, India, and the Eastern
3
Stock of Foreign Labor Force in Advanced Economies 25
bloc countries have opened up, world markets
(percent of total labor force)
and opportunities to export have expanded 20
considerably for advanced economies and
15
developing countries alike. Developing coun-
tries’ imports have been growing faster than 10
163
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
200 Ratio of Import and Export Price Deflators to Total Absorption 120 services produced in skilled sectors, that is, sectors with a
Deflator, Advanced OECD Economies (index, 2000 = 100) 115 higher share of skilled workers in their labor force. The
180
Export price deflator results are generally robust to excluding medium-skill sec-
160 Terms of trade 110
(left scale) tors and focusing instead on low-skill and high-skill sec-
(right scale) 105
140 tors (see Appendix 5.1 for details). Using a more refined
100
120 classification of products by skill intensity, Rodrik (2006)
95 concludes that China’s export basket is much more skill
100 90
Non-oil terms of trade intensive than would be expected given China’s level of
Import price deflator
80 (right scale) 85 development.
(left scale) It is common to scale imported intermediates by
60 80
1980 85 90 95 2000 05 total intermediate inputs to estimate the intensity of
offshoring. However, it seems more appropriate to scale
Sources: OECD, STAN Bilateral Trade Database; and IMF staff calculations. imported intermediates by total inputs (including labor
and capital), since imported intermediates can substitute
not only for domestic intermediate inputs but also for
in-house labor and capital.
164
How Globalized Is Labor?
165
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
166
How Has the Globalization of Labor Affected Workers in Advanced Economies?
167
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
168
How Has the Globalization of Labor Affected Workers in Advanced Economies?
169
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
170
How Has the Globalization of Labor Affected Workers in Advanced Economies?
the influence of these variables is difficult, in Figure 5.9. Advanced Economies: Labor Compensation
particular because technological change and the and Employment in Skilled and Unskilled Sectors
globalization of labor may be expected to affect (Index, 1980 = 100)
compensation and the labor share in similar
ways. The influence of policy variables is com- Despite strong growth of labor compensation overall, the growth in labor
compensation of unskilled sectors has been very slow. In the United States, the
plex, particularly because they may also affect the earnings gap between skilled and unskilled workers has widened by about 25 percent
labor share indirectly by facilitating or obstruct- since 1980, while in Europe, employment in unskilled sectors has contracted.
171
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
Brazil Colombia Venezuela change in the labor share over the sample period is the
Chile Mexico product of its coefficient and of its own average annual
change over the same period.
100 20Most studies have focused on explaining the decline
172
How Has the Globalization of Labor Affected Workers in Advanced Economies?
Each channel of labor globalization (trade Figure 5.11. Information and Communications
prices, offshoring, and immigration) individu- Technology (ICT) Capital, Patents, and Labor Market
ally plays a relatively small role in explaining the Indicators
decline in the labor share.
Labor globalization contributed to the The globalization of labor is but one of the forces that have influenced labor
markets in advanced economies over the past two decades. Rapid technological
decline in labor shares in most countries, with change and changes in labor and product market policies are other significant
developments with potentially important implications for labor market outcomes.
broadly similar effects in both Anglo-Saxon
countries and Europe.21 Nevertheless, the labor United States Europe2
globalization effect in the Anglo-Saxon coun- Other Anglo-Saxon1 Japan
tries and Europe is driven by different factors. 6 ICT Capital Number of Patents per 180
Europe’s labor share has been affected both (percent of total capital) Working-Age Person3 160
5
by offshoring and immigration, while, in the 140
Anglo-Saxon countries, offshoring was a some- 4 120
effect on the labor share. Hence, while global- 60 Average Replacement Rate Tax Wedge4 60
for Unemployment Benefits (percent of labor cost)
ization exerted downward pressure on the labor
50 (percent of income) 50
share through declines in import prices, this
effect has been broadly compensated by similar 40 40
173
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
Labor globalization and technological progress have acted to reduce the labor share, with the impact of technological progress being somewhat larger,
while changes in labor market policies have generally had a smaller but positive impact on the labor share. Trade prices, offshoring, and immigration
individually play a relatively small role in explaining the decline in the labor share.
174
How Has the Globalization of Labor Affected Workers in Advanced Economies?
and Nationality Act, which changed the basis of entry of the increase in relative wages of high school gradu-
into the United States from country quotas to family- ates (12 years of schooling) and 14 percent of the
based reunification. This brought about a drastic increase in relative wages of those with some college
change in the composition of immigration, increasing education (13–15 years of schooling) between 1990
the share of migrants from developing countries. and 2000.
175
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
is taken into account and after controlling for studies. Studies using household survey data define
other important determinants, such as the qual- skill based on education of the household head,
whereas studies using plant- or firm-level data typically
ity of institutions and geography.
differentiate between production and nonproduction,
In contrast, the internal distributional conse- or blue-collar and white-collar, workers.
quences of trade reform in developing countries Other explanations of the rising wage gaps include
are still the subject of intense debate (see Gold- skill-biased technological change or increased offshor-
berg and Pavcnik, forthcoming, for a survey). ing of activities that are relatively skill intensive from
the point of view of developing countries (though
The workhorse model to analyze the labor mar-
offshoring may itself be triggered by a free trade
ket consequences of trade liberalization—the agreement with an advanced economy, leading to
Stolper-Samuelson theorem—predicts that trade reduced tariffs) (Feenstra, 2007).
176
How Has the Globalization of Labor Affected Workers in Advanced Economies?
identify only relative differences across regions also mixed. For example, studies find no sig-
or industries and not identify the impact on the nificant relationship between trade policy and
nation as a whole. industry wages in Brazil and Mexico (Pavcnik
The econometric evidence from different and others, 2004; and Feliciano, 2001), while
countries is mixed on how trade reforms affect the reduction in tariffs within a sector is found
relative labor market outcomes across regions to be associated with a significant reduction in
or industries. Topalova (2005) and Edmonds, wages in that sector in Colombia (Goldberg
Pavcnik, and Topalova (2007) find that districts and Pavcnik, 2005) but with an increase in
in India that were more exposed to import wages in Poland (Goh and Javorcik, 2007). The
liberalization experienced a slower reduction evidence from India on the effects of changes
in poverty, which was coupled with lower invest- in tariffs on wages is mixed (see Topalova, 2005;
ment in human capital and a lower decline Dutta, 2004; and Kumar and Mishra, forthcom-
in child labor. On the other hand, using a ing). Given that the sectors that experienced
broader measure of openness, Hanson (2007) the largest tariff reductions were those with
finds that states in Mexico with high exposure the largest share of unskilled workers, the
to globalization (measured by the shares of industry-level studies thus suggest mixed effects
foreign direct investment, imports, and exports of trade liberalization on the overall wage gap
assembly in state GDP) experienced a rise in between skilled and unskilled workers: trade
labor incomes relative to low-exposure states in reforms were associated with a higher wage gap
the 1990s. in Colombia, possibly with an unchanged wage
The empirical evidence on the effect of trade gap in Brazil and Mexico, and with lower wage
liberalization on wages at the industry level is inequality in Poland.
In conclusion, on the one hand, emigration
Porto (2006) is one study that uses a general and trade both increase the aggregate incomes
equilibrium model of trade to answer the ambitious of developing countries (once the income of
question of the overall effect of trade liberalization emigrants is included). On the other hand, the
on inequality, in the context of Argentinean trade existing evidence on the impact of globalization
reforms. The model is used to simulate the effect of on inequality is mixed, particularly in the case
trade policy changes on the distribution of household
of trade. Further research efforts are needed to
welfare (household expenditure per capita). He finds
evidence of a pro-poor bias caused by the reform. On fully understand these important issues.
average, poor households gained more from reforms
than did middle-income households. However, the These studies use a two-step methodology. First,
drawback of this approach is that predictions of the they use household survey data to estimate “industry
model depend crucially on parameter estimates that wage premia,” defined as the part of worker wages
are typically not known (e.g., wage-price elasticities) that is explained by a worker’s industry affiliation
and are difficult to estimate consistently with time- after controlling for observable worker characteristics
series data on wages and prices when many other (e.g., schooling, experience, and so on). Second,
policies changed along with trade (see Goldberg and the estimated industry wage premia are regressed on
Pavcnik, forthcoming, for a discussion of this paper). measures of trade reform by industry.
advanced in the use of ICT. The adverse labor Saxon countries, but a much more modest
demand effects of ICT appear to be stronger effect on average in Europe, particularly in
at the early stages of ICT adoption, before the large European economies where labor policies
needed adjustments in workers’ education have are estimated to have actually contributed to a
taken place. decline in the labor share. The contribution of
Changes in labor market policies have had labor market policies is driven primarily by the
a positive effect on the labor share in Anglo- changes in the tax wedge and unemployment
177
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
Contribution of labor market policies 22The other variables, namely, employment protec-
tion legislation, product market regulation, and union
Contribution of employment shifts
away from unskilled sectors
density, did not have significant effects. The analysis was
expanded to investigate whether some labor market insti-
-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
tutions tend to amplify or attenuate the impact of labor
globalization and technological progress. Although strict
Source: IMF staff calculations. employment protection legislation does not appear to
11982–2002 or longest period available. 1986–2001 for Japan, as changes in the
have any effect on its own, there is some evidence that it
relative import price in earlier years reflected the yen's strong appreciation rather
than globalization. The contributions are based on estimated regression coefficients tends to increase the adverse effects of labor globalization
and average annual changes in the respective variables by country (see Appendix 5.1). on labor shares. A more flexible labor market may thus
contribute to limiting the decline in the overall labor
share caused by globalization.
23Workers in unskilled sectors have also benefited
178
How Has the Globalization of Labor Affected Workers in Advanced Economies?
179
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
180
Appendix 5.1. Data Sources and Methods
have to be designed with fiscal consequences ability. If trade-displaced workers are treated
in mind. more generously, including, for instance, by
• Improve access to education and training. Devel- being provided supplementary wage subsidies,
oping workers’ skills is necessary for keeping such compensation should be structured to
up with rapid technological change and avoid dulling incentives to search actively for
for continuing innovation. Skilled sectors new jobs.
have been better able to adapt to chang-
ing conditions caused by the ICT revolution
than unskilled sectors. Further, countries Appendix 5.1. Data Sources and Methods
that started adopting ICT and training The main authors of this appendix are Florence
workers in this area earlier experienced less Jaumotte and Irina Tytell.
decline in their labor share. Workers must
also be ready to compete with the growing
pool of skilled workers in emerging markets, Variable Definitions and Data Sources
especially those in Asia. Beyond increases This section provides further details on the
in spending on education and training, the construction of the variables used in this chapter
quality of this spending is crucial. Experi- and the sources of the data.
ence shows that evaluation and targeting
of training are important to maximize its Sectoral Classification
impact. Throughout the chapter, the analysis is car-
• Ensure adequate social protection for workers dur- ried out both for the aggregate economy and
ing the adjustment period. This includes provid- for a disaggregation of the economy by skill
ing adequate income support to cushion, category. The classification of trade and labor
but not obstruct, the process of change, into skill categories is based on the skill intensity
and also making health care less dependent of the sector. Hence skilled exports are exports
on continued employment and increasing of goods and services typically produced by skill-
the portability of pension benefits in some intensive sectors. The skilled labor share is the
countries. The latter would also enhance share of national income that accrues to workers
the flexibility of the economy by facilitating in skill-intensive sectors. One drawback of this
the move of workers from declining sectors approach is that it does not capture changes
to expanding sectors. Whether measures that occur between skilled and unskilled workers
specifically targeted at workers who have been within sectors. A more refined approach was,
displaced by international trade are desirable however, not feasible because of the lack of
is less clear (see, e.g., OECD, 2005). The fact cross-country data on the wages of production
that these workers may face special hurdles (unskilled) and nonproduction (skilled) work-
reintegrating into the labor market as they ers, which would have been needed to calculate
are often older and less educated, and their labor shares and labor compensation of skilled
skills are specific to declining industries or and unskilled workers.
occupations, argues in favor of such measures. The classification of sectors into skilled and
Also, minimizing losses for such workers may unskilled is based on the share of skilled workers
increase support for the international eco- in the labor force of the sector, where a person
nomic integration process. However, it may be is considered skilled if he or she has at least
difficult (even conceptually) to differentiate upper secondary education. Data on the average
between job losses caused by globalization fraction of skilled labor in each sector (across 16
and those caused by other factors, since most OECD economies from 1994 to 1998) are from
labor markets are characterized by high rates Jean and Nicoletti (2002). The chapter classi-
of turnover and year-to-year earnings vari- fies 18 sectors (from the International Standard
181
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
140 140
100
Low skilled
100 Labor Compensation and Labor Shares
Unskilled
80 80 Labor compensation was calculated by
1980 85 90 95 2000 1980 85 90 95 2000
a ugmenting the compensation of employees
Sources: Haver Analytics; International Labor Organization, Labor Statistics Database;
for the income of other categories of workers
OECD, Employment and Labour Market Statistics, National Accounts Statistics, and STAN (self-employed, employers, and family work-
Industrial Database; United Nations, National Accounts Statistics (2004); and IMF staff
calculations. ers). Following Gollin (2002) and for data
1For the analysis by skill level, advanced economies include Austria, Belgium, Canada,
availability reasons, it was assumed that other
Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, the United
Kingdom, and the United States; weighted using series on GDP in U.S. dollars from the categories of workers earn the same average
World Economic Outlook database.
wage as employees. Labor compensation is
hence the product of the compensation of
employees and the ratio of total employment
182
Appendix 5.1. Data Sources and Methods
and employees.27 Other correction procedures availability reasons, the calculations were limited
(see Gollin, 2002, for a review), for which the to advanced OECD economies.
data are not widely available, yield similar pat-
terns over the subset of the sample used in this Manufacturing Wages
chapter for which the data are available. This Manufacturing wages for advanced and devel-
correction was applied at both the aggregate oping economies are from the UNIDO Indus-
and the sectoral level of data. When sectoral trial Statistics Database. They were converted
data on employees or total employment were into constant purchasing power parity (PPP)
not available, the following procedure was used: dollars using CPI indices and PPP exchange
• the ratio of total employment to total employ- rates from the World Economic Outlook data-
ees was assumed to be the same as in previous base. The data for China are from the CEIC Asia
years or, if it was not available for any year, it database.
was assumed to be equal to the average for
this sector across other OECD economies; and Immigration
• the sum of “nonemployee” workers across The data on foreign labor force are from the
sectors was constrained to add up to the total OECD’s Trends in International Migration (2003
for the aggregate economy by scaling the edition for all countries except the United
imputed number of nonemployee workers States). For the United States, the data are from
proportionately. the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau
The variables are defined as follows. Real of Labor Statistics. Data for Italy, the Nether-
labor compensation is labor compensation lands, Norway, and the United Kingdom are
deflated by the CPI index from the World for foreign employment instead of labor force.
Economic Outlook database. The labor share Data for Australia, Canada, and the United
is calculated as the ratio of labor compensation States refer to foreign-born labor force instead
and value added at basic prices.28 The share of of foreign labor force. The available series were
labor in skilled (unskilled) sectors is the ratio of extended backward using growth rates from the
labor compensation in skilled (unskilled) sectors stock of foreign (or foreign-born, in the case
to the economy-wide value added. of Australia, Canada, and the United States)
The main data source is the OECD’s Struc- population when available, and the missing years
tural Analysis (STAN) Database. However, were interpolated.
several other sources were used to fill in missing Data on emigration for 1990 and 2000 are
data and extend the series to the most recent from Docquier and Marfouk (2005) and refer to
year possible. For employees’ compensation and the stock of emigrants to the OECD economies.
value added, these include the OECD’s National
Accounts Statistics, the UN’s National Accounts Trade and Offshoring
Statistics, and Haver Analytics (for Japan). For Data on trade used in the chapter are from a
data on total employment and employees, the variety of sources. Aggregate data on trade quan-
additional sources were the OECD’s Employ- tities and prices are from the World Economic
ment and Labor Market Statistics Database and Outlook database, including for the non-oil
the ILO Labor Statistics Database. Due to data goods and services aggregates. Sectoral trade
data for advanced economies (used to construct
27Korea
skilled and unskilled trade) are from the OECD
was excluded from the sample because some
of the income of the self-employed is already in the STAN Industrial Database (for manufacturing)
employees’ compensation, making it impossible to apply and from the OECD International Trade in
the correction (see also Young, 1995 and 2003). Services Database (for services). For develop-
28The exceptions are Japan, where value added is mea-
sured at producer prices, and the United States, where it ing countries, sectoral trade data were obtained
is measured at market prices. from the World Integrated Trade Solution (for
183
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
manufacturing) and from the IMF’s Balance of Imports of final goods and services are con-
Payments Statistics (for services). Data on manu- structed as a residual by subtracting imported
facturing trade of advanced OECD economies by intermediate inputs from total imports.
source country are from the OECD STAN Bilat-
eral Trade Database. The services data for India Global Labor Supply
were extended using the CEIC Asia database. Several measures of the global labor supply
Offshore outsourcing is the outsourcing are calculated, including the world’s working-
of intermediate production to companies in age population, the world’s labor force, and an
locations outside the country, which can be export-weighted world’s labor force. The latter
foreign affiliates or independent companies. attempts to measure the presence of the coun-
It is measured by the imports of intermediate tries’ labor supply in the international market
inputs, as provided in the OECD Input-Output and is calculated as the sum across countries
Tables (1995, 2002, and 2006 editions). These of national labor forces, each weighted by the
tables assume that an industry uses an import country’s ratio of non-oil exports to GDP (Har-
of a particular product in proportion to its total rigan and Balaban, 1999). The export-to-GDP
use of that product (“the import proportional- ratio is capped to one to limit the weight of
ity assumption”), and this proportion is the countries specialized in re-export trade. Data
economy-wide share of imports in domestic on working-age population and labor force
demand. The measure used in the chapter only are from various sources, including the World
includes nonfuel manufacturing and services Economic Outlook, the World Bank’s World
inputs. Imported intermediate inputs of a sector Development Indicators, the United Nations
are scaled by either the sector’s gross output or Population Projections, and the CEIC Asia data-
its total use of intermediates. Sectoral offshoring bases. The global labor supply by education level
intensities are then aggregated based on sectoral is calculated using the Barro-Lee (2000) data
gross output weights. Finally, the data on the set on educational attainment of the population
overall offshoring intensity are interpolated for aged 15 or more. It is assumed that the share of
missing years. the labor force with higher education is about
For years beyond 2000, the OECD data were the same as the share of the population aged 15
extended using the latest input-output table or more with higher education. For the years
available (2000 for most countries) and updat- 2001–05, this share was extrapolated linearly for
ing the data on the import proportions for each each country.
category of intermediate input. The latter was The projections of the global labor supply
approximated by the share of imports in domes- for 2006–50 are based on the UN projections
tic absorption (consumption and investment) of the working-age population. The labor force
for that category of products (sector). Data on participation rate in each country is assumed to
imports by sectors are from the OECD STAN converge by 2050 to the current rate of labor
Industrial Database for manufacturing and from force participation in the United States. Assum-
the OECD International Trade in Services Data- ing instead that labor force participation rates
base for services. Data on value added by sector remain at their current levels does not have
(used to calculate absorption) are from a com- much effect on the global labor supply projec-
bination of the OECD STAN Industrial Database tions. Projections for the export-to-GDP ratio
and the Groningen 60-Industry Database.29 are based on country-specific World Economic
Outlook projections until 2012, and on the trend
increase observed in the world export-to-GDP
29Sectoral offshoring intensities were aggregated using
ratio for later years. Under these assumptions,
sectoral value-added weights, due to the lack of data on
sectoral gross output for the later years. The historical the cumulative growth in the export-weighted
and extended series were then spliced using growth rates. global labor force over 2005–50 could range
184
Appendix 5.1. Data Sources and Methods
from a low of 120 percent (under the low vari- average production worker earnings. It is
ant of the population projections) to a high of thus the sum of personal income tax and all
190 percent (under the high variant). social security contributions expressed as a
percentage of the total labor cost. The origi-
Capital Stock and ICT Capital nal data are from the OECD Taxing Wages
Fajnzylber and Lederman (1999) are the Database.
source of the capital stock series for the entire • Employment protection legislation is the
economy. This data set extends the capital stock OECD summary indicator of the stringency
series estimated by Nehru and Dhareshwar of Employment Protection Legislation. The
(1993) by adding the annual flow of gross fixed original data are from the OECD Employment
capital formation and assuming a 4 percent Outlook (2004).
depreciation rate to the preexisting stock of • Product market regulation is the OECD sum-
capital. mary indicator of regulatory impediments
Jorgenson and Vu (2005) provide series on to product market competition in seven
IT investment using national expenditure data nonmanufacturing industries (gas, electricity,
for computer hardware, software, and telecom- post, telecom, passenger air transport, railways
munications equipment. A perpetual inventory passenger and freight services, and road
method applies varying depreciation rates to freight). The original data are from Conway
estimate IT capital stock. This method assumes and others (2006).
a geometric depreciation rate of 31.5 percent • Union density measures the share of work-
and a service life of 7 years for computer hard- ers affiliated with a trade union. The original
ware, 31.5 percent and 5 years for software, and data are from the OECD Employment Outlook
11 percent and 11 years for telecommunications (2004).
equipment.
185
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
Using the translog revenue function, product to reflect potential nonlinearities associated
and factor shares can be obtained as with the need for learning the new technology:
the adverse effect on wages and employment
piyi is likely to be greatest before workers acquire
Si = –––– = ai + ∑aij lnpj + ∑gij lnvj + ∑ϕijzj
G the skills necessary to effectively handle the
wivi new equipment. The model was estimated on
Ri = –––– = bi + ∑gij lnpj + ∑bij lnvj + ∑φijzj ,
G a panel of 18 countries over 1982–2002 using
country fixed effects. The basic specification
where S are product shares, R are factor shares,
was extended to include several measures of
p are product prices, v are factor quantities, and
labor market policies, including the tax wedge,
z are shift variables. The shift variables capture
the replacement rate of unemployment ben-
any factors that could be expected to shift the
efits, indices of product market regulation,
revenue function, for example, measures of
employment protection legislation, and union
technological progress or offshoring, as sug-
density.30
gested by Feenstra (2004). The share equations
A potential concern with the accuracy of
are subject to a number of cross-equation restric-
the estimation is that the variables related to
tions that follow from symmetry and linear
labor globalization—trade prices, offshoring,
homogeneity of the corresponding revenue
and immigration—may be endogenous. Trade
function.
prices are unlikely to be exogenous for coun-
Given the theme of this chapter, the estima-
tries whose economic size is sufficiently large.31
tions focused primarily on the labor share equa-
Reverse causality or common third factors may
tions. The following equation was adopted as
bias the effects of offshoring and immigration
the basic specification for the analysis:
on the labor share. To address this concern, an
pE pM L instrumental variables estimation was used with
RL = bL + gELln––– + gMLln––– + bLLln–––
pA pA K variables reflecting domestic and foreign supply
and demand conditions, as well as lags of the
LM
+ φLXX + φLM –––
L
KICT
+ φLC ––––
K
KICT 2
+ φLC2 ––––
K ( )
+ eL, potentially endogenous variables as instruments.
Specifically, the list of instruments included the
where PE , PM, and PA are prices of exports, share of government consumption in GDP; the
imports, and absorption; L is labor; K is capital; consumption tax rate; the (log of) total popula-
X is offshoring; LM is immigrant employment; tion; the (log of) export-weighted real GDP of
and K ICT is ICT capital. The relative prices and trading partners; the distance-weighted export-
quantities are used to impose the necessary adjusted employment in the rest of the world (a
homogeneity restrictions. Labor shares are cor- measure of the global labor supply); and lags of
rected for the income of other (nonemployee) (logs of) relative trade prices, offshoring, and
categories of workers, prices and the capital immigration.
stock variables are measured in 2000 U.S. dol- In addition to the aggregate labor share
lars, and labor stock variables are represented equation, a system of labor share equations for
by employment. Offshoring is measured as a skilled and unskilled workers was also estimated
share of imported intermediate inputs in total as follows:
intermediate inputs, immigration is captured
as a share of immigrant employment in total
domestic employment, and ICT capital is 30A specification including interaction terms between
modeled as a share of ICT capital in the total these policy variables and measures of labor globalization
capital stock (more detail on these measure- and technological progress was also explored.
31The price of absorption could also be affected by
ments is provided above). The effect of ICT changes in the labor share, which reflect changes in unit
capital is represented by a quadratic function labor costs.
186
Appendix 5.1. Data Sources and Methods
187
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
Table 5.3. Impact of Labor Globalization and Technological Change on Skilled and Unskilled Labor Shares
Instrumental Three-Stage
Fixed Effects Estimation
________________________ Variables Estimation
________________________ Least Square Estimation
_________________________
Skilled labor Unskilled Skilled labor Unskilled Skilled labor Unskilled
Dependent Variable share labor share share labor share share labor share
Log of:
Relative export price –0.072*** –0.049*** –0.117*** –0.060*** –0.115*** –0.058***
Relative import price 0.053*** 0.031** 0.089*** 0.041*** 0.097*** 0.044***
Skilled labor-capital ratio 0.093** –0.203*** 0.075** –0.210*** 0.156*** –0.163***
Unskilled labor-capital ratio –0.089*** 0.181*** –0.098*** 0.177*** –0.163*** 0.143***
Offshoring –0.134* –0.016 –0.203*** –0.052 –0.191*** –0.043
Immigration –0.507*** –0.162** –0.678*** –0.225** –0.663*** –0.216***
ICT capital –0.808 –0.922* –1.413* –1.099** –2.046*** –1.409***
ICT capital squared 22.358* 10.458 29.792*** 13.346* 38.688*** 17.860***
Tax wedge –0.001 –0.001** –0.002*** –0.001*** –0.002*** –0.001***
Unemployment benefits –0.001** –0.000* –0.001*** –0.000** –0.001*** –0.000***
Product market regulation 0.000 0.002 0.001 0.002** 0.000 0.002**
Fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Observations 219 219 202 202 202 202
R-squared 0.53 0.94 . . . . . . . . . ...
Anderson test . . . . . . 140.83*** 140.83*** . . . ...
Hansen test . . . . . . 7.7 8.4 . . . ...
Source: IMF staff calculations.
Note: * denotes statistical significance at the 10 percent level; ** denotes statistical significance at the 5 percent level; and *** denotes sta-
tistical significance at the 1 percent level. Standard errors are heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation robust. ICT = information and communica-
tions technology.
The findings are generally robust to the in the ICT capital stock and offshoring on the
exclusion of outliers (identified in terms of labor share. The coefficients on the share of ICT
their influence on predicted values and the capital are more robust to the inclusion of time
variance-covariance matrix of the estimates) and effects when measured as a share of investment,
of individual countries.33 They are also robust rather than of capital stock. Similarly, the coef-
to splitting the import price into that of oil ficient on offshoring of skilled inputs is more
and non-oil imports (while the oil price has a robust to the inclusion of time effects than that
statistically significant effect on the labor share, on total offshoring.
it is small in magnitude). The coefficients on The estimation results from the labor share
the ICT capital stock, its square, and offshor- equations for skilled and unskilled sectors
ing become statistically insignificant when time are shown in Table 5.3. The first two columns
effects are included. This is not surprising since contain independent fixed effects estimations
time effects are often used in empirical studies of the two equations, the middle two columns
to capture the effect of worldwide technologi- present independent instrumental variables
cal progress and other broad global trends. The estimations, and the last two columns show
time effects show a declining pattern over time, the system estimation with the cross-equation
consistent with the negative effect of the growth restriction imposed. Labor globalization and
technological progress appear to have some-
what different effects on the labor shares of
33Partial correlation plots, showing the correlation
workers in skilled and unskilled sectors. Labor
between the labor share and each regressor after control-
ling for the other explanatory variables, confirm that the globalization has a somewhat stronger effect
estimated relationships are quite robust. on the skilled sectors, in line, for example,
188
References
with more offshoring occurring in the skilled Combining these elasticities gives the elasticity
sectors. Technological change affects both skill of the total labor compensation to trade prices:
groups negatively, but the effect is less strong
e(WL,pi) = e(W,pi) + e(L,pi),
for the skilled, consistent with the nonlinear-
ity due to learning requirements, as suggested where i = E, M. It is important to point out that
above. These results should be treated as these elasticities are derived from the model
somewhat more tentative, however, given that that assumes fixed prices, hence possible price
the classification by skill is based on broad eco- adjustments are not taken into account in these
nomic sectors. calculations.34
The contributions of the various factors to the To compute the actual percent changes in the
change in the labor shares shown in the main total labor compensation resulting from changes
text are calculated as the average annual change in trade prices, these elasticities are multiplied
in the respective variable multiplied by the cor- by the average percent changes in relative trade
responding coefficient estimate. The averages prices in each country. The averages across
across country groups are weighted by the num- country groups are weighted by the number of
ber of years of data available for each country, years of data available for each country, so that
so that countries with more data receive a larger countries with more data receive a larger weight
weight in these averages. These contributions in these averages. The results are shown in the
allow introducing cross-country differences in main text.
the role of various factors, although they do not
fully reflect cross-country heterogeneity, since
the estimated coefficients are the same for all References
countries in the sample. Amiti, Mary, and Shang-Jin Wei, 2005, “Fear of Service
Outsourcing: Is It Justified?” Economic Policy, Vol. 20
Elasticity Calculations (April), pp. 308–47.
The econometric model used in this chapter ———, 2006, “Service Offshoring and Productivity:
Evidence from the United States,” NBER Work-
allows going beyond the effects of various factors
ing Paper No. 11926 (Cambridge, Massachusetts:
on the labor share by computing the elasticities
National Bureau of Economic Research).
of labor compensation per worker and employ-
Annett, Anthony, 2006, “Lessons from Successful
ment to these factors (Kohli, 1991). Labor Market Reformers in Europe,” in Euro Area
The elasticities of labor compensation per Policies: Selected Issues, IMF Country Report No.
worker to trade prices (given employment) are 06/288 (Washington: International Monetary
obtained as follows: Fund).
Aydemir, Abdurrahman, and George J. Borjas, 2006,
giL
e(W,pi) = ––– + Si , “A Comparative Analysis of the Labor Market
RL Impact of International Migration: Canada, Mexico,
and the United States,” NBER Working Paper No.
where i = E, M, and the output shares RL and Si 12327 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau
are evaluated at the mean for each country. of Economic Research).
The employment elasticities with respect to Barro, Robert J., and Jong-Wha Lee, 2000, “Interna-
trade prices (given labor compensation per tional Data on Educational Attainment: Updates
worker) are obtained as follows:
189
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
and Implications,” CID Working Paper No. 42 tances and the Brain Drain, ed. by Ç. Özden and M.
(Cambridge, Massachusetts: Center for Interna- Schiff (Washington: World Bank).
tional Development). Dutta, Puja Vasudeva, 2004, “Trade Protection and
Bassanini, Andrea, and Romain Duval, 2006, “Employ- Inter-Industry Wages in India,” PRUS Working
ment Patterns in OECD Countries: Reassessing the Paper No. 27 (Sussex: Poverty Research Unit,
Role of Policies and Institutions,” OECD Econom- Department of Economics, University of Sussex).
ics Department Working Paper No. 486 (Paris: Edmonds, Eric, Nina Pavcnik, and Petia Topalova,
Organization for Economic Cooperation and 2007, “Trade Adjustment and Human Capital
Development). Investments: Evidence from Indian Tariff Reform,”
Berg, Andrew, and Anne O. Krueger, 2003, “Trade, NBER Working Paper No. 12884 (Cambridge,
Growth, and Poverty: A Selective Survey,” IMF Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic
Working Paper 03/30 (Washington: International Research).
Monetary Fund). Fajnzylber, Pablo, and Daniel Lederman, 1999,
Blanchard, Olivier, 1998, “Revisiting European Unem- “Economic Reforms and Total Factor Productivity
ployment: Unemployment, Capital Accumulation Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean (1950–
and Factor Prices,” NBER Working Paper No. 6566 95)—An Empirical Note,” Policy Research Working
(Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Paper No. 2114 (Washington: World Bank).
Economic Research). Feenstra, Robert C., 2004, Advanced International Trade:
Blinder, Alan S., 2006, “Offshoring: The Next Theory and Evidence (Princeton, New Jersey: Princ-
Industrial Revolution?” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85 eton University Press).
(March/April). ———, 2007, “Globalization and Its Impact on Labor,”
Borjas, George J., 1994, “The Economics of Immigra- Global Economy Lecture 2007, Vienna Institute for
tion,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 32 (Decem- International Economic Studies, Vienna, Febru-
ber), pp. 1667–717. ary 8. Available via the Internet: http://www.econ.
———, 1995, “The Economic Benefits from Immigra- ucdavis.edu/faculty/fzfeens/papers.html.
tion,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9 (Spring), Feliciano, Zadia M., 2001, “Workers and Trade
pp. 3–22. Liberalization: The Impact of Trade Reforms in
Cardarelli, Roberto, and Kenichi Ueda, 2004, “Domes- Mexico on Wages and Employment,” Industrial
tic and Global Perspectives of Migration to the and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 55 (October),
United States,” in United States: Selected Issues, IMF pp. 95–115.
Country Report No. 04/228 (Washington: Interna- Freeman, Richard B., 1995, “Are Your Wages Set
tional Monetary Fund). in Beijing?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9
Christensen, Laurits R., Dale W. Jorgenson, and Law- (Summer), pp. 15–32.
rence J. Lau, 1975, “Transcendental Logarithmic ———, 2006, “Labor Market Imbalances: Shortages,
Utility Functions,” American Economic Review, Vol. 65 or Surpluses, or Fish Stories?” paper presented at
(June), pp. 367–83. the Boston Federal Reserve Economic Conference,
Conway, Paul, Donato de Rosa, Giuseppe Nicoletti, “Global Imbalances—As Giants Evolve,” Chatham,
and Faye Steiner, 2006, “Regulation, Competition Massachusetts, June 14–16.
and Productivity Convergence,” OECD Econom- Goh, Chor-Ching, and Beata S. Javorcik, 2007, “Trade
ics Department Working Paper No. 509 (Paris: Protection and Industry Wage Structure in Poland,”
Organization for Economic Cooperation and in Globalization and Poverty, ed. by Ann Harrison
Development). (Chicago: University of Chicago Press and the
Davis, Donald R., and Prachi Mishra, 2007, “Stolper- National Bureau of Economic Research).
Samuelson Is Dead, and Other Crimes of Both Goldberg, Pinelopi, and Nina Pavcnik, 2005, “Trade,
Theory and Data,” in Globalization and Poverty, Wages, and the Political Economy of Trade
ed. by Ann Harrison (Chicago: University of Protection: Evidence from the Colombian Trade
Chicago Press and National Bureau of Economic Reforms,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 66
Research). (May), pp. 75–105.
Docquier, Frédéric, and Abdeslam Marfouk, 2005, ———, forthcoming, “Distributional Effects of
“International Migration by Educational Attain- Globalization in Developing Countries,” Journal of
ment, 1990–2000,” in International Migration, Remit- Economic Literature.
190
References
Gollin, Douglas, 2002, “Getting Income Shares for Policy Research (Geneva: International Labor
Right,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 110 (April), Organization).
pp. 458–74. Jean, Sébastien, and Giuseppe Nicoletti, 2002, “Prod-
Greenwood, Michael J., Gary Hunt, and Ulrich Kohli, uct Market Regulation and Wage Premia in Europe
1996, “The Short-Run and Long-Run Factor-Market and North America: An Empirical Investigation,”
Consequences of Immigration to the United OECD Economics Department Working Paper
States,” Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 36 (Febru- No. 318 (Paris: Organization for Economic Coop-
ary), pp. 43–66. eration and Development).
Grossman, Gene M., and Esteban Rossi-Hansberg, Jensen, J. Bradford, and Lori G. Kletzer, 2005, “Trad-
2006, “The Rise of Offshoring: It’s Not Wine able Services: Understanding the Scope and Impact
for Cloth Anymore,” paper presented at Federal of Services Outsourcing,” IIE Working Paper
Reserve Bank of Kansas City symposium, “The New No. 05-9 (Washington: Institute for International
Economic Geography: Effects and Policy Implica- Economics).
tions,” Jackson Hole, Wyoming, August 24–26. Jorgenson, Dale W., and Khuong Vu, 2005, “Informa-
Available via the Internet: http://www.kc.frb.org/ tion Technology and the World Economy,” Scandi-
PUBLICAT/SYMPOS/2006/PDF/Grossmanand- navian Journal of Economics, Vol. 107 (December),
Rossi-Hansberg.paper.0831.pdf. pp. 631–50.
Gupta, Sanjeev, Catherine Pattillo, and Smita Wagh, Katz, Larry F., and David H. Autor, 1999, “Changes
2007, “Impact of Remittances on Poverty and in the Wage Structure and Earnings Inequality,”
Financial Development in Sub-Saharan Africa,” IMF in Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3A, ed. by
Working Paper 07/38 (Washington: International Orley C. Ashenfelter and David Card (Amsterdam:
Monetary Fund). North-Holland).
Guscina, Anastasia, 2006, “Effects of Globalization on Kohli, Ulrich, 1991, Technology, Duality, and Foreign
Labor’s Share in National Income,” IMF Working Trade: The GNP Function Approach to Modeling Imports
Paper 06/294 (Washington: International Monetary and Exports (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan
Fund). Press).
Hanson, Gordon, forthcoming, “Emigration, Labor Kumar, Utsav, and Prachi Mishra, forthcoming, “Trade
Supply, and Earnings in Mexico,” in Mexican Liberalization and Wage Inequality: Evidence from
Immigration to the United States, ed. by George Borjas India,” Review of Development Economics.
(Chicago: University of Chicago Press and National Lewer, Joshua J., and Hendrik Van den Berg, 2003,
Bureau of Economic Research). “How Large Is International Trade’s Effect on Eco-
———, 2007, “Globalization, Labor Income, and nomic Growth?” Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 17
Poverty in Mexico,” in Globalization and Poverty, (July), pp. 363–96.
ed. by Ann Harrison (Chicago: University of Mishra, Prachi, 2006, “Emigration and Brain-Drain:
Chicago Press and National Bureau of Economic Evidence from the Caribbean,” IMF Working Paper
Research). 06/25 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Harrigan, James, 1998, “International Trade and ———, 2007, “Emigration and Wages in Source Coun-
American Wages in General Equilibrium, 1967– tries: Evidence from Mexico,” Journal of Development
1995,” Staff Report No. 46 (New York: Federal Economics, Vol. 82 (January), pp. 180–99.
Reserve Bank of New York). Nehru, Vikram, and Ashok Dhareshwar, 1993, “A New
———, and Rita A. Balaban, 1999, “U.S. Wages in Database on Physical Capital Stock: Sources, Meth-
General Equilibrium: The Effects of Prices, Tech- odology, and Results,” Revista de Análisis Económico,
nology, and Factor Supplies, 1963–1991,” NBER Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 37–59.
Working Paper No. 6981 (Cambridge, Massachu- Olsen, Karsten Bjerring, 2006, “Productivity Impacts
setts: National Bureau of Economic Research). of Offshoring and Outsourcing: A Review,” OECD
Harrison, Anne E., 2002, “Has Globalization Eroded Science, Technology and Industry Working Paper
Labor’s Share? Some Cross-Country Evidence” No. 2006/1 (Paris: Organization for Economic
(unpublished; Berkeley, California: University of Cooperation and Development).
California at Berkeley). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Develop-
International Labor Office and World Trade Orga- ment (OECD), 2004, OECD Employment Outlook
nization, 2007, Trade and Employment: Challenges (Paris).
191
CHAPTER 5 The Globalization of Labor
———, 2005, “Trade-Adjustment Costs in OECD Slaughter, Matthew J., 2001, “International Trade and
Labour Markets: A Mountain or a Molehill?” in Labor-Demand Elasticities,” Journal of International
OECD Employment Outlook (Paris). Economics, Vol. 54 (June), pp. 27–56.
———, 2006a, “The Internationaliation of Produc- Topalova, Petia, 2005, “Factor Immobility and
tion, International Outsourcing and OECD Labour Regional Impacts of Trade Liberalization:
Markets” (Paris). Evidence on Poverty and Inequality from India”
———, 2006b, “Migration in OECD Countries: Labour (unpublished; Cambridge, Massachusetts: Mas-
Market Impact and Integration Issues” (Paris). sachusetts Institute of Technology). Available via
Pavcnik, Nina, Andreas Blom, Pinelopi Goldberg, the Internet: http://www.isid.ac.in/~planning/
and Norbert Schady, 2004, “Trade Liberaliza- Topalova.pdf.
tion and Industry Wage Structure: Evidence from Young, Alwyn, 1995, “The Tyranny of Numbers: Con-
Brazil,” World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, fronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian
pp. 319–44. Growth Experience,” Quarterly Journal of Economics,
Porto, Guido, 2006, “Using Survey Data to Assess Vol. 110 (August), pp. 641–80.
the Distributional Effects of Trade Policy,” Journal ———, 2003, “Gold into Base Metals: Productivity
of International Economics, Vol. 70 (September), Growth in the People’s Republic of China During
pp. 140–60. the Reform Period,” Journal of Political Economy,
Rodrik, Dani, 2006, “What’s So Special About China’s Vol. 111 (December), pp. 1220–61.
Exports?” NBER Working Paper No. 11947 (Cam- World Bank, 2006, Global Economic Prospects
bridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Eco- 2007: Managing the Next Wave of Globalization
nomic Research). (Washington).
192