Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40496093?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Tempo
This content downloaded from 136.186.1.81 on Mon, 08 Aug 2016 12:30:33 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Tempo 63 (249) 2-11 © 2009 Cambridge University Press
doi:10.1017/S0040298209000229 Printed in the United Kingdom
1 For example Steve Reich, Three Tales (2001) and John Adams, On the Transmigration of Souh
(2002).
For example Philip Glass, The Hours (2002), dir. Stephen Daldry and Michael Nyman,
Wonderland (1999), dir. Michael Winterbottom.
See Simon Emmerson, ' "Losing Touch?": The Human Performer and Electronics', in Music,
Electronic Media and Cuture ed. Simon Emmerson (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000), pp. 194-217.
4 Robert K. Schwarz, Minimalists (London: Phaidon Press, 1999), p. 208 and Josiah Fisk, The
New Simplicity: The Music of Górecki, Tavener and Part', The Hudson Review, vol. 47, no. 3
(Autumn, 1994), pp. 394-412.
This content downloaded from 136.186.1.81 on Mon, 08 Aug 2016 12:30:33 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
THOUGHTS ON ARVO PART'S TINTINNABULI STYLE 3
This content downloaded from 136.186.1.81 on Mon, 08 Aug 2016 12:30:33 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
4 TEMPO
I am not sure there could be progress in art... Many art objects of the past
appear to be more contemporary than our present art. How do we explain it?
The secret to its contemporaneity resides in the question: How thoroughly has
the author-composer perceived, not his own present, but the totality of life, its
joys, worries and mysteries? . . . Art has to deal with eternal questions, not just
sorting out the issues of today.12
11 See Max Paddison, Adorno's Aesthetics of Music (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1993), pp. 135-138.
12 Quoted in Hillier, Arvo Part, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 65.
13 Charles Jencks, What is Postmodernism? (Chichester: Academy Editions, 1996), p. 23.
14 Geoff Smith, 'Sources of Invention: An Interview with Arvo Part', The Musical Times, vol.
140 (Autumn, 1999), p. 19.
This content downloaded from 136.186.1.81 on Mon, 08 Aug 2016 12:30:33 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
THOUGHTS ON ARVO PART'S TINTINNABULI STYLE 5
greatly to that of Steve Reich and John Adams who rely on advanced
synthesisers and playback at every stage of creativity This is not to deny
the craftsmanship apparent in the Americans' work, but only to suggest
that the absence of technology in Part's music has contributed to a focus
on nuanced differentiation between works, in contrast to the dramatic
juxtaposition of styles and genres within the oeuvres of those more
technologically-minded composers.
The shifts in style that have consistently characterized Reich's output
are an instructive example. These significant changes in Reich's compo-
sitional technique have been dependent upon - and arguably the result
of - his continual interest in technology. In both his more experimen-
tal music (such as Pendulum Music, the tape pieces and, more recently
the mixed-media productions of The Cave and Three Tales) through to
his less immediately avant-garde works Different Trains and the 'coun-
terpoint' series, recording technology and sound manipulation have
facilitated new avenues of musical inventiveness. This gamut of works
represents more than the traditional attempt to master different genres,
but is illustrative of a form of musical pluralism which employs record-
ed, manipulated and electronically-created sounds to undermine the
very concept of genre and thus the notion of a 'composer-style'.15 Part's
music desists from putting forward a similar aesthetic challenge; on the
contrary, the unified style of his output revivifies an older, pre-modern
argument because of his resoundingly traditional materials.
Not only traditional, but arguably ascetic. His development of a sys-
tematic musical grammar, namely tintinnabuli, has resulted in a corpus
of works whose intent is inextricable with an exercise of self-discipline.
The strictness of Part's palate is the third way, in addition to his rejection
of technology and contemporary subject matter, in which his music
is distinct from the music of the contemporary avant-garde currently
composing in Europe and North America. There is a strong sense of
iconoclasm embodied by this tradition (or, as Harold Bloom perceived
in relation to poetry, an oedipal desire16) to desecrate the musical ten-
ets of technique established by canonic predecessors. Part himself felt
a similar urge in the music of his first period but, by FiirAlina ( 1 976), this
had been replaced by an idiom free of patricidal angst. Tintinnabuli is,
in essence, harmonically simple, undeviating in terms of its modal rela-
tionships and could not be classed as 'experimental',17 with the caveat
that this kind of discipline is itself radical in comparison to the reigning
compositional paradigm of difference and development as it emerged
in the middle of the 20th century. This paradigm, which in music can be
understood as the effect of such experimental figures as John Cage or
Cornelius Cardew, was to expand the number of compositional choices
available beyond any governing system. Their aleatoric procedures were
the means for challenging the serialist hegemony, even if the manner of
achieving an aleatoric work of music, as through Cage's use of Í Ching,
was highly organized. In union with similar advances in science and
technology, the latter stages of the 20th century have witnessed the con-
tinuation of this approach within music, easily accepting the association
of 'experimentation' with 'progress.' At the same time, the embracing
15 See Marina Lobanova, Musical Style and Genre: History and Modernity (Amsterdam: Harwood
Academic Publishers, 2000). Particularly relevant here is chapter v, The Problem of Musical
Genre: Baroque, Classicism and the Twentieth Century,' pp. 171-199.
16 Harold Bloom, The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry (New York; Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1997).
17 My understanding of experimental is borrowed from the definition propounded in Michael
Nyman, Experimental Music: Cage and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1999), pp. 1-30.
This content downloaded from 136.186.1.81 on Mon, 08 Aug 2016 12:30:33 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
6 TEMPO
This content downloaded from 136.186.1.81 on Mon, 08 Aug 2016 12:30:33 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
THOUGHTS ON ARVO PART'S TINTINNABULI STYLE 7
ays into collage, he warns that Tar from signifying the resolution of the
conflicts of modernity, this music is in fact symptomatic of a deepening
crisis',23 precisely because of the music's palatable nature. In this judge-
ment Clarke is unable to extricate himself fully from the mindset which
modernism has engendered, one which takes for granted that music
should point towards some sort of dialectical thinking and never 'pro-
vide the comfort of a closed and harmonious other world' through its
harmonious sameness.24
There are two aspects of Part's tintinnabuli music that contribute
to the seemingly unified quality. Firstly they are works which are self-
contained, that is, they do not engage in citation of music of the past.
Certainly they are semantically referential through text or an allusive
title, and often have a dramatic purpose through drawing on Christian
subjects and the liturgy. Because of this tendency they could hardly be
considered as abstract. However, one of the most notable features of
Part's tintinnabuli style when compared to his earlier compositions is
the absence of musical quotation, and it is this aspect which provides a
groundwork of unity. This is not to claim that Part's works do not make
reference to each other, since his tintinnabuli style has only become rec-
ognizable because of its reappearance across multiple works; but it is
true that the constellation of Part's music is becoming a closed and uni-
fied body because he has stepped back from incorporating music from
other sources. This is indicative of a broader change in Part's outlook
towards the interaction of music and history. The play of found musi-
cal objects was a defining aspect of Part's modernism and rooted him
within a specific tradition of eclecticism. The move to unified, self-refer-
ential music highlights his departure from this tradition.
Secondly, the term 'unified' in relation to Part's compositions refers
to his espousal of 'non-dialectical' forms. While his tintinnabuli works
do display moments of contrast in both the rhythmic organization
and between certain lines of counterpoint, there is rarely a sense of
formal transformation at a deeper level.25 The one possible, although
significant, exception is Passio, whose expansive conclusion mirrors the
summation of the Passion narrative. Even this work could hardly be
interpreted as ideological, however, as the sense of being harmonically
pulled towards an end-point is deliberately absent throughout the work;
the final phrase cannot represent an apotheosis as it is effectively a free-
standing section, unrelated tonally to that which has preceded it in the
same manner as a religious doxology. In a work such as Passio, where
there are no differentiated formal sections, the tension and synthesis
which is inherent to classical forms cannot function.
This contrasts significantly with his earlier work Credo, described
by Paul Hillier as the 'pivotal work in Part's oeuvre'.26 Credo of 1968
articulates the conclusion of Part's interest in collage and heterogene-
ity within single movements, while tentatively suggesting the first move
towards the homogenized tintinnabuli works for which he has become
most widely recognised. As a fabric of multiple distinct historical styles
- the Baroque, the serial and the aleatory - it represents the culmina-
tion of Part's fascination with the idea of 'the past' as a topic. This is
pre-figured in the predecessor closest to Credo, Collage sur B-A-C-H
(1964), the second movement of which can be understood as the most
This content downloaded from 136.186.1.81 on Mon, 08 Aug 2016 12:30:33 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
8 TEMPO
27 To be capable of doing so, Part required an extended type of form and instrumentation,
both of which were conceived for choral-symphonic forces. These include a full comple-
ment of wind, brass, percussion, four-part choir and piano. Within these orchestral sections
the extreme tessitura of the work is reflected by the use of almost the entire range of the
piano's keyboard, by the employment of double piccolo and double bass clarinet to empha-
size the limits of acoustic instrumental pitch and through extensive percussion.
28 On Part and the dialectic of Credo, see Peter Quinn, Out with the Old and in with the New:
Arvo Part's Credo', Tempo No. 211 (January 2001), pp. 15-21.
29 Hillier, Arvo Part, p. 59.
30 The translation reads: Ί believe in Jesus Christ. You have heard it said: an eye for an eye and a
tooth for tooth; But I say unto you: do not resist injustice'.
31 Quinn, Out with the Old', Tempo, p. 16.
This content downloaded from 136.186.1.81 on Mon, 08 Aug 2016 12:30:33 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
THOUGHTS ON ARVO PART'S TINTINNABULI STYLE 9
This content downloaded from 136.186.1.81 on Mon, 08 Aug 2016 12:30:33 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
10 TEMPO
This content downloaded from 136.186.1.81 on Mon, 08 Aug 2016 12:30:33 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
THOUGHTS ON ARVO PART'S TINTINNABULI STYLE 11
A culture that attempts to live without the sustaining power of myth is a culture
that is not whole, that has no connection with the past. And it is in this manner
that we may understand Part's sense of purpose: as an attempt to reconstitute
art within a sense of past and future time, to fly in the face of the disconnected-
ness of postmodernism and seize a cultural meta-narrative from time so distant,
yet so potently realized that it has the force of new life.38
36 I refer to the film Arvo Part: 24 Preludes for a Fugue (2002), dir. Dorian Supin.
37 For example the use of Speidel im Spiegel in Wit (2001) dir. Mike Nichols, and In Memonam
Benjamin Britten in Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004) dir. Michael Moore.
38 Hillier, Arvo Part, p. 74.
This content downloaded from 136.186.1.81 on Mon, 08 Aug 2016 12:30:33 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms