Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The statement, “While it may seem to some that I was employing a double standard by
saving Eric from expulsion and pulling strings for him at the firehouse, Eric’s situation as student
caught within a cycle of abuse came first” reminded me of the importance of fairness within
inclusive classrooms (Schwarz, 2006, p. 23). The perception of fairness is often misconstrued as
rewarding destructive behavior. For example, Eric physically hit the students who upset him in
the classroom. From an outsider’s viewpoint, Eric is rewarded with a works-study opportunity.
Based the common definition of the word fair, Eric did not receive punishment. However, from
the perceptive of Dr. Schwarz, Eric’s success as a student is more important. The idea of fairness
in an inclusive setting is not the same as the common definition. In fact, fairness states that every
student receives what they need, which may not be the same as other students.
In the same way, a student’s overall academic and personal success is more important
than the “appearance” of a double standard. Therefore, employing fairness is more important
than avoiding the perception of a double standard. In Eric’s case and those like his, expulsion
would create a negative outcome. He would have dropped out of school and not fulfilled his
purpose in life. Who wins in this situation? No one. Therefore, Dr. Schwarz chose Eric’s future
practice of fairness allows special education teachers to be inventive with lessons plans, projects,
and activities. In my opinion, it is comforting to know that every student’s education looks
different. I will not be teaching a subject in the same way, every single day. I have a bit of
freedom to plan and implement instruction in a more effective way. Every day brings a new