Professional Documents
Culture Documents
From the Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Parkview Episcopal
Hospital, Pueblo, Colorado 81003
ABSTRACT
4
51% .
> : |
jtia.'
FIG. 1 (upper). Tuberculous endometritis in a 54-year-old women with a long history of amenorrhea and
infertility. Hematoxylin and eosin. X100.
Fie. 2 (lower). Polypoid cystic hyperplasia in a 24-year-old woman with Stein-Levinthal syndrome.
Hematoxylin and cosin. xlOO.
and 96 of these were associated with occurring in patients more than 50 years
necrotic decidual tissue, with or without of age. One case of tuberculosis was
chorionic villi. One hundred thirty-six diagnosed (Fig. 1).
biopsies showing endometritis showed no Eighty-four biopsies showed hyperplasia,
specific cause. Most of the latter were including cases of proliferative hyperplasia,
obtained from patients also in the child- polypoid cystic hyperplasia of the Stein-
bearing age group, with only five cases Leventhal type (Fig. 2), and cystic hyper-
FIG. 3 (upper). State II Squamous-cell carcinoma of the cervix in a 64-year-old women with irregular
"spotting." Hematoxylin and eosin. XlOO.
FIG. 4 (lower). Carcinoma in situ of the endometrium in a 46-year-old woman with metrorrhagia. Several
contiguous glands are partly lined by or contain neoplastic cells. Hematoxylin and eosin. XlOO.
FIG. 5 (upper). Cluster of neoplastic cells within an endometrial gland. Stromal invation was not
demonstrated in serial sections. Hematoxylin and eosin. X400.
FIG. 6 (lower). Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium confined to the uterus in a 50-year-old woman with
symptomatic cystocele and rectocele. Hematoxylin and eosin. X100.
and in each instance the vaginal smear vaginal smear was positive. Six smears
was negative. Curettage confirmed the showed "inflammatory atypia," and the
diagnosis of carcinoma in situ in one case, remainder were normal,
whereas no further carcinoma was found Ninety-eight biopsies were inadequate
in the other two. In the 11 cases of for histologic examination. Many of these
infiltrative carcinoma (Fig. 6), only one were from postmenopausal or postpartum
Table 3. Comparative Results of Biopsy and vaginal smears negative, but subsequent
Cytologic Smears in Carcinoma of the curettage failed to show residual car-
Cervix and Endometrium cinoma. This suggests that perhaps in
some instances carcinoma is discovered at
Result of
Diagnosis Number Cytologic Smear
an early stage and is completely removed
by biopsy. In spite of the large number of
Carcinoma of cervix 4 4 positive patients taking oral contraceptives
Carcinoma-in-situ of examined during the course of this study,
endometrium 3 3 negative only a few patients showed hormonal
Adenocarcinoma of the suppression of the endometrium. A sur-
endometrium 11 1 positive prisingly large number of women with
6 "inflammatory abnormal bleeding in the postpartum
atypia" period had retained placental and de-
4 negative cidual fragments in the biopsies, although
the exact incidence of this occurrence was
not determined in this study. Since the
women, in whom the quantity of en- absence of tissue fragments constituted an
dometrium would be expected to be inadequate specimen, a relatively large
small. Cytologic examinations of these number of biopsies was placed in this
specimens were generally not helpful in category.
clarifying the clinical status of the patient, The office endometrial biopsy has sev-
and curettage was recommended in the eral advantages over other means of
cases of patients with persistent symptoms. evaluating the endometrium being used
currently. It is valuable not only in the
Discussion detection of carcinoma, but also as a
T h e findings in this series of endome- means of differentiating various benign
trial biopsies reflect the pathology of the lesions of the uterine cavity. It is a useful
endometrium in general 14 and do not means of evaluating the uterine tract
differ considerably from the reports of prior to hospitalization, with the advan-
others. 10,11 T h e results support the con- tage of availability of a pathologist's re-
tention that many women with abnormal port prior to operation. It is invaluable in
uterine bleeding have functional bases for the cases of patients requiring periodic
the bleeding. 8 Although some of these evaluation of the endometrium, such as
patients had various extents of prolifera- women with infertility or those using oral
tive hyperplasia in the biopsies, most had or mechanical contraceptives.
no apparent histologic abnormality. The T h e advantages to the laboratory are
incidence of malignancy compares favor- several. Technically, the handling of the
ably with the findings of others in com- biopsy is simple. As the specimen is placed
parable series 10 and further substantiates directly in formalin, the tissue is well fixed
the low rate of positive vaginal smears in by the time it arrives in the laboratory.
patients with endometrial carcinoma. T h e T h e tissue is processed, sectioned and
finding of only one case of tuberculosis stained with other surgical material, and
also reflects the low incidence of genital additional technical staff for special prep-
tuberculosis in this country at the present aration and screening, such as are re-
time. 12 quired with cytologic methods, is not
Some findings were unexpected. In the necessary.
cases of two of the three patients with Pathologically, the quantity of tissue
carcinoma in situ, not only were the obtained generally reflects the functional
or pathologic state of the endometrium at 2. Ayre EJ: Rotating endometrial brush: A new
technic for diagnosis of fundal carcinoma.
the time of biopsy. Ordinarily, only small Obstet Gynecol 5:137-141, 1955
amounts are obtained from the post- 3. Barnett JM: Suction curettage on unanes-
menopausal women unless hyperplasia or thetized outpatients. Obstet Gynecol 42:672-
674, 1973
carcinoma exists. Nearly all pathologists 4. Burge ES, Morley B: Endometrial biopsy in the
are familiar with the histologic interpreta- office Am J Obstet Gynecol 80:325-331, 1960
5. Cary WA: A method of obtaining endometrial
tion of endometrial specimens. In con- smears for study of their cellular content. Am
trast, interpretation of cytologic material J Obstet Gynecol 46:422-424, 1943
from the endometrium requires consider- 6. Coleman SA, Rube IF, Erickson CC: Cytologic
detection of adenocarcinoma of the uterus in
able experience and expertise in order to a mass screening project. Am J Obstet
be meaningful. As the diagnosis made on Gynecol 92:474-476, 1965
the basis of a biopsy is histologic, addi- 7. Dowling EA, Gravlee LC: Endometrial cancer
diagnosis: A new technique using a jet-
tional confirmatory procedures are not washer. Ala J Med Sci 1:412-416, 1964.
ordinarily required. 8. Hark B, Sommers SC: Endometrial curettage in
diagnosis and therapy. Obstet Gynecol
Perhaps a major barrier to the routine 21:636-638, 1963
use of the endometrial biopsy at present is 9. Hecht EL: Endometrial aspiration smear: Re-
search status and clinical value. Am J Obstet
the small number of physicians familiar Gynecol 71:819-833, 1956
with the procedure. It is relatively time- 10. Hofmeister FJ: Endometrial sampling. J Reprod
Med 4:33-36, 1970.
consuming and is not a very versatile 11. Hofmeister FJ, Vondrak B, Barbo DM: T h e
screening device. The inadvertent inter- value of the endometrial biopsy. A study of
14,655 office endometrial biopsies. Am J
ruption of a pregnancy that would other- Obstet Gynecol 95:91-98, 1966
wise proceed to term is a potential hazard, 12. Israel SL, Roitman HB, Clancy E: Infrequency
but this factor is also a consideration in of unsuspected endometrial tuberculosis: A
histologic and bacteriologic study. JAMA
other procedures used to sample the 183:63-65, 1963
endometrium. As no anesthetic was used, 13. Koss LG, Durfee GR: Cytologic diagnosis of
complaints of transient discomfort or pain endometrial carcinoma. Results often years of
experience. Acta Cytol 6:519-531, 1962
during the procedure were frequent. 14. Kraus FT: T h e endometrium, Gynecologic
However, no serious complication oc- Pathology. St. Louis, C.V. Mosby, 1967, pp
208-250
curred, and no pregnancy was interrupted 15. Novak E: A suction-curette apparatus for en-
during the couse of this study. dometrial biopsy. JAMA 104:1497-1498,
1935
When used judiciously in selected pa- 16. Nugent FB: Office suction biopsy of the en-
tients for specific indications, the benefits dometrium. Obstet Gynecol 2 2 : 1 6 8 - 1 7 3 ,
1963
from the procedure outweigh the few 17. Randall LM: Endometrial biopsy. Proc Staff
potential disadvantages. As ambulatory Meet Mayo Clin 10:143-144, 1935
medicine assumes a larger role in the care 18. Slaughter CR, Schewe EJ: Evaluation of biopsy
of the endometrium by the Novak suction
of patients, the endometrial biopsy should curette. Am J Obstet Gynecol 83:1302-1305,
become a more valuable diagnostic proce- 1962
19. Steiner GJ, Craig JM: Endometrial biopsy: A
dure. valuable adjunct in diagnosis and manage-
ment of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cor-
References pus. Obstet Gynecol 24:389-395, 1964
20. Wall J H , Fletcher GH, MacDonald EJ: En-
1. Abate SD, Edwards CL, Vellios F: A compara- dometrial biopsy as a standard diagnostic
tive study of the endometrial jet-washing technique. Am J Roentgenol 71:95-101, 1954
technic and endometrial biopsy. Am J Clin 21. Wildhack RH, Graham J B : Endometrial biopsy.
Pathol 58:118-122, 1972 Obstet Gynecol 23:446-450, 1964