Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Felipe B. God v. Culture - Seeds of The Word Review
Felipe B. God v. Culture - Seeds of The Word Review
The book “Seeds of the Word” by Robert Barron dissects films, books, politics and
culture in a way that is fundamentally motivated by the love of God, truth, and the
Church. The book is divided into four sections. The first part, “Imago Dei,” talks about the
pop culture and its relationship with philosophy and religion. Barron demonstrates that
even the most recent blockbusters utilizes elements of theological truth. The second
section, “Take and Read,” analyses books such as The Hobbit and The Shack throwing
some religious questions to season the discussion. “City on the Hill,” my favorite part, is
where Barron unveils his political and religious agenda. He avoids the “Fetishes of
dialogue” by showing his defense for the Catholic Church, that, according to him, is
currently under attack of people with blind tolerance and unintelligent discourse.
Definitely, the Church is not just something he and his crew work by – it’s clearly
something they live by. Barron closes the book with “Rays of truth,” where he presents
us with a miscellaneous of subjects and how they are all under the influence of the
the Word” is a book to return whenever you finish watching, reading or listening to one
of the subjects in the spectrum of discussion that it provides us. Robert Barron invites us
to leave our personality behind and, temporarily, see through the eyes of others, to look
On the chapter “Superman, General Zod, and God,” Barron question the tension
between a state-controlled society and the individual autonomy, a dualism present in the
movie Man of Steel. The society throughout history has been falling into one of those two
ideals, freedom v. tyranny. Baron states that God surpasses both, since “any attempt to
deify the state, the king, or the self-asserting ego results in spiritual calamity.” He defends
a “theonomy,” in which God is the inner principle of law and justice in one`s life.
The Superman`s theory is fascinating; it says that all Superhero`s myth has a hero
and its corresponding alter-ego. Batman is Bruce Wayne. Spider-man is Peter Parker; they
need their uniforms and masks to become someone else, a super-hero. And, in that
Superman, he was born this way, his uniform was made from the blanket that was
covering him when the Kents found him. His Alter-ego is Clark Ken. Superman disguise
himself as an insecure, fragile and weak man to blend between us, humans. That`s the
way Superman sees us, Clark Kent is Superman`s critique of the whole human race.
When Barron says that in the end, all the ideologies must kneel to God, I
understand. But God is not the Church. The church is to God what Clark Kent is to Super-
Man. A way to approach the divine, the incomprehensible, to men. We shouldn’t bow to
On the chapter “The Gospel According to the Hobbit,” Robert Barron highlights
the influence of the Bible on Tolkien, the author of The Hobbit, and how the path of the
self-sacrificing love can lead to the teachings of Jesus Christ. A great evil power doesn`t
need a greater worldly power to be overthrown, but the opposite of that. Acts of kindness
can be responsible for the greatest changes. Gandalf says in the first Lord of the Ring`s
book that “Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it
to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment”. It is not up to us to
decide one`s fate. Is up to us to break the cycle of revenge and violence, through acts of
love, nonviolence, and forgiveness. Like the One Ring represents sin and corruption, often
bringing the worst in people. The pureness and loyalty of the Hobbits present a perfect
contrast to the evil in this world. “Many are the strange chances of the world,” said
Gandalf, “and help often shall come from the hands of the weak.”
manifest his ideas regarding the polarization between blind tolerance and unintelligent
discourse. He states that some things are given and not chosen. But to recognize the
“moral absolutes,” we must make a reconciliation with our thought. Overcome our
prejudices and realize the presence of God and how it transcends our traumas and fears.
identity, and social reality. This idea of embracing our wounds our brokenness is
meaning “Golden Joinery.” Kintsugi is the art of fixing broken pottery with lacquer resin
dusted or mixed with powdered gold. A technique that dates from the 15th century.
The art of kintsugi became famous for turning broken objects into pieces more
beautiful than the original product. The philosophy follows from a broader Japanese
aesthetic called Wabi-Sabi that finds beauty not in traditional in western ideals of
symmetry or geometry, but in Buddhist concepts of impermanence and imperfection.
The fractures on the ceramic bowl don’t represent the end of that object`s life, but rather
an essentials moment in its history. The flaws in its shape aren’t hidden from inspection
The amazing art of kintsugi, a fading art like so many handcrafts, symbolizes the
truth that repair requires transformation. That the pristine is less beautiful than the
broken, and the shape of us is impossible to see until its fractured. Until a wound like a
crack runs its length. That`s when we need God as the ultimate criterion of truth and
justice. The “Moral Absolutes” that Barron present to us. Because, only with the absolute
“The World breaks everyone, and afterward many are strong in the broken
I found interesting how the cover of the book “Seeds of the word” relates to one
photography project that I made some time ago. They both question the status quo of
the pop culture. How it is all about appearances. How the deeper meaning is on our faces
and blurred at the same time. Often, consumers don’t know how to distinguish elements
of truth in popular works in our culture, even if it was based on the Gospel itself.
The Picture #1 is all about the idea of advertisement`s elements and its function:
How it was supposed to be and how it is in fact. The billboards at the Times Square loses
its marketing function since it has become the landscape itself. Those elements are what
provides the identity of the space. Therefore, by cutting the billboards out of the picture,
and adding a negative copy on the background, the work highlights the idea of non-
although it can be easily recognized. The spectator feels like a flanêur, a man in the crowd.
The Photography #2 composition-wise is the opposite of the first work but reinforces the
concept. This work is all about the negative, the white spaces. The only thing that
remained was the billboard`s shapes that were filled with distorted images of Time
Square. Again, the Billboard is what makes that space recognizable, even with its non-