Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This chapter presents the analysis and interpretation of the data gathered through the
1.1 Gender
Presented in Table 1.1 the summary of the frequency and percentage Distribution of the
Table 1.1
Male 27 35.06%
Female 50 64.94%
Total 77 100%
Table 1.1 revealed that the majority of the students who took part in the study were
female which has 69.94% while 41.1% of the students were male.
Presented in Table 1.2 the summary of the frequency and percentage Distribution of the
Table 1.2
According to Age
18 - 21 yrs.old 63 81.82%
22 - 24 yrs.old 8 10.39%
Total 77 100%
Table 1.2 revealed that 81.82% of the students who took part in the study were between
18-21 years of age. 10.39% were between 22-24 years while only 7.79% were range of 25years
and above. This result suggests that some students of BSA took part in the study are slightly
Presented in Table 1.3 the summary of the frequency and percentage distribution of
Total 77 100%
Table 1.3 revealed that the majority of the students who took part in the study were 3rd year
which has 77.92% while 22.08% of the students were 4th year
habits.
Table 2.1
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSES
Read in advance 45 32
Table 2.2 shows the frequency distribution of the items on the reading habits of students
as follows:
1. Read books, newspapers, e-books – 74 students read books while 3 does not read.
advance.
3. Find reading fun - Out of 77 respondents, 55 find reading fun while 22 does not.
4. Have a reading strategy - 60 respondents have a reading strategy while 17 does not
have.
5. Practice reading habits consistently - 22 respondents consistently practice reading their
Presented in Table 2.2 the summary of the frequency Distribution of respondents’ reading
preferences.
Table 2.2
group or alone?
Alone 68
With a group 10
spend reading?
About 15 minutes 0
usually read?
Morning 22
Lunch 4
Evening 53
Before I go to school 14
After I go to school 6
While I am in school 11
when reading?
entertaining?
Listening to music 44
Eating foods 23
Highlighting 32
coffee 33
Reading in nature 6
motivates you?
Personally (self-information) 30
Enjoyment 28
Relaxation 27
students as follows:
1. Preference of the students to read alone or to read with a group - 68 student preferred to
2. Times the student read - 25 students read only when it is required in school, 21 students
at least read 2 times a week, 19 students read at least 4 times a week, 10 of the
respondents read every day of the week while 2 students read as little as possible.
3. The time spent by the student reading - none of the respondents read about 15 minutes,
50 students read more than 1 hour, 18 students read about an hour, 8 of the respondents
read about half an hour while 1 student answered none of the choices given.
4. Time of the day student usually read - 53 students preferred to study in the evening, 22
students usually study in the morning, 14 students read before to go to school, 11 students
read while in school, 6 students read after they go to school, while 4 students read at
lunch.
5. Kind of format the student prefers when reading - 58 students prefers to read from a
print/printed book, 43 students prefers to read the handouts given by the students’
6. How the student makes reading entertaining - 44 students listens to music to make
students makes their reading entertaining by highlighting the text, 23 students eat food
while reading, 6 students that reading is their nature, 5 students prefers to read with
students read for school assignments, 30 students read for self-information, 28 students
read for enjoyment, while 27 students read for relaxation. This implies that most of the
respondents engaged in reading mainly to pass their exams. This revelation confirms the
findings in Table 2.2 question number 5 where majority of the respondents read handouts
given by a professor.
The presentation of the summary of the Mean scores and Descriptive Interpretation
Table 3
SCORES INTERPRETATION
Legend:
RANGE DESCRIPTIVE
INTERPRETATION
Based on Table 3, it shows Mean and Descriptive Interpretation on the Reading Techniques
interpretation of agree; Predict the main idea of the whole passage from its title or subtitles, the
mean is 2.71 with a descriptive interpretation of neutral; Try to guess the main ideas of the text on
the basis of pictures, charts, figures or key words, the mean is 2.51 with a descriptive interpretation
of agree; Try to understand complicated sentences by analyzing their structure and grasp the
general idea before going to read the next sentence, the mean is 2.35 with a descriptive
interpretation of agree; Use simple words to replace difficult ones in sentence understanding, the
mean is 1.99 with a descriptive interpretation of agree; I use advance reading strategy throughout
my college days, the mean is 2.70 with a descriptive interpretation of neutral; Advance reading
helps me improve in my academic performance, the mean is 2.56 with a descriptive interpretation
of agree; Listening to the professor first before reading is an efficient and effective reading
strategy, the mean is 2.34 with a descriptive interpretation of agree; Listening to the professor first
before reading help me improve in my academic performance, the mean is with a descriptive
interpretation of 2.34 agree; Use mnemonic devices in studying my lessons to easily remember
what have read, the mean is 2.18 with a descriptive interpretation of agree; Repeatedly recall what
I have read to strengthen my memory retention, the mean is 2.32 with a descriptive interpretation
of agree; I often have trouble remembering what I have read, the mean is 2.69 with a descriptive
interpretation neutral.
4. How do we relate the reading habits and techniques to the academic performance of
The presentation of the summary of the Mean scores and Descriptive Interpretation on the
Table 4
Mean Scores and Descriptive Interpretation on the
Frequency of Responses
74 3
Read books, newspapers, e-books
GWA: 1.87 GWA: 2.17
Agreed in most of the Reading Techniques identified with a Mean score of 2.396
45 32
Agreed in most of the Reading Techniques identified with a Mean score of 2.25
55 22
Agreed in most of the Reading Techniques identified with a Mean score of 2.27
60 17
Have a reading strategy
GWA:1.88 GWA:1.91
Agreed in most of the Reading Techniques identified with a Mean score of 2.40
Agreed in most of the Reading Techniques identified with a Mean score of 2.27
Based on Table 4, it shows the correlation of the reading habits and reading techniques with the
performance of the student through measurement of GWA. Majority of the respondents answered
yes in reading books, newspaper, ebook with a mean score 2.93 in relation with reading technique
and a higher result of gwa compared to the respondents that answered no. A better result of gwa
was found for the majority who answered yes when reading in advance, .16 higher than those who
do not read in advance it also has an agreed mean score of 2.25. If asked if reading is fun, a total
of 55 out of the 77 respondents answered yes but has a lower gwa of 1.89 compared to the 22
respondents that answered no having an average gwa of 1.88, it also has an agreed mean score of
2.27. 60 of the respondents answered yes when asked if they have a reading strategy but only 22
of those are practicing it consistently. Having a reading strategy resulted to an average gwa of
1.88, higher than those not having a reading strategy that has an average gwa of 1.91 it also shows
an agreed mean score of 2.40. The respondents that answered no in practicing their reading strategy
consistently resulted to higher gwa of 1.87. It shows an agreed mean score of 2.27 when asked if
5. Is there a significant relationship between the reading habits and techniques of BSA
and techniques of the respondents in relation to their academic performance is shown below
in Table 5.
Table 5
Test of significant relationship between Reading Habits and Techniques of BSA students
Reading 0.95
Based on Table 5, it shows the information given on the test of significant relationship of
the reading habits and techniques of the respondents in consonance to their academic
performance. The computed value is 26.55 for the T stat. The critical value is .781 which is
significant. .95 is computed as the correlation coefficient which indicates a high correlation.
Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected. This means that from the computed values, a
significant relationship between reading habits and techniques in consonance to the academic