Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The King's Indian Defence is a common chess opening. It arises after the moves:
1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 g6
Black intends to follow up with 3...Bg7 and 4...d6 (the Grünfeld Defence arises when
Black plays 3...d5 instead, and is considered a separate opening). White's major third
move options are 3.Nc3, 3.Nf3 or 3.g3, with both the King's Indian and Grünfeld
playable against these moves. The Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings (ECO) classifies
the King's Indian Defence under the codes E60 through E99.
In the most critical lines of the King's Indian, White erects an imposing pawn center with
Nc3 followed by e4. Black stakes out his own claim to the center with the Benoni-style
...c5, or ...e5. If White resolves the central pawn tension with d5, then Black follows with
either ...b5 and queenside play, or ...f5 and an eventual kingside attack. Meanwhile,
White attempts to expand on the opposite wing. The resulting unbalanced positions
offer scope for both sides to play for a win.
Overview
The King's Indian is a hypermodern opening, where Black deliberately allows White
control of the centre with his pawns, with the view to subsequently challenge it with the
moves ...e5 or ...c5. Until the mid-1930s, it was generally regarded as highly suspect,
but the analysis and play of three strong Soviet players in particular—Alexander
Konstantinopolsky,Isaac Boleslavsky, and David Bronstein—helped to make the
defence much more respected and popular. It is a dynamic opening, exceptionally
complex, and a favourite of formerworld champions Garry Kasparov, Bobby Fischer,
and Mikhail Tal, with prominent grandmasters Viktor Korchnoi, Miguel Najdorf, Efim
Geller, John Nunn, Svetozar Gligorić,Wolfgang Uhlmann, and Ilya Smirin having also
contributed much to the theory and practice of this opening. In the early 2000s the
opening's popularity suffered after Vladimir Kramnik scored excellent results against it,
so much so that even Kasparov gave up the opening after relentless losses to Kramnik.
However, Kramnik himself won a fine game on the black side of the KID in 2012, [1] and
current top players Hikaru Nakamura, Teimour Radjabov and Ding Liren all play the
opening.
Variations
The main variations of the King's Indian are:
3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6[edit]
Classical Variation: 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be2 e5
The Classical Variation is 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be2 e5.
The Main Line or Mar del Plata Variation continues 7.0-0 Nc6 8.d5 Ne7. Now White
has a wide variety of moves, including 9.b4, 9.Ne1, and 9.Nd2, among others.
Typically, White will try to attack on the queenside by preparing the pawn break c4–
c5, while Black will attack on the kingside by transferring his knight from f6 to d7
(usually better placed than at e8, as it helps slow White's queenside play with c4–
c5), and starting a kingside pawn storm with f7–f5–f4 and g6–g5. 9.b4, introduced
by Korchnoi in the 1970s, used to put top players off playing this line, but it has
recently been revived by Radjabov.
7.0-0 Nbd7 is the Old Main Line, and is playable, though less common nowadays
than 7...Nc6.
7.0-0 exd4 8.Nxd4 is also possible, although White's extra space usually is of
greater value than Black's counterplay against White's centre. Made popular in the
mid-1990s by the Russian Grandmaster Igor Glek, new ideas were found for White
yet some of the best lines for White were later refuted. White still has an advantage
in most lines.
7.0-0 Na6 has seen some popularity recently. The purpose of this awkward-looking
move is to move the knight to c5 after an eventual d5, while guarding c7 if Black
should play ...Qe8. Play commonly continues 8.Be3 Ng4 9.Bg5 Qe8! but White has
also tried:
8.dxe5 dxe5 9.Qxd8 Rxd8 with even chances;
8.d5 Nc5 9.Qc2 a5 may transpose into the Petrosian System (see below);
8.Bg5 h6 9.Bh4 Qe8 10.Bxf6 Bxf6 11.c5!, which is not totally reliable for Black.
7.d5 is the Petrosian System, so named for the 1963–69 world champion Tigran
Petrosian, who often essayed the line in the 1960s, with Vladimir Kramnik playing
this variation extensively in the 1990s. The plans for both sides are roughly the
same as in the main variation. After 7...a5 White plays 8.Bg5 to pin the knight,
making it harder for Black to achieve the f7–f5 break. In the early days of the
system, Black would drive the bishop back with ...h6 and ...g5, though players
subsequently switched to ideas involving ...Na6, ...Qe8 and ...Bd7, making White's
c4–c5 break more difficult, only then playing for kingside activity. Joe
Gallagher[2] has recommended the flexible 7...Na6 which has similar ideas to 7...a5.
7.Be3 is often known as the Gligoric System, after the World Championship
Candidate Svetozar Gligorić, who has contributed much to King's Indian theory and
practice with both colours. More recently, other strong players such as
Korchnoi, Anatoly Karpov, and Kasparov have played this line. The main idea
behind this move is to avoid the theoretical lines that arise after 7.0-0 Nc6. This
move allows White to maintain, for the moment, the tension in the centre. If Black
plays mechanically with 7...Nc6, 8.d5 Ne7 9.Nd2! is a favourable setup, so Black
most often responds by crossing his opponent's plans with 7...Ng4 8.Bg5 f6 9.Bh4
Nc6, but other moves are also seen, such as:
7...Na6 8.0-0 transposing into the modern.
7...h6!? is a favourite of John Nunn. The main line runs 8.0-0 Ng4 9.Bc1 Nc6
10.d5 Ne7 11.Ne1 f5 12.Bxg4 fxg4. In this subvariation, Black's kingside play is
of a different type than normal KID lines, as it lacks the standard pawn breaks,
so he will now play g6–g5 and Ng6–f4, often investing material in a piece attack
in the f-file against the white king, while White plays for the usual queenside
breakthrough with c4–c5.
7...exd4 immediately surrenders the centre, with a view to playing a quick c7–c6
and d6–d5. For example, 8.Nxd4 Re8 9.f3 c6 10.Qd2 (10.Bf2!?) 10...d5 11.exd5
cxd5 12.0-0 Nc6 13.c5 and 13...Rxe3!? (which was first seen in game 11 of
the 1990 World Chess Championship between Kasparov and Karpov).
In the Exchange Variation (7.dxe5 dxe5 8.Qxd8 Rxd8), White exchanges queens
and is content to play for a small, safe advantage in the relatively quiet positions
which will ensue in this queenless middlegame. The line is often played by White
players hoping for an early draw, but there is still a lot of play left in the position.
White tries to exploit d6 with moves such as b4, c5, Nf3–d2–c4–d6, etc., while Black
will play to control the hole on d4. In practice, it is easier to exploit d4, and chances
are balanced. If Black is able to play ...Nd4, he will often have at least an equal
position, even when this involves the sacrifice of a pawn to eliminate White's dark-
squared bishop.
The Sämisch Variation is 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.f3. It is named after Friedrich Sämisch,
who developed the system in the 1920s. This often leads to very sharp play with the
players castling on opposite wings and attacking each other's kings, as in the Bagirov–
Gufeld game given below, though it may also give rise to heavyweight positional
struggles. Black has a variety of pawn breaks, such as ...e5, ...c5 and ...b5 (prepared by
...c6 and/or ...a6). This can transpose to the Modern Benoni after 5...0-0 6.Bg5 c5 7.d5
e6. World champions Mikhail Botvinnik, Mikhail Tal, Tigran Petrosian, Boris
Spassky, Anatoly Karpov and Garry Kasparov have all played this variation. This line
defends the e4-pawn to create a secure centre and enables White to begin an attack
kingside with Be3, Qd2, Bh6, g2–g4 and h2–h4. It allows placement of a bishop on e3
without allowing ...Ng4; however, its drawback is that it deprives the knight on g1 of its
most natural square, thus impeding development of the kingside. Black can strike for
the centre as previously mentioned or delay with 6...Nc6, 7...a6 and 8...Rb8 so that
Black can play ...b7–b5 to open lines on the queenside.
The Classical Defence to the Sämisch is 5...0-0 6.Be3 e5, when White has a choice
between closing the centre with 7.d5, or maintaining the tension with 7.Nge2. Kasparov
was a major proponent of this defence.[3]
The Sämisch Gambit arises after 5...0-0 6.Be3 c5. This is a pawn sacrifice, and was
once considered dubious. As Black's play has been worked out, this evaluation has
changed, and the gambit now enjoys a good reputation. A practical drawback, however,
is that a well-prepared but unambitious White player can often enter lines leading to a
forced draw.[3] The line where White accepts the gambit runs 5...0-0 6.Be3 c5 7.dxc5
dxc5 8.Qxd8 (8.e5 Nfd7 9.f4 f6 10.exf6 is also possible here, though less often seen)
Rxd8 9.Bxc5 Nc6. Black's activity is believed to give sufficient compensation. White's
most frequent play is to decline the gambit, and instead play 7.Nge2, and head for
Benoni type positions after a d4–d5 advance.
5...0-0 6.Be3 Nc6 7.Nge2 a6 8.Qd2 Rb8 leads to the Panno Variation of the Sämisch.
Black prepares to respond appropriately depending on White's choice of plan. If White
plays 0-0-0 and goes for a kingside attack, then 7...a6 prepares ...b7–b5 with a
counterattack against White's castled position. If instead White plays more cautiously,
then Black challenges White's centre with ...e5.
Averbakh Variation: 5.Be2 0-0 6.Bg5
The Averbakh Variation is 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Be2 0-0 6.Bg5 (named for Yuri
Averbakh), which prevents the immediate 6...e5.
Black often repels the bishop with ...h6 giving him the option of a later g5, though in
practice this is a weakening move. White has various ways to develop, such as Qd2,
Nf3, f4 or even h4. However, Black obtains good play against all of these development
schemes.
The old main line in this begins with 6...c5 (which keeps the long diagonal open).
However, 6...Nbd7 and 6...Na6 (Judit Polgár's move) are also seen.
It is possible that the Averbakh System (of the Modern Defense) can transition to the
Averbakh Variation of the King's Indian Defence.
The Four Pawns Attack continues with 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.f4 0-0 6.Nf3. This is the
most aggressive method for White, and was often seen in the 1920s. With his fifth
move, White erects a massive centre at the price of falling behind in development. If
Black can open the position, White may well find himself overextended. From this 6...c5
is the main line.
6...Nbd7 with 8...exd4. Black intends to claim the centre with ...e7–e5. 7.Nc3 e5 8.e4
exd4 9.Nxd4 Re8 10.h3 a6. Preparation has been made for 11...Rb8, with ...c7–c5
and ...b7–b5, and sometimes with ...Ne5 first. This is known as the Gallagher
Variation of theFianchetto Variation.
8...c6 and 8...a6 are alternatives.
6...Nc6 7.Nc3 a6 8.d5 Na5. This variation goes against ancient dogma which states
that knights are not well placed on the rim; however, extra pressure is brought to
bear against the Achilles Heel of the fianchetto lines—the weakness at c4.
Hundreds of master games have continued with 9.Nd2 c5 10.Qc2 Rb8 11.b3 b5
12.Bb2 bxc4 13.bxc4 Bh6 14.f4 (14.e3 Bf5 is a trap that numbers Mark
Taimanov among its victims;[4] White must now lose material, as he has no good
interposition) e5!
Sidelines
Finally, White has other setups, such as Nf3 and h3 and Nge2 (with or without Bd3), but
these are currently not as popular at the grandmaster level. 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7
4.e4 d6 5.Nge2 followed by 6.Ng3 is called the Hungarian Attack.
Famous games
The moves are shown for one of the most famous King's Indian games, a brilliancy by
the late Ukrainian-American grandmaster Eduard Gufeld, who called it his "Mona
Lisa":[5]
Vladimir Bagirov–Eduard Gufeld, USSR championship 1973
1.d4 g6 2.c4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.e4 Nf6 5.f3 0-0 6.Be3 Nc6 7.Nge2 Rb8 8.Qd2 a6
9.Bh6 b5 10.h4 e5 11.Bxg7 Kxg7 12.h5 Kh8 13.Nd5 bxc4 14.hxg6 fxg6 15.Qh6
Nh5 16.g4 Rxb2 17.gxh5 g5 18.Rg1 g4 19.0-0-0 Rxa2 20.Nef4 exf4 21.Nxf4 Rxf4
22.Qxf4 c3 23.Bc4 Ra3 24.fxg4 Nb4 25.Kb1 Be6 26.Bxe6 Nd3 27.Qf7 Qb8+
28.Bb3 Rxb3+ 29.Kc2 Nb4+ 30.Kxb3 Nd5+ 31.Kc2 Qb2+ 32.Kd3 Qb5+ 0–1
ECO codes
The Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings (ECO) classification of variations of the King's
Indian are:
E60 King's Indian Defence
E61 King's Indian Defence, 3.Nc3
E62 King's Indian, Fianchetto Variation
E63 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Panno Variation
E64 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Yugoslav system
E65 King's Indian, Yugoslav, 7.0-0
E66 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Yugoslav Panno
E67 King's Indian, Fianchetto with ...Nbd7
E68 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Classical Variation, 8.e4
E69 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Classical Main line
E70 King's Indian, 4.e4
E71 King's Indian, Makogonov system (5.h3)
E72 King's Indian with e4 & g3
E73 King's Indian, 5.Be2
E74 King's Indian, Averbakh, 6...c5
E75 King's Indian, Averbakh, Main line
E76 King's Indian, Four Pawns Attack
E77 King's Indian, Four Pawns Attack, 6.Be2
E78 King's Indian, Four Pawns Attack, with Be2 and Nf3
E79 King's Indian, Four Pawns Attack, Main line
E80 King's Indian, Sämisch Variation
E81 King's Indian, Sämisch, 5...0-0
E82 King's Indian, Sämisch, 6...b6
E83 King's Indian, Sämisch, 6...Nc6
E84 King's Indian, Sämisch, Panno Main line
E85 King's Indian, Sämisch, Orthodox Variation
E86 King's Indian, Sämisch, Orthodox, 7.Nge2 c6
E87 King's Indian, Sämisch, Orthodox, 7.d5
E88 King's Indian, Sämisch, Orthodox, 7.d5 c6
E89 King's Indian, Sämisch, Orthodox Main line
E90 King's Indian, 5.Nf3
E91 King's Indian, Kazakh variation, 6.Be2
E92 King's Indian, Classical Variation
E93 King's Indian, Petrosian system, Main line
E94 King's Indian, Orthodox Variation
E95 King's Indian, Orthodox, 7...Nbd7, 8.Re1
E96 King's Indian, Orthodox, 7...Nbd7, Main line
E97 King's Indian, Orthodox, Aronin–Taimanov Variation (Yugoslav Attack / Mar del
Plata Variation)
E98 King's Indian, Orthodox, Aronin–Taimanov, 9.Ne1
E99 King's Indian, Orthodox, Aronin–Taimanov, Main
Play normally starts in the Kings Indian Defense with the moves 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3.
Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6.
This defense is a hypermodern idea that allows white to control the center of the board
early on while black looks to develop his minor pieces early on and move his pawns
towards the center later on in the game.
Although the Kings Indian Defense is a very solid opening for black it is also very
passive in the early stages and if you are a very aggressive player you will not enjoy this
opening. Much like any opening in chess, though, in the middle stages of this opening
will allow for many opportunities for counter play.
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 c6 4. Bg2 d5 5. cd5 cd5 6. Nc3 Bg7 7. Nh3 Bh3 8. Bh3 Nc6 9.
Bg2 e6 10. e3 O-O 11. Bd2 Rc8 12. O-O Nd7 13. Ne2 Qb6 14. Bc3 Rfd8 15. Nf4 Nf6
16. Qb3 Ne4 17. Qb6 ab6 18. Be1 Na5 19. Nd3 Bf8 20. f3 Nd6 21. Bf2 Bh6 22. Rac1
Nac4 23. Rfe1 Na5 24. Kf1 Bg7 25. g4 Nc6 26. b3 Nb5 27. Ke2 Bf8 28. a4 Nc7 29. Bg3
Na6 30. Bf1 f6 31. Red1 Na5 32. Rc8 Rc8 33. Rc1 Rc1 34. Nc1 Ba3 35. Kd1 Bc1 36.
Kc1 Nb3 37. Kc2 Na5 38. Kc3 Kf7 39. e4 f5 40. gf5 gf5 41. Bd3 Kg6 42. Bd6 Nc6 43.
Bb1 Kf6 44. Bg3 fe4 45. fe4 h6 46. Bf4 h5 47. ed5 ed5 48. h4 Nab8 49. Bg5 Kf7 50. Bf5
Na7 51. Bf4 Nbc6 52. Bd3 Nc8 53. Be2 Kg6 54. Bd3 Kf6 55. Be2 Kg6 56. Bf3 N6e7 57.
Bg5
Fischer was the world champion with the most limited and consistent opening
repertoire. Indeed, Fischer had an attitude that there must be one correct way of playing
in each position -- or perhaps more accurately, he felt that consistency was required to
fully become expert in a variation, and that a chess player should find "his" opening and
stick with it.
Fischer fairly early on found "his" openings. He always played 1.e4 as White, and as
Black he met 1.e4 with the Najdorf and played the King's Indian against all the closed
openings.
It is ironic that a player who invented "Fischer Random Chess" and bemoaned the ever-
increasing amount of theory would be the same who was the biggest (until that time)
specialist in certain openings, and the most dedicated and hardest worker on opening
theory. One can surmise that the young Fischer did not view his work on his favorite
openings as an unpleasant necessity in order to achieve competitive success.
Rather, I think that as a young player he genuinely enjoyed the opening theory. But over
the course of years one's perspective can change, one might become tired of what one
did with joy as a youth, and suddenly years later you have the bitter, older Fischer who
felt that opening theory was killing chess.
Fischer is known for the clarity and directness of his play. Thus, it might seem that an
extremely complex opening like the King's Indian would not suit him as well as one of
the various classically-direct openings. But Fischer had reached an unprecedentedly
high level of technique and understanding, and thus rather than being carried by the
crazy winds of complications -- as most King's Indian players are -- he could control
them himself.
The complexity only served to lead his opponents astray, not himself.
Thus, for instance, let us see Fischer's win against Jan Hein Donner, where the
complicated, "twisted" kind of position arising from the fianchetto variation of the King's
Indian results in a game of classical simplicity:
Fischer was consistent in his use of the King's Indian, and even within that opening he
tended to respond in the same way to each of White's variations. For instance, he
almost always met the classical main line (Nf3/Be2) with 6...e5, and if 7.0-0 then
6...Nc6. The resulting lines with attacks on opposite sides of the board are now the
deepest theory in the King's Indian, but in the 1950s and 1960s, it was fairly new.
Indeed, Fischer's international career began only a few years after the Mar Del Plata
1953 tournament, which for the most part introduced the variation and provided its
name. Thus Fischer did not play as many such games as a modern King's Indian
specialist would encounter. White players tended to play 7.d5 instead, or 7.Be3, if they
did reach this position.
Nevertheless, Fischer's blitz game with Kortschnoj in Herceg Novi showed that he fully
understood and had put a great deal into these lines which not long after became
critical.
The King's Indian was also featured in Fischer's 1971 match demolitions of Mark
Taimanov and Bent Larsen.
But interestingly, Fischer avoided playing the King's Indian entirely against Tigran
Petrosian in the next, candidates final match. In addition, he had tended to avoid the
opening against "Iron Tigran" in earlier, tournament play. It seems that despite
preferring consistency, Fischer could be pragmatic too -- and thus usually avoided
playing the opening that fed Tigran's family.
Nevertheless, Fischer felt the King's Indian positions perfectly, and could rely on them to
mow down weaker opposition.
The Queen's Indian Defense[1] (QID) is a chess opening defined by the moves:
1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 e6
3. Nf3 b6
The opening is a solid defense to the Queen's Pawn Game.[2] 3...b6 increases Black's
control over the central light squares e4 and d5 by preparing to fianchetto the queen's
bishop, with the opening deriving its name from this maneuver. As in the other Indian
defenses, Black attempts to control the center with pieces, instead of occupying it
with pawns in classical style.
By playing 3.Nf3, White sidesteps the Nimzo-Indian Defense that arises after 3.Nc3
Bb4. The Queen's Indian is regarded as the sister opening of the Nimzo-Indian, since
both openings aim to impede White's efforts to gain full control of the center by playing
e2–e4. Together, they are a well-respected response to 1.d4.
Other lines
4.a3[edit]
The Petrosian Variation, prepares 5.Nc3 by stopping ...Bb4 pinning the knight. White
intends to follow up with Nc3 and e4, building a large pawn center. Black usually
responds by contesting the e4-square with ...Bb7 and ...d5. (See Gurevich, 1992, for an
extensive analysis.) This variation was often used by Garry Kasparov early in his
career.
4.Nc3[edit]
Black can choose between 4...Bb7 and 4...Bb4.
4... Bb7
5. a3 became the more common move order to reach the Petrosian system by
the mid-1980s, where White has avoided 4.a3 c5 5.d5 Ba6 and 4.a3 Ba6.
5. Bg5 is an older line which gives Black good equalizing chances after 5...h6
6.Bh4 g5 7.Bg3 Nh5 8.e3 Nxg3 9.hxg3 Bg7. After 5...Be7, White can play 6.e3
or 6.Qc2.
4... Bb4 (or the transposition 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Nf3 b6) is a Queen's Indian/Nimzo-Indian
line. Moves for White include 5.Bg5, 5.e3, and 5.Qb3.
After 5. Bg5, Black may play 5...Bb7 or 5...h6.
5...Bb7 6.e3 h6, White can play 7.Bh4.
5...h6 6.Bh4 Bb7 (or by transposition 4...Bb7 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bh4 Bb4), White
can play 7.e3. The position after 6...g5 7.Bg3 Ne4 8.Qc2 was heavily played
and analyzed in the 1980s.
After 5. e3, Black usually plays 5...Bb7. White usually plays 6.Bd3 for the Fischer
Variation of the Nimzo-Indian (or by transposition 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 b6 5.Bd3 Bb7
6.Nf3). White can play 6.e3, then Black usually plays 6...h6, although 6.Nd2 or
6.Qc2 may be better.
After 5. Qb3, Black usually plays 5...c5.
4.e3[edit]
Preparing to develop the king's bishop and castle kingside, was also a favorite of Tigran
Petrosian. This apparently quiet development may lead to complex middlegame play.
Black usually replies 4...Bb7, then play may continue 5.Bd3 d5 6.0-0 or 5.Nc3 Bb4,
transposing into the Nimzo-Indian Defence.
4.Bf4[edit]
The Miles Variation, which simply develops the bishop to a good square. Despite some
success by its originator, this idea has never been popular.
ECO codes
The Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings classifies the Queen's Indian under codes E12
to E19 according to the following scheme:
E12 – 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6
E13 – 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.Nc3 Bb7 5.Bg5
E14 – 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.e3
E15 – 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3
E16 – 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7
E17 – 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7
E18 – 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.0-0 0-0 7.Nc3
E19 – 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.0-0 0-0 7.Nc3 Ne4 8.Qc2
What are the main ideas and goals in the Queen's Indian Defense?
There's no real surprise when it comes to the strategy for the King's Indian Defence:
storm white's king side, maybe sac a few things, and mate (ideally).
But what does a practitioner of the QID hope to achieve in terms of the opening and
long term goals?
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 b6
NN – NN
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6
In the Queen's Indian Defense, black is going aim his light-squared bishop and knight
at e4 in order to restrain the moves e4 and to prevent d4 to d5.
White's most popular move is 4...g3 in which white aims to complete development on
the king side and counter black on the long diagonal.
A key position is reached after the following:
NN – NN
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb75. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3
In the above position, 7...d5 might seem like a logical move, but it is against the spirit of
the opening which say's that Black should be waiting for the most opportune moment to
make moves like 7...d5which occupy the center until the timing is just right. Also, after
exchanging pawns on d5, black finds himself with 2 problems, the bishop on b7 is
blocked in and the c pawn is on an open file and becomes vulnerable to attack. For
example, after white plays Bf4 to eye the c pawn, Black would like to move his pawn
to c5, but after the following:
NN – NN
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb75. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d58. cxd5 exd5 9.
Bf4 c5 10. dxc5 bxc5
The above leaves Black with a hanging pawn formation. The d and c pawns are
extremely vulnerable and if white can quickly generate an attack such as 11.
Ne5 generating a third attacker and pinning the pawn. Black may continue 11...Na6 and
now white has 12. Nc4 taking advantage of the pin with the mindset of getting his knight
to e3, so Black often plays Qd7, but White just plays Na5
Going back to positon after 7. Nc3, we just illustrated that 7...d5 is not a logical move for
black, so instead he plays 7...Ne4 directly occupying the e4 square making it impossible
for white to play e4and he wants to use his f pawn to strengthen his hold over
the e4 square and he won't block the diagonal of his bishop. After the following:
NN – NN
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb75. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 Ne4
8.Nxe4 Bxe4 9. Ne1 Bxg2 10. Nxg2d5
Black is now willing to play d5 because there is not bishop on b7 anymore and he can
now gain share of the center and the position is about equal, so after 7...Ne4, white
often plays 8. Qc2, 8...f5 looks like a natural response, but white plays 9. Ne5 and
would black would quickly find himself in trouble after:
NN – NN
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb75. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 Ne48. Qc2 f5
9. Ne5 d6 10. Nxe4 fxe411. Bxe4
In the above diagram, black does not have time to capture the knight because of
the bishop and queen staring down the diagonal, so instead of 8...f5, black should
play 8...Nxc3 9. Qxc3 f5. White still has in mind one other factor to gain an advantage.
In addition to still play pawn to e4, he also counts on the fact that blacks e6 pawn will
become weak if black plays d6 eventually, so for example:
NN – NN
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 Ne4 8. Qc2 Nxc3
9. Qxc3 f5 10. b3 Bf6 11. Bb2 d6 12. Rad1 Qe7 13. Ne1 Bxg2 14. Nxg2 Nd7 15. Qc2.
White is looking for small small initiative based upon the weakness of the e6 pawn, so in
the end the fight for e4 is the major theme that holds the entire Queen's Indian together.