You are on page 1of 3

Epidemiology of rugby football injuries

Summary Introduction
With the exception of spinal cord injuries, the frequency Interest in rugby football injuries has focused largely on
and consequences of rugby injuries are not clearly the spinal cord.’ Although other sorts of injury have been
understood. We therefore conducted a prospective cohort studied at club or regional level, 2-8 the findings are hard to
study involving all the senior rugby clubs in the Scottish interpret because of differences in reporting criteria and
Borders. 1169 (96%) of 1216 eligible players provided incomplete ascertainment. We report here the frequency,
personal details and recorded all 15-a-side matches they nature, circumstances, and outcome of rugby injuries in a
played in the 1993-94 rugby season. Physiotherapists prospective cohort consisting of virtually all players
visited the clubs weekly to liaise with volunteer linkmen registered with senior rugby clubs in the South of
Scotland District of the Scottish Rugby Union (SRU).
who were appointed to notify the circumstances of all new
or recurrent injuries occurring in matches or rugby-related
Methods
training.
361 players experienced 584 injuries in 512 injury Players were eligible for the survey if members of an SRU-
affiliated senior rugby club in the South of Scotland during the
episodes, 84% of which arose in matches. The period 1993-94 season. All 26 clubs agreed to participate and each
prevalence rate of match injuries was 13·95 (95% Cl appointed a linkman responsible for injury notification. These
12·64-15·26) per 1000 playing hours, the equivalent of an linkmen operated a "cascade" of observers to cover all games
injury episode every 1·8 rugby matches. An injury episode played by the club using a standard closed questionnaire to
took the player away from the game for an average of 39 record the circumstances of the injuries. They were visited weekly
days. 28% of injury episodes resulted in absence from throughout the season by chartered physiotherapists who ensured I
that the details of each injury were complete and were applicable
employment or school/college work, for an average of 18 to a registered player. All players were contacted at the beginning
days. of the season for information on playing position and physique;
Rugby injuries are an important source of morbidity in permission was also sought for examination of their general-
young men. They need to be better understood if their practitioner or hospital medical records should they be injured
frequency and consequences are to be reduced. during the season. The players were also contacted in the middle
and at the end of the season and invited to complete a diary of
Lancet 1995; 345: 1485-87
matches played over the previous three months; these diaries
See Commentary page 1452 were checked against club fixture lists and the injury register for

completeness. Playing hours at risk were calculated for each


player as number of matches played X I - 33 (each match lasts for
80 min). The outcome of a rugby injury was obtained by
contacting the player after an injury episode, as well as from
hospital and general-practitioner records. Incapacity was
measured as days away from playing or training for rugby and
days lost to employment or school/college work.
A rugby injury was defined as an injury sustained on the field
during a competitive match, during a practice game, or during
other training activity directly associated with rugby football,
which prevented the player from training or playing rugby
football from the time of the injury or from the end of the match
or practice in which the injury was sustained. Rugby injuries
sustained during training were those sustained during practice
scrums or manoeuvres involving a rugby ball (not circuit training
or activities undertaken to achieve fitness). Injuries that
necessitated leaving the field of play or practice and missing the
remainder of the match or practice, but did not cause the player
to miss subsequent matches or practice for at least 7 days, were
classified as transient. Rugby injuries were coded according to
the International Classification of Diseases (9th revision), and
were classified by time to resumption of playing or training:

within 28 days, mild; 29-84 days, moderate; more than 84 days,


severe.
The 26 clubs fielded 1541 teams involving 1216 players in the
1993-94 season, which lasted from August, 1993, to April, 1994.
Complete census and playing records were available for 1169
Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical School, Edinburgh (96%) eligible players, each of whom participated in an average
EH8 9AG, UK (Prof W M Garraway MD); and Department of Surgery, of 19.8 matches. 361 of these players experienced 512 injury
St John’s Hospital, Livingston, West Lothian (D A D Macleod FRCSE)
episodes resulting in 584 injuries at matches or during training.
Correspondence to: Prof W M Garraway In cases of multiple injury, the decision on which injury was

1485
Table 1: Frequency and distribution of injury episodes occurring in matches

primarily responsible for incapacity was a matter of clinical For fractures the upper limb was most at risk but the
judgment. main site of injury (42% of episodes) was the lower limb,
with a much greater frequency of dislocations, strains,
Results and sprains. 35% of dislocations, strains, and sprains of
Frequency and distribution the shoulder were recurrent injuries.
Of the 361 players injured, 268 (74%) had 1 injury
episode during the season, 61 (17%) had 2, and 32 (9%) Injury association
had 3 or more. 84% of the 429 injury episodes (290 Injuries were more frequent at the beginning of the
players) occurred in matches and the remainder (71 season, with a period prevalence of 15.2 per 1000 playing
players) during training. 442 (86%) injury episodes hours in the autumn (September-October) and 12.3 in
involved only 1 injury; 70 (14%) involved 2 or more the spring (March-April). The manoeuvre most strongly
separate injuries. Table 1 summarises the age-specific associated with injury was the tackle, accounting for 49%
incidence and period prevalence rates of injury. Overall, 1 of injury episodes in matches; the remainder occurred in
in every 4 players was injured during the season, with the the scrum (8%), ruck (15%), maul (2%), lineout (12%),
highest proportion (43%) in the age group 20-24 years- while gathering the ball (8%), or away from play in other
more than five times the incidence rate for players under circumstances (6%). Of the severe injury episodes, 60%
16 years. The incidence and period prevalence rates mean occurred while players were tackling or being tackled. 6
that the average team (of 15) can expect to sustain 5-5 out of 11I lower limb fractures and 37% of knee
new injuries and 1 1 recurrences of old injury during the dislocations, ligament, and cartilage tears occurred while
season. players were on the receiving end of a tackle, whereas
45% of shoulder dislocations, strains, and sprains arose in
Nature and site of injury players who were doing the tackling. There were no
96 (22%) injury episodes in matches were transient, 164 significant differences in the proportion of injury episodes
(38%) mild, 99 (24%) moderate, and 70 (16%) severe. according to playing position, but injuries to the trunk
Recurrent injuries were not more severe than new ones; as (mainly back strain and sprain) were three times more
might be expected, the proportion of recurrent to new frequent in forwards than in backs. In centres and wing
injuries increased with age (from 8% in players under 16 threequarters 4 out of every 5 injury episodes were
years of age to 39% in players aged 30-34). No spinal associated with the tackle.
injuries were recorded in 30 750 playing hours of rugby.
Dislocations, strains, and sprains of the knee had the Outcome
highest incidence and period prevalence rates (table 2). 19 741 playing days were lost to matches and training

iuu coamgs Tor tne site ana nature or eacn injury can oe oolamea Trom tne autnors.

Table 2: Site and nature of primary injuries sustained in matches

1486
overuse can only be established by continuing follow-up
of this cohort of players.
A remarkably high response rate was achieved by use of
field staff who maintained personal contact with
nominated club representatives throughout the season.
This is the approach that others must adopt and refutes
the view that registration of rugby injuries cannot be
enforced because Rugby Union, being an amateur
game, relies on the goodwill and enthusiasm of unpaid
officials. 10
Like a more limited study in selected clubs," our
investigation has revealed a high level of incapacity due to
injury. Apart from time lost from the game or training,
this has economic implications. In 28% of injury episodes
players lost time from employment or education-a mean
of 18 days.
This survey is not the first to highlight the dangers of
tackling and being tackled in rugby.12.13 More needs to be
known about the frequency and circumstances of tackling
so that players can be coached in tackling techniques that
are safe for themselves and their opponents. The
overwhelming contribution of the tackle to injury episodes
could reflect recent law changes that encourage open play
conducted at higher speeds to enhance the game as a
flowing spectator sport. The challenge now is to sustain
*Mean (SE); tno (%). the popularity of the game while lessening the hazard of
Table 3: Loss of playing time and length of absence from high-velocity contact in the tackle. A first step is to set up
employment or education cohort studies in other locations, with the same
definitions and methods, to allow comparison of rugby
during the 1993-94 season. Table 3 shows the loss of
rugby-playing days for each group of primary injuries. A injuries in different playing environments. The
International Rugby Football Board is in an excellent
period prevalence rate of 2-34 per 1000 playing hours
together with a mean of 60-4 (SE 9-2) days of lost playing position to guide and coordinate this work.
time meant that knee injuries were responsible for 25% of We thank George Murray, district secretary for the South of Scotland; the
all playing time lost through injury episodes in matches. presidents and linkmen of participating rugby clubs; Gregor Nicholson,
28% of primary injuries in matches lost the player time administrative secretary, SRU; Sue Davidson, our survey coordinator and
the chartered physiotherapists of the Fitness Assessment and Sports
from work, school, or college. Training injuries accounted
Injuries Centre, University of Edinburgh Department of Physical
for 15% (372 days) of time away from employment or Education; Lyn Chalmers for computing support; Mandy Lee for
education. Injured players lost an average of 18 days’ statistical advice; Ann Cocallis and Caroline Adams for secretarial
services; and, finally, the rugby players of the Scottish Borders for their
employment or education (table 3). Fractures at all sites outstanding cooperation.
caused most absence. Again, the tackle emerged as an
important contributor to injury episodes. Tackling in
games was associated with 22% of injury episodes and References
accounted for 18% of absence days from employment or 1 Calcinai C. Cervical spinal injuries. NZJ Sports Med 1992; 20: 14-15.
school; being tackled was associated with a further 27% of 2 O’Brien C. Retrospective survey of rugby injuries in the Leinster
Province of Ireland 1987-1989. Br J Sports Med 1992; 26: 243-44.
injury episodes and resulted in 43% of all time lost from 3 Addley K, Farren J. Irish rugby injury survey: Dungannon Football
employment or education. Club (1986-1987). Br J Sports Med 1988; 22: 22-24.
4 Myers PT. Injuries presenting from Rugby Union football. Med J Aust
Discussion 1980; ii: 17-20.
5 Dalley DR, Laing DR, Rowberry JM, Caird MJ. Rugby injuries: an
This study has demonstrated that rugby injuries are an
epidemiological survey, Christchuch, 1980. NZ J Sports Med 1982; 10:
important source of morbidity in young players. The 782 5-17.
players aged 16-29 years in the survey represented 8% of 6 Davies JE, Gibson T. Injuries in Rugby Union football. BMJ 1978; ii:
the male population in this age group resident in the 1759-61.
7 Roy SP. The nature and frequency of rugby injuries. A pilot study of
catchment population of the South of Scotland rugby 300 injuries at Stellenbosch. S Afr Med J 1974; 48: 2321-27.
clubs.9 A player can expect to be injured every 2-7 seasons 8 O’Connell TCJ. Rugby football injuries and their prevention. A review
playing an average of 20 rugby matches per season; and, of 600 cases. J Irish Med Assoc 1954; 34: 20-26.
when injured, he will be out of the game for nearly 6 9 Census 1991 Scotland, Report for Borders Region, General Register

weeks. On average, each club lost 759 playing days Office, Scotland. London: HM Stationery Office, 1993.
10 Beer I. Rugby injuries. BMJ 1991; 303: 1552.
through injury in the season. This must have an 11 Clark DR, Roux C, Noakes TD. A prospective study of the incidence
important bearing on the coaching, match preparation, and nature of injuries to adult rugby players. S Afr Med J 1990; 77:
559-62.
results, and completion of fixture lists. Only those acute
12 Scher AT. Catastrophic rugby injuries of the spinal cord: changing
traumatic injuries that presented on the field of play were
patterns of injury. Br J Sports Med 1992; 25: 57-60.
addressed. The amount of degenerative disease that might 13 Dalley DR, Laing DR, McCartin PJ. Injuries in rugby football,
arise in weightbearing joints from injury or chronic Christchurch 1989. NZ J Sports Med 1992; 20: 205.

1487

You might also like