Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315651329
CITATION READS
1 98
4 authors, including:
Greg Cote
147 PUBLICATIONS 1,977 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Greg Cote on 16 October 2017.
ABSTRACT: Corrosion is a global issue that affects safety and economics. There is an increasing demand for bio-based polymers for
industrial applications and production of polymers by micro-organisms is especially attractive. This work reports on the electrochem-
ical and physical properties of exopolysaccharides produced from lactic acid bacteria and their suitability as anti-corrosive coatings.
Bacterial exopolysaccharide coatings protected low carbon steel from corrosion by reducing ionic diffusion rates and maintaining a
relatively passive metal-coating interface. The data suggest the kinetics of film deposition are fast (<5 min) and there is little excess
(loosely bound) material when hydrated. Measurements show thin (50 nm) coatings that when exposed to water exhibit self-repairing
phenomenon. The corrosion protection offered by the coatings is reported as the corrosion rate calculated from the corrosion current
obtained by electrochemical impedance and polarization spectroscopy. V C 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 45032.
INTRODUCTION Thin polymer films are the subject of intensive study as cheap
and efficient alternatives to traditional anti-corrosive coating
Corrosion is a global issue that affects safety and economics. It
technology.13 They are easy to tailor to the specific needs of an
affects almost every industry in an economy from electronics1
application, have varying diffusive and hydrophobic properties
to healthcare,2 energy,3 and infrastructure,4 and it causes exorbi-
and are easily applied, usually by spraying or dipping in solu-
tant losses. 5 Corrosion can be defined as the disintegration of a
tions. Polymer thin films also provide more esoteric capabilities
material into its constituent atoms due to chemical reactions
such as “healing” inflicted deformations (scratches) and a tight
with its surroundings6 otherwise known as rusting.7 Corrosion
interaction with the substrate which minimizes collection of
inhibition technology ranges from a metallurgical approach8 to
water or dust at the substrate/film interface.14,15 They also often
a chemical modification of the substrate and to specialized pro-
need only be applied in thin layers (and so less quantity needs
tective coatings and paints.9,10 Plating, painting, and the appli-
to be used) which adds to their profitability appeal. Covering
cation of enamel are the most common anti-corrosion the substrate protects it from corrosion through reducing diffu-
treatments.11 They are effective by providing a physical barrier sion rates of ions and maintaining a relatively hydrophobic
(coating) between the damaging environment and the structural environment at the substrate/coating interface. Two major
material. Coatings start failing rapidly if scratched or damaged shortcomings of corrosion inhibitive paints are incomplete pro-
because a corrosion process called “pitting” occurs at very high tection16 especially when damaged and weak adherence to the
rates in small cracks or paint defects.12 substrate.17 Coatings often experience rapid and complete
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
Disclaimer: Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and
does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Table I. Designations (Strain) for Lactic Acid Bacteria Capable of Producing Dextran-Like Exopolysaccharides
NRRL # Organisma
B-1254 Lactobacillus satsumensis
B-1127 Lactobacillus brevis
B-1501, B-1498, B-1355, B-742 Leuconostoc citreum
B-1145 Leuconostoc mesenteroides subspecies dextranicum
B-1202, B-1203, B-1205, B-1207, B-1208, B-1211, B-1212, Leuconostoc mesenteroidesb
B-1213, B-1216, B-1290, B-1382, B-1384, B-1390, B-
1395, B-1417, B-1422, B-1499, B-1525, B-1527
a
Available from the USDA ARS Northern Region Research Lab (NRRL) Culture Collection.
b
All strains are lactic acid bacteria endemic to the environment. Recent taxonomy has not been completed (Cote and Leathers, 2005).
Figure 1. Corrosion resistance and corrosion rate for 29 EPS coatings on low carbon steel. All standard deviations were less than 5% of the total value.
[Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
polysaccharide polymers build a coating approximately 50– of electrical current with a dependency on frequency and was
500 nm thick depenidng on the number of layers applied by used to evaluate corrosion potential.34 See Supporting Informa-
spraying. tion for detailed information regarding interpretation of EIS
data. Impedance spectra taken shortly after exposure to the elec-
ATR measurements were performed with a Varian 3100 FT-IR
trolyte solution gave irregular results which we compensated for
Excalibur Series fitted with a horizontal ATR heated plate from
this by allowing the coated substrate to hydrate for 24 h in
PIKE Technologies with a 458 germanium (Ge) crystal. The
order to reach equilibrium. According to Fickian diffusion, the
crystal was cleaned using 50:50 v/v ethanol/H2O with sonication
overall density of ion flow in a system is the sum of ion diffu-
for 20 min and cleaned in a UV/Ozone chamber (Bioforce
sion and ion conductivity.35 Conductive paths through the EPS
Nanosciences, Ames, IA) for 10 min. The crystal was then
coating were undeveloped at the initial stage of exposure. The
washed with 18 MX deionized water and dried with a stream of
only means for ion transport in the coatings is diffusion due to
nitrogen. Polysaccharide film deposition was carried out by cast-
difference in chemical potentials within the system. The diffu-
ing a polymer solutions (100 mg/L) by letting it evaporate on sion of ions and water through the coating (from the electrolyte
top of the Ge crystal. solution to the metal substrate) reduce the coating resistance
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (commonly called, “pore resistance,” but represented here by
the charge-transfer resistance, “Rct,” of the coating and coating-
Corrosion Inhibition
metal interface). Once the film is hydrated enough such that
Electrochemical impedance measures the ability of a circuit (in
this case, the solution-coating-metal system) to resist the flow
Figure 3. Polarization spectra (Tafel) for the best four inhibiting exopoly-
saccharides. Better corrosion inhibition is denoted here by a shift in the
Figure 2. EIS spectra (Nyquist) for the top 4 EPS coatings. The bare inflection point (Ecorr) toward less negative potentials (to the right). Leg-
uncoated metal is represented by *, B-1254 L coating by D, B-1498 L by end: Metal substrate (‡); B-1254 L (D); B-1498 L (w); B-1355 (䊊) and
‡, B-1355 by 䊊 and B-1254c by w. B-1254c (x).
Table III. Dynamic Contact Advancing and Receding Angles for Exopoly- have an obvious demarcation between coating and coating-
saccharides Exhibiting Good Corrosion Resistance metal impedance response conventionally shown by a division
between high frequency and low frequency data points.38 Better
Advancing Receding corrosion inhibition could be due to phenomena such as film
EPS contact angle contact angle formation kinetics, diffusion dynamics through the coating,
none 46.96 42.12 adsorption of the EPS coating to the metal surface and/or chela-
tion at the metal surface. Polarization curves (Tafel plots) can
B-1213 49.98 41.10
determine corrosion rate and the mechanism of the reaction
B-1501 54.68 42.17
(anodic, cathodic, or both). Figure 3 shows that both the anodic
B-1254L 76.97 44.21 and cathodic reactions are reduced by the EPS coating. Unpro-
B-1498L 77.90 67.54 tected bare metal (blank) shows steeper slopes and occur at
B-1254c 79.97 42.94 higher currents than its coated counterparts. Also, the EPS coat-
B-1355 83.06 67.85 ing tends to shift the open corrosion potential toward less nega-
tive values. These factors suggest that the exoplysaccharides act
predominantly as anodic-type corrosion inhibitors. Exopolysac-
conductive paths are formed, Rct is the sum of water diffusion
charide coatings inhibit corrosion by (1) forming a protective
and ion conduction through the coating.36,37 The anti-corrosive
barrier between the metal substrate and the corrosive environ-
behavior of the EPS is related to coating structure, adherence to
ment (salt solution) and slowing down the diffusion of corrod-
the substrate and the diffusion rate(s) of the corrosive species
ing species through the coating; and (2) adhering to the surface
once hydrated.
and reacting with the metal surface to create a passive layer
Table II tabulates several important parameters obtained from thus blocking the corroding species from the surface.18
impedance and polarization experiments: corrosion rate (c.r.),
The surface of the EPS coating is hydrophilic as determined by
corrosion current (icorr), corrosion potential (Etafel), diffusion
dynamic contact angles that are less than 908 shown in Table
capacitance (Cd), and charge transfer resistance (Rct). Larger
III. We chose the top six EPS coatings. In dynamic contact
values of the Cd and Rct indicate slower processes leading to
angle measurements, larger angles correspond to more
less corrosion and smaller corrosion rates (c.r.). The exopolysac-
charides are arranged in order of their corrosion rate which is
inversely correlated to polarization resistance (Figure 1). Experi-
mental Nyquist plots for the best four performing polysacchar-
ides films (Figure 2) give Rct values based on extrapolated
intercepts. The higher the radius of the semicircle, the higher
the Rct value and the better protection the coating provides.
The solution (NaCl) resistance was found to be approximately
3.6X in all cases. Inspection of bode phase angle plots (from
which the Nyquist plot in Figure 2 is derived) suggest the exis-
tence of a dominant maxima and hence a single dominant con-
stant. The coating contribution is evident in terms of an
increase in overall impedance. Also, the Nyquist plot does not
Figure 6. AFM images of an exopolysaccharides coating (B1254c) (left) and its subsequent healing upon a 30 s exposure to water (right). Profilometry is
displayed below the AFM image. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
hydrophobic surfaces. The receding angle is lower than the AFM is routinely used to construct images with nanometer res-
advancing angle because the EPS coating absorbs water and the olution by rastering a small tip mounted on a cantilever across
coating swells. We explored the EPS coating hydration phenom- the sample surface. The samples were imaged in tapping mode.
enon using ATR-FTIR. AFM imaging of exopolysaccharide films on surrogate Si wafers
Coating Evaluation show an overall thickness of 45–65 nm by measuring the depth
Exopolysaccharide solutions were cast out of aqueous solutions of a scratch in the coating (Figure 6). Interestingly, after the dry
onto the ATR crystal and the resulting film was allowed to take coating was exposed to water for 30 s, the exopolysaccharides
up water and dry in monitored sequences.39 Figure 4 shows the coating “healed” the scratch. The cross-sectional view of the
hydration of a 60 nm thick representative sample of an EPS scratched surface shows 400 nm tall residual ridges on either
coating (B-1254c). We observed a change in the water peak area side of the scratch formed displaced material. The AFM image
present at 3300 cm21 corresponding to hydration/dehydration shows the scratch being filled in. The original edges are still vis-
of the film. The data suggest that most exopolysaccharide films ible but the polymer film slides in toward the center of the
fully hydrate in less than 5 min. scratch where it meets. Hydration-dehydration experiments
show that the EPS coatings absorb water without causing the
QCM experiments show that approximately 720 ng/cm2 is being coating to delaminate from the metal surface, and can allow the
deposited (Figure 5). The areal mass difference related to the excess material along the scratches to flow and then adhere to
coating deposition occurs in a repeatable fashion [Figure 5(A)]. the metal surface. Further studies will be conducted on the
Subsequent addition of exopolysaccharide solution does not add coating structure and the diffusion parameters of ionic species.
extra polymer to the thin coating. This experiment suggests the
formation of a coating which adheres well to the metal substrate
CONCLUSIONS
and does not peel off during successive rinses. The film reaches
its maximum thickness after approximately 10 min. The data Bio-based polymers, produced from lactic acid bacteria in a
suggest the kinetics of film deposition are fast (<5 min) and commercially available process, have shown to inhibit corrosion
there is little excess (loosely bound) material coming off during on low carbon steel substrates. Extensive electrochemical analy-
rinses in water. Figure 5(B) shows film deposition from a poly- ses showed that the exopolysaccharide, purified from cell-free
mer solution and subsequent rinsing and drying. It shows a cultures, adhered strongly to the metal substrate, provided
similar areal mass for the coating [lower right corner of Figure active resistance to corrosive environments, and displayed limit-
5(B)]. Future experiments will explore viscoelastic properties of ed self-healing after scratching. The coating is applied through
the coatings and data regarding the adhesive forces in the commercial spray technology with a controlled thickness of 50–
coating-metal system. 500 nm. Hydration phenomenon, ion diffusion, and viscoelastic
properties of the exopolysaccharide coatings will be investigated 17. Gvozdenovic, M. M.; Grgur, B. N. Prog. Org. Coat. 2009, 65,
in the future. 401.
18. Arthur, D. E.; Jonathon, A.; Ameh, P. O.; Anya, C. Int. J.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Ind. Chem. 2013, 4, 2.
This work was funded in part by CSREES-USDA Critical Agricul- 19. Kumar, A. S.; Mody, K.; Jha, B. J. Basic Microbiol. 2007, 47,
tural Materials Program. The Midwest Area of the Agricultural 103.
Research Service (USDA) funded a summer undergraduate fellow- 20. Ghafari, M. D.; Bahrami, A.; Rasooli, I.; Arabian, D.;
ship for Eru Kyeyune-Nyombi to support Project 3620–41000- Ghafari, F. Int. Biodeteriorat. Biodegrad. 2013, 80, 29.
157–03, “Agricultural Polymers for Prevention of Corrosion on
21. Ignatova-Ivanova, T.; Ivanov, R.; Iliev, I.; Ivanova, I. Biotech-
Metals.” The authors thank Richard Haig for technical support. nol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2009, 23, 705.
22. van Leeuwen, S.; Kralj, S.; van Geel-Schutten, I.; Gerwig, G.
J.; Dijkhuizen, L.; Kamerling, J. P. Carbohydr. Res. 2008, 343,
REFERENCES 1237.
1. Lee, J.; Cho, C. S.; Morris, J. E. Microsyst. Technol. Micro. 23. Stadler, R.; Fuerbeth, W.; Harneit, K.; Grooters, M.;
Nanosyst. Inf. Storage Process. Syst. 2009, 15, 145. Woellbrink, M.; Sand, W. Electrochim. Acta. 2008, 54, 91.
2. McCarthy, J. C.; Bono, J. V.; ODonnell, P. J. Clin. Orthopaed. 24. Jeanes, A.; Haynes, W. C.; Wilham, C. A.; Rankin, J. C.;
Relat. Res. 1997, 344, 162–171. Melvin, E. H.; Austin, M. J.; Cluskey, J. E.; Fisher, B. E.;
3. Schutz, R. W.; Watkins, H. B. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. Struct. Tsuchiya, H. M.; Rist, C. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 5041.
Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process. 1998, 243, 305. 25. Leathers, T.; Bischoff, K. M. Biotechnol. Lett. 2011, 33, 517.
4. Dieng, L.; Perier, V.; Gaillet, L.; Tessier, C. Mec. Ind. 2009, 26. Finkenstadt, V. L.; Cote, G.; Willett, J. L. Biotechnol. Lett.
10, 33. 2011, 33, 1093.
5. Bhaskaran, R.; Palaniswamy, N.; Veerakumar, M.; 27. Beech, I. B. Int. Biodeteriorat. Biodegrad. 2004, 53, 177.
Raghuvaran, G.; Raja, T. S.; Nazar, A. M. Mater. Perform. 28. Cote, G. L.; Robyt, J. F. Carbohydr. Res. 1982, 101, 57.
2008, 47, 62.
29. Wilham, C. A.; Alexander, B. H.; Jeanes, A. Arch. Biochem.
6. Castle, J. E. J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. A. 2007, 25, 1. Biophys. 1955, 59, 61.
7. Balasubramaniam, R.; Kumar, A. V. R.; Dillmann, P. Curr. 30. Leathers, T.; Cote, G. L. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008,
Sci. 2003, 85, 1546. 78, 1025.
8. Dewidar, M. M.; Yoon, H. C.; Lim, J. K. Metals Mater. Int. 31. Baker, M. A. J. Phys. E-Sci. Instrum. 1968, 1, 774. &.
2006, 12, 193. 32. Johansson, E.; Lundstrom, L.; Norgren, M.; Wagberg, L. Bio-
9. Zaarei, D.; Sarabi, A. A.; Sharif, F.; Kassiriha, S. M. J. Coat. macromolecules. 2009, 10, 1768.
Technol. Res. 2008, 5, 241. 33. Strashilov, V. L.; Alexieva, G. E.; Velichkov, V. N.; Mateva,
10. Montemor, M. F.; Trabelsi, W.; Zheludevich, M.; Ferreira, R. P.; Avramov, I. D. Sensor Lett. 2009, 7, 203.
M. G. S. Prog. Org. Coat. 2006, 57, 67. 34. Gao, J.; Jiang, Y. M.; Deng, B.; Zhang, W.; Zhong, C.; Li, J.
11. Xie, D. B.; Zhu, S. L.; Wang, F. H. High Temp. Corros. Pro- Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 5830.
tect. Mater. 6, Part 1 and 2, Proc. 2004, 461. 297-304. 35. Bitaraf, M.; Mohammadi, S. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22,
12. Jorcin, J. B.; Krawiec, H.; Pebere, N.; Vignal, V. Electrochim. 546.
Acta. 2009, 54, 5775. 36. van Westing, E. P. M.; Ferrari, G. M.; de Wit, J. H. W. Cor-
13. de Leon, C. P.; Campbell, S. A.; Smith, J. R.; Walsh, F. C. ros. Sci. 1993, 34, 1511.
Trans. Inst. Metal Finish. 2008, 86, 34. 37. van Westing, E. P. M.; Ferrari, G. M.; de Wit, J. H. W. Cor-
14. Dai, J. H.; Sullivan, D. M.; Bruening, M. L. Ind. Eng. Chem. ros. Sci. 1994, 36, 957.
Res. 2000, 39, 3528. 38. Hinderliter, B. R.; Croll, S. G.; Tallman, D. E.; Su, Q.;
15. Rohwerder, M.; Michalik, A. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 53, Bierwagen, G. P. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 4505.
1300. 39. Cheng, S. S.; Scherson, D. A.; Sukenik, C. N. Langmuir.
16. Jo, M. C.; Noh, B. I. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2002, 8, 458. 1995, 11, 1190.
National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Agricultural Research Service, United
States Department of Agriculture, 1815 North University Street, Peoria, IL 61604
**Current address: Environment, Analysis, and Future Battery, Toyota Motor Engineering &
Manufacturing North America, Inc., 1555 Woodridge Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48105;
claudiu.bucur@tema.toyota.com
Electrochemical Experimental
The AC current and voltage signal through the resistor (corrosive solution) do not need to
be in phase with each other. EIS is measured experimentally by applying a small AC excitation
signal (5 mV in our experiments) to the electrochemical cell and measuring the current response.
Given that the cell’s response is pseudo-linear, the current response will be a sinusoid at the
Et
Z= , (S1)
It
Et = E0 sin(ωt ) (S2)
with E0 the amplitude of signal, ω=2πf, or the radial frequency with units of radians/second and f
is frequency in Hz.
E
Zω = = Z 0 exp( jφ ) = Z 0 (cos φ + j sin φ ) (S3)
I
Plotting the real part of equation (3) on the x-axis and the imaginary part on the y-axis
displays a Nyquist plot. In this plot the impedance is a vector of length Z from the origin to any
data point. The angle between this vector and the x-axis represents the phase angle φ. When this
data is fitted to a circuit, the first x-axis intercept corresponds to the resistance of the solution
(RΩ) and the second x-axis intercept corresponds to the film resistance (Rp) associated with the
Two important parameters often used in characterizing the corrosion protection offered
by a film are the corrosion rate and the corrosion current (icorr) 41. The corrosion current can be
calculated with the aid of a Tafel plot and the polarization resistance Rp obtained from the
Nyquist diagram. Plotting a modified Tafel plot with the x-axis in terms of I (not log i) can also
∆η
obtain Rp as the slope of the line ( = R p by definition). Rp can thus be calculated with
∆i
In our cell, the anode undergoes uniform corrosion at the open circuit. The open circuit
potential is controlled by the equilibrium between two different electrochemical reactions, one of
which generates the cathodic current and the other the anodic current. The open circuit potential
translates into the equilibrium between the two. It is a mixed potential and the value of the
circuit potential in volts, βa is the anodic Beta coefficient in volts/decade, βc is the cathodic Beta
coefficient in volts/decade. The Beta coefficients can be obtained from the slopes of the linear
βa βc 1
I corr = ⋅ (S5)
2.303( β a + β c ) R p
∆η
where Rp is from the linear polarization plot.
∆i
The corrosion current can be related directly to the corrosion rate (c.r) through the
following equation
0.13 ⋅ I corr ⋅ EW
c.r (mpy ) = (S6)
d
where EW is the equivalent weight of the corroding species (g) and d is the density of the
corroding species (g/cm3). Corrosion rate is expressed as milli-inches per year (mpy).
Tafel plots give numerical insight into the corrosion potential (which, given enough time
for steady state conditions to be met will equal the open circuit potential). In a corroding system,
M + + e− ↔ M (S7)
Z + + e− ↔ Z (S8)
where M is the corroding metal and Z is usually a species in solution or a second metal present;
in this case, the graphite electrode in our cell 42. The corrosion potential is the potential at which
the rate of oxidation of M is equal to the rate of reduction of Z+. Here “rate” and “current” can