This house support use of bounty hunters in the law enforcement

Oposition (-)

A. The bounty hunters could hurting the innocent people while pursuing a fugitive

With their skill, the bounty hunters could hurt the innocent people while pursuing the fugitive, what
about the bounty hunters break some property and stuff? Taking dangerous actions that may injure
innocent people

Bounty hunting is the government granting a right to a private company to forcibly enter property and
detain someone that owes a debt. If we extend this logic, then COMCAST should be able to forcibly send
its workers into your home to collect on a late cable bill that you promised to pay.

Most bounty hunters aren't licensed. It is nearly impossible to protect the rights of those that may be
falsely identified. They are not sworn to serve anyone but their employer. And it is considered
kidnapping in every other country in the world.

B. Threat the citizen

It should not being support because they only human, they could lie ,trespass on peoples property that
has nothing to with the person they are looking for, violate People rights , present themselves as police
officers ,break & enter into dwellings

unlawfully, threatened people with arrest that they can't do if they don't give information they want.

Bounty hunting is barbaric and it should not be legal. It is the job of police to find criminals, not private
individuals. The idea that people are being hunted for profit is reprehensible. Bounty hunting is an
outdated practice and it should be outlawed. This kind of business should be left to professionals.