You are on page 1of 26

A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 1

CHP 1: ARBITRAGE

1.1) Introduction

Arbitrage is the making of a gain through trading without committing any money and without

taking a risk of losing money. The term is also used more loosely to cover a range of

activities, such as statistical arbitrage, risk arbitrage, and uncovered interest arbitrage, that are

not true arbitrage (because they are risky).

Many of these strategies bear some similarities to true arbitrage, in that they are market

neutral attempts to identify and exploit (usually short lived) anomalies in pricing. The

terminology used usually adds a qualifier to make it clear that it is not real arbitrage. The

discussion below is of true arbitrage.

An arbitrage opportunity exists if it is possible to make a gain that is guaranteed to be at least

equal to the risk free rate of return, with a chance of making a greater gain. This is equivalent

to the definition of an arbitrage opportunity as the possibility of a riskless gain with a zero

cost portfolio, because a portfolio that is guaranteed to make a profit can be bought with

borrowed money.

Arbitrage should not be possible as, if an arbitrage opportunity exists, then market forces

should eliminate it. Taking a simple example, if it is possible to buy a security in one market

and sell it at a higher price in another market, then no-one would buy it at the more expensive

price, and no one would sell it at the cheaper price. The prices in the two markets would

converge.
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 2

Arbitrage between markets is the simplest type of arbitrage. More complex strategies such as

arbitraging the price of a security against a portfolio that replicates its cash flows. These

range from the relatively simple, such as delta and gamma hedges, to extremely complex

strategies based on quantitative models.

Much of financial theory (and therefore most methods for valuing securities) are ultimately

built on the assumption that securities will trade at prices that make arbitrage impossible. In

particular, if there is no arbitrage then a risk neutral pricing measure exists and vice versa.

Although this result is not something that is used by most investors, it is of great importance

in the theory of financial economics.

Although arbitrage opportunities do exist in real markets, they are usually very small and

quickly eliminated; therefore the no arbitrage assumption is a reasonable one to build

financial theory on.

When persistent arbitrage opportunities do exist it means that there is something badly wrong

with financial markets. For example, there is evidence that during the dotcom boom the value

of internet related tracker stocks and listed subsidiaries was not consistent with the market

value of parent companies: an arbitrage opportunity existed and persisted.

In economics and finance, arbitrage is the practice of taking advantage of a price difference

between two or more markets: striking a combination of matching deals that capitalize upon

the imbalance, the profit being the difference between the market prices. When used by

academics, an arbitrage is a transaction that involves no negative cash flow at any

probabilistic or temporal state and a positive cash flow in at least one state; in simple terms, it
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 3

is the possibility of a risk-free profit after transaction costs. For instance, an arbitrage is

present when there is the opportunity to instantaneously buy low and sell high.

In principle and in academic use, an arbitrage is risk-free; in common use, as in statistical

arbitrage, it may refer to expected profit, though losses may occur, and in practice, there are

always risks in arbitrage, some minor (such as fluctuation of prices decreasing profit

margins), some major (such as devaluation of a currency or derivative). In academic use, an

arbitrage involves taking advantage of differences in price of a single asset or identical cash-

flows; in common use, it is also used to refer to differences between similar assets (relative

value or convergence trades), as in merger arbitrage.

People who engage in arbitrage are called arbitrageurs such as a bank or brokerage firm. The

term is mainly applied to trading in financial instruments, such as bonds, stocks, derivatives,

commodities and currencies.

1.2) Conditions for Arbitrage

Arbitrage is possible when one of three conditions is met:

 The same asset does not trade at the same price on all markets ("the law of one

price").Two assets with identical cash flows do not trade at the same price.

 An asset with a known price in the future does not today trade at its future price

discounted at the risk-free interest rate (or, the asset has significant costs of storage; as

such, for example, this condition holds for grain but not for securities).

 Arbitrage is not simply the act of buying a product in one market and selling it in another

for a higher price at some later time. The transactions must occur simultaneously to avoid
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 4

exposure to market risk, or the risk that prices may change on one market before both

transactions are complete. In practical terms, this is generally possible only with

securities and financial products that can be traded electronically, and even then, when

each leg of the trade is executed the prices in the market may have moved. Missing one

of the legs of the trade (and subsequently having to trade it soon after at a worse price) is

called 'execution risk' or more specifically 'leg risk'.

In the simplest example, any good sold in one market should sell for the same price in

another. Traders may, for example, find that the price of wheat is lower in agricultural

regions than in cities, purchase the good, and transport it to another region to sell at a higher

price. This type of price arbitrage is the most common, but this simple example ignores the

cost of transport, storage, risk, and other factors. "True" arbitrage requires that there be no

market risk involved. Where securities are traded on more than one exchange, arbitrage

occurs by simultaneously buying in one and selling on the other.


A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 5

CHP 2: TYPES OF ARBITRAGE

2.1) Spatial Arbitrage

Also known as Geographical arbitrage is the simplest form of arbitrage. In case of spatial

arbitrage, an arbitrageurs looks for pricing discrepancies across geographically separate

markets. For example, there may be a bond dealer in Virginia offering a bond at 100-12/23

and a dealer in Washington is bidding 100-15/23 for the same bond. For whatever reason, the

two dealers have not spotted the aberration in the prices, but the arbitrageur does. The

arbitrageurs immediately buy the bond from the Virginia dealer and sells it to the

Washington dealer.

2.2) Merger Arbitrage

Also called risk arbitrage, merger arbitrage generally consists of buying/holding the stock of

a company that is the target of a takeover while shorting the stock of the acquiring company.

Usually the market price of the target company is less than the price offered by the acquiring

company. The spread between these two prices depends mainly on the probability and the

timing of the takeover being completed as well as the prevailing level of interest rates.

The bet in a merger arbitrage is that such a spread will eventually be zero, if and when the

takeover is completed. The risk is that the deal "breaks" and the spread massively widens.

2.3) Municipal Bond Arbitrage

Also called municipal bond relative value arbitrage, municipal arbitrage, or just muni

arbitrageurs, this hedge fund strategy involves one of two approaches.


A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 6

Generally, managers seek relative value opportunities by being both long and short municipal

bonds with a duration-neutral book. The relative value trades may be between different

issuers, different bonds issued by the same entity or capital structure trades referencing the

same asset (in the case of revenue bonds). Managers aim to capture the inefficiencies arising

from the heavy participation of non-economic investors (i.e., high income "buy and hold"

investors seeking tax-exempt income) as well as the "crossover buying" arising from

corporations' or individuals' changing income tax situations (i.e., insurers switching their

muni for corporates after a large loss as they can capture a higher after-tax yield by offsetting

the taxable corporate income with underwriting losses). There are additional inefficiencies

arising from the highly fragmented nature of the municipal bond market which has two

million outstanding issues and 50,000 issuers in contrast to the Treasury market which has

400 issues and a single issuer.

Second, managers construct leveraged portfolios of AAA- or AA-rated tax-exempt municipal

bonds with the duration risk hedged by shorting the appropriate ratio of taxable corporate

bonds. These corporate equivalents are typically interest rate swaps referencing Libor or

SIFMA. The arbitrage manifests itself in the form of a relatively cheap longer maturity

municipal bond, which is a municipal bond that yields significantly more than 65% of a

corresponding taxable corporate bond. The steeper slope of the municipal yield curve allows

participants to collect more after-tax income from the municipal bond portfolio than is spent

on the interest rate swap; the carry is greater than the hedge expense. Positive, tax-free carry

from muni arbitrageurs can reach into the double digits. The bet in this municipal bond

arbitrage is that, over a longer period of time, two similar instruments municipal bonds and

interest rate swaps will correlate with each other; they are both very high quality credits, have
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 7

the same maturity and are denominated in U.S. dollars. Credit risk and duration risk are

largely eliminated in this strategy. However, basis risk arises from use of an imperfect hedge,

which results in significant, but range-bound principal volatility. The end goal is to limit this

principal volatility, eliminating its relevance over time as the high, consistent, tax-free cash

flow accumulates. Since the inefficiency is related to government tax policy, and hence is

structural in nature, it has not been arbitraged away.

Note, however, that many municipal bonds are callable, and that this imposes substantial

additional risks to the strategy.

2.4) Convertible Bond Arbitrage

A convertible bond is a bond that an investor can return to the issuing company in exchange

for a predetermined number of shares in the company. A convertible bond can be thought of

as a corporate bond with a stock call option attached to it.

The price of a convertible bond is sensitive to three major factors:

• Interest rate: When rates move higher, the bond part of a convertible bond tends to

move lower, but the call option part of a convertible bond moves higher (and the

aggregate tends to move lower).

• Stock price: When the price of the stock the bond is convertible into moves higher, the

price of the bond tends to rise.

• Credit spread: If the creditworthiness of the issuer deteriorates (e.g. rating downgrade)

and its credit spread widens, the bond price tends to move lower, but, in many cases, the
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 8

call option part of the convertible bond moves higher (since credit spread correlates with

volatility).

Given the complexity of the calculations involved and the convoluted structure that a

convertible bond can have, an arbitrageur often relies on sophisticated quantitative models in

order to identify bonds that are trading cheap versus their theoretical value.

Convertible arbitrage consists of buying a convertible bond and hedging two of the three

factors in order to gain exposure to the third factor at a very attractive price.

For instance an arbitrageur would first buy a convertible bond, then sell fixed income

securities or interest rate futures (to hedge the interest rate exposure) and buy some credit

protection (to hedge the risk of credit deterioration). Eventually what he'd be left with is

something similar to a call option on the underlying stock, acquired at a very low price. He

could then make money either selling some of the more expensive options that are openly

traded in the market or delta hedging his exposure to the underlying shares.

2.5) Depository Receipts

A depositary receipt is a security that is offered as a "tracking stock" on another foreign

market. For instance a Chinese company wishing to raise more money may issue a

depository receipt on the New York Stock Exchange, as the amount of capital on the local

exchanges is limited. These securities, known as ADRs (American depositary receipt) or

GDRs (global depository receipt) depending on where they are issued are typically

considered "foreign" and therefore trade at a lower value when first released. Many ADR's

are exchangeable into the original security (known as fungibility) and actually have the same
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 9

value. In this case there is a spread between the perceived value and real value, which can be

extracted. Other ADR's that are not exchangeable often have much larger spreads. Since the

ADR is trading at a value lower than what it is worth, one can purchase the ADR and expect

to make money as its value converges on the original. However there is a chance that the

original stock will fall in value too, so by shorting it one can hedge that risk.

2.6) Dual-Listed Companies

A dual-listed company (DLC) structure involves two companies incorporated in different

countries contractually agreeing to operate their businesses as if they were a single enterprise,

while retaining their separate legal identity and existing stock exchange listings. In integrated

and efficient financial markets, stock prices of the twin pair should move in lockstep. In

practice, DLC share prices exhibit large deviations from theoretical parity. Arbitrage

positions in DLCs can be set up by obtaining a long position in the relatively underpriced

part of the DLC and a short position in the relatively overpriced part. Such arbitrage

strategies start paying off as soon as the relative prices of the two DLC stocks converge

toward theoretical parity. However, since there is no identifiable date at which DLC prices

will converge, arbitrage positions sometimes have to be kept open for considerable periods of

time. In the meantime, the price gap might widen. In these situations, arbitrageurs may

receive margin calls, after which they would most likely be forced to liquidate part of the

position at a highly unfavorable moment and suffer a loss. Arbitrage in DLCs may be

profitable, but is also very risky.

A good illustration of the risk of DLC arbitrage is the position in Royal Dutch Shell which

had a DLC structure until 2005 by the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management(LTCM,
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 10

see also the discussion below). Lowenstein (2000) describes that LTCM established an

arbitrage position in Royal Dutch Shell in the summer of 1997, when Royal Dutch traded at

an 8 to 10 percent premium. In total $2.3 billion was invested, half of which long in Shell

and the other half short in Royal Dutch. In the autumn of 1998 large defaults on Russian debt

created significant losses for the hedge fund and LTCM had to unwind several positions.

Lowenstein reports that the premium of Royal Dutch had increased to about 22 percent and

LTCM had to close the position and incur a loss. According to Lowenstein, LTCM lost $286

million in equity pair’s trading and more than half of this loss is accounted for by the Royal

Dutch Shell trade.

2.7) Private to Public Equities

The market prices for privately held companies are typically viewed from a return on

investment perspective (such as 25%), whilst publicly held and or exchange listed companies

trade on a Price to earnings ratio (P/E) (such as a P/E of 10, which equates to a 10% ROI).

Thus, if a publicly traded company specializes in the acquisition of privately held companies,

from a per-share perspective there is a gain with every acquisition that falls within these

guidelines. A hedge fund that is an example of this type of arbitrage is Green ridge Capital,

which acts as an angel investor retaining equity in private companies which are in the process

of becoming publicly traded, buying in the private market and later selling in the public

market. Private to public equities arbitrage is a term which can arguably be applied to

investment banking in general. Private markets to public markets differences may also help

explain the overnight windfall gains enjoyed by principals of companies that just did an

initial public offering (IPO).


A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 11

CHP 3: WHAT IS ARBITRAGE TRADING?

3.1) Introduction

Theoretically, there should not be any sustained opportunity for arbitrage trading because for

arbitrage opportunity to emerge, prices of same commodity need to differ in different

markets at the same time, which is not feasible according to the law of single price, which

states that in a competitive environment, assets with same risk and return profile should sell

at the same price. Hence, same asset cannot sell at different prices at different markets. Any

difference would be a temporary phenomenon and speculators would wipe out any difference

by buying in cheaper market and selling in costlier market. This temporary aberration is what

presents arbitrage opportunity and is exploited by traders.

In simplest terms, arbitrage is the process of making profit from the price differential of same

assets or instruments with same underlying assets in two or more markets. Now, because

trade is carried simultaneously at different markets, theoretically there is no risk. In its

simplest form, it works in this way; a trader spots the price difference of an asset in two

markets, he buys the asset in the market where price is lower and simultaneously sells the

asset in the expensive market, pocketing the difference. In plain vanilla form, same asset can

have different prices in two markets say, BSE and NSE. However, there are many other ways

in which price differentials in assets or indices can be exploited in cash or derivative markets.

At any given point of time, there are many scripts and ETFs in which price differentials exist

which can be exploited. Similarly, at any point of time, there are price discrepancies between

spot and future prices which can be arbitraged to gain risk free returns. And there are
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 12

substantial profits to be made. It is possible to make as much as four per cent on a monthly

basis with careful exploitation of arbitrage opportunities.

3.2) Types of Arbitrage Trades

Before the introduction of derivatives in India, the most prevalent arbitrage game used to be

on the difference of price of individual stocks in different markets. So, a price difference in

price of say HLL or Infy on BSE and NSE would present opportunity for a trader to buy and

sell the shares in the cheaper and costlier markets respectively. Thus he can pocket the

difference without taking any risk. So, if HLL is trading at Rs 465 on NSE and at Rs 470 on

BSE at the same time, you can simply buy the stock on NSE and sell at BSE, thus making a

profit of Rs 5 in the trade. Similarly, many times, you can find substantial price difference in

the ETF price on exchange and the price at which the ETF can be bought from the fund

house. There also you can just buy the ETF at lower price point and sell at higher price point,

making a risk free profit.

However, one should be a little cautious while executing this arbitrage. Reason being the

prices that you see on the trading screen is the last traded price, which is not at which your

order would go through; that is decided by the bid or ask prices on order book. Hence there is

a definite possibility that the trade may not fetch you the arbitrage gains at all. It is, therefore,

important that arbitrage trade should be tried only in liquid stocks, in which chances of trade

going through at given price are much higher than illiquid stocks.
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 13

After introduction of derivatives, arbitrage trading in many more types of assets and market

segments has become possible. The most prominent pair of arbitrage that has come up in

derivative era is the spot futures trade. This works in a very simple manner, on price

differentials between spot and futures market. In a typical trade, the trader would identify an

asset whose price in spot market is lower than price in the future market. Let us say price of

stock is Rs. 100 in spot market and 110 in futures market. To exploit this difference, he

would undertake following sequence of actions. First he would go long on spot market, i.e.

buy the stock at Rs. 100. Simultaneously he would sell the stock futures at Rs. 110. Moving

forward, he has two choices. If price differential narrows down a lot later on that day, or in

next day or two, he can reverse his positions and book profits. Or else, He can hold both the

positions till the expiry of the futures contract. Because at the expiration, the prices of futures

and cash markets would converge, he can then reverse the positions and make the profit.

Here it is important to understand the concept of cost of carry. The cost of carry defines the

relationship between the futures price and the spot price. To understand in non-mathematical

expression, It is the cost of "carrying" or holding a position from the date of entering into the

transaction up to the date of maturity. It measures the storage cost plus interest that is paid to

finance the asset less the income earned on the asset. So, the future price of an asset should

be taken as the sum of spot price of the asset and the cost of carry. Technically, you can

make a profit from your holdings if future price is higher than the sum of spot price and cost

of carry. So, in above example, if the cost of carry is Rs. 3, then the net profit from the

arbitrage trade would be Rs 7.


A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 14

This is the plain vanilla spot future trade. If we were to take advantage of options on stocks

and futures, we can go long with deep in the money option on spot and simultaneously go

short on deep in the money options on Futures. This way we can take benefit of the widest of

price range discrepancy in cash and futures market.

Another very popular arbitrage play is between Nifty spot and Nifty futures. There are two

types of possibilities here. First, whenever Nifty futures trades at a premium to Nifty spot

which is higher than the cost of carry, there is an arbitrage possible. To play on this

discrepancy, one can buy Nifty spot, which means buying all stocks of Nifty in the same

proportion. This can be done by special software provided by NSE for buying all 50 Nifty

stocks in the spot market in the same ratio. At the same time, he can sell Nifty futures. As in

case of stock arbitrage, positions can be reversed in case of sudden reduction in price

differential or at the expiry of contract. Second and ore complex arbitrage method is to

exploit the price differential between Nifty futures and underlying stock futures, which is

called Basis Arbitrage. In this situation, one can create a short position in Nifty futures and

simultaneously create long positions in Nifty's underlying stock futures, taking advantage of

the differential (basis) between the two.

Third popular arbitrage play is the reverse arbitrage. The strategy here is opposite of a regular

cash-futures stock arbitrage, where one buys shares and simultaneously sell stock futures. In

reverse arbitrage, one sells shares in spot market and buys stock futures in the beginning and

reverses the positions moving forward. This type of arbitrage works best in a falling market

when futures are at a discount to the cash market. Generally, mutual funds are big players in

this category of arbitrage trading.


A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 15

From institutional perspective, arbitrage between ADRs (American Depository Receipts) or

GDRs (Global Depository Receipts) and local shares are also an interesting segment of

arbitrage play. Because there is two-way fungibility allowed between ADRs/GDRs and local

listed shares, many FIIs convert these to India listed shares whenever ADRs/ GDRs are in

discount to local price and sell converted shares in India at higher price, making a profit at no

risk.

• Operational Issues to Remember

Most important aspect of arbitrage trading is swiftness of execution of trade. To remove the

possibility of price fluctuation it is imperative that both legs of transaction are executed very

fast. From this perspective, arbitrage should be tried only in those assets which are highly

liquid. Secondly, interest rate fluctuations can make calculations go awry, as cost of carry is

an important link between prices in cash and future markets. Finally, trading circuit on

individual stocks and restriction on short selling for various market players create

impediments in exploitation of arbitrage opportunities.

• Automated Arbitrage Trade

Very often it is not possible for individuals to track multiple markets simultaneously and also

execute trades in quick succession. To address this problem, automated trading software

packages have come into being. It started with spot trading but quickly upgraded to

derivatives and arbitrage trading. These software’s identify price discrepancies across
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 16

markets on a real time basis and also execute automated trades depending upon parameters

passed by users. For example, ODIN™ Program Trading software by Financial Technologies

facilitates auto-execution of the trades based on the defined parameters. It identifies arbitrage

opportunities that exist across the spot and futures markets and even spreads, which means

price discrepancies across futures of different trading contracts, across exchanges can be

exploited.

• Arbitrage Funds

If you are intimidated by the complexity of the arbitrage trading and strategies, you can still

take benefit of arbitrage opportunities by investing in arbitrage funds. These mutual funds are

created to exploit the arbitrage opportunity in market that may exist in any exchange in cash

or derivative segments. Because of the nature of inherent transactions, these funds are mostly

low risk investments. They generally generate returns in line with those of liquid and money

market funds. However, in a momentum market where prices are volatile, these funds can

generate higher returns than other near risk free funds. For example, over one year period

ending March 28, 2013, top one dozen arbitrage funds generated returns in excess of nine per

cent, with four fund clocking over ten per cent. This compares decently with best of debt

funds.

In a nutshell, arbitrage trading is a well-developed but complex trading strategy which

presents opportunity to earn risk free return in cash and derivative segments for smart
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 17

investors. However, it must be undertaken with extreme caution because inherent

complexities and uncertain factors could make potential profits disappear in no time.

3.3) Types of Risks Attached to Arbitrage Trade

Arbitrage transactions in modern securities markets involve fairly low day-to-day risks, but

can face extremely high risk in rare situations, particularly financial crises, and can lead to

bankruptcy. Formally, arbitrage transactions have negative skew prices can get a small

amount closer (but often no closer than 0), while they can get very far apart. The day-to-day

risks are generally small because the transactions involve small differences in price, so an

execution failure will generally cause a small loss (unless the trade is very big or the price

moves rapidly). The rare case risks are extremely high because these small price differences

are converted to large profits via leverage (borrowed money), and in the rare event of a large

price move, this may yield a large loss.

The main day-to-day risk is that part of the transaction fails – execution risk. The main rare

risks are counterparty risk and liquidity risk – that a counterparty to a large transaction or

many transactions fails to pay, or that one is required to post margin and does not have the

money to do so. In the academic literature, the idea that seemingly very low risk arbitrage

trades might not be fully exploited because of these risk factors and other considerations is

often referred to as limits to arbitrage.


A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 18

• Execution risk

Generally it is impossible to close two or three transactions at the same instant; therefore,

there is the possibility that when one part of the deal is closed, a quick shift in prices makes it

impossible to close the other at a profitable price. However, this is not necessarily the case.

Many exchanges and inter-dealer brokers allow multi legged trades (e.g. basis block trades

on LIFFE).

Competition in the marketplace can also create risks during arbitrage transactions. As an

example, if one was trying to profit from a price discrepancy between IBM on the NYSE and

IBM on the London Stock Exchange, they may purchase a large number of shares on the

NYSE and find that they cannot simultaneously sell on the LSE. This leaves the arbitrageur

in an un-hedged risk position.

In the 1980s, risk arbitrage was common. In this form of speculation, one trades a security

that is clearly undervalued or overvalued, when it is seen that the wrong valuation is about to

be corrected by events. The standard example is the stock of a company, undervalued in the

stock market, which is about to be the object of a takeover bid; the price of the takeover will

more truly reflect the value of the company, giving a large profit to those who bought at the

current price—if the merger goes through as predicted. Traditionally, arbitrage transactions

in the securities markets involve high speed, high volume and low risk. At some moment a

price difference exists, and the problem is to execute two or three balancing transactions

while the difference persists (that is, before the other arbitrageurs act). When the transaction

involves a delay of weeks or months, as above, it may entail considerable risk if borrowed

money is used to magnify the reward through leverage. One way of reducing the risk is
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 19

through the illegal use of inside information, and in fact risk arbitrage with regard to

leveraged buyouts was associated with some of the famous financial scandals of the 1980s

such as those involving Michael Milken and Ivan Boesky.

• Mismatch

Another risk occurs if the items being bought and sold are not identical and the arbitrage is

conducted under the assumption that the prices of the items are correlated or predictable; this

is more narrowly referred to as a convergence trade. In the extreme case this is merger

arbitrage, described below. In comparison to the classical quick arbitrage transaction, such an

operation can produce disastrous losses.

• Counterparty risk

As arbitrages generally involve future movements of cash, they are subject to counterparty

risk: if counterparty fails to fulfill their side of a transaction. This is a serious problem if one

has either a single trade or many related trades with a single counterparty, whose failure thus

poses a threat, or in the event of a financial crisis when many counterparties fail. This hazard

is serious because of the large quantities one must trade in order to make a profit on small

price differences.

For example, if one purchases many risky bonds, then hedges them with CDSes, profiting

from the difference between the bond spread and the CDS premium, in a financial crisis the

bonds may default and the CDS writer/seller may itself fail, due to the stress of the crisis,

causing the arbitrageur to face steep losses.


A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 20

• Liquidity risk

Arbitrage trades are necessarily synthetic, leveraged trades, as they involve a short position.

If the assets used are not identical (so a price divergence makes the trade temporarily lose

money), or the margin treatment is not identical, and the trader is accordingly required to

post margin (faces a margin call), the trader may run out of capital (if they run out of cash

and cannot borrow more) and be forced to sell these assets at a loss even though the trades

may be expected to ultimately make money. In effect, arbitrage traders synthesize a put

option on their ability to finance themselves.

Prices may diverge during a financial crisis, often termed a "flight to quality"; these are

precisely the times when it is hardest for leveraged investors to raise capital (due to overall

capital constraints), and thus they will lack capital precisely when they need it most.
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 21

CHP 4: HOW TO PLAY THE ARBITRAGE GAME

Arbitrage, in layman’s terms, involves simultaneously buying and selling the same asset

across two different markets, profiting from the price difference. Many times, arbitrage is

considered to be risk-free as the two simultaneous acts automatically hedge the price risk of

the asset going up or down in value. Let’s take an example. Suppose Reliance Industries’

shares are trading at ₹860 on the BSE and at ₹862 on the NSE. One could simply purchase

the shares at ₹860 from the BSE and sell the same quantity at ₹862 on the NSE.

In most equity markets, the trader can immediately claim a profit of ₹2; however, since

cross-clearing has not been approved in India, the trader would need to sell the BSE shares

and purchase back the NSE shares within the same day to capture the ₹2 profit.

Due to arbitrage, the prices tend to converge andthe price of Reliance shares may overlap on

both the exchanges. At that point, the trader can execute his reversal trades. For example,

assume Reliance Industries is priced at ₹865 later in the same day.

• Cash-Futures Arbitrage

The trader would sell his shares at ₹865 on the BSE and purchase shares at the same price on

the NSE. He has now earned ₹2 in profit per share. Another common arbitrage strategy is the

Cash-Futures arbitrage. Suppose Reliance Industries equity is trading at ₹860 on the NSE,

and the near month Futures contract is trading at ₹870 on the NSE. The trader can buy the

underlying and sell the Futures contract.


A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 22

Since Futures contracts are traded in lots, the trader should execute the same number of

shares. Since Reliance Industries has a lot size of 250, the trader could purchase 250 shares

of Reliance Industries at ₹860 and sell one lot of Reliance Futures at ₹870.

Now, the trader has two options. As the price difference between the Futures price and the

Equities price is ₹10, he needs to wait for the price difference to be lower than ₹10 to earn a

profit. If this is not possible, he can hold the positions overnight and execute the reverse

trades on a future date.

The risk here is that the Securities Transaction Tax for delivery shares (holding shares

overnight) is significantly higher than that on sale of shares within the same day (known as

intraday). So, it’s best to wait for the price difference to be below ₹10 within the same day.

• Patience pays

Suppose, later in the day, Reliance shares are trading at ₹864 and Reliance Futures, at ₹872.

He sells his 250 shares and buys one lot of Reliance Futures. He has now earned ₹2 in profit.

There are many profitable arbitrage traders who use automated algorithms that constantly

scan the markets for price discrepancies. If you’re looking to play the arbitrage game, be

patient and seek out opportunities where the price discrepancy is large. Over time, you can

look to increase your position sizes.


A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 23

CHP 5: ARBITRAGE AND SPECULATION

• Arbitrage

Arbitrage involves the simultaneous buying and selling of an asset in order to profit from

small differences in price. Often, arbitrageurs buy stock on one market (for example, a

financial market in the United States like the NYSE) while simultaneously selling the same

stock on a different market (such as the London Stock Exchange). In the United States, the

stock would be traded in US dollars, while in London; the stock would be traded in pounds.

As each market for the same stock moves, market inefficiencies, pricing mismatches and

even dollar/pound exchange rates can affect the prices temporarily. Arbitrage is not limited to

identical instruments; arbitrageurs can also take advantage of predictable relationships

between similar financial instruments, such as gold futures and the underlying price of

physical gold.

Since arbitrage involves the simultaneous buying and selling of an asset, it is essentially a

type of hedge and involves limited risk, when executed properly. Arbitrageurs typically enter

large positions since they are attempting to profit from very small differences in price.

• Speculation

Speculation, on the other hand, is a type financial strategy that involves a significant amount

of risk. Financial speculation can involve the trading of instruments such as bonds,

commodities, currencies and derivatives. Speculators attempt to profit from rising and falling

prices. A trader, for example, may open a long (buy) position in a stock index futures

contract with the expectation of profiting from rising prices. If the value of the index rises,
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 24

the trader may close the trade for a profit. Conversely, if the value of the index falls, the trade

might be closed for a loss.

Speculators may also attempt to profit from a falling market by shorting(selling short, or

simply "selling") the instrument. If prices drop, the position will be profitable. If prices rise,

however, the trade may be closed at a loss.


A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 25

CONCLUSION

Arbitrage has many forms and encompasses many strategies; however, they all seek to take

advantage of increased chances of success. Many of the risk-free forms of pure arbitrage are

typically unavailable to retail traders, although several types of risk arbitrage do offer

significant profit opportunities to all arbitrageurs.

In the private sector, true arbitrage is completely hedged. In other words, both sides of the

transaction are guaranteed at the time the position is taken so there is no risk of loss.

Arbitrage differs from traditional investing in that profits are made by the trade itself, not

from the appreciation of a security. In fact, holding securities long enough for them to change

in value is generally considered a risk by the arbitrageur.

Riskless, or near riskless, profit opportunities without the need for actual work are so

attractive to arbitrageurs that they continue to search and exploit them using whatever means

necessary. In so doing, it appears that they also contribute to the smooth functioning of the

market.
A STUDY ON ARBITRAGE 26

APPENDIX/BIBLIOGRAPHY

 Books

Financial Market and Services - Gordan & Natrajan

Financial Management - PRASANNA CHANDRA

 Magazines

Business Today

Business world

Business India

 Webilography

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/arbitrage.asp

http://shabbir.in/arbitrage-trading/

http://www.indianinfoline.com

http://www.nseindia.com

You might also like