NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD TARGETING SYSTEM FOR POVERTY REDUCTION (NHTS-PR)

Field Office Caraga

R. Palma St., Butuan City

TERMINAL REPORT ON THE UCT VALIDATION ACTIVITY

As of April 2 to May 2, 2018

I. Highlights of the Accomplishment

 10 UCT Field Staffs
o Christine N. Batiao
o Mary Ann Zanoria
o Marcelina Galeon
o April Silagan
o Liza Lou Labartini
o Gerlie Margate
o Avelina Opriasa
o Maricel De Vera
o Jonel Mationg
o Bryan Melloria
  Activities Undertaken
o March 27, 2018- Courtesy Call at MSWD Office and the Municipal Administrator
o April 2 to May 2, 2018- Courtesy Call in every Brgy to be validated.
o April 2 to May 2, 2018- Validation in 27 Brgys of San Francisco, Agusan del Sur.
o May 8, 2018- Exit Conference at MSWD Office and Municipal Mayor.

 Total Household Validated per Barangay

NOT VALIDATED

TOTAL No NO. OF % OF
BARANGAY TARGET VALIDA Transferre Vacant Conflict/ HHS ACCOMPLISH
TOTAL Qualified
TED Unlocated d Housing Disaster Refused Pantawid Others VISITED MENT
NHL Respond
Residence Unit Area
ent

Brgy 1 160 144 16 8 3 0 0 0 0 4 1 144 90%

Brgy 2 19 17 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 89.47%
Brgy 3 113 98 15 7 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 98 86.73%
Brgy 4 60 54 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 54 90%
Brgy 5 110 96 14 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 96 87.27%
Karaos 95 84 11 3 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 84 88.42%
San Isidro 90 74 16 6 7 0 0 0 0 3 0 74 82.22%
Bayugan 2 134 117 17 5 8 0 0 0 0 4 0 117 87.31%
Lapinigan 258 242 16 3 7 0 0 0 0 6 0 242 93. 80%
Ormaca 40 36 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 36 90%
Mate 90 75 15 1 9 0 0 0 0 5 0 75 83.33%
Pasta 125 115 10 0 7 0 0 0 0 3 0 115 92%
Buenasuerte 98 85 13 3 7 0 0 0 0 2 1 85 86.73%
Caimpugan 93 77 16 5 6 0 0 0 0 4 1 77 82.80%
Ebro 87 80 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 3 80 91.95%
New Visayas 78 66 12 5 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 66 84.62%
Hubang 95 73 21 7 10 0 0 0 0 4 0 73 76.84%
Pisaan 94 84 10 2 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 84 89.36%
Sta. Ana 65 56 9 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 1 56 86.15%
Ladgadan 54 51 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 51 94.44%
Tagapua 138 113 25 8 4 0 0 0 0 6 7 113 81.88%
Borbon 180 156 25 6 10 0 0 0 0 9 0 156 86.67%
Rizal 50 49 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 49 98%
Bitan Agan 60 48 12 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 4 48 80%
Das Agan 75 55 20 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 73.33%
Lucac 93 75 18 3 9 0 0 0 0 4 2 75 80.65%
Alegria 226 212 14 4 6 0 0 0 0 4 0 212 93.81%
TOTAL 2,780 2, 432 348 106 130 0 0 0 0 81 31 2,432 87.48

The above table shows the 27 Brgy’s in the Municipality of San Francisco, Agusan del Sur with the total of 2,780 Households.
After 30 days of validation, the total household validated is 2, 780 and the non-validated is 348. The 348 consists of Unlocated
with the total of 106 Households, 130 Transferred Households, 81 Pantawid Beneficiaries and 31 Social Pensioners.

 Strategies/Innovations/Practices/
 The Validators did the mapping of areas and schedules before the proper validation.
 Team approach. The validators will validate that specific Brgy as a team.
 The Brgy Captain will be informed ahead of time.
  The team did collaboration with the Brgy Health Workers for guidance every purok.
 The team did collaboration with the ML’s/Area Supervisors.
 AS Spot Check during the UCT Validation
 No spot checking happened.
 Lessons Learned/ Gains
 The Validators learned how to be patient with the different approach of the community people.
 They learned how to manage their time.
 The team learned how to approach people especially those with high positions.
 They understand the situation of the clients that they need help from the government.

II. Issues and Concern: (During the UCT Validation)

Issues/Challenges Actions-Taken Recommendations

The validator was Was reported to the Brgy Call the attention of the
threatened by Kagawad. perpetrator and confront
one of the him in Brgy Office and
household head advise him to not do it
that he will going again.
to hurt her
physically and he
will tear the HVF
during the
validation in Brgy
Das Agan.
 Some of the Explained to the other In that case, the validator
Households member of the household should explain clearly and
refused to be the benefits of this make them understand
interviewed program. the purpose of the
because they program.
don’t want to
receive
assistance from
the government.

III. Attachment
i. Photo documentation with caption include AS spot check
ii. Certificate of Validation (COV)
iii. Transmittal Submitted HFV, HVL and NHL

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

CHRISTINE N. BATIAO _________________
Admin Aide AS Team leader

Noted by: Approved by:

ALDIE MAE A. ANDOY NERISA T. MURIH

Regional Field Coordinator ARD-Administration/ Chief PPD