Tuesday, 8 May 2018 21:26:55 1

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Model Information

Data Set WORK.NEW

Response Variable incomelevel

Number of Response Levels 2

Model binary logit

Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring

Number of Observations Read 213

Number of Observations Used 178

Response Profile

Ordered Total
Value incomelevel Frequency

1 1 82

2 0 96

Probability modeled is incomelevel='1'.

Note: 35 observations were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables.

Model Convergence Status

Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied.

Model Fit Statistics

Intercept
Intercept and
Criterion Only Covariates

AIC 247.658 243.891

SC 250.840 250.254

-2 Log L 245.658 239.891

Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0

Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq

Likelihood Ratio 5.7673 1 0.0163

Score 5.6727 1 0.0172

Wald 5.5019 1 0.0190

Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

Standard Wald
Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq

Intercept 1 1.9048 0.8899 4.5812 0.0323

employrate 1 -0.0353 0.0150 5.5019 0.0190

 Tuesday, 8 May 2018 21:26:55 2

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Odds Ratio Estimates

Point 95% Wald

Effect Estimate Confidence Limits

employrate 0.965 0.937 0.994

Association of Predicted Probabilities and

Observed Responses

Percent Concordant 60.3 Somers' D 0.209

Percent Discordant 39.4 Gamma 0.209

Percent Tied 0.3 Tau-a 0.104

Pairs 7872 c 0.604

 Tuesday, 8 May 2018 21:26:55 3

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Model Information

Data Set WORK.NEW

Response Variable incomelevel

Number of Response Levels 2

Model binary logit

Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring

Number of Observations Read 213

Number of Observations Used 158

Response Profile

Ordered Total
Value incomelevel Frequency

1 1 70

2 0 88

Probability modeled is incomelevel='1'.

Note: 55 observations were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables.

Model Convergence Status

Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied.

Model Fit Statistics

Intercept
Intercept and
Criterion Only Covariates

AIC 218.979 192.377

SC 222.042 201.565

-2 Log L 216.979 186.377

Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0

Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq

Likelihood Ratio 30.6026 2 <.0001

Score 27.8608 2 <.0001

Wald 23.7351 2 <.0001

Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

Standard Wald
Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq

Intercept 1 2.1912 1.1205 3.8241 0.0505

employrate 1 -0.0501 0.0188 7.1007 0.0077

polityscore 1 0.1268 0.0311 16.5916 <.0001

 Tuesday, 8 May 2018 21:26:55 4

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Odds Ratio Estimates

Point 95% Wald

Effect Estimate Confidence Limits

employrate 0.951 0.917 0.987

polityscore 1.135 1.068 1.207

Association of Predicted Probabilities and

Observed Responses

Percent Concordant 77.9 Somers' D 0.558

Percent Discordant 22.1 Gamma 0.558

Percent Tied 0.0 Tau-a 0.277

Pairs 6160 c 0.779