Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Publishers
0022–2461 °
C 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers 2361
prior to 1980. The origin of these efforts dates back where σ ∗ (iω) and ε ∗ (iω) are the Fourier transforms of
to the observation by Nutting [8], as early as 1921, the stress and strain respectively. Factoring and dividing
that relaxation phenomena are often proportional to terms in this operation produces:
time or frequency raised to a fractional power and the
subsequent suggestion by Gemant [9] in 1938 of the E 0 + E u (iωτ1 )a ∗
σ ∗ (iω) = · ε (iω) (12)
use of derivatives of fractional order to model it. Major 1 + (iωτ1 )a
advances were made in the 1980s, Bagley and Torvik
[6, 7] proposed a general fractional viscoelastic model In another way we can use the representation proposed
as: by Tschoegl [5] called the relaxance Q̄ in order to obtain
XM X
N a more general description of the Cole-Cole behaviour.
σ (t) + τmam Dtam σ (t) = E 0 ε(t) + E n τnbn Dtbn ε(t) The relaxance Q̄ is the ratio of the Laplace transformed
m=1 n=1 stress σ̄ to the Laplace transformed deformation ε̄ and
(4) is given as:
where σ is the applied stress, ε is the strain and f) Dtr (
the fractional derivative of order r defined as [10]: σ̄ L[σ ]
Q̄ = = (13)
· Z t ¸ ε̄ L[ε]
1 d f (y)
Dtr ( f ) = dy
0(1 − r ) dt 0 (t − y)r The Laplace transform of FZM Equation 6 yields:
for 0 < r < 1 (5)
E 0 + E u (sτ1 )a
This approach was first applied to the description Q̄(s) = 0<a≤1 (14)
1 + (sτ1 )a
of the rheological behaviour of organic glasses [6],
elastomers [11], polyurethane [12], polyisobutylene The same complex modulus of the Equation 12 can be
and a monodisperse polybutadiens [13] and even derived using the following relation:
viscoelastic dampers [11, 14] or structures [7, 12], and
finally to solid amorphous polymers over a very wide E 0 + E u (iωτ1 )a
temperature range [15] (Tg − 190 ◦ C and Tg + 25 ◦ C). E ∗ (iω) = Q̄(s)|s=iω = (15)
1 + (iωτ1 )a
From Equation 4 if M = N = 1; am = bn = a, with
0 < a ≤ 1, and E 1 = E u we can obtain the equation as- with the Laplace variable (s = iω).
sociated to the Fractional Zener Model (FZM) [15] The real and imaginary parts (E ∗ = E 0 + i E 00 ) can be
with one spring-pot: calculated by separating the complex function into real
σ (t) + τ1a Dta σ (t) = E 0 ε(t) + E u τ1a Dta ε(t) (6) and imaginary parts. In the preceding papers [15] we
have studied the different cases of the a parameter in the
where E u is the unrelaxed modulus, E 0 the relaxed complex plane, then we have shown that FZM cannot
modulus and τ1 the characteristic material time. be used to model the viscoelastic behaviour of solid
The Laplace transform of the fractional derivative amorphous polymers because the Cole-Cole diagram
operator Dtr f (t) can be written as s r times the Laplace of FZM is symmetrical independently of the value of
transform of f (t): the a parameter.
£ ¤ From Equation 4 we obtain the equation of FZM
L Dtr f (t) = s r L[ f (t)] (7) with two spring-pots [15] a and b by considering
where s is the Laplace variable. This property can be that 0 < a ≤ b ≤ 1. The relaxance function Q̄(s) of this
demonstrated by taking the Laplace transform: model can be written as follows:
Z +∞ £ ¤
L[ f (t)] = f (t)e−st dt (8) E u + E 0 (sτ0 )−a + (sτ1 )−b
Q̄(s) = (16)
0 1 + (sτ0 )−a + (sτ1 )−b
of Equation 5. A similar relationship exists in the
Fourier transform domain. By taking the Fourier It is easy to determine the complex modulus E ∗ (ω) as
transform, following:
Z +∞
F[ f (t)] = f (t)e−iωt dt (9) E ∗ (iω) = Q̄(s)|s=iω
0
£ ¤
of Equation 5, a relationship similar to Equation 7 E u + E 0 (iωτ0 )−a + (iωτ1 )−b
= (17)
results: 1 + (iωτ0 )−a + (iωτ1 )−b
£ ¤
F Dtr f (t) = (iω)r F[ f (t)] (10) The real and imaginary parts of the complex modulus
The Fourier transform of the fractional derivative of or- can be calculated from Equation (16) as following:
der r of f (t) is (iω)r times the Fourier transform of f (t).
(E u − E 0 )(1 + B1 )
Taking the Fourier transform of the FZM Equation 6, E 0 = E0 +
yields: (1 + B1 )2 + B22
(18)
σ ∗ (iω) + τ1a (iω)a σ ∗ (iω) = E 0 ε∗ (iω) (E u − E 0 )B22
00
E =
+ E u τ1a (iω)a ε∗ (iω) (11) (1 + B1 )2 + B22
2362
where From Equations 9 and 20 we obtain:
¶µ µ ¶ " #
−b π −a π Z ∞ X
N
B1 = D(ωτ1 ) cos b + (ωτ1 ) cos a ∗ −t/τi
2 2 E (ω) = iω E0 + Hi · e e−iωt dt
µ ¶ µ ¶ 0 i=1
−b π −a π (21b)
B2 = D(ωτ1 ) sin b + (ωτ1 ) sin a (19) X
2 2
N
iωHi · τi
= E0 +
µ ¶−b 1 + iωτi
τ0 i=1
D= .
τ1
E ∗ (ω) can be split into its real and imaginary parts:
The variation of E 0 and E 0 with the model parameters
has been discussed in a previous paper [15] and the XN
Hi (ωτi )2
E 0 (ω) = E 0 + (22a)
real viscoelastic response of amorphous polymers in the i=1
1 + (ωτi )2
glass transition region can be predicted by this model
nevertheless a limit of this model has been observed for X
00
N
Hi · ωτi
temperatures lower than Tg . E (ω) = (22b)
The fractional calculus approach allows us to calcu- i=1
1 + (ωτi )2
late all the viscoelastic functions and in the following
we will calculate the relaxation spectra H (τ ) and com- However, it must be noted that the results obtained with
pare this function with experiments for an amorphous this method depend strongly on the number N of relax-
polymer solid in the neighbourhood of the glass transi- ation times [4]. In addition, there is no unambiguous
tion temperature. relation between the discrete relaxation times τi , the
contribution Hi , and the corresponding continuous re-
laxation time spectrum H (τ ) [3] Equations 1–3.
3. Relaxation time spectrum Nevertheless, discrete and continuous relaxation
Linear viscoelastic models are often presented as spec- time spectra may be compared in the way described
tral models. Although direct measurement of the relax- by Baumgaertel and Winter [16–18]. A comparison be-
ation time spectrum is impossible, the main advantage tween some of these procedures is presented by Orbey
of this modelling is to ensure consistency with linear and Dealy [19]. In this paper, we will derive an ana-
viscoelastic theory and to easily solve the problem of lytical expression based on the relaxance Q̄(s) Equa-
converting dynamic data from the frequency domain to tion 13. Equations 1–3 suggest the use of an inverse
the time domain. Laplace transform in order to obtain H (τ ). However, it
The linear viscoelastic theories give the following is very complicated for most of the different relaxation
description of the function E(t) [5]: functions. For this reason, another method—the inverse
Stieltjes transform [5]—has been used. In this way, one
obtains:
X
N X
N
ηi
E(t) = E 0 + Hi e−t/τi = E 0 + e−t/τi (20) 1 © ª
i=1 i=1
τi H (τ ) = ± Im Q̄(s)|s = (1/τ )e∓iπ (23)
π
where N is the number of relaxation modes, τi the re- Then, we can calculate the relaxation spectrum of FZM
laxation times, Hi the contribution of each time to the with two spring-pots from Equations16 and 23 as fol-
modulus and ηi the viscosity associated with each time. lowing:
The distribution should be considered continuous, how-
ever the mathematical treatment of constitutive equa- Eu − E0 B2
H (τ ) = (24)
tions is greatly simplified when a discrete spectrum is π (1 + B1 )2 + B22
used.
Theoretically the characteristic values (τi , Hi ) can where
be inferred from the behaviour of the material under µ ¶ µ ¶b
τ a τ
oscillations in the linear viscoelastic domain, either in B1 = D cos aπ + cos bπ
static or in dynamic experiments, provided that both the τ1 τ1
strain and the rate of strain are low. In a dynamic ex- µ ¶a µ ¶b
τ τ
periment, where the strain is given by ε∗ (iω) = ε0 eiωt , B2 = D sin aπ + sin bπ
τ1 τ1
the material response can be described by the use of
µ ¶−b
the complex modulus E ∗ (ω) which can be rewritten by τ0
using the Fourier transform of relaxation modulus E(t) D= 0<a≤b≤1
τ1
as follows:
The plot of the logarithm of the normalised relaxation
E ∗ (ω) = iωF[E(t), iω] (21a) time spectra for Equation 24 is given in Fig. 1 for various
values of the parameter b. With b − a = 0.1 = constant,
F[E(t), iω] is the Fourier transform defined from the spectrum becomes broader with decreasing values
Equation 9. of b.
2363
Figure 1 Logarithm of the normalised relaxation spectrum for the FZM with two spring-pots versus the normalised time for various values of a and b
with b − a = 0.1: N b = 0.2; ¥ b = 0.4; h b = 0.6; xb = 0.8.
2364
Figure 2 Loss modulus, E 00 , versus temperature at 1 Hz for the reference and the aged PMMA samples for different times of ageing ta at Ta = 90 ◦ C:
(a) The reference ( x) PMMA sample; (b) The aged PMMA samples (¥ ta = 10 hours; h ta = 20 hours; N ta = 96 hours).
Figure 3 Loss factor, tan δ, versus temperature at 1 Hz for the reference and aged PMMA samples for different times of ageing ta at Ta = 90 ◦ C:
(a) The reference ( x) PMMA sample; (b) The aged PMMA samples (¥ ta = 10 hours; h ta = 20 hours; N ta = 96 hours).
temperature of ageing (Fig. 6b). Therefore, as related tween about 30 and 115 ◦ C ≈ Tg , these deviations may
in our case to the fractional parameters a and b, these be ascribed to the presence of β relaxation and even-
parameters must be affected by the structural recovery tually, another relaxation at about 60 ◦ C in the case of
or physical ageing. PMMA [15, 20, 22, 23]. The parameters of the FZM
with two spring-pots a and b for all samples are plotted
in Table I.
5. Discussion: model and comparison The parameter a is connected with the slope in the
with experiment glass transition low temperature domain and b is con-
Let us now compare the response of FZM with two nected with the slope in the high temperature domain.
spring-pots Equations 18 and 19 with the experimental In order to show the effect of physical ageing on
curves (Cole-Cole diagrams) at 1 Hz. The comparison the viscoelastic behaviour of amorphous polymers, the
between the measured and calculated material func- relaxation time spectrum is usually considered because
tions of FZM with two spring-pots is plotted in Fig. 7 this function can easily be connected with processes on
for the reference sample of PMMA and in Fig. 8 for the a molecular level [24]. The corresponding density func-
aged sample of PMMA at 90 ◦ C during 10 hours. Agree- tion of the relaxation time spectrum (H (τ )/E u − E 0 ) of
ment is excellent except the low temperature zone be- FZM with two spring-pots calculated from Equation 24
2365
T A B L E I The parameters of the FZM with two spring-pots a and b is plotted in Fig. 9 for the reference and the aged sam-
for reference and aged PMMA samples ples of PMMA. The relaxation time spectrum shows a
PMMA Ref 10 h 20 h 96 h maximum at τ = τ1 and the viscoelastic time scale are
apparent in the relaxation spectra, the glassy zone to the
a90 0.33 0.27 0.26 0.25 left of the maximum and the transition zone in which
a70 0.33 0.3 0.28 0.25 (H (τ )/E u − E 0 ) changes steeply.
a50 0.33 0.31 0.3 0.26
b90 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
The changes observed in the spectra at high time
b70 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 scales (transition zone) e.g., at a high relaxation time,
b50 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 broaden in the aged sample, reflect differences in the
E u−90 (MPa) 1250 1580 1630 1800 modes of motion within the quenched compared with
E u−70 (MPa) 1300 1500 1615 1780 the aged sample. They also reflect the effect of phys-
E u−50 (MPa) 1200 1400 1550 1650
E 0−90 (MPa) 30 40 30 20
ical ageing on the a parameter which depends on the
E 0−70 (MPa) 20 20 20 20 slope of the Cole-Cole diagram on the low side of the
E 0−50 (MPa) 20 20 20 20 glass transition zone. Fig. 10 shows the relaxation time
Figure 4 Loss modulus, E 00 , versus temperature at 1 Hz for the reference and the aged PMMA samples at different temperatures for an ageing time
ta of 10 hours: (a) The reference ( x) PMMA sample; (b) The aged PMMA samples (¥ Ta = 50 ◦ C; h Ta = 70 ◦ C; N Ta = 90 ◦ C).
Figure 5 Loss factor, tan δ, versus temperature at 1 Hz for the reference and aged PMMA samples at different temperatures for an ageing time ta of
10 hours: (a) xreference PMMA sample; (b) The aged PMMA samples (¥ Ta = 50 ◦ C; h Ta = 70 ◦ C; N Ta = 90 ◦ C).
2366
model Cole-Cole diagrams. They were obtained from
the angles between the tangent and the E 0 axis. In the
same way, the remaining parameters for the glassy and
transition zones, E u and E 0 , were obtained by extend-
ing this tangent onto the E 0 axis to lower and higher
temperatures, in the glass transition zone, respectively.
From Figs 9 and 10, we note that the relaxation spec-
trum is affected by the thermal history of PMMA and
depends on the time and the temperature of ageing. The
a parameter relates to the broadening of the relaxation
spectrum around the glass transition zone. At high time
scales, the spectrum is unaffected by the physical age-
(a) ing so the b parameter is usually constant.
Then, this spectrum gives a clear picture on the
molecular mobility of solid amorphous polymers in the
neighbourhood of the glass transition zone, but there is
a limit of the spectrum in the glassy zone below Tg be-
cause the β-relaxation and another relaxation at about
60 ◦ C.
We have proposed the Extended Fractional Solid
Model [15] (EFSM) to describe the entire viscoelastic
behaviour of solid amorphous polymers in the glassy
region. This model gives predictions of the entire vis-
coelastic behaviour of the amorphous polymers in the
glassy zone (Tg − 190 ◦ C and Tg + 25 ◦ C). The a, b, c
parameters can be associated with the relaxation time
(b) spectrum H (τ ) of amorphous solid polymers. We will
dedicate a future paper to the study of the distribution of
Figure 6 The Cole-Cole diagrams for the reference and the aged PMMA relaxation times over a wide range of temperature and
samples for (a) different times of ageing ta at Ta = 90 ◦ C: (a) Reference
frequency to take into account the effect of physical
sample ( x), (b) the aged PMMA samples (¥ ta = 10 hours; h ta = 20
hours; N ta = 96 hours). (b) Different temperatures for an ageing time ageing phenomenon on the relaxation spectrum.
ta of 10 hours: (a) The reference ( x) PMMA sample; (b) the aged PMMA
samples (¥ Ta = 50 ◦ C; h Ta = 70 ◦ C; N Ta = 90 ◦ C).
6. Conclusion
The examples show that the dynamic moduli of an
spectrum (H (τ )/E u − E 0 ) for the other sample studied amorphous polymer (PMMA) can accurately be ap-
(ta = 10 hours, Ta = 50, 70, 90 ◦ C). proximated using the rheological models based on frac-
The corresponding parameters used are given in tional derivatives. The relaxation time spectrum can be
Table I, the b parameter is unaffected by the structural derived by the inverse Stieltjes transform (Keeping in
recovery but the a parameter varies from sample to sam- mind that the determination of the relaxation time spec-
ple. Here, b and a were obtained from the slopes of the trum requires the solution of an ill-posed problem). The
Figure 7 Comparison in the complex plane between the experimental PMMA Cole-Cole diagram at 1 Hz and the corresponding calculated model
FZM Equation 18: xexperimental data; h model.
2367
Figure 8 Comparison in the complex plane between the aged experimental PMMA sample at 1 Hz and the FZM model: ¥ aged sample; h model.
Figure 9 Logarithm of the normalised relaxation spectrum (the density function) versus logarithm of the normalised time for the reference and the
aged PMMA samples for different times of ageing ta at Ta = 90 ◦ C: (a) The reference ( x) PMMA sample; (b) The aged PMMA samples (¥ ta = 10
hours; h ta = 20 hours; N ta = 96 hours).
effect of physical ageing (structural recovery) on the to be the natural counterpart to our recent understanding
model parameters has been investigated in the neigh- of fractal (geometric) structures [24]. Both concepts are
bourhood of the glass transition zone and the distribu- drawing on the same inspiration: the principle of exact
tion of relaxation times is affected by both the time and or statistical self-similarity. Fractional calculus models
the temperature of physical ageing. should be regarded as tools to describe the behaviour of
The models proposed in this paper fit very well, in the complex systems in the first instance on a mesoscopic
vicinity of the glass rubber transition zone. In contrast or macroscopic level. Giving an answer to the ques-
to their simplicity and their satisfactory fit properties, tion for a general connection between the orders of the
the physical interpretation has been difficult and insuffi- fractional operators and some sort of fractal (similarity)
cient until now. This problem can only be solved if phys- dimension requires further investigations.
ical explanations are found for the fractional derivatives In summary, the models discussed in this paper can
occurring in the relaxation equation. be regarded as an interesting generalisation, especially
But fractal time processes governed by fractional dif- for materials showing cooperative phenomena. Conse-
ferential or integral equations, as discussed here, seem quently, it should be further developed.
2368
Figure 10 Logarithm of the normalised relaxation spectrum (the density function) versus logarithm of the normalised time for the reference and the
aged PMMA samples at different temperatures for an ageing time ta of 10 hours: (a) The reference ( x) PMMA sample; (b) The aged PMMA samples
(¥ Ta = 50 ◦ C; h Ta = 70 ◦ C; N Ta = 90 ◦ C).
2369